Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Pure submodule
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Module components with flexibility in module theory}} In [[mathematics]], especially in the field of [[module theory]], the concept of '''pure submodule''' provides a generalization of [[direct summand]], a type of particularly well-behaved piece of a [[module (mathematics)|module]]. Pure modules are complementary to [[flat module]]s and generalize Prüfer's notion of [[pure subgroup]]s. While flat modules are those modules which leave [[short exact sequence]]s exact after [[tensor product|tensoring]], a pure submodule defines a short exact sequence (known as a '''pure exact sequence''') that remains exact after tensoring with any module. Similarly a flat module is a [[direct limit]] of [[projective module]]s, and a pure exact sequence is a direct limit of [[split exact sequence]]s. ==Definition== Let ''R'' be a [[ring (mathematics)|ring]] (associative, with 1), let ''M'' be a (left) [[module (mathematics)|module]] over ''R'', let ''P'' be a [[submodule]] of ''M'' and let ''i'': ''P'' → ''M'' be the natural [[injective]] map. Then ''P'' is a '''pure submodule of ''M''''' if, for any (right) ''R''-module ''X'', the natural induced map id<sub>''X''</sub> ⊗ ''i'' : ''X'' ⊗ ''P'' → ''X'' ⊗ ''M'' (where the [[tensor product]]s are taken over ''R'') is injective. Analogously, a [[short exact sequence]] :<math>0 \longrightarrow A\,\ \stackrel{f}{\longrightarrow}\ B\,\ \stackrel{g}{\longrightarrow}\ C \longrightarrow 0</math> of (left) ''R''-modules is '''pure exact''' if the sequence stays exact when tensored with any (right) ''R''-module ''X''. This is equivalent to saying that ''f''(''A'') is a pure submodule of ''B''. ==Equivalent characterizations== Purity of a submodule can also be expressed element-wise; it is really a statement about the solvability of certain systems of linear equations. Specifically, ''P'' is pure in ''M'' if and only if the following condition holds: for any ''m''-by-''n'' [[matrix (mathematics)|matrix]] (''a''<sub>''ij''</sub>) with entries in ''R'', and any set ''y''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''y''<sub>''m''</sub> of elements of ''P'', if there exist elements ''x''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''x''<sub>''n''</sub> '''in ''M''''' such that :<math>\sum_{j=1}^n a_{ij}x_j = y_i \qquad\mbox{ for } i=1,\ldots,m</math> then there also exist elements ''x''<sub>1</sub>′, ..., ''x''<sub>''n''</sub>′ '''in ''P''''' such that :<math>\sum_{j=1}^n a_{ij}x'_j = y_i \qquad\mbox{ for } i=1,\ldots,m</math> Another characterization is: a sequence is pure exact if and only if it is the [[filtered colimit]] (also known as [[direct limit]]) of [[split exact sequence]]s :<math>0 \longrightarrow A_i \longrightarrow B_i \longrightarrow C_i \longrightarrow 0.</math><ref>For abelian groups, this is proved in {{harvtxt|Fuchs|2015|loc=Ch. 5, Thm. 3.4}}</ref> ==Examples== * Every [[direct summand]] of ''M'' is pure in ''M''. Consequently, every [[Linear subspace|subspace]] of a [[vector space]] over a [[field (mathematics)|field]] is pure. ==Properties== Suppose{{sfn|Lam|1999|p=154}} :<math>0 \longrightarrow A\,\ \stackrel{f}{\longrightarrow}\ B\,\ \stackrel{g}{\longrightarrow}\ C \longrightarrow 0</math> is a short exact sequence of ''R''-modules, then: # ''C'' is a [[flat module]] if and only if the exact sequence is pure exact for every ''A'' and ''B''. From this we can deduce that over a [[von Neumann regular ring]], ''every'' submodule of ''every'' ''R''-module is pure. This is because ''every'' module over a von Neumann regular ring is flat. The converse is also true.{{sfn|Lam|1999|p=162}} # Suppose ''B'' is flat. Then the sequence is pure exact if and only if ''C'' is flat. From this one can deduce that pure submodules of flat modules are flat. # Suppose ''C'' is flat. Then ''B'' is flat if and only if ''A'' is flat. If <math>0 \longrightarrow A\,\ \stackrel{f}{\longrightarrow}\ B\,\ \stackrel{g}{\longrightarrow}\ C \longrightarrow 0</math> is pure-exact, and ''F'' is a [[finitely presented module|finitely presented]] ''R''-module, then every homomorphism from ''F'' to ''C'' can be lifted to ''B'', i.e. to every ''u'' : ''F'' → ''C'' there exists ''v'' : ''F'' → ''B'' such that ''gv''=''u''. ==References== <references/> *{{Citation|title=Abelian Groups|author=Fuchs|first=László|isbn=9783319194226|series=Springer Monographs in Mathematics|year=2015|publisher=Springer}} *{{Citation | last1=Lam | first1=Tsit-Yuen | title=Lectures on modules and rings | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | series=Graduate Texts in Mathematics No. 189 | isbn=978-0-387-98428-5 |mr=1653294 | year=1999}} [[Category:Module theory]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Citation
(
edit
)
Template:Harvtxt
(
edit
)
Template:Sfn
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)