Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Right to a fair trial
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Civil and human right}} {{Criminal procedure (trial)}} A '''fair trial''' is a trial which is "conducted fairly, justly, and with procedural regularity by an impartial judge".<ref>{{Cite web|title=Legal Definition of FAIR TRIAL|url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/legal/fair+trial|access-date=2022-01-05|website=www.merriam-webster.com|language=en}}</ref> Various rights associated with a fair trial are explicitly proclaimed in Article 10 of the [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]], the [[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourth]], [[Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fifth]], [[Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Sixth]], [[Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution|Seventh]], and [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution]], and [[Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights|Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights]]<!-- same as Article 47 of the [[Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union]]? -->, in addition to numerous other constitutions and declarations throughout the world. There is no binding [[international law]] that defines what is not a fair trial; for example, the right to a [[jury trial]] and other important procedures vary from nation to nation.<ref>Doswald-Beck, Louise. [http://www.mpepil.com/sample_article?id=/epil/entries/law-9780199231690-e798&recno=20& Fair Trial, Right to, International Protection], ''Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law''</ref> == Definition in international human rights law == The right to fair trial is very helpful to explore in numerous declarations which represent [[customary international law]], such as the [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]] (UDHR).<ref name="bare_url">{{Cite book| last = Doebbler| first = Curtis| title = Introduction to International Human Rights Law| publisher = CD Publishing| year = 2006| page = 108| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=mQ61oCPJ1GEC&q=right%20to%20fair%20trial&pg=PA108| isbn = 978-0-9743570-2-7 }}</ref> Though the UDHR enshrines some fair trial rights, such as the [[presumption of innocence]] until the accused is proven guilty, in Articles 6, 7, 8 and 11,<ref name="bare_url_b">{{Cite book| last = Alfredsson| first = Gudmundur|author2=Eide, Asbjorn | title = The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: a common standard of achievement| publisher = Martinus Nijhoff Publishers| year = 1999| page = 225 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=FmuoB-BlMvEC| isbn = 978-90-411-1168-5}}</ref> the key provision is Article 10 which states that:<ref>{{Cite web| title = Universal declaration of Human Rights| publisher = United Nations| url = https://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml}}</ref> <blockquote> Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him. </blockquote> Some years after the UDHR was adopted,{{When|date=September 2015}} the right to a fair trial was defined in more detail in the [[International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]] (ICCPR). The right to a fair trial is protected in Articles 14 and 16 of the ICCPR which is binding in international law on those states that are party to it.<ref>{{Cite book| last = Doebbler| first = Curtis| title = Introduction to International Human Rights Law| publisher = CD Publishing| year = 2006| page = 107| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=mQ61oCPJ1GEC&q=right%20to%20fair%20trial&pg=PA108| isbn = 978-0-9743570-2-7 }}</ref> Article 14(1) establishes the basic right to a fair trial, article 14(2) provides for the [[presumption of innocence]], and article 14(3) sets out a list of minimum fair trial rights in criminal proceedings. Article 14(5) establishes the right of a convicted person to have a higher court review the conviction or sentence, and article 14(7) prohibits [[double jeopardy]].<ref>{{Cite book| last = Alfredsson| first = Gudmundur|author2=Eide, Asbjorn | title = The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: a common standard of achievement| publisher = Martinus Nijhoff Publishers| year = 1999| pages = 225β226 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=FmuoB-BlMvEC| isbn = 978-90-411-1168-5}}</ref> Article 14(1) states that:<ref>{{Cite web| title = International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights| publisher = Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights| url = http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/ccpr.htm| url-status = dead| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080705115024/http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/ccpr.htm| archive-date = 2008-07-05}}</ref> <blockquote> All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law. The press and the public may be excluded from all or part of a trial for reasons of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, or when the interest of the private lives of the parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice; but any judgement rendered in a criminal case or in a suit at law shall be made public except where the interest of juvenile persons otherwise requires or the proceedings concern matrimonial disputes or the guardianship of children. </blockquote> ==Geneva Conventions== The [[Geneva Conventions]] (GC) and their Additional Protocols (APs) require that any [[prisoners of war]] facing a judicial proceeding receive a fair trial.<ref name="Bhuta">Nehal Bhuta, [https://www.ejiltalk.org/joint-series-on-international-law-and-armed-conflict-fair-trial-guarantees-in-armed-conflict/ Joint Series on International Law and Armed Conflict: Fair Trial Guarantees in Armed Conflict], ''[[EJIL: Talk!]] Blog of the European Journal of European Law'' (September 22, 2016).</ref> For example, Articles 102β108 of the 1949 [[Third Geneva Convention]] detail requirements for the fairness of trials against prisoners of war.<ref name=Bhuta/> Other provisions require a "fair and regular trial"; "safeguards of proper trial and defence"; an "impartial and regularly constituted court respecting the generally recognized principles of regular judicial procedure"; a "regularly constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples"; and "court offering the essential guarantees of independence and impartiality".<ref name=Bhuta/> == Definition in regional human rights law == The right to a fair trial is enshrined in articles 3, 7 and 26 of the [[African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights]] (ACHPR).<ref name="bare_url" /> The right to a fair trial is also enshrined in articles [[Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights|5]], [[Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights|6]] and [[Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights|7]] of the [[European Convention on Human Rights]] and articles 2 to 4 of the 7th Protocol to the convention.<ref name="bare_url" /> The right to a fair trial is furthermore enshrined in articles 3, 8, 9 and 10 of the [[American Convention on Human Rights]].<ref name="bare_url" /> == Relationship with other rights == The [[right to equality before the law]] is sometimes regarded as part of the right to a fair trial. It is typically guaranteed under a separate article in [[international human rights instruments]]. The right entitles individuals to be recognised as subject, not as object, of the law. [[International human rights law]] permits no derogation or exceptions to this human right.<ref name="bare_url_a">{{Cite book| last = Doebbler| first = Curtis| title = Introduction to International Human Rights Law| publisher = CD Publishing| year = 2006| page = 110| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=mQ61oCPJ1GEC&q=right%20to%20fair%20trial&pg=PA108| isbn = 978-0-9743570-2-7 }}</ref> Closely related to the right to a fair trial is the prohibition on [[ex post facto law]], or retroactive law, which is enshrined in human rights instrument separately from the right to fair trial and can not be limited by states according to the [[European Convention on Human Rights]] and the [[American Convention on Human Rights]].<ref name="bare_url" /> [[Speedy trial|Speedy justice]] tends to correlate with quality and fairness of justice.<ref name="g896">{{cite journal | last=Melcarne | first=Alessandro | last2=Ramello | first2=Giovanni B. | last3=Spruk | first3=Rok | title=Is justice delayed justice denied? An empirical approach | journal=International Review of Law and Economics | volume=65 | date=2021 | doi=10.1016/j.irle.2020.105953 | page=105953}}</ref> Right to [[speedy trial]] and Right to a fair trial can be difficult to combine.<ref name="j611">{{cite journal | last=Easton | first=Jo | title=Where to Draw the Line? Is Efficiency Encroaching on a Fair Justice System? | journal=The Political Quarterly | volume=89 | issue=2 | date=2018 | issn=0032-3179 | doi=10.1111/1467-923X.12487 | pages=246β253}}</ref> ==Fair-trial rights== The right to a fair trial has been defined in numerous regional and [[international human rights instruments]]. It is one of the most extensive human rights and all international human rights instruments enshrine it in more than one article.<ref>{{Cite book| last = Doebbler| first = Curtis| title = Introduction to International Human Rights Law| publisher = CD Publishing| year = 2006| pages = 107β108| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=mQ61oCPJ1GEC&q=right%20to%20fair%20trial&pg=PA108| isbn = 978-0-9743570-2-7 }}</ref> The right to a fair trial is one of the most litigated human rights and substantial case law that has been established on the interpretation of this human right.<ref name="bare_url_a" /> Despite variations in wording and placement of the various fair trial rights, international human rights instrument define the right to a fair trial in broadly the same terms.<ref name="bare_url_b" /> The aim of the right is to ensure the proper administration of justice. As a minimum the right to fair trial includes the following fair trial rights in [[Civil law (common law)|civil]] and [[Criminal law|criminal]] proceedings:<ref name="bare_url" /> * the right to be heard by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal * the right to a [[hearing (law)|public hearing]] * the right to be heard within a reasonable time * the [[right to counsel]] * the right to interpretation<ref name="bare_url" /> States may limit the right to a fair trial or derogate from the fair trial rights only under circumstances specified in the human rights instruments.<ref name="bare_url" /> === In civil and criminal proceedings === The [[European Court of Human Rights]] and the [[Inter-American Court of Human Rights]] have clarified that the right to a fair trial applies to all types of judicial proceedings, whether [[Civil law (common law)|civil]] or [[Criminal law|criminal]]. According to the European Court of Human Rights, Article 6 of the [[European Convention on Human Rights]] and the fair trial rights apply to all civil rights and obligations created under domestic law and therefore to all civil proceedings (see ''Apeh Uldozotteinek Szovetsege and Others v. Hungary'' 2000).<ref name="bare_url" /> === In administrative proceedings === Both the [[European Court of Human Rights]] and the [[Inter-American Court of Human Rights]] have clarified that the right to a fair trial applies not only to judicial proceedings, but also administrative proceedings. If an individual's right under the law is at stake, the dispute must be determined through a fair process.<ref name="bare_url" /> === In special proceedings === In Europe special proceeding may also be subject to Article 6 of the [[European Convention on Human Rights]].<ref>The immunity could not be an obstacle: on the one hand, following a immunity resolution of the Senate, the judicial proceeding may raise jurisdictional dispute before the Constitutional Court ( ... ); on the other side (β¦.) the citizen may submit an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights {{cite journal|last1=Buonomo|first1=Giampiero|title=L'Italia "difende" il Regno Unito in nome del procuratore Cordova|journal=Diritto&Giustizia Edizione Online|date=2002|url=https://www.questia.com/projects#!/project/89332670|access-date=2016-03-26|archive-date=2012-08-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120801002834/http://www.questia.com/projects#!/project/89332670|url-status=dead}}</ref> In ''Mills v. the United Kingdom'' 2001 the [[European Court of Human Rights]] held that a [[court-martial]] was subject to Article 6 because of the defendants had been accused of what the court considered to be serious crime, assault with a weapon and wounding. The [[African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights]] (ACHPR) frequently deals with instances where [[civilians]] are tried by [[military tribunals]] for serious crimes. The ACHPR has held that on the face of it military courts to do not satisfy civilians' right to a fair trial (see ''Constitutional Rights Project v. Nigeria''). In this respect the ACHPR has reaffirmed the [[right to counsel]] as essential in guaranteeing a fair trial. The ACHPR held that individuals have the right to choose their own counsel and that giving the military tribunal the right to veto a counsel violates the right to a fair trial.<ref name="bare_url_c">{{Cite book| last = Doebbler| first = Curtis| title = Introduction to International Human Rights Law| publisher = CD Publishing| year = 2006| page = 109| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=mQ61oCPJ1GEC&q=right%20to%20fair%20trial&pg=PA108| isbn = 978-0-9743570-2-7 }}</ref> ==In the United Kingdom== Right to a fair trial in the United Kingdom is guaranteed by the [[Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights]], which is incorporated in UK law as Schedule 1 of the [[Human Rights Act 1998]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Article 6: Fair trials |url=https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/human-rights/what-are-human-rights/human-rights-act/article-6-fair-trials |publisher=[[Liberty (advocacy group)|Liberty]] |access-date=17 August 2019 |language=en |date=31 August 2010}}</ref> Between 1971 and 1975, the right to a fair trial [[Operation Demetrius|was suspended in Northern Ireland]]. Suspects were simply imprisoned without trial, and interrogated by the British army for information. This power was mostly used against the Catholic minority. The British government supplied deliberately misleading evidence to the European Court of Human Rights when it investigated this issue in 1978.<ref name=ministers-sanctioned>[http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/british-ministers-sanctioned-torture-of-ni-internees-1.1820882 'British ministers sanctioned torture of NI internees'] (5 June 2014)</ref> The Irish government and human rights group [[Amnesty International]] requested that the ECHR reconsider the case in December 2014.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-30296397|title=Bid to reopen NI 'torture' case|work=BBC News|date=2 December 2014|access-date=3 April 2018}}</ref> Three court cases related to the Northern Ireland conflict that took place in mainland Britain in 1975 and 1976 have been accused of being unfair, resulting in the imprisonment of the [[Birmingham Six]], [[Guildford Four and Maguire Seven]]. These convictions were later overturned, though an investigation into allegations that police officers perverted the course of justice failed to convict anyone of wrongdoing. The United Kingdom created an act β the [[Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997]] β which led to the creation of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/68/contents|title=Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997|work=legislation.gov.uk|access-date=20 September 2015}}</ref> It allowed for secret evidence to be stated in court and provided provisions for the anonymity of the sources and information itself. The judge has the power to clear the courtroom of the public and press, and the appellant if need be, if sensitive information must be relayed. The appellant is provided with a Special Advocate, who is appointed in order to represent their interests; no contact can be made with the appellant after seeing the secret evidence. SIAC is mostly used for deportation cases and other cases of public interest.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/special-immigration-appeals-commission|title=Apply to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission|work=justice.gov.uk|access-date=20 September 2015}}</ref> Secret evidence has seen increased use in UK courts.{{since when?|date=September 2024}} Some{{weasel inline|date=September 2024}} argue that this undermines the British criminal justice system, as this evidence may not come under proper democratic scrutiny. Secret evidence can now be used in a wide range of cases including deportations hearings, control orders proceedings, parole board cases, asset-freezing applications, pre-charge detention hearings in terrorism cases, employment tribunals, and planning tribunals.{{cn|date=September 2024}} ==Juries and a fair trial== The rationale for a jury was that it offers a check against state power.{{Citation needed|date=September 2015}} Under Article 6 of the [[European Convention on Human Rights|ECHR]], the right to a fair trial implies that accused and public must be able to understand the verdict.{{according to whom|date=September 2024}} Trials decided by jury, as they do not provide reasons for their decision, therefore do not allow for this.<ref>Lemmens, P. (2014). "The right to a fair trial and its multiple manifestations". In E. Brems & J. Gerards (Eds.), ''Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights'' (pp. 294-314). Cambridge Books Online: Cambridge University Press.</ref> In ''Taxquet v Belgium''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-101739|title=HUDOC - European Court of Human Rights|work=coe.int|access-date=20 September 2015}}</ref> a violation of article 6(1) was found. The court also implied a right to a reasoned verdict, irrespective of whether that was given by a judge or a jury. Under ECHR case law, jury decisions can also be problematic in circumstances where juries draw adverse inferences from trial judges' directions in contravention of Article 6(3) (b) and (c).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-58798|title=HUDOC - European Court of Human Rights|work=coe.int|access-date=20 September 2015}}</ref> == See also == * [[Change of venue]] * [[Four freedoms]] * ''[[Jus de non evocando]]'' * [[Impartiality]] * [[Legal aid]] * [[Natural justice]] * [[Presumption of guilt]] * [[Law reform]] * [[Judicial reform]] * [[Judicial review]] ==References== {{Reflist}} {{Particular human rights}} {{Authority control}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Right To A Fair Trial}} [[Category:Criminal law]] [[Category:Criminal procedure]] [[Category:Types of trials]] [[Category:Human rights by issue]] [[Category:Prisoners' and ex-prisoners' rights]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:According to whom
(
edit
)
Template:Authority control
(
edit
)
Template:Citation needed
(
edit
)
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite journal
(
edit
)
Template:Cite news
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Cn
(
edit
)
Template:Criminal procedure (trial)
(
edit
)
Template:Particular human rights
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Template:Since when?
(
edit
)
Template:Weasel inline
(
edit
)
Template:When
(
edit
)