Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Trivial objections
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|Fallacy in informal logic}} '''Trivial objections''' (also referred to as '''hair-splitting''', '''nothing but objections''', '''barrage of objections''' and '''banal objections''') is an [[Informal fallacy|informal logical fallacy]] where irrelevant and sometimes frivolous objections are made to divert the attention away from the topic that is being discussed.<ref name="Pirie">{{cite book |last=Pirie |first=Madsen |author-link=Madsen Pirie |date=12 Mar 2015 |title=How to Win Every Argument |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YMPuBQAAQBAJ&dq=madsen+pirie+trivial+objections&pg=PT134 |location=London |publisher=Bloomsbury |isbn=9781472526977}}</ref><ref name="Pirie1985">{{cite book|author=Madsen Pirie|title=The book of the fallacy: a training manual for intellectual subversives|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=o0DYAAAAMAAJ|date=November 1985|publisher=Routledge & K. Paul|page=164|isbn=9780710205216}}</ref> This type of argument is called a "quibble" or "quillet".<ref name="x338">{{cite web | title=Word of the Day: Quibble | website=Merriam-Webster | date=2019-06-08 | url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/word-of-the-day/quibble-2019-06-08 | access-date=2025-01-21}}</ref> Trivial objections are a special case of [[red herring (fallacy)|red herring]]. A person engaging in this logical fallacy could also be considered [[Pedantry|pedantic]]. The fallacy often appears when an argument is difficult to oppose. The person making a trivial objection may appear ready to accept the argument in question, but at the same time they will oppose it in many different ways.<ref name="Pirie"/><ref name="Pirie1985"/>{{rp|165}} These objections can appear in the form of lists, hypotheticals, and even accusations. Such objections themselves may be valid, but they fail to confront the main argument under consideration. Instead, the objection opposes a small, irrelevant part of the main argument.<ref name="Damer2008">{{cite book|author=T. Edward Damer|title=Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-qZabUx0FmkC|date=21 February 2008|publisher=Cengage Learning|isbn=978-0-495-09506-4|page=206}}</ref> The fallacy is committed because of this diversion; it is fallacious to oppose a point on the basis of minor and incidental aspects, rather than responding to the main claim. These objections are often used to not address the merit of an argument but rather to oppose them from a technicality. ==See also== {{Portal|Philosophy}} * [[Red herring]] * [[Straw man]] ==References== {{reflist}} ==Further reading== *{{cite book|author=Alex C. Michalos|title=Improving Your Reasoning|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=huEQAQAAIAAJ|year=1986|publisher=Prentice Hall PTR|isbn=978-0-13-453465-7|page=78}} {{psych-stub}} {{logic-stub}} [[Category:Informal fallacies]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Asbox
(
edit
)
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Logic-stub
(
edit
)
Template:Portal
(
edit
)
Template:Psych-stub
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Rp
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)