Editing Third World

{{short description|Geopolitical concept}}
{{Other uses|Third World (disambiguation)}}
{{Distinguish|Developing country}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{More citations needed|date=March 2025}}
{{Original research|date=March 2025}}
}}
{{Three worlds}}
The term '''Third World''' arose during the [[Cold War]] to define countries that remained non-aligned with either [[NATO]] or the [[Warsaw Pact]]. The [[United States]], [[Canada]], [[Taiwan]], [[Japan]], [[South Korea]], the [[Southern Cone]], [[NATO|Western European countries]] and other allies represented the "[[First World]]", while the [[Soviet Union]], [[China]], [[Cuba]], [[North Korea]], [[Vietnam]], and their allies represented the "[[Second World]]". This terminology provided a way of broadly categorizing the nations of the Earth into three groups based on political divisions. Due to the complex history of evolving meanings and contexts, there is no clear or agreed-upon definition of the Third World.<ref name="Tomlinson" /> Strictly speaking, "Third World" was a political, rather than economic, grouping.<ref name=":7">{{cite news |last=Silver |first=Marc |date=4 January 2015 |title=If You Shouldn't Call It The Third World, What Should You Call It? |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2015/01/04/372684438/if-you-shouldnt-call-it-the-third-world-what-should-you-call-it |access-date=5 March 2020 |work=[[NPR]] |archive-date=1 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200401165708/https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2015/01/04/372684438/if-you-shouldnt-call-it-the-third-world-what-should-you-call-it |url-status=live}}</ref> 

Since most Third World countries were economically poor and non-industrialized, it became a [[stereotype]] to refer to [[developing countries]] as "third-world countries". In political discourse, the term Third World was often associated with being underdeveloped. China was labeled "Third World" for several decades in the 20th century before its robust development of the 21st century. Some countries in the [[Eastern Bloc]], such as [[Economy of Cuba|Cuba]], were often regarded as Third World.  The Third World was normally seen to include many countries with [[Colonization|colonial]] pasts in [[Africa]], [[Latin America]], [[Oceania]], and [[Asia]]. It was also sometimes taken as synonymous with countries in the [[Non-Aligned Movement]]. In the [[dependency theory]] of thinkers like [[Raúl Prebisch]], [[Walter Rodney]], [[Theotônio dos Santos]], and others, the Third World has also been connected to the [[World-systems theory|world-systemic]] economic division as [[periphery countries|"periphery" countries]] dominated by the countries comprising the [[core countries|economic "core"]].<ref name="Tomlinson" />

In the Cold War, some European democracies ([[Austria]], [[Finland]], [[Republic of Ireland|Ireland]], [[Sweden]], and [[Switzerland]]) were neutral in the sense of not joining NATO, but were prosperous, never joined the [[Non-Aligned Movement]], and seldom self-identified as part of the Third World.

Since the [[dissolution of the Soviet Union]] and the [[Cold War (1985–1991)|end of the Cold War]], the term ''Third World'' has decreased in use. It is being replaced with terms such as [[Developing country|developing countries]], [[least developed countries]] or the [[Global South]].

[[File:Three Worlds Theory.png|thumb|The three worlds in [[Three Worlds Theory]]
{{Legend|#3465A4|First World: [[Superpower|Superpowers]]}}
{{Legend|#FFC90E|Second World: Developed Countries}}
{{Legend|#CC0000|'''Third World''': Developing Countries}}]]

==Etymology==
The demographer, anthropologist, and historian [[Alfred Sauvy]], in an article published in the French magazine ''{{lang|fr|[[Le Nouvel Observateur|L'Observateur]]}}'', August 14, 1952, coined the term ''third world'' ({{lang|fr|tiers monde}}), referring to countries that were playing a small role in international trade and business.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sauvi |first=Alfred |title=TROIS MONDES, UNE PLANÈTE. |url=http://www.homme-moderne.org/societe/demo/sauvy/3mondes.html |access-date=2023-03-27 |website=www.homme-moderne.org |language=French |publication-date=August 14, 1952}}</ref> His usage was a reference to the [[Estates-General of 1789|Third Estate]] ({{lang|fr|tiers état}}), the commoners of France who, before and during the [[French Revolution]], opposed the clergy and nobles, who composed the First Estate and Second Estate, respectively (hence the use of the older form ''tiers'' rather than the modern {{lang|fr|troisième}} for "third"). Sauvy wrote, "This third world ignored, exploited, despised like the third estate also [[What Is the Third Estate?|wants to be something]]."<ref>Literal translation from French</ref> In the context of the [[Cold War]], he conveyed the concept of political [[Non-Aligned Movement|non-alignment]] with either the capitalist or communist bloc.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Wolf-Phillips |first=Leslie |date=1987 |title=Why 'Third World'?: Origin, Definition and Usage |journal=[[Third World Quarterly]] |volume=9 |number=4 |pages=1311–1327|doi=10.1080/01436598708420027 }}</ref> Simplistic interpretations quickly led to the term merely designating these unaligned countries.<ref name="Gregory">{{Cite book |editor-last=Gregory |editor-first=Derek |others=et al. |date=2009 |title=Dictionary of Human Geography |edition=5th |publisher=[[Wiley-Blackwell]]}}</ref>

== Related concepts ==
{{More citations needed section|date=August 2023}}
=== Third World vs. Three Worlds ===
{{Main|Three World Model|Three Worlds Theory}}
The "Three Worlds Theory" developed by [[Mao Zedong]] is different from the Western theory of the Three Worlds or Third World. For example, in the Western theory, China and India belong respectively to the second and third worlds, but in Mao's theory both China and India are part of the Third World which he defined as consisting of exploited nations.

=== Third Worldism ===
{{main|Third-Worldism}}

Third Worldism is a political movement that argues for the unity of third-world nations against first-world influence and the principle of [[Non-interventionism|non-interference]] in [[Westphalian sovereignty|other countries' domestic affairs]]. Groups most notable for expressing and exercising this idea are the [[Non-Aligned Movement]] (NAM) and the [[Group of 77]] which provide a base for relations and diplomacy between not just the third-world countries, but between the third-world and the first and [[Second World|second worlds]]. The notion has been criticized as providing a [[fig leaf]] for human rights violations and [[political repression]] by [[dictatorship]]s.<ref>{{cite report |last=Pithouse |first=Richard |date=2005 |url=http://ccs.ukzn.ac.za/default.asp?3,28,11,1994 |title=Report Back from the Third World Network Meeting Accra, 2005 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111028163706/http://ccs.ukzn.ac.za/default.asp?3,28,11,1994 |archive-date=2011-10-28 |publisher=Centre for Civil Society |pages=1–6}}</ref>{{failed verification|date=July 2023}}<!--Having read the whole article, the closest statement to the claim it's cited as a source for is the observation that 'Third Worldism is popular among Third World autocrats'. Nothing about 'providing a [[fig leaf]] for human rights violations and [[political repression]] by [[dictatorship]]s'. Moreover, the author defines Third Worldism in a way very different from this section, namely 'the idea that Third World elites were the privileged historical actor (that will deliver the world from the tyranny of capital)'.-->

Initially, the term “third world” meant a nation was under-developed or impoverished.<ref>{{cite journal | title=Third Worldism and Internationalism | date=2003-01-01 | doi-access=free | last=Nash | first=Andrew | journal=[[African Sociological Review]] | volume=7 | issue=1 | issn=1027-4332 | doi=10.4314/asr.v7i1.23132 | quote=Third Worldism can be defined roughly as the political theory and practice that saw the major faultline in the global capitalist order as running between the advanced capitalist countries of the West and the impoverished continents of Africa, Asia, and Latin America, and saw national liberation struggles in the Third World as the major force for global revolution. Third Worldism was the form of internationalism specific of an age in which colonial rule was coming to an end -an age in which the economic power of western capital remained intact, but its global political dominance was contested. It was the internationalism of an age in which the capitalist divide between economic and political power was in the process of being globalised but was not yet firmly established, in which formal equality among nation-states accompanied continuing and thengrowing inequality in the global economy.}}</ref> Nowadays, it means “developing".{{fact|date=March 2025}}

=== Great Divergence and Great Convergence ===

Many times there is a clear distinction between First and Third Worlds. When talking about the [[Global North and Global South]], the majority of the time the two go hand in hand. People refer to the two as "Third World/South" and "[[First World]]/North" because the Global North is more affluent and developed, whereas the Global South is less developed and often poorer.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Mimiko |first=Oluwafemi |year=2012 |title=Globalization: The Politics of Global Economic Relations and International Business |journal=Carolina Academic Press |pages=49}}</ref>

To counter this mode of thought, some scholars began proposing the idea of a change in world dynamics that began in the late 1980s, and termed it the [[The Great Convergence|Great Convergence]].<ref name="cliodynamics.ru">{{cite journal |last1=Korotayev |first1=A. |last2=Zinkina |first2=J. |url=http://cliodynamics.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=361&Itemid=1 |title=On the structure of the present-day convergence |journal=Campus-Wide Information Systems |volume=31 |number=2/3 |date=2014 |pages=139–152 |doi=10.1108/CWIS-11-2013-0064 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141008181304/http://cliodynamics.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=361&Itemid=1 |archive-date=2014-10-08|url-access=subscription }}</ref> As [[Jack A. Goldstone]] and his colleagues put it, "in the twentieth century, the [[Great Divergence]] peaked before the First World War and continued until the early 1970s, then, after two decades of indeterminate fluctuations, in the late 1980s, it was replaced by the Great Convergence as the majority of Third World countries reached economic growth rates significantly higher than those in most First World countries".<ref>{{Cite journal |url=http://cliodynamics.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=378&Itemid=1 |title=Phases of global demographic transition correlate with phases of the Great Divergence and Great Convergence |journal=Technological Forecasting and Social Change |volume=95 |date=June 2015 |page=163 |doi=10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150703063805/http://cliodynamics.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=378&Itemid=1 |archive-date=2015-07-03|last1=Korotayev |first1=Andrey |last2=Goldstone |first2=Jack A. |last3=Zinkina |first3=Julia |url-access=subscription }}</ref>

Others have observed a return to Cold War-era alignments ([[Mark MacKinnon|MacKinnon]], 2007; [[Edward Lucas (journalist)|Lucas]], 2008), this time with substantial changes between 1990&ndash;2015 in geography, the world economy and relationship dynamics between current and emerging world powers; not necessarily redefining the classic meaning of ''First'', ''Second'', and ''Third World'' terms, but rather which countries belong to them by way of association to which world power or coalition of countries, such as the [[G7]], the [[European Union]], [[OECD]]; [[G20]], [[OPEC]], [[Next 11|N-11]], [[BRICS]], [[ASEAN]]; the [[African Union]], and the [[Eurasian Union]].

== History ==
Most Third World countries are former [[Colony|colonies]]. Having gained independence, many of these countries, especially smaller ones, were faced with the challenges of {{nowrap begin}}nation-{{nowrap end}} and institution-building on their own for the first time. Due to this common background, many of these nations were "[[Developing country|developing]]" in economic terms for most of the 20th century, and many still are. This term, used today, generally denotes countries that have not developed to the same levels as [[OECD]] countries, and are thus in the process of ''developing''.

In the 1980s, economist [[Peter Thomas Bauer|Peter Bauer]] offered a competing definition for the term "Third World". He claimed that the attachment of Third World status to a particular country was not based on any stable economic or political criteria, and was a mostly arbitrary process. The large diversity of countries considered part of the Third World, ranged widely from economically primitive to economically advanced and from politically non-aligned to Soviet- or Western-leaning. An argument could also be made for how parts of the U.S. are more like the Third World.<ref>[http://www.macleans.ca/2010/09/14/third-world-america/ "Third World America"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140213004354/http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/14/third-world-america/ |date=2014-02-13 }}, ''MacLeans'', September 14, 2010</ref>

The only characteristic that Bauer found common in all Third World countries was that their governments "demand and receive Western aid," which he strongly opposed. The aggregate term "Third World" was challenged as misleading even during the Cold War period, because it had no consistent or collective identity among the countries it supposedly encompassed.

=== Development aid ===
{{Main|Development aid}}
[[File:Least Developed Countries Map New.svg|thumb|A map of the world with [[Least Developed Countries|Least Developed Countries]], as designated by the [[United Nations]], highlighted in red and countries formerly considered least developed highlighted in yellow]]
During the Cold War, unaligned countries of the Third World<ref name="Tomlinson">{{cite journal |last=Tomlinson |first=B.R. |date=2003 |title=What was the Third World |journal=[[Journal of Contemporary History]] |volume=38 |number=2 |pages=307–321|doi=10.1177/0022009403038002135 |s2cid=162982648 }}</ref> were seen as potential allies by both the First and Second World. Therefore, the United States and the Soviet Union went to great lengths to establish connections in these countries by offering economic and military support to gain strategically located alliances (e.g., the Soviet Union in Cuba).<ref name="Tomlinson" /> By the end of the Cold War, many Third World countries had adopted capitalist or communist economic models and continued to receive support from the side they had chosen. Throughout the Cold War and beyond, the countries of the Third World have been the priority recipients of Western [[foreign aid]] and the focus of [[economic development]] through mainstream theories such as [[modernization theory]] and [[dependency theory]].<ref name="Tomlinson" />

By the end of the 1960s, the idea of the Third World came to represent countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America that were considered underdeveloped by the West based on several characteristics: low economic development, low [[life expectancy]], high rates of poverty and disease, and others.<ref name="Gregory" /> These countries became the targets for aid and support from governments, [[non-governmental organization]]s (NGOs), and individuals from wealthier nations. One popular model, known as [[Rostow's stages of growth]], argued that development took place in five stages: traditional society, pre-conditions for take-off, take-off, drive to maturity, and age of high mass consumption.<ref name="reference">Westernizing the Third World (Ch 2), Routledge</ref> [[W. W. Rostow]] argued that "take-off" was the critical stage with which the Third World was struggling, which some argued could be facilitated through foreign aid.<ref name="reference"/>

=== Perceived "End of the Third World" ===
{{ref improve section|date=March 2025}}
Since 1990 the term "Third World" evolved to denote countries with less economic development. The term "Third World" is increasingly perceived to be politically incorrect or outdated, as it is a historical term that isn't as relevant in modern day [[geopolitics]]. Around the early 1960s, the term "underdeveloped countries" was frequently used to refer to roughly the same group of countries. This term was in turn replaced by 'developing' and 'less-developed' countries, as politicians{{which|date=March 2025}} found that the earlier term contributed to stereotypes or disrespect of this group of countries.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Wolf-Phillips |first=Leslie |date=1979 |title=Why Third World?|journal=[[Third World Quarterly]] |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=105–115 |doi=10.1080/01436597908419410 |jstor=3990587 |issn=0143-6597}}</ref> 

The general definition of the Third World can be traced back to the history that nations positioned as neutral and independent during the Cold War were considered as Third World Countries, and normally these countries are defined by high poverty rates, lack of resources, and unstable financial standing.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Drakakis-Smith |first1=D. W. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WbzIix8TEckC&q=third+world&pg=PA3 |title=Third World Cities |date=2000 |publisher=[[Psychology Press]] |isbn=978-0-415-19882-0 |language=en |access-date=2020-11-22 |archive-date=2021-07-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210715062318/https://books.google.com/books?id=WbzIix8TEckC&q=third+world&pg=PA3 |url-status=live |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> However, based on the rapid development of modernization and globalization, some countries previously considered to be Third World countries, such as [[Brazil]], [[India]], and [[Indonesia]], achieved large economic growth and are no longer considered poor nations in the 21st century.{{fact|date=March 2025}}

The differences among nations of the Third World are continually growing throughout time, and it will be hard to use the Third World to define and organize groups of nations based on their common political arrangements since most countries live under diverse creeds in this era, such as [[Mexico]], [[El Salvador]], and [[Singapore]], which each have their distinct political systems.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Rieff |first=David |date=1989 |title=In The Third World |journal=Salmagundi |issue=81 |pages=61–65 |jstor=40548016 |issn=0036-3529}}</ref> The Third World categorization becomes anachronistic since its political classification and economic system are distinct to be applied in today's society. Based on the Third World standards, any region of the world can be categorized into any of the four types of relationships among state and society, and will eventually end in four outcomes: [[praetorianism]], multi-authority, quasi-democratic and viable democracy.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Kamrava |first=Mehran|date=1995 |title=Political Culture and a New Definition of the Third World |journal=[[Third World Quarterly]] |volume=16 |issue=4 |pages=691–701 |doi=10.1080/01436599550035906 |jstor=3993172 |issn=0143-6597}}</ref>

== See also ==
{{portal|border=no|World}}
* [[Fourth World]]
* [[Majority World]]
* [[Neutral and Non-Aligned European States]]

== References ==
{{Reflist|30em}}

== Further reading ==
{{Wikiquote}}
{{Commonscat}}
* {{cite book |last=Aijaz |first=Charles K. |title= The political economy of development and underdevelopment |year=1973 |publisher=[[Random House]] |location=New York}}

* {{cite book |last=Aijaz |first=Ahmad |author-link=Aijaz Ahmad |title=In theory: Classes, nations, literatures |year= 1992 |publisher=[[Verso Books]] |location=London}}
* {{cite book |last=Bauer |first= Peter T. |title=Equality, the Third World, and economic delusion |url=https://archive.org/details/equalitythirdwor00baue |url-access=registration |year=1981 |publisher=[[Harvard University Press]] |location=Cambridge, MA |isbn=9780674259850}}
* Chaouad, Robert. (2016) ''Emergence: genesis and circulation of a notion that has become a category of analysis,'' International and Strategic Review, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 55-66.
* {{cite book |last=Escobar |first=Arturo |author-link=Arturo Escobar (anthropologist) |title=Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World |year=2011 |publisher=[[Princeton University Press]] |location=Princeton, NJ |edition=revised}}
* {{cite book |last=Furtado |first=Celso |author-link=Celso Furtado |title=Development and underdevelopment |url= https://archive.org/details/developmentunder0000furt |url-access=registration |year=1964 |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |location=Berkeley}}
* Lawrence, Mark Atwood. ''The End of Ambition: The United States and the Third World in the Vietnam War Era'' (Princeton University Press, 2021) {{ISBN|978-0-691-12640-1}} [https://issforum.org/to/jrt14-18 | Website: rjissf.org online reviews]
* Melkote, Srinivas R. & Steeves, H. Leslie. (1991). ''Communication for development in the Third World: Theory and practice for Empowerment'' . New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
* {{cite book |editor-last1=Parrott |editor-first1=R. Joseph |editor-last2=Lawrence |editor-first2=Mark Atwood |title=The Tricontinental Revolution: Third World Radicalism and the Cold War |series=Cambridge Studies in US Foreign Relations |year=2022 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |doi=10.1017/9781009004824 |isbn=978-1-009-00482-4 |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/tricontinental-revolution/C7B8647FD273BD6F7416AE5EDFD95F4B }}

* {{cite book |last=Rangel |first=Carlos |author-link=Carlos Rangel |title=Third World Ideology and Western Reality |url=https://archive.org/details/thirdworldideolo00rang |url-access=registration |year=1986 |publisher=[[Transaction Books]] |location=New Brunswick|isbn=9780887386015 }}
* Sheppard, Eric & Porter, Wayland P. (1998). ''A world of difference: Society, nature, development'' (New York: Guilford Press).

* {{cite book |last=Smith |first=Brian C. |title=Understanding Third World Politics: Theories of Political Change and Development |year=2013| publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]] |location=London |edition=4th}}
* Wolf-Phillips, L. (1987). "Why 'Third World'? Origin, definition and usage’, ''Third World Quarterly'', 9 (4), pp. 1311–27. {{JSTOR|3991655}}

{{South-South}}
{{Global economic classifications}}

[[Category:Economic country classifications]]
[[Category:Political pejoratives]]
[[Category:Political terminology]]
[[Category:Politics by region]]
[[Category:Cold War terminology]]
[[Category:Imperialism studies]]
[[Category:Third-Worldism]]
[[Category:Linguistic controversies]]