Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Shell Crisis of 1915
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|Political crisis in Britain}} {{about|British responses to the ammunition shortages|the Russian shell shortage of 1915|Economic history of World War I|}} {{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}} [[File:PMLloydGeorge--nsillustratedwar03londuoft.jpg|thumb|David Lloyd George]] The '''Shell Crisis of 1915''' was a shortage of artillery shells on the front lines in the [[First World War]] that led to a political crisis in the [[United Kingdom]]. Previous military experience led to an over-reliance on shrapnel to attack infantry in the open, which was negated by the resort to trench warfare, for which [[High-explosive incendiary|high-explosive shells]] were better suited.{{sfn|Strachan|2001|pp=992β1,105}} At the start of the war there was a revolution in doctrine: instead of the idea that artillery was a useful support for infantry attacks, the new doctrine held that heavy guns alone would control the battlefield. Because of the stable lines on the [[Western Front (World War I)|Western Front]], it was easy to build railway lines that delivered all the shells the factories could produce. The 'shell scandal' emerged in 1915 because the high rate of fire over a long period was not anticipated and the stock of shells became depleted.{{sfn|French|1979|pp=192β205}} The inciting incident was the disastrous [[Battle of Aubers]], which reportedly had been stymied by a lack of shells. The shortage was widely publicised in the press. ''[[The Times]]'', in cooperation with [[David Lloyd George]] and [[Alfred Harmsworth, 1st Viscount Northcliffe|Lord Northcliffe]], sought to force Parliament to adopt a national munitions policy with centralised control. This resulted in a transfer of the Munitions Department from the War Office to a cabinet level position in government, and a coalition government with Lloyd George as Minister of Munitions. In 1916 the long-term effects included the fall of the Prime Minister [[H. H. Asquith]] and his replacement by Lloyd George in December 1916.{{sfn|Fraser|1983|pp=77β94}} == ''The Times'' attacks Kitchener == Shortage of ammunition had been a serious problem since the autumn of 1914 and the British Commander-in-Chief [[Field Marshal]] Sir [[John Denton Pinkstone French, 1st Earl of Ypres|John French]] gave an interview to ''The Times'' (27 March) calling for more ammunition. On the basis of an assurance from Kitchener, Asquith stated in a speech at Newcastle (20 April) that the army had sufficient ammunition.{{sfnp|Holmes|2004|p=287}} After the [[Battle of Aubers Ridge|failed attack at Aubers Ridge]] on 9 May 1915, ''The Times'' war correspondent, Colonel [[Charles Γ Court Repington]], sent a telegram to his newspaper blaming lack of high-explosive shells. French had, despite Repington's denial of his prior knowledge at the time, supplied him with information and sent [[Brinsley FitzGerald|Brinsley Fitzgerald]] and [[Freddie Guest]] to London to show the same documents to Lloyd George and senior Conservatives [[Bonar Law]] and [[Arthur Balfour]].{{sfnp|Holmes|2004|p=287}} ''The Times'' headline on 14 May 1915, was: "Need for shells: British attacks checked: Limited supply the cause: A Lesson From France".{{sfnp|Holmes|2004|pp=287β289}} It commented "We had not sufficient high explosives to lower the enemy's parapets to the ground ... The want of an unlimited supply of high explosives was a fatal bar to our success", blaming the government for the battle's failure.{{sfn|Duffy|2009}} However, due to his reputation, the British public were hesitant to question Kitchener, leading to the subsequent circulation decline of the newspapers despite the growing consensus that the political role was ill-suited.<ref>{{Cite web|title=First World War.com - Encyclopedia - The Shell Scandal, 1915|url=https://www.firstworldwar.com/atoz/shellscandal.htm|access-date=2021-09-22|website=www.firstworldwar.com}}</ref> == Coalition government == As the crisis continued, the immediate catalyst for a change in government was the resignation on 15 May of [[John Fisher, 1st Baron Fisher|Admiral Fisher]] as [[First Sea Lord]], owing to disagreements with his ministerial chief, [[First Lord of the Admiralty]] [[Winston Churchill]], over the [[Naval operations in the Dardanelles campaign|naval attack on the Dardanelles]] (a precursor to the subsequent [[Gallipoli campaign|stalemated landings at Gallipoli]]). Churchill was detested by the Conservatives as he had defected from their party over a decade earlier. Chancellor of the Exchequer [[David Lloyd George]] and Conservative Leader [[Bonar Law]] visited Asquith on 17 May 1915, and after a very brief meeting Asquith wrote to his ministers demanding their resignations,{{sfn|Holmes|2004|p=288}} then formed a [[Asquith coalition ministry|new coalition government]] in which he appointed Lloyd George as [[Minister of Munitions]], heading a newly-created government department. The Shells Crisis had allowed Lloyd George to push for a coalition in which the [[Liberal Party (UK)|Liberal Party]] relinquished their full control while [[Conservative Party (UK)|the Conservatives]] remained in a subordinate position.<ref>{{Cite web|title=How Far was the Shells Crisis of 1915 Exploited by David Lloyd George for his own Political Gain? {{!}} The Western Front Association|url=https://www.westernfrontassociation.com/world-war-i-articles/how-far-was-the-shells-crisis-of-1915-exploited-by-david-lloyd-george-for-his-own-political-gain/|access-date=2021-09-22|website=www.westernfrontassociation.com}}</ref> Since then no purely Liberal government has held office in the UK, although [[Liberal Party (UK)|Liberal]] politicians have held office in subsequent coalitions. == ''Daily Mail'' attacks Kitchener == Whilst Asquith was still forming his new government, a sensational version of the press criticism was printed in the popular ''Daily Mail'' on 21 May, blaming Kitchener, under the headline "The Shells Scandal: Lord Kitchener's Tragic Blunder". Lloyd George had to warn Northcliffe that the campaign was counterproductive and creating sympathy for Kitchener.{{sfn|Holmes|2004|pp=288β289}} Kitchener wanted to let the Shells Scandal drop. [[Stanley von Donop]], Master-General of the Ordnance, demanded an Inquiry to clear his name but Kitchener persuaded him to withdraw the request as it would have led to French's dismissal.{{sfn|Holmes|2004|p=291}} Kitchener, popular with the public, remained in office as Secretary of State for War, responsible for training and equipping the volunteer [[Kitchener's Army|New Armies]], but lost control over munitions production and was increasingly sidelined from control of military strategy. French was also tarnished by his blatant meddling in politics, a factor which contributed to his enforced resignation in December 1915. ==Ministry of Munitions== [[File:Women with shells at Chilwell 1917 IWM Q 30017.jpg|thumb|The labour demands of the munitions industry were met by an estimated one million [[munitionette]]s]] The [[Munitions of War Act 1915]] ended the shell crisis and guaranteed a supply of munitions that the Germans were unable to match. The government policy, according to [[J. A. R. Marriott]], was that, <blockquote>No private interest was to be permitted to obstruct the service, or imperil the safety, of the State. Trade Union regulations must be suspended; employers' profits must be limited, skilled men must fight, if not in the trenches, in the factories; man-power must be economised by the dilution of labour and the employment of women; private factories must pass under the control of the State, and new national factories be set up. Results justified the new policy: the output was prodigious; the goods were at last delivered.{{sfn|Marriott|1948|p=376}}</blockquote> Following the creation of the [[Ministry of Munitions]], new factories began to be built for the mass production of war materiel. The construction of these factories took time and to ensure that there was no delay in the production of munitions to deal with the Shell Crisis, the Government turned to railway companies to manufacture materials of war. Railway companies were well placed to manufacture munitions and other war materials, with their large locomotive, carriage works and skilled labourers; by the end of 1915 the railway companies were producing between 1,000 and 5,000 6-inch high explosive shells per week.{{sfn|Pratt|1921|p=7}} As well as the components for a number of different types of shell, the railway companies, under the direction of the Railway War Manufactures Sub-Committee of the [[Railway Executive Committee]], produced mountings for larger artillery, water-tank carts, miners' trucks, heavy-capacity wagons, machinery for howitzer carriages, armoured trains and ambulances. In 1916, when the many factories being constructed by the Ministry of Munitions began producing large volumes of munitions, the work of the railway companies in producing war materials actually increased and they continued to produce high volumes of munitions throughout the war. The official record, presented to the government in May 1920, of the munitions work done throughout the war by the various railway companies ran to a total of 121 pages, giving some idea of the scale of what was undertaken by the railway companies across the country. Many of the companies undertook this vital war work to the detriment of the maintenance of their locomotives, carriages and wagons.{{sfn|Pratt|1921|p=7}} The Munitions of War Act 1915 prevented the resignation of munitions workers without their employer's consent. It was a recognition that the whole economy would have to be mobilised for the war effort if the Allies were to prevail on the Western Front. Supplies and factories in [[Commonwealth of Nations|British Commonwealth]] countries, particularly [[Canada]], were reorganised under the [[Imperial Munitions Board]], to supply adequate shells and other [[materiel]] for the remainder of the war. The [[Health of Munitions Workers Committee]], one of the first investigations into [[occupational safety and health]], was set up in 1915 to improve productivity in factories.{{sfn|Weindling|1985|p=91}} {{sfn|BLS|1916|pp=66β70}} A huge munitions factory, [[HM Factory, Gretna]] was built on the English-Scottish border to produce [[cordite]]. There were at least three major explosions in such factories: # An [[Faversham explosion|explosion at Faversham]] involving 200 tons of TNT killed 105 in 1916. # The [[National Shell Filling Factory, Chilwell]] exploded in 1918, killing 137. # The [[Silvertown explosion]] occurred in [[Silvertown]] (now part of the London Borough of Newham, in Greater London) killing 73 and injuring 400 on Friday, 19 January 1917 at 6.52 pm. ==See also== * [[Filling factories in the United Kingdom]] * [[Munitionettes]] * [[National Filling Factory, Georgetown]] (NFF No 4, in Scotland) ==Footnotes== {{reflist|20em}} ==References== {{refbegin}} * {{cite web |first=Michael |last=Duffy |year=2009 |url=http://www.firstworldwar.com/atoz/shellscandal.htm |title=The Shell Scandal, 1915 |website=FirstWorldWar.com |access-date=9 May 2020}} * {{cite journal |first=Peter |last=Fraser |title=The British 'Shells Scandal' of 1915 |journal=[[Canadian Journal of History]] |date=April 1983 |volume=18 |issue=1 |pages=69β86 |doi=10.3138/cjh.18.1.69}} * {{cite journal |first=David |last=French |title=The Military Background to the 'Shell Crisis' of May 1915 |journal=Journal of Strategic Studies |date=September 1979 |volume=II |issue=2 |pages=192β205 |doi=10.1080/01402397908437021 }} * {{cite journal |ref={{harvid|BLS|1916}} |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Health of Munitions Workers, Great Britain |journal=Monthly Review of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics |volume=II |issue=5 |date=May 1916 |pages=66β70 |jstor=41822985}} * {{Cite book |last=Holmes |first=Richard |title=The Little Field Marshal: A Life of Sir John French |publisher=Weidenfeld & Nicolson |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-297-84614-7}} * {{cite book |last=Marriott |first=J. A. R. |author-link=J. A. R. Marriott |title=Modern England: 1885β1945 |year=1948 |edition=4th |publisher=Methuen |location=London |oclc=407888}} * {{cite book |last=Pratt |first=Edwin A. |title=British Railways and the Great War Book |year=1921 |publisher=Selwyn and Blount |location=London |isbn=978-1-1518-5240-3 |url=https://archive.org/stream/cu31924092566128#page/n7/mode/2up}} * {{cite book |first=Hew |last=Strachan |title=The First World War: To Arms |volume=I |year=2001 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-1916-0834-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ChpqA02Sa10C}} * {{cite book |first=Paul |last=Weindling |title=The Social History of Occupational Health |publisher=Croom Helm: Society for the Social History of Medicine |year=1985 |isbn=978-0-7099-3606-0 |page=91 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=epoOAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA91}} {{refend}} ==Further reading== * {{cite book |last=Adams |first=R. J. Q. |author-link=Adams, R. J. Q. |year=1978 |title=Arms and the Wizard: Lloyd George and the Ministry of Munitions 1915β1916 |location=London |publisher=Cassell |isbn=0-304-29916-2}} * {{cite thesis |title=The Evolution of the British Army's Logistical and Administrative Infrastructure and its Influence on GHQ's Operational and Strategic Decision-Making on the Western Front, 1914β1918 |last=Brown |first=I. M. |year=1996 |type=PhD |publisher=London University |location=London |url=http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?did=2&uin=uk.bl.ethos.321769 |access-date=9 May 2020 |oclc=53609664}} * {{cite book |last=Carnegie |first=David |year=1925 |title=The History of Munitions Supply in Canada 1914β1918 |location=London |publisher=Longmans Green and Co. |oclc=224844256}} * {{cite book |last=Lloyd George |first=David |author-link=David Lloyd George |year=1933 |title=War Memoirs of David Lloyd George |location=London |publisher=Ivor Nicholson & Watson |oclc=1140996940}} * {{cite book |last=Wilgus |first=J. Brandon |year=2024 |title=The Shell Crisis: A Lesson From the First World War |location=Annapolis |publisher=Naval History, US Naval Institute Press, Nov/Dec |url=https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history/2024/december/shell-crisis-lesson-first-world-war |access-date=27 Dec 2024}} ==External links== * [http://www.firstworldwar.com/atoz/shellscandal.htm The Shell Scandal, 1915] * [https://archive.org/search.php?query=history%20of%20the%20ministry%20of%20munitions&and History of the Ministry of Munitions] {{H. H. Asquith}} {{David Lloyd George}} {{Bonar Law}} [[Category:British military scandals]] [[Category:Cordite]] [[Category:United Kingdom in World War I]] [[Category:Government munitions production in the United Kingdom]] [[Category:Arms industry]] [[Category:1915 in British politics]] [[Category:1915 in military history]] [[Category:Military logistics of World War I]] [[Category:Military logistics of the United Kingdom]] [[Category:Bonar Law]] [[Category:David Lloyd George]] [[Category:Winston Churchill]] [[Category:H. H. Asquith]] [[Category:Politics of World War I]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:About
(
edit
)
Template:Bonar Law
(
edit
)
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite journal
(
edit
)
Template:Cite thesis
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:David Lloyd George
(
edit
)
Template:H. H. Asquith
(
edit
)
Template:Refbegin
(
edit
)
Template:Refend
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Sfn
(
edit
)
Template:Sfnp
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Template:Use dmy dates
(
edit
)