Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Reaction formation
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Type of defense mechanism in psychoanalytic theory}} In [[psychoanalytic theory]], '''reaction formation''' ({{langx|de|Reaktionsbildung}}) is a [[defense mechanism]] in which emotions, desires and impulses that are [[anxiety]]-producing or unacceptable to the [[Ego (Freudian)|ego]] are mastered by exaggeration of the directly opposing tendency.<ref name="RycroftC-Psychoanalysis-Dictionary">Charles Rycroft, ''A Critical Dictionary of Psychoanalysis'' (London, 2nd Edn, 1995)</ref> == Theory == Reaction formation depends on the hypothesis that: {{quote|[t]he instincts and their derivatives may be arranged as pairs of opposites: life versus death, construction versus destruction, action versus passivity, dominance versus submission, and so forth. When one of the instincts produces anxiety by exerting pressure on the ego either directly or by way of the superego, the ego may try to sidetrack the offending impulse by concentrating upon its opposite. For example, if feelings of hate towards another person make one anxious, the ego can facilitate the flow of love to conceal the hostility."<ref name="HallCS-Freudian-Primer">Calvin S. Hall, ''A Primer of Freudian Psychology'' (New York, 1954)</ref>}} Where reaction-formation takes place, it is usually assumed that the original, rejected impulse does not vanish, but persists, unconscious, in its original infantile form.<ref name="RycroftC-Psychoanalysis-Dictionary"/> Thus, where love is experienced as a reaction formation against hate, we cannot say that love is substituted for hate, because the original aggressive feelings still exist underneath the affectionate exterior that merely ''masks'' the hate to hide it from awareness.<ref name="HallCS-Freudian-Primer"/> In a diagnostic setting, the existence of a reaction-formation rather than a 'simple' emotion would be suspected where ''[[exaggeration]]'', ''compulsiveness'' and ''inflexibility'' were observed. For example, {{quote|[r]eactive love [[The lady doth protest too much, methinks|protests too much]]; it is overdone, extravagant, showy, and affected. It is counterfeit, and [...] is usually easily detected. Another feature of a reaction formation is its compulsiveness. A person who is defending himself against anxiety cannot deviate from expressing the opposite of what he really feels. His love, for instance, is not flexible. It cannot adapt itself to changing circumstances as genuine emotions do; rather it must be constantly on display as if any failure to exhibit it would cause the contrary feeling to come to the surface.<ref name="HallCS-Freudian-Primer"/>}} Reaction formation is an effective form of disguise, and can be utilized in many forms. For example, "solicitude may be a reaction-formation against cruelty, cleanliness against [[coprophilia]]".<ref name="RycroftC-Psychoanalysis-Dictionary"/> An analyst might explain a client's unconditional pacifism as a reaction formation against their sadism. In addition, {{quote|[h]igh ideals of virtue and goodness may be reaction formations against primitive object [[cathexis|cathexes]] rather than realistic values that are capable of being lived up to. Romantic notions of chastity and purity may mask crude sexual desires, altruism may hide selfishness, and piety may conceal sinfulness.<ref name="HallCS-Freudian-Primer"/>}} Even more counter-intuitively, according to this model {{quote|[a] [[phobia]] is an example of a reaction formation. The person wants what he fears. He is not afraid of the object; he is afraid of the wish for the object. The reactive fear prevents the dreaded wish from being fulfilled.<ref name="HallCS-Freudian-Primer"/>}} The concept of reaction formation has been used to explain responses to external threats as well as internal anxieties. In the phenomenon described as [[Stockholm syndrome]], a hostage or kidnap victim 'falls in love' with the feared and hated person who has complete power over them. Similarly, paradoxical reports exist of powerless and vulnerable inmates of Nazi camps creating 'favourites' among the guards and even collecting objects discarded by them. The mechanism of reaction formation is often characteristic of obsessional neuroses. When this mechanism is overused, especially during the formation of the ego, it can become a permanent character trait. This is often seen in those with obsessional character and obsessive personality disorders. This does not imply that its periodic usage is always obsessional, but that it can lead to obsessional behavior. == Research == A few studies have found evidence for the existence of reaction formation.<ref>Baumeister RF, Dale K, Sommer KL. Freudian Defense Mechanisms and Empirical Findings in Modern Social Psychology: Reaction Formation, Projection, Displacement, Undoing, Isolation, Sublimation, and Denial. J Pers. 1998;66(6):1081-1124. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00043</ref> Women who scored high on sex-related guilt feelings claimed lower arousal when exposed to erotic stimulus, but physiological measures showed higher than average sexual responses.<ref>Morokoff P. Effects of sex guilt, repression, sexual "arousability," and sexual experience on female sexual arousal during erotica and fantasy. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;49(1):177-187. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.177</ref> When Caucasians who actually showed non-racist, egalitarian tendencies were told they scored high for racist tendencies, they gave more money to an African-American [[panhandler]] when leaving the testing lab than those who were not accused of harboring racist sentiments.<ref>Dutton D, Lake R. Threat of own prejudice and reverse discrimination in interracial situations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1973;28(1):94-100. doi:10.1037/h0035582</ref> == See also == {{Div col|colwidth=20em}} * [[Counterphobic attitude]] * [[Displacement (psychology)|Displacement]] * [[Dunning-Kruger effect]] * [[Psychological projection|Projection]] * [[Psychological repression|Repression]] * [[Rationalization (psychology)|Rationalization]] * [[Regression (psychology)|Regression]] {{div col end}} == References == {{Reflist}} {{Defence mechanisms}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Reaction Formation}} [[Category:Psychoanalytic terminology]] [[Category:Defence mechanisms]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Defence mechanisms
(
edit
)
Template:Div col
(
edit
)
Template:Div col end
(
edit
)
Template:Langx
(
edit
)
Template:Quote
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)