Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Separate school
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|Type of school in some Canadian provinces}} {{About|religion-based separate schools in Canada|race-based separate schools|Racial separate schools (Canada)}} {{Use Canadian English|date=May 2021}} {{Use mdy dates|date=May 2021}} In Canada, a '''separate school''' is a type of school that has [[constitutional law|constitutional status]] in three provinces ([[Ontario]], [[Alberta]] and [[Saskatchewan]]) and [[statutory law|statutory status]] in the three territories ([[Northwest Territories]], [[Yukon]] and [[Nunavut]]). In these Canadian jurisdictions, a separate school is one operated by a civil authority—a separate [[school board]]—with a mandate enshrined in the [[Canadian Constitution]] (for the three provinces) or in federal statutes (for the three territories). In these six jurisdictions a civil [[electoral district|electorate]], composed of the members of the [[minority group|minority]] [[religion|faith]], elects separate [[school trustee]]s according to the province's or territory's local authorities election legislation. These trustees are legally accountable to their electorate and to the provincial or territorial government. No church has a [[constitutional]], legal, or [[:wikt:proprietary|proprietary]] interest in a separate school. The constitutionally provided mandate of a separate school [[jurisdiction]] and of a separate school is to provide education in a school setting that the separate school board considers reflective of [[Roman Catholic]] (or, rarely, [[Protestant]]) theology, doctrine, and practices. This mandate can manifest itself in the Program of Studies and the [[curriculum]], exercises and practices, and staffing. The limits of this mandate are determined by the application of the ''[[Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms]]'', and judicial decisions. The different experience in [[Ontario]] as compared to Alberta and Saskatchewan is principally the result of the same constitutional provisions having effect on settlement at different stages in Canadian history. The Constitution of Canada does not establish separate school education as a natural or unconditional right available to all. Only Protestants or Roman Catholics, whichever is the minority faith population compared to the other in a community, can consider the establishment of separate school education. The separate school establishment right is not available to citizens of any other faith (such as [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Orthodox Christians]], [[Jews in Canada|Jews]], [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Canada|Mormons]], [[Islam in Canada|Muslims]], [[Hinduism in Canada|Hindus]] or [[Sikhism in Canada|Sikhs]]). In addition, the minority faith must establish that they wish to leave the public school system and create a separate school system. == Historical background == When [[New France|France's colonies in North America]] were conquered by Britain during the 18th century, British authorities were faced with the dilemma of ruling over a large Roman Catholic community. This was significant, as Catholic-Protestant violence in England and Ireland had been nearly constant since the beginning of the [[English Reformation]]. Since the [[Glorious Revolution]] of 1688, however, Protestantism had been the official religion of the British state as evidenced by the [[Act of Settlement 1701]] which forbade Catholics to become monarch. This was the beginning of a long period of [[Anti-Catholicism in the United Kingdom|anti-Catholic laws and policies in the British Empire]], most famously expressed through the [[Penal Laws (Ireland)|Irish "Penal" Laws]]. In the case of the New World French there was also the fear that the new population was potentially more loyal to a foreign king, that of France, than to Britain. The first French colony to fall to the British was [[Acadia]] on the Atlantic coast in 1713 (invaded in 1710). Here the problem of dealing with a French Catholic community was solved through the simple but brutal method of expulsion. The [[Expulsion of the Acadians]] of 1755 saw some 12,000 Acadians killed and/or forcibly resettled to the Thirteen Colonies, Louisiana, France, England, etc. Some later returned, but their land and villages had been given away to Anglo-Protestant settlers. However, the trigger for expulsion was about the fear that Acadians would side with France during the "[[French and Indian War]]" (1754–1760/1763). When the much larger colony of [[Canada (New France)|Canada]] fell in 1763 ([[Quebec City]] invaded in 1759, [[Montreal]] in 1760), deportation was seen as less practical. Instead British officials promised to allow French Canadians to keep their religion and customs: {{blockquote|His Britannick Majesty, on his side, agrees to grant the liberty of the Catholick religion to the inhabitants of Canada: he will, in consequence, give the most precise and most effectual orders, that his new Roman Catholic subjects may profess the worship of their religion according to the rites of the Romish church, as far as the laws of Great Britain permit. His Britannick Majesty farther agrees, that the French inhabitants, or others who had been subjects of the Most Christian King in Canada, may retire with all safety and freedom wherever they shall think proper...|[[Treaty of Paris (1763)|Treaty of Paris]], Article IV (part)}} This guarantee was later threatened on several occasions by assimilationist legislation such as the [[Royal Proclamation of 1763]], but this was largely reversed by the [[Quebec Act 1774]]. After the [[American Revolution]], the new colony was flooded with Anglo-Protestant refugees. The colony was then divided by [[Constitutional Act of 1791]], with the Anglican Church becoming the [[established religion]] in Upper Canada (now Ontario) while Lower Canada remained legally secular but dominated by the Catholic church. Inevitably, some people ended up on the "wrong" side of this division, with a French Catholic minority in Upper Canada and an Anglo-Protestant minority in Lower Canada. Schools of the era were almost entirely parochial schools controlled by the various churches. Only when government mandated standardization and public funding for education were introduced did this then become a political issue. By the time of Confederation in 1867, the majority of Catholics in Upper Canada were of Irish extraction as well as English speaking. In the 1840s [[Methodist]] minister and [[Reform Party (pre-Confederation)|Reformist]] politician [[Egerton Ryerson]] championed "common schools" that would educate the children of all faiths under one system. He became Chief Superintendent of Education for Upper Canada in 1844. However, Ryerson was not able to convince the Catholic minority and grudgingly agreed to clauses in his education reforms that allowed for minority-faith schools within the publicly funded system. The Catholic case was strengthened by the fact that the Protestant minority in Lower Canada had already{{when|date=December 2012}} won the right to a separate system. The institutionalization of separate schools in Canada West (Upper Canada before 1840) was secured by the ''[[Scott Act (1863)|Scott Act]]'' of 1863, but with the caveat that rural Catholic schools could only serve an area with a radius of {{convert|3|mi}}.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://torontoist.com/2011/09/catholic-schools-separate-but-equal-funding/ | title=Catholic Schools: Separate but Equal Funding | date=September 16, 2011 }}</ref> In the Maritime provinces, similar issues were at play. {{blockquote|In 1864, the government of Nova Scotia reformed its system of education, withdrawing support from all schools which were religious or which used any language other than English as a medium of instruction.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.cchahistory.ca/journal/CCHA1970/Toner.html | title=Peter M. Toner, "The New Brunswick Schools Question" }}</ref>}} In New Brunswick under the Parish Schools Act of 1858, there was only loose supervision from the central board of education, and in practice each school was run independently by its board of trustees, and most schools boards were dominated by partisans from one religion or another. Textbooks were not standardized; Protestant-majority regions used the textbooks of the [[Irish National Schools]] while the English-speaking Catholic areas used the books of the [[Irish Christian Brothers]]. The few Acadian schools used French-language textbooks from Canada East (Lower Canada). == The 1867 Constitution == These pre-existing rights for tax-funded minority faith schools were then part of the constitutional negotiations surrounding Canadian Confederation in the 1860s. At the Confederation conferences, Roman Catholic [[Archbishop Connolly of Halifax]] argued for separate Catholic and Protestant school systems across the entire federation, administered by the central government. This was forcefully rejected by French Canadian delegates from Canada East, who demanded provincial control over education.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.cchahistory.ca/journal/CCHA1970/Toner.html | title=Peter M. Toner, "The New Brunswick Schools Question" }}</ref> The compromise was section 93 of the ''[[Constitution Act, 1867]]'' which allows the federal government to intervene only to protect minority schools which are established after Confederation. Apart from that caveat, section 93 provides that education is a matter of exclusive provincial jurisdiction. == Continuing application of Constitutional settlement == The relevant provision for Ontario is s. 93(1) of the ''Constitution Act, 1867'' as originally enacted.<ref>''[http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-5.html#anchorbo-ga:s_91-gb:s_93 Constitution Act, 1867]'', s. 93(1).</ref> For Alberta and Saskatchewan, the relevant provision is s. 93(1), as amended by the ''[[Alberta Act]]''<ref>''Constitution Act, 1867'', s. 93(1), as enacted by the ''[http://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/aa_1905.html Alberta Act]'', S.C. 1905, c. 3, s. 17(1).</ref> and the ''[[Saskatchewan Act]]'',<ref>''Constitution Act, 1867'', s. 93(1), as amended by the ''[http://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/sa_1905.html Saskatchewan Act]'', S.C. 1905, c. 42, s. 17(1).</ref> respectively. As held by the [[Supreme Court of Canada]] in ''[[Adler v. Ontario]]'', the provincial education power under section 93 of the ''Constitution Act, 1867'' is [[plenary power|plenary]], and is not subject to ''Charter'' attack. As Iacobucci J. noted, it is the product of a historical compromise crucial to [[Confederation]] and forms a comprehensive code with respect to denominational school rights which cannot be enlarged through the operation of s. 2(a) of the ''Charter''. It does not represent a guarantee of [[fundamental freedoms]]. Section 93 of the ''Constitution Act, 1867'' only applies to provinces, not territories. Instead, the right to separate schools is protected in the three territories by the federal Acts of Parliament which establish those three territories. The ''Northwest Territories Act'',<ref>''[http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/N-27/page-4.html#h-7 Northwest Territories Act]'', R.S.C. 1985, c. N-27, s. 16(n)(''ii'').</ref> the ''Yukon Act''<ref>''[http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/Y-2.01/page-3.html#h-8 Yukon Act]'', S.C. 2002, c. 7, s. 18(1)(o)(''ii'').</ref> and the ''Nunavut Act''<ref>''[http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/N-28.6/page-3.html#h-12 Nunavut Act]'', S.C. 1993, c. 28, s. 23(1)(m)(''ii'').</ref> all provide that the territorial legislatures can legislate with respect to education, provided they respect the right of religious minorities (whether Protestant or Roman Catholic) to establish separate schools. == Ontario == School boards funded by the province consist of 29 English [[Roman Catholic|Catholic]] and 8 French Catholic boards, as well as 35 non-denominational [[Public school (government funded)|public school]] boards (31 English public, 4 French public). There is one [[Protestantism|Protestant]] separate school jurisdiction in Ontario, the Burkevale Protestant Separate School, operated by the [[Penetanguishene Protestant Separate School Board]]. In Ontario, this determination was largely made throughout the province by the time of Confederation. The public school system in the province was historically Protestant but was gradually transformed into a secular public system. Prayer in public schools was banned in the late 1980s by a decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal.<ref>[https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/1988/1988canlii189/1988canlii189.html?autocompleteStr=zylb&autocompletePos=1 ''Zylberberg v Sudbury Board of Education'', 1988 CanLII 189, 65 OR (2d) 641; 52 DLR (4th) 577; 29 OAC 23; 34 CRR 1; [1988<nowiki>]</nowiki> OJ No 1488 (QL). (ON CA)]</ref> Since the 19th century, funding for the Roman Catholic separate school system was provided up to Grade 10 under the [[British North America Act|British North America (BNA) Act]]. In 1984, the government of Premier [[Bill Davis|William Davis]] extended full funding to include the last three (Grades 11–13 ([[Ontario Academic Credit|OAC]])) years of Roman Catholic secondary schools after having rejected that proposal fifteen years earlier. The first funded academic year occurred in 1985–86, as grade 11, and one grade was added in each of the next two years. The right to have a publicly funded separate denominational school system continues to be guaranteed to Roman Catholics in Ontario by s. 93 of the ''Constitution Act, 1867''.<ref>[https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/does-constitutional-protection-prevent-education-reform-in-ontario.pdf Bruce Pardy, "Does Constitutional Protection Prevent Education Reform in Ontario?", Fraser Institute Research Bulletin, 2016.]</ref> The issue of extending public funding to other religious schools was raised by the [[Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario]] in the [[2007 Ontario general election]]; however they lost the election and the issue was not raised again in the subsequent election. == Alberta and Saskatchewan == {{more sources needed|section|date=October 2023}} In Alberta and Saskatchewan, the extent of separate school education is more limited, and Protestant separate schools are slightly more present. For example, in Alberta, about 40% of the land area of the province is included in separate school jurisdictions and there are two Protestant Separate School Districts, in the [[St. Albert, Alberta|City of St. Albert]] ([[St. Albert Protestant Separate School District]]) and in the Town of [[St. Paul, Alberta|St. Paul]] ([[Glen Avon Protestant Separate School District]]). One anomaly of the system is that the Town of [[Morinville]] has only a public Catholic high school (part of the [[Greater St. Albert Catholic Regional Division]]), and no secular or Protestant high schools of any kind.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/in-an-alberta-town-parents-fight-for-a-secular-education/article1931158/| url-status = dead| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110309011158/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/in-an-alberta-town-parents-fight-for-a-secular-education/article1931158| archive-date = 2011-03-09| title = In an Alberta town, parents fight for a secular education - The Globe and Mail| website = [[The Globe and Mail]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://edmontonjournal.com/life/Parents+want+secular+school/4393217/story.html |title=Parents want secular school |access-date=2011-03-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110317235555/http://www.edmontonjournal.com/life/Parents+want+secular+school/4393217/story.html |archive-date=2011-03-17 }}</ref> In Alberta and Saskatchewan, there continues to be large areas of the province where separate school education has never been established. In these two provinces, there is a clear and well-known process for determining the wishes of the members of the minority faith. In Alberta, for example, the geographic basis for separate school establishment is the underlying public school district. At any time, three or more residents, either Protestant or Roman Catholic, who believe that they are members of the minority faith locally, can initiate the process. A census must be conducted to confirm that they are, in fact, the minority faith locally. When the census confirms minority status, a meeting must be widely advertised. The purpose of meeting is to provide a venue at which all of the local members of the minority faith can debate the pros and cons of leaving the public school jurisdiction and creating a separate school district. At the end of the meeting, a vote may be held on the question of establishment. If the majority of the minority vote in favour of establishment, the establishment becomes a fact. If the majority of the minority vote against establishment, it does not proceed. The process is civil, democratic, and binding on the minority of the minority. A decision at the meeting against establishment precludes a number of the minority faith who may have favoured establishment from continuing for themselves. (At the same time, any decision against establishment has no term: proponents can begin almost immediately to organize a subsequent effort.) In Alberta, wherever a separate school system exists, individuals who are of the minority faith that established the separate school system must be residents, electors, and ratepayers of the separate school system (the [[Schmidt decision]]). There is no way by which they could opt to be supporters of the public school system except by leaving the minority faith. In Saskatchewan and Ontario, members of the minority faith may choose to be supporters of the public school system, notwithstanding their faith. == Other provinces == Retention of separate school boards with public funding was a major issue of contention in the negotiations that led to [[Canadian confederation]], chiefly as a result of ethnic and religious tension between the (largely French-speaking) Roman Catholic population in Canada and the [[Protestant]] majority. The issue was a subject of debate at the [[Quebec Conference, 1864|1864 Quebec Conference]] and was finally resolved at the [[London Conference of 1866]] with a proposal to preserve the separate school systems in [[Quebec]] and [[Ontario]]. The way in which this agreement was written into the [[British North America Act]], 1867 was to the effect that the condition of education in each colony (or territory) at the time it entered Confederation would be continued thereafter. Consequently, the provinces of [[British Columbia]], [[New Brunswick]], [[Nova Scotia]], and [[Prince Edward Island]] have never had an education system that included "separate schools". Up until 1997 the [[Quebec education system]] was also separated, with Protestant and Catholic school boards. The system was replaced by a linguistically based secular school system, after the passage of a [[Amendments to the Constitution of Canada|constitutional amendment]]<ref>SI/97-141</ref> The province of [[Newfoundland and Labrador]] had a separate school system until 1997. At the time that the [[Dominion of Newfoundland]] joined Canada on March 31, 1949, the Newfoundland schools were all organized on a confessional basis with separate denominational schools for [[Roman Catholics]], [[Seventh-day Adventist Church|Seventh-day Adventists]], [[Salvation Army|Salvationists]], [[Pentecostalism|Pentecostals]], and an integrated stream which oversaw the schooling for children of many members of so-called "mainstream" Protestant denominations. All of these schools received grants from the provincial government for their operation. Ownership of the schools ranged from parochial (owned and operated directly by a church) to ownership and operation by a separate not-for-profit society. The constitutional obligation on the province to maintain this system of confessional schools was eliminated by the ''Constitution Amendment, 1998 (Newfoundland Act)'',<ref>[http://www.canadagazette.gc.ca/archives/p2/1998/1998-01-14-x/html/si-tr25-eng.html SI/98-25] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121208175248/http://www.canadagazette.gc.ca/archives/p2/1998/1998-01-14-x/html/si-tr25-eng.html |date=2012-12-08 }}</ref> following a provincial [[referendum]] in 1997. The province then established a single non-denominational public school system. == Controversy == The question of separate schools has been most controversial in [[Ontario]] and [[Manitoba]]. In the former, the issue of separate schools aggravated tensions between [[English-speaking|anglophones]] and [[francophones]], both [[Protestant]] and [[Catholic]].<ref name=Postrozny>Postrozny, Peter Anthony (1990). ''[http://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/22/ 'Let them educate themselves': The reform of separate schools in Ottawa, 1882-1912]'' (M.A. thesis) Wilfrid Laurier University</ref> The ending of public support for separate schools in the latter province in the 1890s prompted a national crisis known as the [[Manitoba Schools Question]], and led to [[Pope Leo XIII]]'s [[papal encyclical]] ''Affari Vos''. Separate school rights have often been criticized as contrary to the spirit of official [[multiculturalism]], primarily, but not exclusively, because only adherents of the Protestant or Roman Catholic faith have these constitutional rights and only in some provinces and territories. In addition, where separate school systems exist, employees or prospective employees who are of the minority faith have more employment opportunities. (All other things being equal, a member of the minority faith can be employed by either the public board or by the separate board, while anyone else can be excluded from employment by the separate system.) On November 5, 1999, the [[United Nations]] [[Human Rights Committee]] condemned Canada and Ontario for having violated the equality provisions (Article 26) of the [[International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]]. The Committee restated its concerns on November 2, 2005, when it published its [http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/CCPR.C.CAN.CO.5.En?OpenDocument Concluding Observations] regarding Canada's fifth periodic report under the Covenant. The Committee observed that Canada had failed to "adopt steps in order to eliminate discrimination on the basis of religion in the funding of schools in Ontario." Opposition to publicly funded separate schools continues in all three provinces where it remains, but most notably in Ontario, where court cases (see [https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/toronto/catholic-school-funding-challenged-in-court/article4619931/ Reva Landau]) and long-standing, organized opposition groups (OneSchoolSystem.org and Civil Rights in Public Education) continue to actively seek to end or limit public funding for Catholic schools. ==See also== {{Portal|Canada|Education}} *[[Education in Canada]] *[[Education in Quebec]] *[[Education in Ontario]] {{-}} == References == {{reflist|2}} ==External links== *[https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights] *[http://www.oneschoolsystem.org/ OneSchoolSystem.org] *[https://web.archive.org/web/20051019032202/http://www.rccdsb.edu.on.ca/cathedral/significant_events_in_the_histor.htm Significant Events in the History of Catholic Education] (in Ontario) *[https://historyofrights.ca/encyclopaedia/main-events/1896-religious-freedom-manitoba-schools-question/ Canada's Human Rights History] {{schools}} {{Segregation by type}} [[Category:Education in Manitoba]] [[Category:Education in Newfoundland and Labrador]] [[Category:Education in Ontario]] [[Category:Education in Quebec]] [[Category:Education in Saskatchewan]] [[Category:School types]] [[Category:Education in Alberta]] [[Category:Minority rights]] [[Category:Constitution of Canada]] [[Category:Christian schools in Canada|*]] [[Category:Segregated schools]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:-
(
edit
)
Template:About
(
edit
)
Template:Blockquote
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Clear
(
edit
)
Template:Comma separated entries
(
edit
)
Template:Convert
(
edit
)
Template:Main other
(
edit
)
Template:More sources needed
(
edit
)
Template:Portal
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Schools
(
edit
)
Template:Segregation by type
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Template:Use Canadian English
(
edit
)
Template:Use mdy dates
(
edit
)
Template:Webarchive
(
edit
)
Template:When
(
edit
)