Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
The Phantom Edit
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|2000 film}} {{Use American English|date=January 2025}} {{DISPLAYTITLE:''The Phantom Edit''}} [[Image:Phantom Edit.jpg|thumb|The VHS cover]] '''''Star Wars Episode I.I: The Phantom Edit''''' is a [[fan edit]] of the film ''[[Star Wars: Episode I β The Phantom Menace]]'', removing many elements of the original film. The purpose of the edit, according to creator [[Mike J. Nichols]], was to make a much stronger version of ''The Phantom Menace'' based on the previous execution and philosophies of film storytelling and editing of [[George Lucas]].<ref name="Salon">{{cite web|url=http://archive.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2001/11/05/phantom_edit/index.html|title=The Phantom Edit |website=Salon.com |author=Daniel Kraus |date=November 5, 2001 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090715062244/http://archive.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2001/11/05/phantom_edit/index.html |archive-date=July 15, 2009}}</ref> ''The Phantom Edit'' was the first unauthorized re-edit of ''The Phantom Menace'' to receive major publicity and acclaim and is also considered the first fan-edit of a feature film ever to be shared by an online audience.<ref name="PBS">{{cite news |author=Mann, Charles C. |title=Hollywood Goes Digital, Like It or Not |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/hollywood/digital/mann.html |website=PBS.org |date=November 22, 2001 |access-date=November 9, 2019}}</ref><ref name="NPR">{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1125961|title='Star Wars' - The Phantom Edit|date=July 16, 2001|work=NPR.org}}</ref> ==History== ''The Phantom Edit'' was originally circulated in [[Hollywood (film industry)|Hollywood]] studios in 2000 and 2001, and was followed by media attention. [[Salon.com]],<ref name="Salon"/> [[National Public Radio|NPR]],<ref name="NPR"/> [[Public Broadcasting Service|PBS]],<ref name="PBS"/> and the [[BBC]]<ref name="BBC">{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/1375742.stm | work=BBC News | title=Mystery of Star Wars phantom edit | date=June 7, 2001 |access-date=November 9, 2019}}</ref> all covered the edit to various degrees. Rumor initially attributed ''The Phantom Edit'' to [[Kevin Smith]], who admitted to having seen the re-edit but denied that he was the editor. The editor was revealed to be [[Mike J. Nichols]] of [[Santa Clarita, California]], in the September 7, 2001, edition of ''[[The Washington Post]]''.<ref>{{cite news | first = Daniel | last = Greenberg | title = Thumbs Down? Re-Edit the Flick Yourself | date = September 7, 2001 | url = https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/79888484.html?dids=79888484:79888484&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT | newspaper = [[The Washington Post]] | pages = E.01 | access-date = March 10, 2012 | archive-date = February 25, 2013 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130225091749/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/79888484.html?dids=79888484:79888484&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT | url-status = dead }}</ref> [[Lucasfilm]], the production company of series creator George Lucas, condoned the edit and did not pursue legal action against its distributors.<ref name="BBC"/> ==Reviews== Critics and filmmakers have commented on the original ''Phantom Edit'', in most cases providing the approval and recognition which furthered the fan edit movement. * "Smart editing to say the least" β [[Kevin Smith]], film director<ref>{{cite news|last1=Rodgers|first1=Andrew|title=Kevin Smith speaks out about 'Phantom Edit'|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1129&dat=20010703&id=jIZIAAAAIBAJ&pg=2283,2261483&hl=en|access-date=30 January 2018|work=Pittsburgh Post-Gazette|date=July 3, 2001}}</ref> * "...Materialized from out of nowhere was a good film that had been hidden inside the disappointing original one." β Daniel Kraus, ''[[Salon.com|Salon]]''<ref name="Salon"/> * "[Done by]; someone with a gift (and equipment) for editing" β Michael Wilmington, ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' film critic<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2001-06-18-0106180230-story.html|title='Star Wars' phantom edit: good, not better than the original|last=Wilmington|first=Michael|website=chicagotribune.com|language=en-US|access-date=February 24, 2019|date=June 18, 2001}}</ref> ==References== {{Reflist}} ==External links== * [https://web.archive.org/web/20010617161022/http://members.onecenter.com/hollywood/phantomedit/ Wayback Machine archive of ''The Phantom Edit'' fan website] * [https://www.theforce.net/rouser/reviews/phantom_attack.asp "The Phantom Editor Strikes Again"], Joshua Griffin's April 29, 2005, review of ''Episode II.I: Attack of the Phantom'', on TheForce.net fan site {{Non-canon Star Wars}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Phantom Edit}} [[Category:2000 films]] [[Category:2000 independent films]] [[Category:Fan films based on Star Wars]] [[Category:Star Wars: Episode I β The Phantom Menace]] [[Category:Alternative versions of films]] [[Category:Unofficial adaptations]] [[Category:2000s American films]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Cite news
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Non-canon Star Wars
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Template:Use American English
(
edit
)