Editing Recession

{{Short description|Business cycle contraction}}
{{About|a slowdown in economic activity}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2022}}
{{Macroeconomics sidebar}}
{{Economic history sidebar}}
In [[economics]], a '''recession''' is a [[business cycle]] contraction that occurs when there is a period of broad decline in economic activity.<ref>{{Cite Merriam-Webster|recession}}</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/DictionaryResults.aspx?refid=1861699686 |chapter=Recession definition |access-date=19 November 2008 |title=Encarta World English Dictionary [North American Edition] |publisher=Microsoft Corporation |year=2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090328205929/https://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/DictionaryResults.aspx?refid=1861699686 |archive-date=28 March 2009 }}</ref> Recessions generally occur when there is a widespread drop in spending (an adverse [[demand shock]]). This may be triggered by various events, such as a [[financial crisis]], an external trade shock, an adverse [[supply shock]], the bursting of an [[economic bubble]], or a large-scale [[Anthropogenic hazard|anthropogenic]] or [[natural disaster]] (e.g. a [[pandemic]]). There is no official definition of a recession, according to the [[International Monetary Fund|IMF]].<ref name="auto">{{Cite web|url=https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/recess.htm|title=Recession: When Bad Times Prevail - Back to Basics| last1=Claessens | first1=Stijn | last2=Kose | first2=M. Ayhan | date=2011|website=International Monetary Fund}}</ref>

In the [[United States]], a recession is defined as "a significant decline in economic activity spread across the market, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real [[GDP]], real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales."<ref>{{cite web |date=2008-01-07 |title=Business Cycle Dating Committee Announcement January 7, 2008 |url=https://www.nber.org/cycles/jan08bcdc_memo.html |website=www.nber.org}}</ref> The [[European Union]] has adopted a similar definition.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=FAQ {{!}} EABCN |url=https://eabcn.org/dc/faq |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220429152420/https://eabcn.org/dc/faq |archive-date=29 April 2022 |access-date=29 December 2021 |website=eabcn.org}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web |title=The CEPR and NBER Approaches |url=https://eabcn.org/files/cepr-and-nber-approaches |access-date=30 July 2022 |website=eabcn.org |archive-date=3 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210303032731/https://eabcn.org/files/cepr-and-nber-approaches |url-status=dead }}</ref> In the [[United Kingdom]] and [[Canada]], a recession is defined as negative [[economic growth]] for two consecutive quarters.{{refn|<ref name="BBC">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7495340.stm|title=Q&A: What is a recession?|date=8 July 2008|work=BBC News}}</ref><ref name="UKTreasury">{{cite web|url=http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/junebudget_glossary.htm|title=Glossary of Treasury terms|publisher=[[HM Treasury]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121102095705/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/junebudget_glossary.htm|archive-date=2 November 2012|url-status=dead|access-date=25 October 2012}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last1=Bonham |first1=Mark S. |last2=Poulin |first2=Jessica |date=6 July 2023 |title=Recession in Canada |url=https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/recession |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240823043125/https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/recession |archive-date=23 August 2024 |access-date=23 August 2024 |website=[[The Canadian Encyclopedia]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Deveau |first=Denise |date=3 August 2022 |title=An economist explains: What to know about a recession |url=https://www.cpacanada.ca/news/canada/recession-explainer |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240814022658/https://www.cpacanada.ca/news/canada/recession-explainer |archive-date=14 August 2024 |access-date=23 August 2024 |website=[[CPA Canada]]}}</ref>}}

Governments usually respond to recessions by adopting expansionary [[macroeconomic policies]], such as [[monetary policy|increasing money supply and decreasing interest rates]] or [[fiscal policy|increasing government spending and decreasing taxation]].

==Definitions==

In a 1974 article by ''[[The New York Times]]'', Commissioner of the [[Bureau of Labor Statistics]] [[Julius Shiskin]] suggested that a rough translation of the bureau's qualitative definition of a recession into a quantitative one that almost anyone can use might run like this:
* In terms of duration – [[List of countries by GNI per capita growth|Declines in real gross national income (GNI)]] for two consecutive quarters; a decline in industrial production over a six-month period.
* In terms of depth – A 1.5% decline in real [[gross national income]]; a 15% decline in non-agricultural employment; a two-point rise in unemployment to a level of at least 6%.
* In terms of financial indicators - A significant increase in loan defaults or a tightening of credit conditions by financial institutions, leading to a decrease in business investment and consumer spending.
* In terms of diffusion – A decline in non-agricultural employment in more than 75% of industries, as measured over six-month spans, for six months or longer.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Shiskin |first=Julius |date=1 December 1974 |title=Points of View |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1974/12/01/archives/the-changing-business-cycle-points-op-view.html |access-date=27 July 2022 |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=25 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200325140941/https://www.nytimes.com/1974/12/01/archives/the-changing-business-cycle-points-op-view.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Dale |first=Edwin L. Jr |date=6 April 1974 |title=U.S. to Broaden the Base Of Consumer Price Index |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1974/04/06/archives/us-to-broaden-the-base-of-consumer-price-index-woodcock-criticism.html |access-date=27 July 2022 |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=27 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220727071614/https://www.nytimes.com/1974/04/06/archives/us-to-broaden-the-base-of-consumer-price-index-woodcock-criticism.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Silk |first=Leonard |date=28 August 1974 |title=Recession: Some Criteria Missing, So Far |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1974/08/28/archives/recession-some-criteria-missing-so-far-there-will-be-no-recession.html |access-date=27 July 2022 |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=27 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220727071534/https://www.nytimes.com/1974/08/28/archives/recession-some-criteria-missing-so-far-there-will-be-no-recession.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

Over the years, some commentators dropped most of Shiskin's "recession-spotting" criteria for the simplistic rule-of-thumb of a decline in real GNI for two consecutive quarters.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Lakshman |first1=Achuthan |last2=Banerji |first2=Anirvan |url=https://money.cnn.com/2008/05/05/news/economy/recession/ |title=The risk of redefining recession |work=[[CNN Money]] |date=May 7, 2008 |access-date=August 8, 2022}}</ref>

In the [[United States]], the Business Cycle Dating Committee of the [[National Bureau of Economic Research]] (NBER) is generally seen as the authority for dating US recessions. The NBER, a private economic research organization, defines an economic recession as: "a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in [[real GDP]], [[real income]], employment, [[industrial production]], and [[wholesale]]-[[retail sales]]".<ref name="nber.org">{{cite web |url= https://www.nber.org/cycles/|title= Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions|access-date=20 March 2020 |publisher=National Bureau of Economic Research |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200305102656/https://www.nber.org/cycles/cyclesmain.html |archive-date = 5 March 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> The NBER also explains that: "a recession begins when the economy reaches a peak of activity and ends when the economy reaches its trough."<ref name="auto"/> The NBER is considered the official arbiter of recession start and end dates for the United States.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Anstey |first1=Chris |title='Technical Recession' Sets Up Washington War of the Words |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-28/technical-recession-sets-up-washington-battle-of-words |publisher=Bloomberg News |date=28 July 2022 |access-date=28 July 2022 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Cox |first1=Jeff |title=The economy may look like it's in recession, but we still don't know for sure |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/28/the-economy-may-look-like-its-in-recession-but-we-still-dont-know-for-sure.html |publisher=CNBC |date=28 July 2022 |access-date=28 July 2022 |archive-date=28 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220728160352/https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/28/the-economy-may-look-like-its-in-recession-but-we-still-dont-know-for-sure.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Jacobsen |first1=Louis |title=What exactly is a recession? Sorting out a confusing topic |url=https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/jul/26/what-exactly-recession-sorting-out-confusing/ |publisher=PolitiFact |date=26 July 2022 |access-date=28 July 2022 |archive-date=27 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220727143534/https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/jul/26/what-exactly-recession-sorting-out-confusing/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The [[Bureau of Economic Analysis]], an independent federal agency that provides official macroeconomic and industry statistics,<ref name="LoeLewis2022">{{cite news |last1=Loe |first1=Megan |last2=Lewis |first2=Brandon |title=Yes, there is an official definition of a recession |url=https://www.9news.com/article/news/verify/what-is-a-recession-official-definition/536-47a3cc51-3385-4f43-8fbd-1456c01536df |access-date=31 July 2022 |work=KUSA.com |date=28 July 2022}}</ref> says "the often-cited identification of a recession with two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth is not an official designation" and that instead, "The designation of a recession is the province of a committee of experts at the National Bureau of Economic Research".<ref name="BEA2022">{{cite web |title=Recession {{!}} U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) |url=https://www.bea.gov/help/glossary/recession |website=www.bea.gov |publisher=Bureau of Economic Analysis |access-date=31 July 2022 |date=2022}}</ref>

The European Union, akin to the NBER's methodology, has embraced a definition of recession that integrates GDP alongside a spectrum of macroeconomic indicators, including employment and various other metrics. This approach allows for a comprehensive assessment of the depth and breadth of economic downturns, enabling policymakers to devise more effective strategies for economic stabilization and recovery.

[[List of recessions in the United Kingdom|Recessions in the United Kingdom]] are generally defined as two consecutive quarters of negative economic growth, as measured by the seasonally adjusted quarter-on-quarter figures for [[real GDP]].<ref name="BBC"/><ref name="UKTreasury"/>

The [[Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]] (OECD), an intergovernmental organization, defines a recession as a period of at least two years during which the cumulative [[output gap]] reaches at least 2% of GDP, and the output gap is at least 1% for at least one year.<ref>{{Cite book|chapter-url=https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-economic-outlook-volume-2008-issue-2_eco_outlook-v2008-2-en|chapter=OECD Economic Outlook, Volume 2008 Issue 2|title=oecd-ilibrary.org|year=2008 |publisher=Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development }}</ref>

''GDP per capita recession''<ref name="n313">{{cite web | title=Advance Warning Indicators of Past Severe GDP per Capita Recessions in Turkey | website=OECD | date=11 October 2016 | url=https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/advance-warning-indicators-of-past-severe-gdp-per-capita-recessions-in-turkey_5jlpq7swq4wf-en.html | access-date=28 February 2025}}</ref> refers to the [[List of countries by real GDP per capita growth|decline of GDP per capita]] instead of decline of total GDP.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/43381/|title=On some issues concerning definition of an economic recession|first=Mazurek|last=Jiří|date=22 December 2012|website=mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de}}</ref>

==Attributes==

A recession encompasses multiple attributes that often occur simultaneously and encompasses declines in component measures of economic activity, such as GDP, including consumption, investment, government spending, and net export activity. These summary measures are indicative of underlying drivers such as employment levels and skills, household savings rates, corporate investment decisions, interest rates, demographics, and government policies (Smith, 2018; Johnson & Thompson, 2020). By examining these factors comprehensively, economists gain insights into the complex dynamics that contribute to economic downturns and can formulate effective strategies for mitigating their impact (Anderson, 2019; Patel, 2017).

Economist [[Richard Koo|Richard C. Koo]] wrote that under ideal conditions, a country's economy should have the household sector as net savers and the [[corporate sector]] as net borrowers, with the government budget nearly balanced and [[net exports]] near zero.<ref name="Koo 2009">{{cite book
| last = Koo
| first = Richard
| year = 2009
| title = The Holy Grail of Macroeconomics-Lessons from Japan's Great Recession | publisher=John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte. Ltd.
| isbn = 978-0-470-82494-8}}</ref><ref name="Koo2011">{{cite journal |last1=Koo |first1=Richard C. |title=The world in balance sheet recession: causes, cure, and politics |journal=Real-World Economics Review |date=12 December 2011 |access-date=3 August 2022 |archive-date=10 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200110090211/http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue58/Koo58.pdf |issue=58 |page=19 |url=http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue58/Koo58.pdf}}</ref>

A severe (GDP down by 10%) or prolonged (three or four years) recession is referred to as an [[Depression (economics)|economic depression]], although some argue that their causes and cures can be different.<ref name="Eslake">{{cite web |url=https://www.saul-eslake.com/difference-recession-depression/ |title=What is the difference between a recession and a depression? |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210723231012/https://www.saul-eslake.com/difference-recession-depression/ |archive-date=23 July 2021 |author=Saul Eslake |date=Nov 2008}}</ref> As an informal shorthand, economists sometimes refer to different [[recession shapes]], such as [[V-shaped recession|V-shaped]], [[U-shaped recession|U-shaped]], [[L-shaped recession|L-shaped]] and [[W-shaped recession|W-shaped]] recessions.<ref name="KaurSidhu2012">{{cite journal |last1=Kaur |first1=Rajwant |last2=Sidhu |first2=A.S. |editor1-last=Sarkar |editor1-first=Siddhartha |title=Global Recession and Its Impact on Foreign Trade in India |journal=International Journal of Afro-Asian Studies |date=Spring 2012 |volume=3 |issue=1 |page=62 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pGHTXAD9QnIC&pg=PA62 |publisher=Universal-Publishers|isbn=9781612336084 }}</ref>

===Type of recession or shape===

{{Main|Recession shapes}}
The type and shape of recessions are distinctive. In the US, v-shaped, or short-and-sharp contractions followed by rapid and sustained recovery, occurred in 1954 and 1990–1991; U-shaped (prolonged slump) in 1974–1975, and W-shaped, or [[double-dip recession]]s in 1949 and 1980–1982. Japan's 1993–1994 recession was U-shaped and its 8-out-of-9 quarters of contraction in 1997–1999 can be described as L-shaped. [[Korea]], [[Hong Kong]] and South-east Asia experienced U-shaped recessions in 1997–1998, although [[Thailand]]'s eight consecutive quarters of decline should be termed L-shaped.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.adb.org/Documents/Books/Key_Indicators/2001/default.asp |title=Key Indicators 2001: Growth and Change in Asia and the Pacific |publisher=ADB.org |access-date=31 July 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100317155544/http://www.adb.org/Documents/Books/Key_Indicators/2001/default.asp |archive-date=17 March 2010 }}</ref>

===Psychological aspects===

Recessions have psychological and confidence aspects. For example, if companies expect economic activity to slow, they may reduce employment levels and save [[money]] rather than invest. Such expectations can create a self-reinforcing downward cycle, bringing about or worsening a recession.<ref>{{cite news |author=Samuelson, Robert J. |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/13/AR2010061303330.html |title=Our economy's crisis of confidence |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=14 June 2010 |access-date=29 January 2011 |archive-date=26 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200326123628/https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/13/AR2010061303330.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Consumer confidence is one measure used to evaluate economic sentiment.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.conference-board.org/economics/consumerconfidence.cfm |title=The Conference Board – Consumer Confidence Survey Press Release – May 2010 |publisher=Conference-board.org |date=25 March 2010 |access-date=29 January 2011 |archive-date=3 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200303205552/https://www.conference-board.org/economics/ConsumerConfidence.cfm |url-status=live }}</ref> The term [[Animal spirits (Keynes)|animal spirits]] has been used to describe the [[psychological]] factors underlying economic activity. Keynes, in his ''[[The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money]]'', was the first economist to claim that such emotional mindsets significantly affect the economy.<ref name="AkerlofShiller2010">{{cite book |last1=Akerlof |first1=George A. |last2=Shiller |first2=Robert J. |title=Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism |date=2010 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-1-4008-3472-3 |page=23 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2Rz_cuu88DwC&pg=PR23}}</ref> Economist [[Robert J. Shiller]] wrote that the term "refers also to the sense of trust we have in each other, our sense of fairness in economic dealings, and our sense of the extent of corruption and bad faith. When animal spirits are on ebb, consumers do not want to spend and businesses do not want to make capital expenditures or hire people."<ref>{{cite news |last=Shiller |first=Robert J. |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123302080925418107 |title=Animal Spirits Depend on Trust |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=27 January 2009 |access-date=29 January 2011 |archive-date=11 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200211024623/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123302080925418107 |url-status=live }}</ref>
Behavioral economics has also explained many psychological biases that may trigger a recession including the [[availability heuristic]], the [[money illusion]], and [[normalcy bias]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://medium.com/@how.to.be.an.adult.01/biases-and-errors-that-led-to-historic-bubbles-and-crashes-52df73cf44f|title=Psychological Biases and Errors that led to historic bubbles and crashes|author=How to be an Adult|date=13 May 2020|website=Medium|access-date=13 May 2020|archive-date=28 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200728104134/https://medium.com/@how.to.be.an.adult.01/biases-and-errors-that-led-to-historic-bubbles-and-crashes-52df73cf44f|url-status=live}}</ref>

===Balance sheet recession===

{{Main|Balance sheet recession}}
Excessive levels of indebtedness or the bursting of a real estate or financial asset price bubble can cause what is called a "balance sheet recession". This occurs when large numbers of consumers or corporations pay down debt (i.e., save) rather than spend or invest, which slows the economy.<ref name="Koo2011" /> The term [[balance sheet]] derives from an accounting identity that holds that assets must always equal the sum of liabilities plus equity.<ref name="Jupe2014">{{cite book |last1=Jupe |first1=Robert |editor1-last=Michie |editor1-first=Jonathan |title=Reader's Guide to the Social Sciences |year=2014 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-135-93226-8 |page=11 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ip_IAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA11 |chapter=Accounting, balance sheet}}</ref> If asset prices fall below the value of the debt incurred to purchase them, then the equity must be negative, meaning the consumer or corporation is insolvent. Economist [[Paul Krugman]] wrote in 2014 that "the best working hypothesis seems to be that the [[subprime mortgage crisis|financial crisis]] was only one manifestation of a broader problem of excessive debt—that it was a so-called "balance sheet recession". In Krugman's view, such crises require debt reduction strategies combined with higher government spending to offset declines from the [[private sector]] as it pays down its debt.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/jul/10/geithner-does-he-pass-test/|title=Does He Pass the Test? 'Stress Test: Reflections on Financial Crises' by Timothy Geithner |first=Paul|last=Krugman|access-date=26 November 2018|archive-date=5 November 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151105050812/http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/jul/10/geithner-does-he-pass-test/|url-status=live|magazine=New York Review of Books|date=10 July 2014}}</ref>

For example, economist Richard Koo wrote that Japan's "Great Recession" that began in 1990 was a "balance sheet recession". It was triggered by a collapse in land and stock prices, which caused Japanese firms to have [[negative equity]], meaning their assets were worth less than their liabilities. Despite zero [[interest rate]]s and expansion of the [[money supply]] to encourage borrowing, Japanese corporations in aggregate opted to pay down their debts from their own business earnings rather than borrow to invest as firms typically do. Corporate investment, a key demand component of GDP, fell enormously (22% of GDP) between 1990 and its peak decline in 2003. Japanese firms overall became net savers after 1998, as opposed to borrowers. Koo argues that it was massive fiscal stimulus (borrowing and spending by the government) that offset this decline and enabled Japan to maintain its level of GDP. In his view, this avoided a U.S. type [[Great Depression]], in which U.S. GDP fell by 46%. He argued that monetary policy was ineffective because there was limited demand for funds while firms paid down their liabilities. In a balance sheet recession, GDP declines by the amount of debt repayment and un-borrowed individual savings, leaving government stimulus spending as the primary remedy.<ref name="Koo 2009"/><ref name="Koo2011" /><ref>{{cite web |first=Gregory|last=White |url=http://www.businessinsider.com/richard-koo-recession-2010-4#-1 |title=Presentation by Richard Koo – The Age of Balance Sheet Recessions |work=Business Insider |date=14 April 2010 |access-date=29 January 2011 |archive-date=5 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210505150640/https://www.businessinsider.com/richard-koo-recession-2010-4#-1 |url-status=live }}</ref>

Krugman discussed the balance sheet recession concept in 2010, agreeing with Koo's situation assessment and view that sustained [[deficit spending]] when faced with a balance sheet recession would be appropriate. However, Krugman argued that monetary policy could also affect savings behavior, as inflation or credible promises of future inflation (generating negative real interest rates) would encourage less savings. In other words, people would tend to spend more rather than save if they believe inflation is on the horizon. In more technical terms, Krugman argues that the private sector savings curve is elastic even during a balance sheet recession (responsive to changes in real interest rates), disagreeing with Koo's view that it is inelastic (non-responsive to changes in real interest rates).<ref>{{cite web|first=Paul|last=Krugman|url=https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/17/notes-on-koo-wonkish/|title=Notes On Koo (Wonkish)|date=17 August 2010|access-date=26 November 2018|archive-date=15 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210415215705/https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/17/notes-on-koo-wonkish/|url-status=live|work=The New York Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://voxeu.org/article/debt-deleveraging-and-liquidity-trap-new-model|title=Debt, deleveraging, and the liquidity trap|first=Paul|last=Krugman|date=18 November 2010|access-date=26 November 2018|archive-date=21 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210421110415/https://voxeu.org/article/debt-deleveraging-and-liquidity-trap-new-model|url-status=live|work=Voxeu.org)}}</ref>

A July 2012 survey of balance sheet recession research reported that consumer demand and employment are affected by household leverage levels. Both durable and non-durable goods consumption declined as households moved from low to high leverage with the decline in property values experienced during the subprime mortgage crisis. Further, reduced consumption due to higher household leverage can account for a significant decline in employment levels. Policies that help reduce mortgage debt or household leverage could therefore have stimulative effects (Smith & Johnson, 2012).

===Liquidity trap===

A [[liquidity trap]] is a [[Keynesian]] theory that a situation can develop in which interest rates reach near zero ([[zero interest-rate policy]]) yet do not effectively stimulate the economy.<ref name="Eggertsson2018">{{cite book |last1=Eggertsson |first1=Gauti B. |title=The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics |year=2018 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |isbn=978-1-349-95189-5 |pages=7929–7936 |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2482 |language=en |chapter=Liquidity Trap|doi=10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2482 }}</ref> In theory, near-zero interest rates should encourage firms and consumers to borrow and spend. However, if too many individuals or corporations focus on saving or paying down debt rather than spending, lower interest rates have less effect on investment and consumption behavior; increasing the money supply is like "[[pushing on a string]]".<ref name="CorreiaFarhi 2012">{{cite web |last1=Correia |first1=Isabel |last2=Farhi |first2=Emmanuel |last3=Nicolini |first3=Juan Pablo |last4=Teles |first4=Pedro |title=Unconventional Fiscal Policy at the Zero Bound: Working Paper 698 |url=https://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/wp/wp698.pdf |publisher=Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis |access-date=5 August 2022 |page=1 |date=August 2012}}</ref> Economist [[Paul Krugman]] described the [[Subprime mortgage crisis|U.S. 2009 recession]] and [[Lost decade (Japan)|Japan's lost decade]] as liquidity traps. One remedy to a liquidity trap is expanding the money supply via [[quantitative easing]] or other techniques in which money is effectively printed to purchase assets, thereby creating [[inflationary]] expectations that cause savers to begin spending again. Government stimulus spending and [[Mercantilism|mercantilist]] policies to stimulate exports and reduce imports are other techniques to stimulate demand.<ref name="Krugman 2009">{{cite book
| last = Krugman
| first = Paul
| year = 2009
| title = The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008
| publisher = W.W. Norton Company Limited
| isbn = 978-0-393-07101-6
| url-access = registration
| url = https://archive.org/details/returnofdepressi00krug
}}</ref> He estimated in March 2010 that developed countries representing 70% of the world's GDP were caught in a liquidity trap.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/how-much-of-the-world-is-in-a-liquidity-trap/ |title=How Much of the World is in a Liquidity Trap? |publisher=Krugman.blogs.nytimes.com |date=17 March 2010 |access-date=29 January 2011 |archive-date=24 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200424155051/https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/how-much-of-the-world-is-in-a-liquidity-trap/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

===Paradoxes of thrift and deleveraging===

Behavior that may be optimal for an individual (e.g., saving more during adverse economic conditions) can be detrimental if too many individuals pursue the same behavior, as ultimately, one person's consumption is another person's income. Too many consumers attempting to save (or pay down debt) simultaneously is called the [[paradox of thrift]]<ref name="LipseyHarbury1992">{{cite book |last1=Lipsey |first1=Richard G. |last2=Harbury |first2=Colin |title=First Principles of Economics |year=1992 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-297-82120-5 |page=294 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cV0EZuJxod8C&pg=PA294}}</ref> and can cause or deepen a recession. Economist [[Hyman Minsky]] also described a "paradox of deleveraging" as financial institutions that have too much leverage (debt relative to equity) cannot all de-leverage simultaneously without significant declines in the value of their assets.<ref name="Yellen on Minsky">{{cite web|url=https://www.frbsf.org/our-district/press/presidents-speeches/yellen-speeches/2009/april/yellen-minsky-meltdown-central-bankers/|title=A Minsky Meltdown: Lessons for Central Bankers|website=Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco speeches|date=16 April 2009|access-date=4 June 2019|archive-date=5 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130105104826/http://www.frbsf.org/news/speeches/2009/0416.html|url-status=live}}</ref>

==Causes of recessions==
{{additionalcitations|section|date=April 2025}}

There are many reasons why recessions happen. One overall reason can be lack of demand due to sharp developments in the prices of the inputs used in producing goods and services. Another main reason can be problems e.g. in financial markets. Because recessions have many likely explanations, it is demanding to predict them. Some variables might at first glance be the causes of recessions, but they could also be the results of a recession, which means they are endogenous to recessions.<ref name="auto"/> One can summarize the causes of recessions in the following categories:

Economic factors:
* [[Supply shock]]s: A sudden increase in the prices of key inputs (input price shock) can lead to higher production costs and reduced aggregate demand, triggering a recession.<ref name="auto"/>
* [[Fiscal policy|Fiscal policies]] or monetary policies by the government, which are contractionary in nature: A contractionary policy is a tool usually used to tame rising inflation. Excessive use of tightening policies, e.g. too rapid increases in interest rates, can reduce demand and consumer spending for goods and services, leading to a recession (creating a so called [[Hard landing (economics)|hard landing]]).<ref name="auto"/> Monetary policy changes can influence both the frequency and intensity of recessions.
* [[Demand shock]]s: A widespread drop in spending, known as an adverse demand shock, can lead to recessions. This can be triggered by various events, including the bursting of economic bubbles (see economic bubbles below).

Financial factors:
* [[Credit risk]] and credit and debt issues: Overextension of credit and accumulation of risky debt can lead to financial crises. When borrowers (e.g. corporations) default, it can cause a cascade of business failures and reduced consumption).<ref name="auto"/>
* [[Financial risk]] factors that can cause a recession are plentiful: Besides credit risk like e.g. [[concentration risk]], there is also [[market risk]] like e.g. [[systemic risk]], [[liquidity risk]] like e.g. [[refinancing risk]], [[investment risk]] like e.g. [[model risk]], [[Business risks|business risk]] like e.g. [[political risk]] as well as [[profit risk]].
* Financial market problems: Issues in financial markets, such as rapid credit expansion. When households accumulate excessive debt and later face difficulties in meeting their obligations, they cut back on consumption, leading to a decrease in economic activity.
* [[Credit crunch|Credit tightening]]: Restrictions on credit availability also known as credit crunch, can reduce consumer spending and business investment, leading to a slowdown in economic activity.
* [[Interest rate|Interest rate distortions]]: Artificially low interest rates can encourage excessive borrowing and result in a buildup of risk in the financial sector. When interest rates rise, these investments (like new constructions in real estate) may fail, exacerbate economic declines, contributing to a recession.
* [[Economic bubble]]: Unsustainable rapid increases in asset prices due to excessive risk-taking, characterized by exaggerated optimism during the [[economic boom]] period and accumulation of financial risks during good economic times creates a asset bubble, followed by continued sharp declines in asset prices, a ([[stock market crash]]), which can lead to a cascade of business failures, significant recessions and worst case depressions and [[Economic stagnation|stagnation]].
* [[Minsky Moment]]: Euphoria and speculative borrowing as well as unsustainable financial practices eventually result in economic downturns. A Minsky Moment marks the point at which [[Leverage (finance)|overleveraged]] investors are forced to sell off assets to cover their debts, leading to a rapid decline in asset prices and [[Liquidity risk|liquidity]]. This term is named after the American economist [[Hyman Minsky]], who theorized that financial markets are inherently unstable.

External shocks
* Adverse events: Unexpected major world events like [[natural disaster]]s and geopolitical events like [[war]]s can cause widespread disruptions in critical sectors in supply chains and disrupt economic activity, reduce productivity, increase costs, affect confidence and thereby diminish economic activity, leading to decreased spending and investment and finally recessions.
* Decline in external demand: For countries with strong [[export]] sectors, a decline in demand from major [[International trade|trading partners]] can trigger a recession.<ref name="auto"/>
* Global spillover effects: Recessions in one part of the world can have spillover effects on other economies due to global interconnectedness. For example, economic troubles in Europe can impact the U.S. economy.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2022/12/why-recessions-are-misunderstood|title=Recessions are difficult, but stagnant growth could prove more challenging, Stanford economist warns| last=Cochrane | first=John | date=December 7, 2022|website=Stanford University}}</ref>

==Predictors==
[[File:US Treasury interest rates.webp|thumb|300px|[[United States Treasury security|US Treasury]] interest rates compared to [[Federal funds rate|Federal Funds Rate]]. When the short term  interest rates get above the long term interest rates it is known as an [[Inverted yield curve]].  When the [[Federal Reserve|Fed]] raises the Federal Funds Rate it pushes up the shorter term interest rates.
{{legend-line|black solid 3px|[[Federal funds rate|Federal Funds Rate]]}}
]]
[[File:Job seekers ratio.webp|thumb|300px|The [[JOLTS report]] job seekers ratio
{{legend|#0714FF|Cold job market}}
{{legend|#2A9B00|Balanced job market}}
{{legend|#BA3117|Hot job market}}
]]
[[File:Sahm rule.webp|thumb|[[Sahm rule]] 1949-2024]]

Recessions are very challenging to predict. While some variables like the [[Inverted yield curve|(inverted) yield curve]] appear to be more useful to predict a recession ahead of time than other variables, no single variable has proven to be an always reliable predictor whether recessions will actually (soon) appear, let alone predicting their sharpness and severity in terms of duration.<ref name="auto"/> The longest and deepest Treasury yield curve inversion in history began in July 2022, as the Federal Reserve sharply increased the [[fed funds rate]] to combat the [[2021–2023 inflation surge]]. Despite widespread predictions by economists and market analysts of an imminent recession, none had materialized by July 2024, economic growth remained steady, and a Reuters survey of economists that month found they expected the economy to continue growing for the next two years. An earlier survey of bond market strategists found a majority no longer believed an inverted curve to be a reliable recession predictor. The curve began re-steepening toward positive territory in June 2024, as it had at other points during that inversion; in every previous inversion they examined; [[Deutsche Bank]] analysts found the curve had re-steepened before a recession began.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Peck |first1=Emily |title=Why everyone was so wrong about the 2023 economy |url=https://www.axios.com/2023/12/22/2023-economy-predictions-wrong-recession |work=[[Axios (website)|Axios]] |date=December 22, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Barbuscia |first1=Davide |title=US yield curve nears flip with jury out on recession signal |url=https://www.reuters.com/markets/rates-bonds/us-yield-curve-nears-flip-with-jury-out-recession-signal-2024-07-29/#:~:text=%22Right%20now%2C%20as%20the%20yield,previous%20inversion%20record%20from%201978. |publisher=Reuters |date=July 29, 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Minus 2-Year Treasury Constant Maturity |url=https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/T10Y2Y |publisher=[[Federal Reserve Economic Data]]}}</ref> The following variables and indicators are used by economists, like e.g. [[Paul Krugman]] or [[Joseph Stiglitz]], to try to predict the possibility of a recession:
* The U.S. Conference Board's Present Situation Index year-over-year change turns negative by more than 15 points before a recession.<ref>[http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2013/09/consumer-confidence-a-useful-indicator-of-the-labor-market.html Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Consumer Confidence: A Useful Indicator of ... the Labor Market?] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200514142406/http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2013/09/consumer-confidence-a-useful-indicator-of-the-labor-market.html |date=14 May 2020 }}
Jason Bram, Robert Rich, and Joshua Abel ... Conference Board's Present Situation Index {{PD-notice}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.journal.ky/2017/01/04/wall-street-starts-2017-with-tailwind/ |title=Wall Street starts 2017 with tailwind {{!}} By Juergen Buettner {{!}} 4 January 2017 {{!}} Chart 1: Consumer Confidence Index and Historically Shocks |access-date=14 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200428182941/https://www.journal.ky/2017/01/04/wall-street-starts-2017-with-tailwind/ |archive-date=28 April 2020 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>[https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradmcmillan/2019/06/27/consumer-confidence-drops-why-does-it-matter Consumer Confidence Drops – Why Does It Matter?] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200318004902/https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradmcmillan/2019/06/27/consumer-confidence-drops-why-does-it-matter |date=18 March 2020 }} Forbes. 27 June 2019. Brad McMillan.</ref>
* The U.S. Conference Board Leading Economic Indicator year-over-year change turns negative before a recession.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/gundlach-recession-prediction-030834565.html|title=Gundlach: We don't see a recession on the horizon. But there's bad news...|date=14 February 2019 |publisher=Yahoo! Finance|access-date=25 September 2019|archive-date=25 September 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190925132309/https://finance.yahoo.com/news/gundlach-recession-prediction-030834565.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4293195-take-leader-analyzing-latest-leading-indicators|title=Seeking Alpha {{pipe}} Take Me To Your Leader: Analyzing The Latest Leading Indicators {{pipe}} by −1.9% {{pipe}} 24 September 2019}}</ref>
* When the CFNAI Diffusion Index drops below the value of −0.35, then there is an {{em|increased probability}} of the beginning a recession. Usually, the signal happens in the three months of the recession. The CFNAI Diffusion Index signal tends to happen about one month before a related signal by the CFNAI-MA3 (3-month moving average) drops below the −0.7 level. The CFNAI-MA3 correctly identified the 7 recessions between March 1967 – August 2019, while triggering only 2 false alarms.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.chicagofed.org/~/media/publications/cfnai/background/cfnai-background-pdf.pdf|title=Background on the Chicago Fed National Activity Index {{pipe}} Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago {{pipe}} 19 September 2019|access-date=25 September 2019|archive-date=14 May 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200514220558/https://www.chicagofed.org/~/media/publications/cfnai/background/cfnai-background-pdf.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>

Except for the above, there are no known completely reliable predictors.{{cn|date=August 2024}} Analysis by [[Prakash Loungani]] of the [[International Monetary Fund]] found that only two of the sixty recessions around the world during the 1990s had been predicted by a consensus of economists one year earlier, while there were zero consensus predictions one year earlier for the 49 recessions during 2009.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-11-25/grim-stock-signals-piling-up-as-wall-street-mulls-recession-odds |title=Grim Stock Signals Piling Up as Wall Street Mulls Recession Odds |publisher=Bloomberg L.P. |date=25 November 2018 |access-date=26 November 2018 |archive-date=4 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200304092128/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-11-25/grim-stock-signals-piling-up-as-wall-street-mulls-recession-odds |url-status=live }}</ref>

However, the following are considered possible predictors:<ref>{{cite journal |title=Predicting U.S. Recessions: Financial Variables as Leading Indicators |journal=Review of Economics and Statistics |volume=80 |pages=45–61 |author=A Estrella, FS Mishkin |year=1995 |publisher=MIT Press |doi=10.1162/003465398557320 |s2cid=11641969 |url=http://www.nber.org/papers/w5379.pdf |access-date=25 August 2019 |archive-date=6 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200406193951/https://www.nber.org/papers/w5379.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.conference-board.org/publications/pdf/index.cfm?brandingURL=Leading-Indicators-Recession |last=Ozyildirim | first=Ataman| title = Leading Economic Indicators and the Oncoming Recession |access-date=7 December 2022| archive-date=4 August 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240804165049/https://www.conference-board.org/publications/pdf/index.cfm?brandingURL=Leading-Indicators-Recession|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="auto7">{{cite web| url = https://www.conference-board.org/topics/us-leading-indicators | title = The Conference Board Leading Economic Index® (LEI) for the U.S. |access-date=4 August 2024| archive-date=4 August 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240804182701/https://www.conference-board.org/topics/us-leading-indicators|url-status=live}}</ref>

Manufacturing:
[[File:Real Manufacturing and Trade Industry Sales.webp|thumb|Real [[Manufacturing]] and Trade Industry Sales, percent change year over year.]]
* Average weekly hours in manufacturing.<ref name="auto10">{{Cite web|url=https://www.chicagofed.org/publications/chicago-fed-letter/2019/425 | last=Kelley | first=David |title=Which Leading Indicators Have Done Better at Signaling Past Recessions?|date=2019|website=Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago}}</ref> Firms tend to react to worsening business cycle circumstances by lowering hours worked before laying off workers, according to Glosser and Golden (1997).<ref>{{cite journal |title=Average work hours as a leading economic variable in US manufacturing industries |journal=International Journal of Forecasting |volume=13 |issue=2 |pages=175–195 |author=Stuart M. Glosser, Lonnie Golden |year=1997 |publisher=Elsevier |doi=10.1016/S0169-2070(96)00725-X  |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016920709600725X |access-date=5 August 2024|url-access=subscription }}</ref> This popular indicator leads industrial production by two to four months.<ref name="auto5">{{Cite web|url=https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~dbackus/2303/notes_indicators.pdf|first=David|last=Backus|title=Business-Cycle Indicators|website=New York University's Stern School of Business|date=2024}}</ref>
* Manufacturers' new orders for consumer goods and materials.<ref name="auto10"/>
* Manufacturers' new orders for nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft orders.<ref name="auto10"/>
* Manufacturing sales.
* A decline in manufacturing activities and new orders for consumer and capital goods can signal reduced business investment and economic slowdown.
* Measuring manufacturing output against business demand (new orders plus backlog minus inventory) as a composite index for U.S. economic activity, using data from [[Institute for Supply Management|ISM]] (Manufacturing Services, Chicago) and [[Federal Reserve|Fed]] (Empire Manufacturing, Philadelphia, Kansas City, Richmond, Dallas) indices, has been a reliable recession indicator during the last eight recessions.<ref name="auto2">{{Cite news|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/stock-market-crash-recession-indicators-labor-market-rate-cuts-hussman-2024-8|title=Stock Market Crash: Expert Warns of 70% Potential Downside for S&P 500|first=William|last=Edwards|newspaper=Business Insider|date=31 August 2024|access-date=1 September 2024|archive-date=1 September 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240901145736/https://www.businessinsider.com/stock-market-crash-recession-indicators-labor-market-rate-cuts-hussman-2024-8|url-status=live}}</ref>

Industrial Production:
* Factory output, including factories, mines, and utilities.
* Low industrial output and sales: During economic downturns, companies reduce production to minimize risk. This leads to lower industrial output and sales, which can signal an impending recession, because it causes a [[ripple effect]]. As fewer goods are produced, lesser resources like labor, equipment and raw materials are required. As industrial output falls this sooner or later leads to a cutback in hiring as well as a surge in layoffs.

Chemical Activity:
* Basic industrial chemicals like chlorine, alkalies, pigments and plastic resins are positioned early in the supply chain. This early position allows to identify emerging turning points in the economy.
* Chemical activity also includes data on hours worked in chemicals, chemical company stock data, publicly sourced chemical price information, end-use chemical industry sales-to-inventories.
* Indicators of chemical activity provide a longer lead time compared to other economic indicators. Tracking chemical activity as an index can lead by two to fourteen months, with an average lead of eight months at cycle peaks and four months at cycle troughs, according to the American Chemistry Council (ACC).

Transportation:
[[File:Dow Jones Transportation Average.webp|thumb|[[Dow Jones Transportation Average]] 2015-2025]]
* Declining [[trucking]] and [[shipping]] volumes of goods.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/trucking-truckers-bloodbath-signals-recession-inverted-yield-2019-8|title=The "bloodbath" in America's trucking industry has officially spilled over to the rest of the economy|first=Rachel|last=Premack|website=Business Insider|access-date=18 September 2019|archive-date=8 February 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200208144012/https://www.businessinsider.com/trucking-truckers-bloodbath-signals-recession-inverted-yield-2019-8|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cassinfo.com/hubfs/Freight%20Payment%20/Transportation%20Indexes/Cass%20Freight%20Index/Reports/Cass%20Freight%20Index%20Report%20-%20August%202019.pdf?hsCtaTracking=5fde9be4-1dd0-462f-8c5f-b100aca52fc1%7C0990f099-885d-442a-972a-aeb259c5a188| title = Cass Freight Index Report|date= August 2019| access-date = 18 September 2019| archive-date = 13 December 2019| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20191213020611/https://www.cassinfo.com/hubfs/Freight%20Payment%20/Transportation%20Indexes/Cass%20Freight%20Index/Reports/Cass%20Freight%20Index%20Report%20-%20August%202019.pdf?hsCtaTracking=5fde9be4-1dd0-462f-8c5f-b100aca52fc1%7C0990f099-885d-442a-972a-aeb259c5a188| url-status = live}}</ref>
* The [[Baltic Dry Index|Baltic Dry Index (BDI)]], a shipping freight-cost index which reflects the demand for shipping capacity versus the supply of dry bulk carriers, is generally seen as a leading indicator of economic activity, because changes in the index reflect global supply and demand for commodities and raw materials used in manufacturing. A falling BDI can signal a slowdown in economic activity.
* The [[Dow Jones Transportation Average|Dow Jones Transportation Average (DJTA)]] contains railroads, shipping companies, air freight carriers, marine transportation, delivery services, and logistics companies. The performance of transportation stocks can predict trends in the broader market, according to the [[Dow theory|Dow Theory]], which says that a divergence between the DJTA and the [[Dow Jones Industrial Average|Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA)]] can signal potential early economic weakness if transportation stocks are underperforming while industrial stocks are rising.
* Both indices (BDI and DJTA) serve as barometers for economic health and are considered to be leading economic indicators but from different perspectives. The BDI focuses on global trade and commodity demand, while the DJTA reflects domestic transportation activity in the U.S.
* There are various trucking indices, most notably the Cass Freight Index, which measures monthly freight activity across all domestic freight modes in North America. Other trucking indices are the FreightWaves National Truckload Index (NTI), the FTR Trucking Conditions Index (TCI), the ACT For-Hire Trucking Index, the American Trucking Associations' Truck Tonnage Index, the DAT Trendlines index and the [[Bureau of Labor Statistics|U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics]] Producer Price Index (PPI) by Industry: General Freight Trucking Index. These indices are essential for understanding the dynamics of the trucking industry and predicting future market conditions.
* According to research by the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, the Transportation Services Index (TSI) is a leading indicator of economic cycles. It tracks the movement of freight and passengers to provide insights into the broader economic conditions. Both TSI index components lead the business cycles since 1979 by an average of approximately four months.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bts.gov/newsroom/research-confirms-transportation-index-leading-indicator|title=Research Confirms Transportation Index as Leading Indicator|website=U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics|date=December 15, 2017}}</ref>
* Light truck sales are seen as a recession predictor.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.marketplace.org/2024/09/12/inverted-yield-curve-recession-predictor-indicator/|title=Why the inverted yield curve is typically a recession predictor|first=Stacey Vanek|last=Smith|newspaper=Marketplace|date=12 September 2024|access-date=13 September 2024|archive-date=13 September 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240913122844/https://www.marketplace.org/2024/09/12/inverted-yield-curve-recession-predictor-indicator/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/billconerly/2019/08/15/how-bad-is-the-us-economy-in-2019/|title=How Bad Is The U.S. Economy In 2019?|first=Bill|last=Conerly|newspaper=Forbes|date=15 August 2019|access-date=13 September 2024|archive-date=13 September 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240913123647/https://www.forbes.com/sites/billconerly/2019/08/15/how-bad-is-the-us-economy-in-2019/|url-status=live}}</ref>

Corporate Profits:
* Business sector profits. Declining corporate earnings over successive quarters can signal economic trouble and the risk of a potential bear market.<ref name="auto6">{{Cite web|url=https://www.fisherinvestments.com/en-us/resource-library/market-cycles/bear-markets/indicators | last=Fisher | first=Ken |title=Bear Market Indicators|date=2024|website=Fisher Investments}}</ref>

Employment:
* Decreasing job growth.
* Decreasing payroll employment.
* Growing unemployment rate as measured by the initial claims for unemployment insurance (indicated by a constant enduring year-over-year increase in the three-week average of unemployment insurance initial claims<ref name="auto9">{{cite web| url = https://www.gurufocus.com/news/2508303/recessionary-indicators | title = Recessionary Indicators |website=GuruFocus |access-date=22 August 2024| archive-date=24 August 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240824152220/https://www.gurufocus.com/news/2508303/recessionary-indicators|url-status=live}}</ref>), which are reported by the [[Bureau of Labor Statistics|U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics]]:<ref name="auto10"/> A enlarging unemployment rate with rising initial claims for unemployment insurance indicate weakening labor market conditions, which can be a precursor to a recession. This indicator leads industrial production by two to three months.<ref name="auto5"/> Also see [[Sahm rule]] indicator below in the overview of recession indicators, which tracks the momentum in the U3 unemployment rate.
* Growing labor market weakness as indicated by a negative three-month average of U.S. nonfarm payrolls.<ref name="auto9"/>
* Swelling unemployment rate, specifically a unemployment rate rising above its 36-month moving average<ref name="auto1">{{Cite news|url=https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2024/09/11/jeffrey-gundlach-6-signs-recession-is-near-or-here/|title=Jeffrey Gundlach: 6 Signs Recession Is Near, or Here|first=Dinah|last=Wisenberg Brin|newspaper=ThinkAdvisor|date=11 September 2024|access-date=17 September 2024|archive-date=17 September 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240917160716/https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2024/09/11/jeffrey-gundlach-6-signs-recession-is-near-or-here/|url-status=live}}</ref> is a cause for concern, according to [[Jeffrey Gundlach]].
* A narrowing labor differential between those who think jobs are plentiful versus those who think they are hard to get, as measured by the [[The Conference Board|Conference Board]]. On average, the peak in the labor differential comes nine months ahead of a recession, according to BCA Research strategist Peter Berezin.<ref name="auto4">{{Cite news|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/labor-market-indicators-recession-warning-signs-bca-research-berezin-2024-9|title=2 under-the-radar recession signals are flashing red this month, research firm says|first=Kelly|last=Cloonan|newspaper=Business Insider|date=25 September 2024|access-date=28 September 2024|archive-date=28 September 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240928153223/https://www.businessinsider.com/labor-market-indicators-recession-warning-signs-bca-research-berezin-2024-9|url-status=live}}</ref>
* Jobs market contraction: The 'Perkins rule', created by GlobalData TS Lombard managing director Dario Perkins, triggers when payrolls are declining. Commonly when the Sahm rule produces a recession warning signal the Perkins rule has already triggered.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/recession-indicator-perkins-rule-negative-payroll-report-sahm-unemployment-rate-2024-8|title=The Sahm Rule has flashed, but there's a simpler recession indicator investors should be watching|first=Matthew|last=Fox|newspaper=Business Insider|date=26 August 2024|access-date=27 August 2024|archive-date=27 August 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240827144004/https://www.businessinsider.com/recession-indicator-perkins-rule-negative-payroll-report-sahm-unemployment-rate-2024-8|url-status=live}}</ref> Another jobs market indicator measuring a rise in unemployment is the 'Kantro rule'. This recession indicator isn't influenced by participation rates and has an equally impressive track record as the Sahm rule going back to the early 1970s. Kantro's 10% recession rule, created by Michael Kantrowitz, CIO of Piper Sandler, measures the year-over-year growth in unemployed persons in the U.S. workforce. When the three-month moving average of this indicator grows beyond the 10% threshold at least in the past 11 occurrences the economy has already been in recession.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.marketwatch.com/livecoverage/stock-market-today-dow-futures-flat-after-1000-point-rally-in-four-days/card/a-reliable-labor-market-recession-indicator-has-triggered-but-this-time-it-could-be-bullish-for-stocks-sXgJRUlCo2TNywR6XgDc|title=A reliable labor-market recession indicator has triggered — but this time it could be bullish for stocks|first=Joseph|last=Adinolfi|newspaper=Marketwatch|date=7 May 2024|access-date=29 August 2024|archive-date=29 August 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240829170606/https://www.marketwatch.com/livecoverage/stock-market-today-dow-futures-flat-after-1000-point-rally-in-four-days/card/a-reliable-labor-market-recession-indicator-has-triggered-but-this-time-it-could-be-bullish-for-stocks-sXgJRUlCo2TNywR6XgDc|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/stock-market-crash-recession-indicators-jobs-report-unemploymnet-rate-sp500-2024-8|title=2 recession indicators with perfect track records show the US just entered a downturn — opening the door for stocks to plummet as the Fed gets set to cut rates|first=William|last=Edwards|newspaper=Business Insider|date=3 August 2024|access-date=29 August 2024|archive-date=29 August 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240829164157/https://www.businessinsider.com/stock-market-crash-recession-indicators-jobs-report-unemploymnet-rate-sp500-2024-8|url-status=live}}</ref>
* Growing shifts in labor market internals to part-time work signals increasing weakness in the economy as normally part-time jobs rise and full-time jobs decrease as a share of employment before a recession takes hold. As an indicator this can be measured simply using the ratio of part-time to full-time employment (with the year-over-year change crossing into negative territory as recession risk warning).<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.foxbusiness.com/video/6360053882112|title=Sahm Rule is picking up on something that's 'very worrisome' - New Century Advisors chief economist Claudia Sahm weighs in on the Fed's next rate move|first=Charles|last=Payne|newspaper=FOX Business|date=7 August 2024}}</ref> Another way to use this approach is to look at the number of people who are working part time but would rather be working full time, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.<ref name="auto4"/> This approach is also called U-7 and was invented by [[David Blanchflower]], a Dartmouth labor economist who served on the Bank of England's monetary policy committee. David Kotok, the chief investment officer of Cumberland Advisors, says the way to use the U-7 number is to compare it with the main unemployment rate, which the Labor Department calls U-3. When the U-3 rises faster than the U-7, that is a recession warning.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-unemployment-measure-youve-never-heard-is-flashing-a-recession-warning-1ccfd4ad|title=The unemployment measure you've never heard is flashing a recession warning|first=Steve|last=Goldstein|newspaper=Marketwatch|date=18 September 2024|access-date=28 September 2024|archive-date=28 September 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240928160841/https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-unemployment-measure-youve-never-heard-is-flashing-a-recession-warning-1ccfd4ad|url-status=live}}</ref>
* Six other employment-based recession indicators are:<ref name="auto2"/> 1) new claims for unemployment (8-week smoothing of 26-week change) larger than 60.000. 2) Continuing claims for unemployment (percent change year-over-year) larger 21%. 3) Employed part-time due to economic reasons (percent change year-over-year) larger 16%. 4) Unemployed more than 15 weeks (percent change from 12-month low) larger 30%. 5) Temporary help services (percent change year-over-year) smaller -2%. 6) Aggregate hours worked, production and non-supervisory employees (6-month percent change) smaller 0%.

Personal Income:
* Decline in [[wage]]s.
* Decline in [[personal income]] less transfer payments. Real median household income is reported by the [[Bureau of Economic Analysis|U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)]].
* Increased [[income inequality]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://phys.org/news/2016-08-income-wealth-inequality-recessions-worse.html |year=2016 |title=Income and wealth inequality make recessions worse, research reveals |website=phys.org |access-date=25 August 2019 |archive-date=13 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191213085932/https://phys.org/news/2016-08-income-wealth-inequality-recessions-worse.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Neves |first1=Pedro Cunha |last2=Afonso |first2=Óscar |last3=Silva |first3=Sandra Tavares |title=A Meta-Analytic Reassessment of the Effects of Inequality on Growth |journal=World Development |date=February 2016 |volume=78 |pages=386–400 |doi=10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.038 }}</ref>

Household Savings and Consumer Debt:
* Tracking consumer savings rates can help indicate how people are feeling about the economy in general. A personal savings rate that is too low (and then rises once people become worried about their job security, start to spend less and begin to build their savings again) typically precedes a recession. Prior to the [[2008 financial crisis]], households were saving less than 3% of their disposable personal income based on data from the [[Commerce Department]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/recession-outlook-savings-household-spending-economy-2008-financial-crisis-2024-9|title=A key US consumer indicator has dipped to 'crisis levels,' SocGen says|first=Jennifer|last=Sor|newspaper=Business Insider|date=25 September 2024|access-date=5 October 2024|archive-date=5 October 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241005122850/https://www.businessinsider.com/recession-outlook-savings-household-spending-economy-2008-financial-crisis-2024-9|url-status=live}}</ref>
* Rising consumer debt at the onset of a recession: When the budget shrinks some consumers may turn to debt to maintain their lifestyle and to continue spending. As available cash tightens an increase in overall credit card debt, auto loans and other types of consumer debt can indicate that consumers can't afford daily purchases anymore. This debt overhang suggests lower future consumer spending and a worsening economy.<ref name="auto8">{{Cite news|url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/5-buying-habits-experts-believe-110110863.html|title=5 Buying Habits That Experts Believe Are Key Signs of a Looming Recession|first=Jacob|last=Wade|newspaper=yahoo! finance|date=16 July 2024|access-date=6 October 2024|archive-date=6 October 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241006145942/https://finance.yahoo.com/news/5-buying-habits-experts-believe-110110863.html|url-status=live}}</ref>

Retail Sales, Consumer Confidence and Consumer Expenditures:
* Decline in wholesale/retail sales, which are reported by the [[United States Census Bureau|U.S. Census Bureau]].
* [[Consumer confidence index|Consumer expectations]], confidence surveys like the index of consumer expectations ([[University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index]]) and the [[Consumer confidence index|Conference Board  Consumer Confidence Index]]:<ref name="auto10"/> Declines in consumer sentiment and confidence can signal a recession. These measures reflect consumers' outlook on the economy and their willingness to spend, which drives economic activity. A drop in consumer confidence often precedes reduced consumer spending.
* Weakening [[Personal consumption expenditures price index|personal consumption expenditure growth]].<ref name="auto9"/> Declines in [[consumer spending]] can signal a recession. As consumers cut back on spending, businesses may respond by reducing production and laying off workers, creating a cycle that can lead to a recession.
* Changes in household consumer spending like a switch to more generic brands (trading down): When households start buying more private label or lower-cost goods (generic brands that are a lower-cost option for a similar product instead of more expensive name brand goods) could indicate that consumers have less discretionary income and that a recession is coming.<ref name="auto8"/>
* Consumers choosing to eat out less at restaurants and make food at home more: It can be a leading sign of a looming recession when consumers cut back on non-essential items like restaurants, entertainment and experiences like travel.<ref name="auto8"/>
* Declining luxury purchases: When the jobs market starts getting stressed and cash is less plentiful consumers postpone expensive, non-urgent purchases and especially luxury purchases (fashion, beauty and jewelry) are one of the first spending categories to get hit when a recession is coming.<ref name="auto8"/>
* Tumbling sales in durable consumer goods, like e.g. new car sales (light vehicles unit retail sales).<ref name="auto9"/> and decreasing [[recreational vehicle]] shipments.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/one-countys-rv-industry-points-to-recession-around-the-bend-11566207001|title=An Economic Warning Sign: RV Shipments Are Slipping|first=Shayndi|last=Raice|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|date=19 August 2019|access-date=18 September 2019|archive-date=8 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200608110107/https://www.wsj.com/articles/one-countys-rv-industry-points-to-recession-around-the-bend-11566207001|url-status=live}}</ref>

Housing and non-residential construction:
* Housing starts and construction, specifically [[Planning permission|building permits]] for new private housing units.<ref name="auto10"/><ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2024/07/18/cb-leading-economic-index-continued-to-trend-down-in-june |last=Nash | first=Jennifer| title = Conference Board Leading Economic Index: Continued to Trend Down in June |access-date=18 July 2024| archive-date=4 August 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240804170104/https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2024/07/18/cb-leading-economic-index-continued-to-trend-down-in-june|url-status=live}}</ref> Residential investment contains information that is particularly useful for predicting recessions when compared by what is captured by standard leading indicators such as the term spread. And it is especially useful for the prediction of recessions for countries with high home-ownership rates. Research results strongly suggest that recession predictability of leading indicators is improved, when residential investment is included.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Are Aastveit |first1=Knut |last2=Anundsen |first2=André K. |last3=Herstad |first3=Eyo I.  |title=Residential investment and recession predictability |journal=International Journal of Forecasting |date=October–December 2019 |volume=35 |issue=4 |pages=1790–1799 |doi=10.1016/j.ijforecast.2018.09.008 |hdl=11250/2474303 |hdl-access=free }}</ref>
* Non-residential construction spending (like e.g. offices and industrial plants) as measured by the [[Architecture Billings Index|Architecture Billings Index (ABI)]] 9-12 months ahead. The ABI is a survey send each month by the AIA to several hundreds of architecture firms. The index can be used to predict a recession. The index is centered around a value of 50. Below 50 means there is a high likelihood that construction spending will decrease and that therefore overall economic health is going to worsen. Researchers at the AIA came to the conclusion that their Architecture Billings Index is an accurate indicator of actual construction spending with on average 11 months' worth of lead time and therefore reliably leads economic downturns whenever the index severely drops below 50. For example the ABI plunged below 50 between July of 2000 and January of 2001 (and then in June of 2001 the percentage change in construction spending as compared to the prior year sank into negative growth territory) ahead of the wider crash in the US equity markets that followed.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4227045-forecasting-next-recession-using-architectural-billings-index|title=Forecasting The Next Recession Using The Architectural Billings Index|first=Kevin|last=Mackie|website=Seeking Alpha|date=7 December 2018|access-date=21 September 2024|archive-date=29 November 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221129013001/https://seekingalpha.com/article/4227045-forecasting-next-recession-using-architectural-billings-index|url-status=live}}</ref>

Credit Markets:
* Rising corporate debt can foreshadow a bear market, notably when businesses go ahead with taking on more debt, despite having diminishing sales and dwindling earnings.<ref name="auto6"/>
* Credit conditions like credit spreads. The spread between corporate bonds and U.S. Treasuries is important. If the spread between corporate and government debt increases, this could signal that private sector lending is becoming strained.<ref name="auto3">{{Cite web|url=https://www.marketbeat.com/learn/predicting-a-bear-market-7-signs-and-why-its-tough-to-do/ | last=Schmidt | first=Dan |title=Predicting a Bear Market: 7 Signs and Why it's Tough to Do|date=April 17, 2024|website=MarketBeat}}</ref>
* The long-term spread: The spread between a shorter-term rate (like the three-month Treasury yield) and 10-year U.S. bond yields. The long-term Treasury yield spread has been particularly effective at predicting recessions many months in advance, achieving an AUC (Area Under the [[Receiver operating characteristic|Receiver Operating Characteristic]] curve) value of 0.89 at 14 months ahead. And it is the best predictor at a horizon of 16 to 20 months ahead, when compared to other leading indicators.<ref name="auto10"/>
* The near-term forward spread: This is the difference between the market expectation of the interest rate on a three-month Treasury bill six quarters in the future and the current three-month Treasury bill yield.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Engstrom | first1=Eric C. | last2=Sharpe | first2=Steven A. | title=The near-term forward yield spread as a leading indicator: A less distorted mirror | journal=Finance and Economics Discussion Series | publisher=Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System | volume=2018-055 | date=February 2019 | issue=55r1 | doi=10.17016/FEDS.2018.055r1 |  url=https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/the-near-term-forward-yield-spread-as-a-leading-indicator-a-less-distorted-mirror.htm }}</ref><ref name="auto10"/>
* An [[inverted yield curve]] can indicate that a recession may be on the horizon as it has historically often preceded economic downturns with lead times ranging from several months to over a year. Especially the disinversion, a move back into positive territory for the spread between the shorter (e.g. 3-month or 2-year) yield and the longer (e.g. 10-year) Treasury yield, has in the past, been a reliable recession signal as the curve usually disinverts (or un-inverts) nearly before the recession truly appears. Based on recent history, the last four recessions, as of Q2-2024, didn't start until the inverted curve returned to a positive reading (steepens). Further analysis shows that "the average time to recession (...) [is] only 66 days from when the [3-month/10-year] curve disinverts."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/yield-curve-disinversion-is-recession-signal-watch-2024-06-04/|title=Yield curve disinversion is the recession signal to watch|first=Jamie|last=McGeever|newspaper=Reuters|date=5 June 2024|access-date=30 August 2024|archive-date=30 August 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240830145138/https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/yield-curve-disinversion-is-recession-signal-watch-2024-06-04/|url-status=live}}</ref>
* The S&P 500 and BBB bond spread.<ref>[https://www.ncsl.org/Portals/1/Documents/fiscal/Fiscal_2020_meetings/Jesse_Edgerton_US_Outlook_Presentation_34375.pdf] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201206013511/https://www.ncsl.org/Portals/1/Documents/fiscal/Fiscal_2020_meetings/Jesse_Edgerton_US_Outlook_Presentation_34375.pdf|date=6 December 2020}} JPMorgan | The US Economic Outlook | Feb. 2020 | Page 22]</ref>
* The [[Federal budget (economics)|federal budget]] deficit typically worsens strongly ahead of a recession.<ref name="auto1"/>

Business Expectations:
* Business confidence surveys and expectations for business condition.
* New businesses form at a slower rate when entrepreneurs are less likely to take the risk of starting a new venture while more established struggling businesses close down when a recession is looming.<ref name="auto8"/>

Margin of stock market traders:
* The value of debit balances in broker-dealers' securities [[Margin (finance)|margin accounts]].<ref name="auto10"/>

Asset Prices:
* [[Oil]] is a critical commodity input for many industries.
* [[commodity|Commodity prices]], as measured e.g. by the Standard & Poor's (S&P) Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI),<ref name="auto10"/> may increase before recessions, which usually hinders [[consumer spending]] by making necessities like transportation and housing costlier. This will tend to constrict spending for non-essential goods and services. Once the recession occurs, commodity prices will usually reset to a lower level.
* A [[sector rotation]] in the stock market, specifically strong shifts in investment from leading more volatile sectors like consumer cyclicals and consumer discretionary (as well as e.g. biotechnology) to more stable sectors such as utilities and consumer staples (as well as e.g. telecommunications) can signal increasing market uncertainty and that a recession is on the horizon.<ref name="auto3"/>
* Lowering of asset prices, such as homes and financial assets, or high personal and corporate debt levels.
* Significant declines in stock prices can reflect investor pessimism about future economic conditions and can be a leading indicator of a recession.
* [[VIX|Volatility Index (VIX)]] measuring of stock market volatility. A high VIX indicates increased market stress, which can precede economic downturns.

Gross Domestic Product:
* [[Gross domestic product|GDP]] contraction: The GDP measures a country's economic output, all goods and services a country produces. GDP provides a good insight into what has already been taking place in the economy. A contraction in GDP, especially if it occurs for two consecutive quarters,<ref name="auto"/> is a strong indicator of a recession as it reflects reduced economic activity, lower consumer demand, and decreased employment.
* [[List of countries by real GDP per capita growth|GDP per capita contraction]]<ref name="r327">{{cite journal | last1=Dwyer | first1=Gerald P. | last2=Devereux | first2=John | last3=Baier | first3=Scott | last4=Tamura | first4=Robert | title=Recessions, growth and banking crises | journal=Journal of International Money and Finance | volume=38 | date=2013 | doi=10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.05.009 | pages=18–40}}</ref>
* The Atlanta Fed offers a GDPnow model, which estimates changes in real GDP growth by aggregating 13 subcomponents that make up GDP. GDPnow can provide a timelier gauge of the current state of the economy.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.atlantafed.org/cqer/research/gdpnow|title=GDPNow - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta|date=10 August 2024|website=The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta}}</ref>

Unorthodox Recession Indicators:
* Sausage sales: Heightened appetites for sausages might be a harbinger of a looming economic downturn, because sausages are a cheaper protein substitute for other higher-priced meat products,<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.dallasfed.org/research/surveys/tmos/2024/2408#tab-comments | title = Texas Manufacturing Outlook Survey - Comments from survey respondents |website=The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas | date=26 August 2024 | access-date=29 August 2024 | archive-date=29 August 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240829115924/https://www.dallasfed.org/research/surveys/tmos/2024/2408#tab-comments|url-status=live}}</ref> a reaction by shoppers when times are tough experts call the "trade down."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/26/increased-sausage-demand-could-be-worrying-signal-on-the-economy.html|title=Increased sausage demand could be worrying signal on the economy|first=Alex|last=Harring|newspaper=CNBC|date=26 August 2024|access-date=29 August 2024|archive-date=29 August 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240829144239/https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/26/increased-sausage-demand-could-be-worrying-signal-on-the-economy.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.ft.com/content/325487cd-d771-451e-9e8e-93a6176d93d9|title=The latest US recession indicator just dropped — and it's a banger (Prepare for the wurst)|first=Louis|last=Ashworth|newspaper=Financial Times|date=27 August 2024|access-date=29 August 2024|archive-date=29 August 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240829150055/https://www.ft.com/content/325487cd-d771-451e-9e8e-93a6176d93d9}}</ref>
* Plunging underwear sales: During the [[2008 financial crisis]], men's underwear sales dropped significantly, mirroring reduced consumer spending and causing former Federal Reserve head [[Alan Greenspan]] to see men's underwear as a key economic predictor.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2022/03/26/economy/recession-underwear-alan-greenspan/index.html|title=Is a recession coming? Alan Greenspan says the answer is in men's underwear|first=Nicole|last=Goodkind|newspaper=CNN|date=26 March 2022|access-date=29 August 2024|archive-date=29 August 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240829122918/https://edition.cnn.com/2022/03/26/economy/recession-underwear-alan-greenspan/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref>

Overview of recession indicators:
* [[Index of Leading Indicators|Index of Leading (Economic) Indicators (LEI)]] (includes some of the above indicators).<ref>[http://seekingalpha.com/article/60871-leading-economic-indicators-suggest-u-s-in-recession Leading Economic Indicators Suggest U.S. In Recession] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090706061913/http://seekingalpha.com/article/60871-leading-economic-indicators-suggest-u-s-in-recession |date=6 July 2009 }} 21 January 2008</ref> The LEI's lead time is six to seven months.<ref name="auto7"/> The Conference Board's leading index is highly accurate in the near term, one to three months ahead (accomplishing an AUC value of 0.97).<ref name="auto10"/>
* [https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/mb201105%20focus06.en.pdf Euro Area Leading Indicator (ALI)], research indicates that the ALI can lead turning points in the business cycle by approximately five to six months.
* The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas posts the [https://www.dallasfed.org/~/media/documents/research/swe/1988/swe8801c.pdf Texas Index of Leading Economic Indicators]. This index contains the real oil price, well permits, initial claims for unemployment insurance, Texas stock index, help-wanted index and average weekly hours worked in manufacturing.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dallasfed.org/research/econdata/tli|title=Texas Leading Index|date=22 August 2024|website=Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas|access-date=22 August 2024}}</ref>
* The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago posts updates of the Brave-Butters-Kelley Indexes (BBKI).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.chicagofed.org/publications/chicago-fed-letter/2019/422|title=A 'Big Data' View of the U.S. Economy: Introducing the Brave-Butters-Kelley Indexes – Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago|website=chicagofed.org|access-date=6 May 2020|archive-date=28 May 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200528213016/https://www.chicagofed.org/publications/chicago-fed-letter/2019/422|url-status=live}}</ref>
* The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis posts the Weekly Economic Index (Lewis-Mertens-Stock) (WEI).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WEI|title=Weekly Economic Index (Lewis-Mertens-Stock)|date=5 January 2008|website=FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis|access-date=19 July 2021|archive-date=19 July 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210719173850/https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WEI|url-status=live}}</ref>
* The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis posts the Smoothed U.S. Recession Probabilities (RECPROUSM156N).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RECPROUSM156N|title=Smoothed U.S. Recession Probabilities|date=1 February 1967|website=FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis|access-date=6 May 2020|archive-date=2 May 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200502191643/https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RECPROUSM156N|url-status=live}}</ref>
* The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago's National Financial Conditions Index (NFCI) and its nonfinancial leverage subindex can be used as leading indicators to predict a recession.<ref name="auto10"/><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/NFCI|title=Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index (NFCI)|date=7 August 2024|website=FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis}}</ref>
* The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago developed the ROC Threshold Index (ROC means receiver operating characteristic). It combines multiple leading indicators to predict recessions. It has shown better predictive ability than individual indicators up to 11 months ahead. And it also significantly outperformed other measures at leading recession forecasts with a range of six to nine months in advance.<ref name="auto10"/>
* The [[inverted yield curve]],<ref>{{Cite periodical |title=2020 Recession Signals, After US-Iran Airstrike. Vanguard ETF Best Performing Funds for 2020|first=Jeffrey|last=Ulatan|date=3 July 2020|magazine=Harvard Dataverse |doi=10.7910/DVN/AWWQPN |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>[https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB116821099838669658?mod=mostpop Grading Bonds on Inverted Curve] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190507212152/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB116821099838669658?mod=mostpop |date=7 May 2019 }} By Michael Hudson</ref> the model developed by economist Jonathan H. Wright, uses yields on 10-year and three-month Treasury securities as well as the [[Federal funds rate|Fed's overnight funds rate]].<ref>Wright, Jonathan H., [http://ssrn.com/abstract=899538 The Yield Curve and Predicting Recessions] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200728104135/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=899538 |date=28 July 2020 }} (March 2006). FEDs Working Paper No. 2006-7.</ref> Another model developed by [[Federal Reserve Bank of New York]] economists uses only the 10-year/three-month spread.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Yield Curve as a Leading Indicator |website=newyorkfed.org |publisher=Federal Reserve Bank of New York|url=https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/capital_markets/ycfaq.html#/interactive |year=2020 |access-date=20 March 2020 |archive-date=14 May 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170514111437/https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/capital_markets/ycfaq.html#/interactive |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Park Simar Zelenyuk 2019 pp. 379–392">{{cite journal | last1=Park | first1=Byeong U. | last2=Simar | first2=Léopold | last3=Zelenyuk | first3=Valentin | title=Forecasting of recessions via dynamic probit for time series: replication and extension of Kauppi and Saikkonen (2008) | journal=Empirical Economics | publisher=Springer Science and Business Media LLC | volume=58 | issue=1 | date=2019-05-15 | issn=0377-7332 | doi=10.1007/s00181-019-01708-2 | pages=379–392| s2cid=253717746 | url=https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/fr/object/boreal%3A196164/datastream/PDF_01/view }}</ref><ref>[https://honors.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/1003] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200319044533/https://honors.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/1003|date=19 March 2020}} Using the U.S. Treasury Yield Curve to predict S&P 500 returns and U.S. recessions | Theodore Gregory Hanks | Pennsylvania State University, Schreyer Honors College Department of Finance | Spring 2012</ref> The Estrella and Mishkin model is a well-known approach for predicting U.S. recessions. This model primarily uses the yield curve, specifically the spread between long-term and short-term interest rates, as a predictor. This method has been widely adopted and is considered robust. The model, developed by economists Arturo Estrella and [[Frederic Mishkin]], uses the difference between the yields on 10-year Treasury bonds and 3-month Treasury bills, as detailed in their research papers and working papers for the [[National Bureau of Economic Research]]. Their models estimate the 12-month-ahead recession probabilities using the term spread. This yield curve spread has been found to be a valuable forecasting tool, outperforming other financial and macroeconomic indicators in predicting recessions two to six quarters ahead.<ref>{{cite journal| last1=Estrella | first1=Arturo | last2=Mishkin | first2=Frederic S. |date=June 1996|title=The Yield Curve as a Predictor of U.S. Recessions| journal=The Federal Reserve Bank of New York|url=https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/current_issues/ci2-7.html|language=en}}</ref> An inversion of this yield curve has been successful in predicting past recessions, including those in 1973-75, and 1981-82. The Estrella and Mishkin model later also successfully predicted the recessions in the early 2000s, and the [[Great Recession]] of 2007-2009. Moreover, a negative spread has historically preceded each U.S. recession since the 1950s, according to The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
* The three-month change in the [[Unemployment rate in the U.S.|unemployment rate]] and initial jobless claims.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2008/01/28/labor-model-predicts-lower-recession-odds/ |title=Labor Model Predicts Lower Recession Odds |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=28 January 2008 |access-date=29 January 2011 |archive-date=19 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200819160832/https://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2008/01/28/labor-model-predicts-lower-recession-odds/ |url-status=live }}</ref> U.S. unemployment index is defined as the difference between the 3-month average of the [[Unemployment rate in the U.S.|unemployment rate]] and the 12-month minimum of the unemployment rate.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.hamiltonproject.org/assets/files/Sahm_web_20190506.pdf|title=Direct Stimulus Payments to Individuals|last=Sahm|first=Claudia|date=6 May 2019|website=[[Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System]]|access-date=25 August 2019|archive-date=31 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200331235146/https://www.hamiltonproject.org/assets/files/Sahm_web_20190506.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Unemployment momentum and acceleration with Hidden Markov model.<ref>{{cite SSRN|last=Lihn|first=Stephen H. T.|date=10 August 2019|title=Real-time Recession Probability with Hidden Markov Model and Unemployment Momentum|language=en |ssrn=3435667}}</ref>
* The [[Sahm rule|Sahm Recession Indicator]], named after economist [[Claudia Sahm]], was published in October 2019 by the [[Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis|St. Louis Federal Reserve]] bank's [[Federal Reserve Economic Data]] (FRED). It is defined as: {{blockquote|Sahm Recession Indicator signals the start of a recession when the three-month [[moving average]] of the national unemployment rate (U3) rises by 0.50 percentage points or more relative to its low during the previous 12 months.<ref>{{cite news |title=Sahm Rule Recession Indicator |url=https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SAHMCURRENT |publisher=[[Federal Reserve Economic Data]]|quote=Sahm Recession Indicator signals the start of a recession when the three-month moving average of the national unemployment rate (U3) rises by 0.50 percentage points or more relative to the minimum of the three-month averages from the previous 12 months}}</ref>}}

==Government responses==

{{See also|Stabilization policy}}
[[Keynesian economics|Keynesian economists]] favor the use of expansionary macroeconomic policy during recessions to increase [[aggregate demand]].<ref name="StiglitzOcampo2008">{{cite book |editor1-last=Stiglitz |editor1-first=Joseph E. |editor2-last=Ocampo |editor2-first=José Antonio |title=Capital Market Liberalization and Development |year=2008 |publisher=OUP Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-923058-7 |page=360 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=u8OTK5cIOSoC&pg=PA360}}</ref><ref name="Ahuja2019">{{cite book |last1=Ahuja |first1=H.L. |title=Macroeconomics, 20e |date=2019 |publisher=S. Chand Publishing |isbn=978-93-5283-732-8 |page=527 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7psGEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA527 |chapter=Monetarism and Friedman's Restatement of Quantity Theory of Money}}</ref><ref name="Thornton2018">{{cite book |last1=Thornton |first1=Saranna |title=Bucking The Deficit: Economic Policymaking In America |date=2018 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-429-97052-8 |page=30 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jwHFDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA30}}</ref><ref name="Mason2020">{{cite book |last1=Mason |first1=J.W |editor1-last=MacLean |editor1-first=Brian K. |editor2-last=Bougrine |editor2-first=Hassan |editor3-last=Rochon |editor3-first=Louis-Philippe |title=Aggregate Demand and Employment: International Perspectives |date=2020 |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |isbn=978-1-78643-205-6 |chapter-url=https://www.elgaronline.com/downloadpdf/edcoll/9781786432049/9781786432049.00009.xml |chapter=Chapter 1: Macroeconomic lessons from the past decade |page=29}}</ref> Strategies favored for moving an economy out of a recession vary depending on which economic school the policymakers follow. [[Monetarism|Monetarists]], exemplified by economist [[Milton Friedman]], would favor the use of [[Friedman's k-percent rule|limited]] expansionary [[monetary policy]], while [[Keynesian]] economists may advocate increased [[government spending]] to spark economic growth. [[Supply-side]] economists promote tax cuts to stimulate business [[capital (economics)|capital]] investment. For example, the Trump administration claimed that lower effective tax rates on new investment imposed by the [[Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017]] would raise investment, thereby making workers more productive and raising output and wages. Investment patterns in the United States through 2019, however, indicated that the supply-side incentives of the TCJA had little effect on investment growth. Although investments increased after 2017, much of the increase was a response to oil prices, and investment in other sectors had negligible growth.<ref name="GaleHaldeman2021">{{cite web |last1=Gale |first1=William G. |last2=Haldeman |first2=Claire |title=Searching for supply-side effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act |url=https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/20210628_TPC_GaleHaldeman_TCJASupplySideEffectsReport_FINAL.pdf |website=Brookings |access-date=5 August 2022 |date=6 July 2021 |pages=3–4}}</ref>

Monetarist economists have argued that objectives of monetary policy, i.e., controlling the money supply to influence interest rates, are best achieved by targeting the growth rate of the money supply. They maintain that money may affect output in the short term but that in the long run, expansionary monetary policy leads to inflation only. Keynesian economists have mostly adopted this analysis, modifying the theory with better integration of short and long run trends and an understanding that a change in the money supply "affects only nominal variables in the economy, such as prices and wages, and has no effect on real variables, like employment and output".<ref name="JahanMahmudPapageorgiou2014">{{cite journal |last1=Jahan |first1=Sarwat |last2=Mahmud |first2=Ahmed Saber |last3=Papageorgiou |first3=Chris |title=What Is Keynesian Economics? – Back to Basics |journal=Finance & Development |date=September 2014 |volume=51 |issue=1 |page=54 |url=https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2014/09/pdf/basics.pdf}}</ref><ref name="JahanPapageorgiou2014">{{cite journal |last1=Jahan |first1=Sarwat |last2=Papageorgiou |first2=Chris |title=What Is Monetarism? – Back to Basics  |journal=Finance and Development |date=March 2014 |volume=51 |issue=1 |page=38 |url=https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2014/03/pdf/basics.pdf}}</ref> The Federal Reserve traditionally uses monetary accommodation, a policy instrument of lowering its main benchmark interest rate, to accommodate sudden supply-side shifts in the economy. When the [[federal funds rate]] reaches the boundary of an interest rate of 0%, called the [[zero lower bound]], the government resorts to unconventional monetary policy to stimulate recovery.<ref name="Skaperdas2017">{{cite web |last1=Skaperdas |first1=Arsenios |title=How Effective is Monetary Policy at the Zero Lower Bound? Identification Through Industry Heterogeneity |url=https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/files/2017073pap.pdf |pages=2–3 |date=7 July 2017}}</ref>

Gauti B. Eggertsson of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, using a [[New Keynesian economics|New Keynesian]] macroeconomic [[Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium|model]] for policy analysis, writes that cutting taxes on labor or capital is contractionary under certain circumstances, such as those that prevailed following the economic crisis of 2008, and that temporarily increasing government spending at such times has much larger effects than under normal conditions. He says other forms of tax cuts, such as a reduction in sales taxes and investment tax credits, e.g., in the context of Japan's "Great Recession", are also very effective. Eggertsson infers from his analysis that the contractionary effects of labor and capital tax cuts, and the strong expansionary effect of government spending, are peculiar to the unusual environment created by zero interest rates. He asserts that with positive interest rates a labor tax cut is expansionary, per the established literature, but at zero interest rates, it reverses and tax cuts become contractionary. Further, while capital tax cuts are inconsequential in his model with a positive interest rate, they become strongly negative at zero, and the multiplier of government spending is then almost five times larger.<ref name="Eggertsson2011">{{cite journal |last1=Eggertsson |first1=Gauti B. |title=What Fiscal Policy Is Effective at Zero Interest Rates? |journal=NBER Macroeconomics Annual |date=1 January 2011 |volume=25 |pages=59–60 |doi=10.1086/657529 |hdl=10419/60825 |s2cid=16071568 |url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/657529 |issn=0889-3365|hdl-access=free }}</ref>

[[Paul Krugman]] wrote in December 2010 that significant, sustained government spending was necessary because [[household debt|indebted households]] were paying down debts and unable to carry the U.S. economy as they had previously: "The root of our current troubles lies in the debt American families ran up during the Bush-era housing bubble...highly indebted Americans not only can't spend the way they used to, they're having to pay down the debts they ran up in the bubble years. This would be fine if someone else were taking up the slack. But what's actually happening is that some people are spending much less while nobody is spending more—and this translates into a depressed economy and high unemployment. What the government should be doing in this situation is spending more while the private sector is spending less, supporting employment while those debts are paid down. And this government spending needs to be sustained..."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/13/opinion/13krugman.html|title=Opinion – Block Those Economic Metaphors|first=Paul|last=Krugman|newspaper=The New York Times|date=13 December 2010|access-date=26 November 2018|archive-date=20 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190820122049/https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/13/opinion/13krugman.html|url-status=live}}</ref>

[[John Maynard Keynes]] believed that government institutions could stimulate aggregate demand in a crisis.<ref name="Nayak2009">{{cite journal |last1=Nayak |first1=Pulin B. |title=Anatomy of the Financial Crisis: Between Keynes and Schumpeter |journal=Economic and Political Weekly |year=2009 |volume=44 |issue=13 |page=160 |jstor=40278675 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40278675 |issn=0012-9976}}</ref>

==Stock market==

Some recessions have been anticipated by stock market declines. In ''[[Stocks for the Long Run]]'', Siegel mentions that since 1948, ten recessions were preceded by a stock market decline, by a lead time of 0 to 13 months (average 5.7 months), while ten stock market declines of greater than 10% in the [[Dow Jones Industrial Average]] were not followed by a recession.<ref>Siegel, Jeremy J. (2002). ''Stocks for the Long Run: The Definitive Guide to Financial Market Returns and Long-Term Investment Strategies'', 3rd, New York: McGraw-Hill, 388. {{ISBN|978-0-07-137048-6}}</ref>

The [[real estate]] market also usually weakens before a recession.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://lvrg.org.au/blog/2009/06/from-subprime-to-terrigenous-recession.html |title=From the subprime to the terrigenous: Recession begins at home |publisher=Land Values Research Group |date=2 June 2009 |quote=A downturn in the property market, especially in turnover (sales) of properties, is a ''leading'' indicator of recession, with a lead time of up to 9 quarters... |access-date=16 June 2009 |archive-date=12 June 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090612043622/http://lvrg.org.au/blog/2009/06/from-subprime-to-terrigenous-recession.html |url-status=live }}</ref> However, real estate declines can last much longer than recessions.<ref>{{cite news |first=Robert J. |last=Shiller |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/07/business/economy/07view.html |title=Why Home Prices May Keep Falling |work=The New York Times |date=6 June 2009 |access-date=10 April 2010 |archive-date=3 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200703072950/https://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/07/business/economy/07view.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

Since the business cycle is very hard to predict, Siegel has argued that it is not possible to take advantage of economic cycles for timing investments. Even the [[National Bureau of Economic Research]] (NBER) takes a few months to determine if a peak or trough has occurred in the US.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/10/AR2007121001589.html |title=Recession Predictions and Investment Decisions |first=Allan |last=Sloan |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=11 December 2007 |access-date=10 September 2017 |archive-date=28 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200728104140/https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/10/AR2007121001589.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

==Consequences==

===Unemployment===

Unemployment is particularly high during a recession. Many economists working within the [[Neoclassical economics|neoclassical paradigm]] argue that there is a [[natural rate of unemployment]] which, when subtracted from the actual rate of unemployment, can be used to estimate the [[Output gap|GDP gap]] during a recession. In other words, unemployment never reaches 0%, so it is not a negative indicator of the health of an economy, unless it exceeds the "natural rate", in which case the excess corresponds directly to a loss in the GDP.<ref>[http://www.saylor.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SAYLOR.ORG-ECON102-UNEMPLOYMENT-RATE.pdf  Unemployment Rate] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120912143304/http://www.saylor.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SAYLOR.ORG-ECON102-UNEMPLOYMENT-RATE.pdf |date=12 September 2012 }} p. 1. The Saylor Foundation. Retrieved 20 June 2012.</ref>

The full impact of a recession on employment may not be felt for several quarters. After recessions in Britain in the 1980s and 1990s, it took five years for unemployment to fall back to its original levels.<ref name="ESRC">{{cite web | url=http://www.esrc.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/PO/releases/2009/september/recessionbritain.aspx | title=Recession Britain: New ESRC report on the impact of recession on people's jobs, businesses and daily lives | publisher=Economic and Social Research Council | date=17 September 2009 | access-date=22 January 2010 | last=Vaitilingam | first=Romesh | url-status=dead | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100102162049/https://www.esrc.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/PO/releases/2009/september/recessionbritain.aspx | archive-date=2 January 2010 }}</ref> Employment discrimination claims rise during a recession.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/12/business/12bias.html?ref=business|title=More Workers Complain of Bias on the Job, a Trend Linked to Widespread Layoffs|work=The New York Times|first=Catherine|last=Rampell|date=11 January 2011|access-date=7 February 2017|archive-date=23 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160723010843/http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/12/business/12bias.html?ref=business|url-status=live}}</ref>

===Business===

[[Productivity]] tends to fall in the early stages of a recession, then rises again as weaker firms close. The variation in [[Profit (accounting)|profitability]] between firms rises sharply.{{citation needed|date=August 2022}} The fall in productivity could also be attributed to several macro-economic factors, such as the loss in productivity observed across the UK due to [[Brexit]], which may create a mini-recession in the region. [[Pandemic|Global epidemics]], such as [[Coronavirus disease 2019|COVID-19]], could be another example, since they disrupt the global supply chain or prevent the movement of goods, services, and people.

Recessions have also provided opportunities for [[anti-competitive]] [[merger]]s, with a negative impact on the wider economy; the suspension of [[competition policy]] in the United States in the 1930s may have extended the Great Depression.<ref name="ESRC" />

===Social effects===

The [[living standards]] of people dependent on wages and [[salaries]] are more affected by recessions than those who rely on [[fixed income]]s or [[welfare benefits]]. The loss of a job has a negative impact on the stability of families, and individuals' health and well-being.<ref name="ESRC"/>

==History==

===Global===

{{main|Global recession}}
According to the [[International Monetary Fund]] (IMF), "Global recessions seem to occur over a cycle lasting between eight and 10 years."<ref name="IMF2002 recession statement">[http://www.imf.org/external/np/vc/2002/040502.htm The Recession that Almost Was.] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081212032611/http://www.imf.org/external/np/vc/2002/040502.htm |date=12 December 2008 }} Kenneth Rogoff, International Monetary Fund, Financial Times, 5 April 2002</ref> The IMF takes many factors into account when defining a global recession. Until April 2009, IMF several times communicated to the press, that a global annual [[real GDP]] growth of 3.0% or less in their view was "equivalent to a global recession".<ref name="economist-12381879">{{cite news |url=https://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12381879 |title=The world economy Bad, or worse |newspaper=The Economist |date=9 October 2008 |access-date=15 April 2009 |archive-date=21 February 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090221121619/http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12381879 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>Lall, Subir.  International Monetary Fund, 9 April 2008. [http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2008/RES040908A.htm "IMF Predicts Slower World Growth Amid Serious Market Crisis"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090228204137/http://imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2008/RES040908A.htm |date=28 February 2009 }}</ref>

By this measure, six periods since 1970 qualify: 1974–1975,<ref name="IMF0901">[https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2016/12/31/Global-Economic-Slump-Challenges-Policies Global Economic Slump Challenges Policies] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200109000117/https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2016/12/31/Global-Economic-Slump-Challenges-Policies |date=9 January 2020 }} IMF. January 2009.</ref> 1980–1983,<ref name="IMF0901"/> 1990–1993,<ref name="IMF0901"/><ref name="b1">{{cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=arlKrFbn3pfY&refer=home |title=Global Recession Risk Grows as U.S. "Damage" Spreads. Jan 2008 |publisher=Bloomberg L.P. |date=28 January 2008 |access-date=15 April 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100321154128/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087 |archive-date=21 March 2010 }}</ref> 1998,<ref name="IMF0901"/><ref name="b1"/> 2001–2002,<ref name="IMF0901"/><ref name="b1"/> and 2008–2009.<ref name="IMF1301">{{cite web|url=http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/01/pdf/tables.pdf|title=World Economic Outlook (WEO) April 2013: Statistical appendix – Table A1 – Summary of World Output|publisher=IMF|date=16 April 2013|access-date=16 April 2013|archive-date=25 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130525084203/http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/01/pdf/tables.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> During what IMF in April 2002 termed the past three global recessions of the last three decades, global per capita output growth was zero or negative, and IMF argued—at that time—that because of the opposite being found for 2001, the economic state in this year by itself did not qualify as a ''global recession''.<ref name="IMF2002 recession statement"/>

In April 2009, IMF had changed their Global recession definition to "A decline in annual per{{nbhyph}}capita real World GDP (purchasing power parity weighted), backed up by a decline or worsening for one or more of the seven other global macroeconomic indicators: Industrial production, trade, capital flows, oil consumption, unemployment rate, per{{nbhyph}}capita investment, and per{{nbhyph}}capita consumption."<ref name="New IMF Global Recession definition">{{cite news|url=https://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/04/22/whats-a-global-recession/|title=What's a Global Recession?|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|date=22 April 2009|access-date=17 September 2013|first=Bob|last=Davis|archive-date=28 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190228002745/https://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/04/22/whats-a-global-recession/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="IMF WEO 2009">{{cite web|url=http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2009/01/pdf/text.pdf|title=World Economic Outlook – April 2009: Crisis and Recovery|work=Box 1.1 (pp. 11–14)|publisher=IMF|date=24 April 2009|access-date=17 September 2013|archive-date=31 December 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101231195910/http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2009/01/pdf/text.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> By this new definition, a total of four global recessions took place since [[World War II]]: 1975, 1982, 1991 and 2009. All of them only lasted one year, although the third would have lasted three years (1991–1993) if IMF as criteria had used the normal exchange rate weighted per{{nbhyph}}capita real World GDP rather than the purchase power parity weighted per{{nbhyph}}capita real World GDP.<ref name="New IMF Global Recession definition"/><ref name="IMF WEO 2009"/>

===Australia===

As a result of late 1920s profit issues in agriculture and cutbacks, 1931–1932 saw Australia's biggest recession in its entire history. It fared better than other nations that underwent [[depression (economics)|depressions]], but their poor economic states influenced Australia, which depended on them for export, as well as [[foreign investments]]. The nation also benefited from greater productivity in manufacturing, facilitated by trade protection, which also helped with lessening the effects.

The economy had gone into a brief recession in 1961 because of a credit squeeze. Australia was facing a rising level of [[inflation]] in 1973, caused partially by the oil crisis happening in that same year, which brought inflation at a 13% increase. Economic recession hit by the middle of the year 1974, with no change in policy enacted by the government as a measure to counter the economic situation of the country. Consequently, the unemployment level rose and the trade deficit increased significantly.<ref>{{citation | title = Australian Economic Indicators | publisher = Australian Bureau of Statistics | date = 27 February 1998 | url = http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/90a12181d877a6a6ca2568b5007b861c/d4a22ad91e0348bfca256fd3007baf93!OpenDocument | access-date = 11 August 2015 | archive-date = 16 October 2015 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151016030017/http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/90a12181d877a6a6ca2568b5007b861c/d4a22ad91e0348bfca256fd3007baf93!OpenDocument | url-status = live }}</ref>

Another recession came at the beginning of the 1990s as the result of a major stock collapse in October 1987,<ref>{{citation | title=Reasons for 1990s Recession | work=The Age | date=2 December 2006 | url=http://www.theage.com.au/news/business/the-real-reasons-why-it-was-the-1990s-recession-we-had-to-have/2006/12/01/1164777791623.html?page=3 | location=Melbourne | access-date=11 August 2015 | archive-date=12 April 2014 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140412054240/http://www.theage.com.au/news/business/the-real-reasons-why-it-was-the-1990s-recession-we-had-to-have/2006/12/01/1164777791623.html?page=3 | url-status=dead }}</ref> referred to now as [[Black Monday (1987)|Black Monday]]. Although the collapse was larger than the one in 1929, the global economy recovered quickly, but North America still suffered a decline in lumbering savings and loans, which led to a crisis. The recession was not limited to the United States, but it also affected partnering nations such as Australia. The unemployment level increased to 10.8%, employment declined by 3.4% and the GDP also decreased as much as 1.7%. Inflation, however, was successfully reduced.

Australia next went into recession in March 2020, due to the impact of huge bush fires and the COVID-19 pandemic's effect on tourism and other important aspects of the economy.<ref>{{citation | title = Australian Recession | publisher = Australian Broadcasting Corporation |first=Michael |last=Janda | date = 3 June 2020 | url = https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-03/australian-economy-gdp-recession-march-quarter-2020/12315140 | access-date = 3 June 2020 | archive-date = 3 June 2020 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200603105733/https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-03/australian-economy-gdp-recession-march-quarter-2020/12315140 | url-status = live }}</ref> This recession, while steep, only lasted until May 2020.

===European Union===

The [[Eurozone]] experienced a recession in 2012: the economies of the 17-nation region failed to grow during any quarter of the 2012 calendar year. The recession deepened during the final quarter of the year, with the [[French economy|French]], [[German economy|German]] and [[Italian economy|Italian]] economies all affected.<ref>{{cite web | title=Eurozone recession deepened at end of 2012 | website=BBC News | date=2013-02-14 | url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21455423 }}</ref>

===United Kingdom===

{{Main|List of recessions in the United Kingdom}}
The most recent recession to affect the United Kingdom was the 2020 recession<ref>{{cite web |title=UK officially in recession for first time in 11 years |publisher=The BBC |date=12 August 2020 |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-53748278 |access-date=23 May 2022 |archive-date=12 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200812062202/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-53748278 | url-status=live }}</ref> attributed to the [[Coronavirus disease 2019|COVID-19]] global pandemic, the first recession since the [[Great Recession]].

===United States===

{{Main|List of recessions in the United States}}
[[File:Recessions in the United States — 1930 through 2021.png|thumb|Recessions in the United States – 1930 through 2021|350px]]
[[File:FFR treasuries.webp|thumb|350px|right|[[Inverted yield curve]]s correlation to recessions
{{legend-line|#F5A623 solid 3px|[[Mortgage loan|30 year mortgage average]]}}
{{legend-line|#F8E71C solid 3px|[[treasury bond|30 Year Treasury Bond]]}}
{{legend-line|#000000 solid 3px|10 Year Treasury Bond}}
{{legend-line|#9013FE solid 3px|2 Year Treasury Bond}}
{{legend-line|#4A90E2 solid 3px|3 month Treasury Bond}}
{{legend-line|#D0021B solid 4px|Effective Federal Funds Rate}}
{{legend-line|#E786F9 solid 4px|[[United States Consumer Price Index|CPI inflation]] year/year}}
{{color box|lightgrey}} [[List of recessions in the United States|Recessions]]
]]
According to economists, since 1854, the U.S. has encountered 32 cycles of expansions and contractions, with an average of 17 months of contraction and 38 months of expansion.<ref name="nber.org" /> From 1980 to 2018 there were only eight periods of negative economic growth over one fiscal quarter or more,<ref name="autogenerated1">{{cite web|url=https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xls|title=Percent change from preceding period|publisher=U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)|access-date=26 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180814045606/https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xls|archive-date=14 August 2018|url-status=dead}}</ref> and four periods considered recessions:
* [[Early 1980s recession|July 1981 – November 1982]]: 15 months
* [[Early 1990s recession|July 1990 – March 1991]]: 8 months
* [[Early 2000s recession|March 2001 – November 2001]]: 8 months
* [[Great Recession|December 2007 – June 2009]]: 18 months<ref>{{cite news |last=Isidore |first=Chris |url=https://money.cnn.com/2008/12/01/news/economy/recession/index.htm?postversion=2008120112 |title=It's official: Recession since Dec. '07 |publisher=CNN |date=1 December 2008 |access-date=29 January 2011 |archive-date=14 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814113557/https://money.cnn.com/2008/12/01/news/economy/recession/index.htm?postversion=2008120112 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8332773.stm|title= US economy out of recession|date=29 October 2009|publisher=BBC News – Business|access-date=6 February 2010|archive-date=28 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200728104138/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8332773.stm|url-status=live}}</ref>

For the last three of these recessions, the NBER decision has approximately conformed with the definition involving two consecutive quarters of decline. While the 2001 recession did not involve two consecutive quarters of decline, it was preceded by two quarters of alternating decline and weak growth.<ref name="autogenerated1" />

Since then, the NBER has also declared a 2-month [[COVID-19 recession]] for February 2020 – April 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nber.org/news/business-cycle-dating-committee-announcement-july-19-2021|title=Business Cycle Dating Committee Announcement July 19, 2021|website=NBER|date=19 July 2021 |access-date=19 July 2021|archive-date=26 April 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220426170943/https://www.nber.org/news/business-cycle-dating-committee-announcement-july-19-2021|url-status=live}}</ref>

NBER has sometimes declared a recession before a second quarter of GDP shrinkage has been reported, but beginnings and endings can also be declared over a year after they are reckoned to have occurred. In 1947, NBER did not declare a recession despite two quarters of declining GDP, due to strong economic activity reported for employment, industrial production, and consumer spending.<ref>{{cite news |title=What two negative GDP quarters means for 'recession' – and our politics |first=Aaron |last=Blake |date=July 28, 2022 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref>

An administration generally gets credit or blame for the state of the economy during its time in office;<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7215351.stm |title=Economy puts Republicans at risk |date=29 January 2008 |publisher=BBC |access-date=8 March 2008 |archive-date=2 February 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080202054357/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7215351.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> this state of affairs has caused disagreements about how particular recessions actually started.<ref>[http://budget.senate.gov/democratic/press/2003/fs_bushrecession073103.pdf The Bush Recession] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110204065202/http://budget.senate.gov/democratic/press/2003/fs_bushrecession073103.pdf |date=4 February 2011 }} Prepared by: Democratic staff, [[Senate Budget Committee]], 31 July 2003</ref>

For example, the [[early 1980s recession|1981 recession]] is thought to have been caused by the tight-money policy adopted by [[Paul Volcker]], chairman of the [[Federal Reserve Board of Governors|Federal Reserve Board]], before [[Ronald Reagan]] took office. Reagan supported that policy. Economist [[Walter Heller]], chairman of the [[Council of Economic Advisers]] in the 1960s, said that "I call it a Reagan-Volcker-Carter recession."<ref>{{Cite magazine |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,922689-2,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080423212123/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,922689-2,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=23 April 2008 |title=Ready for a Real Downer |date=23 November 1981 |magazine=Time |first=George J.|last=Church}}</ref>

===Late 2000s===

{{Main|Great Recession}}
Official economic data shows that a substantial number of nations were in recession as of early 2009. The US entered a recession at the end of 2007,<ref name="nber">{{cite web|url=https://www.nber.org/cycles/dec2008.pdf|title=Determination of the December 2007 Peak in Economic Activity.|date=11 December 2008|publisher=NBER Business Cycle Dating Committee|access-date=26 April 2009|archive-date=19 April 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090419133834/http://www.nber.org/cycles/dec2008.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> and 2008 saw many other nations follow suit. The US recession of 2007 ended in June 2009<ref>{{cite news | url=https://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/09/20/nber-recession-ended-in-june-2009/ | work=The Wall Street Journal | first=Phil | last=Izzo | title=Recession Over in June 2009 | date=20 September 2010 | access-date=4 August 2017 | archive-date=7 December 2017 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171207134037/https://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/09/20/nber-recession-ended-in-june-2009/ | url-status=live }}</ref> as the nation entered the current economic recovery. The [[timeline of the Great Recession]] details the many elements of this period.

====United States====

The [[United States housing market correction]] (a consequence of the [[United States housing bubble]]) and [[subprime mortgage crisis]] significantly contributed to a recession.

The [[Great Recession in the United States|2007–2009 recession]] saw private consumption fall for the first time in nearly 20 years. This indicated the depth and severity of the recession. With consumer confidence so low, economic recovery took a long time. Consumers in the U.S. were hit hard by the Great Recession, with the value of their houses dropping and their pension savings decimated on the stock market.<ref>[http://www.ibisworld.com/recession2009/ Economic Crisis: When will it End? IBISWorld Recession Briefing "] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514043916/http://www.ibisworld.com/recession2009/ |date=14 May 2011 }} Dr. Richard J. Buczynski and Michael Bright, IBISWorld, January 2009''</ref>

U.S. employers shed 63,000 jobs in February 2008,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/07/business/07cnd-econ.html|title=Employment Falls for Second Month|date=7 March 2008|work=The New York Times|last=Andrews|first=Edmund L.|access-date=10 March 2020|archive-date=11 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190811210042/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/07/business/07cnd-econ.html|url-status=live}}</ref> the most in five years. Former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan said on 6 April 2008 that "There is more than a 50 percent chance the United States could go into recession."<ref>[http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/columnists/article3694545.ece?openComment=true Recession unlikely if US economy gets through next two crucial months] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110812063532/http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/columnists/article3694545.ece?openComment=true |date=12 August 2011 }}</ref> On 1 October, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that an additional 156,000 jobs had been lost in September. On 29 April 2008, [[Moody's]] declared that nine US states were in a recession. In November 2008, employers eliminated 533,000 jobs, the largest single-month loss in 34 years.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/06/business/economy/06jobs.html | work=The New York Times | title=U.S. Loses 533,000 Jobs in Biggest Drop Since 1974 | first1=Louis | last1=Uchitelle | author-link1=Louis Uchitelle | first2=Edmund L. | last2=Andrews | first3=Stephen | last3=Labaton | date=6 December 2008 | access-date=10 April 2010 | archive-date=9 April 2009 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090409050009/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/06/business/economy/06jobs.html | url-status=live }}</ref> In 2008, an estimated 2.6 million U.S. jobs were eliminated.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/business/worldbusiness/09iht-jobs.4.19232394.html|title=U.S. lost 2.6 million jobs in 2008|date=9 January 2009|work=The New York Times|last=Uchitelle|first=Louis|access-date=10 March 2020|archive-date=1 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200301012755/https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/business/worldbusiness/09iht-jobs.4.19232394.html|url-status=live}}</ref>

The [[unemployment rate]] in the U.S. grew to 8.5% in March 2009,<ref>[https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2009/apr/wk1/art01.htm Unemployment rate in March 2009] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806223944/https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2009/apr/wk1/art01.htm |date=6 August 2020 }} 6 April 2009. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved 10 March 2020.</ref> and there were 5.1 million job losses by March 2009 since the recession began in December 2007.<ref>[https://money.cnn.com/2009/04/03/news/economy/jobs_march/index.htm 2 million jobs lost so far in '09] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200111022432/https://money.cnn.com/2009/04/03/news/economy/jobs_march/index.htm |date=11 January 2020 }} CNN/Money. 3 April 2009. Retrieved 10 March 2020.</ref> That was about five million more people unemployed compared to just a year prior,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm |title=Employment Situation Summary |publisher=Bls.gov |date=2 July 2010 |access-date=31 July 2010 |archive-date=6 October 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091006024659/http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> which was the largest annual jump in the number of unemployed persons since the 1940s.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://money.cnn.com/2009/01/09/news/economy/jobs_december/index.htm | publisher=CNN | access-date=10 April 2010 | title=Worst year for jobs since '45 | date=9 January 2009 | first=David | last=Goldman | archive-date=6 October 2013 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131006034714/http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/09/news/economy/jobs_december/index.htm | url-status=live }}</ref>

Although the US economy grew in the first quarter by 1%,<ref>{{cite web |first=Brent |last=Meyer |url=http://www.clevelandfed.org/research//trends/2008/0608/01ecoact.cfm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081005035837/http://www.clevelandfed.org/research/trends/2008/0608/01ecoact.cfm |url-status=dead |archive-date=5 October 2008 |title=Real GDP First-Quarter 2008 Preliminary Estimate :: Brent Meyer :: Economic Trends :: 06.03.08 :: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland |publisher=Clevelandfed.org |date=16 October 2008 |access-date=29 January 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://finance.yahoo.com/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080707072224/http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080626/economy.html?.v=14|url-status=dead|title=Fragile economy improves but not out of woods yet|archive-date=7 July 2008|publisher=Yahoo! Finance}}</ref> by June 2008 some analysts stated that due to a protracted credit crisis and "rampant inflation in commodities such as oil, food, and steel", the country was nonetheless in a recession.<ref>[http://www.newsweek.com/id/140553 Why it's worse than you think] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091001045325/http://www.newsweek.com/id/140553 |date=1 October 2009 }}, 16 June 2008, Newsweek.</ref> The third quarter of 2008 brought on a GDP retraction of 0.5%,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm |title=Gross Domestic Product: Third quarter 2008 |publisher=Bea.gov |access-date=29 January 2011 |archive-date=14 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180814045711/https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> the biggest decline since 2001. The 6.4% decline in spending during Q3 on non-durable goods, like clothing and food, was the largest since 1950.<ref>{{cite news |last=Chandra |first=Shobhana |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aB3KBZXgh.Rk&refer=home |title=U.S. Economy Contracts Most Since the 2001 Recession |publisher=Bloomberg |date=30 October 2008 |access-date=29 January 2011 }}</ref>

A November 2008 report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia based on the survey of 51 forecasters, suggested that the recession started in April 2008 and would last 14 months.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/real-time-center/survey-of-professional-forecasters/2008/survq408.cfm?loc=interstitialskip |title=Fourth quarter 2008 Survey of Professional Forecasters |publisher=Philadelphiafed.org |date=17 November 2008 |access-date=29 January 2011 |archive-date=3 July 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090703093801/http://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/real-time-center/survey-of-professional-forecasters/2008/survq408.cfm?loc=interstitialskip |url-status=dead }}</ref> They projected real GDP declining at an annual rate of 2.9% in the fourth quarter and 1.1% in the first quarter of 2009. These forecasts represented significant downward revisions from the forecasts of three months prior.

A December 2008 report from the National Bureau of Economic Research stated that the U.S. had been in a recession since December 2007, when economic activity peaked, based on several measures including job losses, declines in personal income, and declines in real GDP.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2008-12-01-recession-nber-statement_N.htm |title=Text of the NBER's statement on the recession |work=USA Today |date=1 December 2008 |access-date=29 January 2011 |archive-date=14 November 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101114225424/http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2008-12-01-recession-nber-statement_N.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> By July 2009, a growing number of economists believed that the recession may have ended.<ref>{{cite web | last=Gross | first=Daniel |authorlink=Daniel Gross (journalist) | title=Daniel Gross: The Recession is Over? | website=Newsweek | date=2009-07-13 | url=https://www.newsweek.com/daniel-gross-recession-over-82097 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Keilis-Borok | first1=V. I. | last2=Soloviev | first2=A. A. | last3=Intriligator | first3=M. D. | last4=Winberg | first4=F. E. | title=Pattern of Macroeconomic Indicators Preceding the End of an American Economic Recession | journal=Journal of Pattern Recognition Research | volume=3 | issue=1 | year=2008 | issn=1558-884X | doi=10.13176/11.106 | pages=40–53 |url=http://jprr.org/index.php/jprr/article/viewFile/106/23| url-access=subscription }}</ref> The National Bureau of Economic Research announced on 20 September 2010 that the 2008/2009 recession ended in June 2009, making it the longest recession since World War II.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nber.org/cycles/sept2010.html|title=Business Cycle Dating Committee, National Bureau of Economic Research|website=nber.org|date=20 September 2010 |access-date=26 November 2018|archive-date=2 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210302041430/http://www2.nber.org/cycles/sept2010.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Prior to the start of the recession, it appears that no known formal theoretical or empirical model was able to accurately predict the advance of this recession, except for minor signals in the sudden rise of forecasted probabilities, which were still well under 50%.<ref name="Park Simar Zelenyuk 2019 pp. 379–392" />

==See also==

{{cols|colwidth=21em}}
* [[1991 Indian economic crisis]]
* [[Credit crunch]]
* [[Deflation]]
* [[Depression (economics)|Depression]]
* [[Disinflation]]
* [[Economic collapse]]
* [[Economic stagnation]]
* [[Flooding the market]]
* [[Foreclosure]]
* [[Inventory bounce]]
* [[List of recessions in the United States]]
* [[Overproduction]]
* [[Stagflation]]
* [[Underconsumption]]
* [[COVID-19 recession]]
{{colend}}

==References==

{{Reflist}}

==External links==

{{Library resources box
|by=no
|onlinebooks=no
|others=no
|about=yes
|label=Recession }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Moore |first1=Geoffrey H. |editor-first= David R. |editor-last= Henderson |editor-link= David R. Henderson |encyclopedia=[[Concise Encyclopedia of Economics]] |title=Recessions |url=http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/Recessions.html |year=2002 |edition= 1st |publisher=[[Library of Economics and Liberty]] }} {{OCLC|317650570|50016270|163149563}}
* [https://www.nber.org/cycles/cyclesmain.html Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions] The National Bureau Of Economic Research

{{United States – Commonwealth of Nations recessions}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Recessions| ]]
[[Category:Unemployment]]
[[Category:Business cycle]]

[[de:Konjunktur#Rezession]]