Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Predictive validity
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
In [[psychometrics]], '''predictive validity''' is the extent to which a [[test score|score]] on a [[scale (social sciences)|scale]] or [[test (student assessment)|test]] predicts scores on some criterion measure.<ref>Cronbach, L.J., & Meehl, P.E. (1955). Construct validity for psychological tests.'' Psychological Bulletin'', ''52'', 281β302.[http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Cronbach/construct.htm]</ref><ref>The [[Marketing Accountability Standards Board]] (MASB) endorses this definition as part of its ongoing [http://www.commonlanguage.wikispaces.net/ Common Language in Marketing Project].</ref> For example, the [[Validity (statistics)|validity]] of a [[cognitive test]] for job performance is the correlation between test scores and, for example, supervisor performance ratings. Such a cognitive test would have ''predictive validity'' if the observed correlation were statistically significant. Predictive validity shares similarities with [[concurrent validity]] in that both are generally measured as correlations between a test and some criterion measure. In a study of concurrent validity the test is administered at the same time as the criterion is collected. This is a common method of developing validity evidence for employment tests: A test is administered to incumbent employees, then a rating of those employees' [[job performance]] is, or has already been, obtained independently of the test (often, as noted above, in the form of a supervisor rating). Note the possibility for restriction of range both in test scores and performance scores: The incumbent employees are likely to be a more homogeneous and higher performing group than the applicant pool at large. In a strict study of predictive validity, the test scores are collected first. Then, at some later time the criterion measure is collected. Thus, for predictive validity, the employment test example is slightly different: Tests are administered, perhaps to job applicants, and then after those individuals work in the job for a year, their test scores are correlated with their first year job performance scores. Another relevant example is [[SAT]] scores: These are validated by collecting the scores during the examinee's senior year and high school and then waiting a year (or more) to correlate the scores with their first year college [[grade point average]]. Thus predictive validity provides somewhat more useful data about [[test validity]] because it has greater fidelity to the real situation in which the test will be used. After all, most tests are administered to find out something about future behavior. As with many aspects of social science, the magnitude of the [[correlation|correlations]] obtained from predictive validity studies is usually not high.<ref>{{cite web|title=Where Predictive Validity May Fail To Make The Grade|url= https://kleinconsultants.com/where-predictive-validity-may-fail-to-make-the-grade/}}</ref> A typical predictive validity for an employment test might obtain a correlation in the neighborhood of ''r'' = .35. Higher values are occasionally seen and lower values are very common. Nonetheless, the [[utility]] (that is the benefit obtained by making decisions using the test) provided by a test with a correlation of .35 can be quite substantial. More information, and an explanation of the relationship between variance and predictive validity, can be found here.<ref>{{cite web|title=Do Psychometric Tests Work?|url= https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/do-psychometric-tests-work-dr-mark-parkinson}}</ref> ==Predictive validity in modern validity theory== The latest ''Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing''<ref name="1999standards">American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). ''Standards for educational and psychological testing''. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.</ref> reflect [[Samuel Messick|Samuel Messick's]] model of validity<ref name="messick1995">Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from personsβ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. ''American Psychologist, 50'', 741β749.</ref> and do not use the term "predictive validity." Rather, the ''Standards'' describe validity-supporting "Evidence Based on Relationships [between the test scores and] Other Variables." Predictive validity involves testing a group of subjects for a certain construct, and then comparing them with results obtained at some point in the future. ==References== {{Reflist}} [[Category:Validity (statistics)]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)