SAVAK

Revision as of 05:59, 26 May 2025 by imported>Citation bot (Altered url. URLs might have been anonymized. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jay8g | #UCB_toolbar)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Template:Short description Template:Redirect Template:Infobox government agency

The Bureau for Intelligence and Security of the State (Template:Langx), shortened to as SAVAK (Template:Langx) or S.A.V.A.K. (Template:Langx)<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> was the secret police of the Imperial State of Iran. It was established in Tehran in 1957 by national security law.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and continued to operate until the Islamic Revolution in 1979, when it was dissolved by Iranian prime minister Shapour Bakhtiar.

At peak, there were around 5,000 SAVAK agents operating under the Pahlavi dynasty.<ref name="auto"/> Iranian-American scholar and ex-politician Gholam Reza Afkhami estimates that SAVAK had between 4,000 and 6,000 members,<ref>Gholam Reza Afkhami, Life and Times of the Shah (University of California Press, 2009, Template:ISBN), p. 386.</ref> while TIME stated in a publication on 19 February 1979 that the agency had 5,000 members.<ref name="TIMEsavak">SAVAK: "Like the CIA". Feb. 19, 1979 Template:Webarchive.</ref>

HistoryEdit

1957–1971Edit

After the 1953 Iranian coup d'état, Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddeq was removed. He was originally focused on nationalizing Iran's oil industry but had also set out to weaken the Shah's power. After the coup, the monarch, Mohammad Reza Shah, established an intelligence service with police powers. The Shah's goal was to strengthen his regime by placing political opponents under surveillance and repressing dissident movements.<ref>Nikki R. Keddie and Yann Richard, Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution Template:Webarchive (Yale University Press, 2006), p. 134.</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> According to Encyclopædia Iranica:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Template:ErrorTemplate:Main other{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

In March 1955, the Army colonel was "replaced with a more permanent team of five career Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officers, including specialists in covert operations, intelligence analysis, and counterintelligence, including Major General Herbert Norman Schwarzkopf who "trained virtually all of the first generation of SAVAK personnel". In October 1956, news of the intended establishment of an agency was reported by state media and in 1965, this agency was reorganized and given the name Sazeman-e Ettela'at va Amniyat-e Keshvar (SAVAK).<ref name="iranica" /><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> These in turn were replaced by SAVAK's own instructors in 1965.<ref>N. R. Keddie and M. J. Gasiorowski, eds., Neither East Nor West: Iran, the United States, and the Soviet Union (New Haven, 1990), pp. 154–55; personal interviews.</ref><ref>Profile: Norman Schwarzkopf Sr. Template:Webarchive History Commons</ref>

SAVAK had the power to censor the media, screen applicants for government jobs, and "according to a reliable Western source,<ref>New York Times, 21 September 1972.</ref>Template:Which use all means necessary, including torture, to hunt down dissidents".<ref name="Iran">Ervand Abrahamian, Iran Between Two Revolutions, p. 437</ref>Template:Clarify After 1963, the Shah expanded his security organizations, including SAVAK, which grew to over 5,300 full-time agents and a large but unknown number of part-time informers.<ref name="Iran"/>

In 1961, the Iranian authorities dismissed the agency's first director, General Teymur Bakhtiar,<ref name=pars>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and he later became a political dissident. In 1970, SAVAK agents assassinated him, disguising the deed as an accident.

General Hassan Pakravan, director of SAVAK from 1961 to 1966,<ref name=pars/> had an almost benevolent reputation, for example dining on a weekly basis with Ayatollah Khomeini while Khomeini was under house arrest, and later intervened to prevent Khomeini's execution on the grounds that it would "anger the common people of Iran".<ref>Harvard Iranian Oral History Project Template:Webarchive Transcript of interview with Fatemeh Pakravan conducted by Habib Ladjevardi 3 March 1983.</ref> After the Iranian Revolution, however, Pakravan was among the first of the Shah's officials to be executed by the Khomeini regime.

Pakravan was replaced in 1966 by General Nematollah Nassiri, a close associate of the Shah, and the service was reorganized and became increasingly active in the face of rising leftist and Islamist militancy and political unrest.

Throughout the 1960s, some agents in SAVAK started to consider financial corruption as a matter of financial security and monitored not only the fiscal activities of the political and economic elite of Iran, but also the royal family. Mohammad Reza Pahlavi was reportedly angered by these SAVAK reports due to its contents and the belief that the security agents were prying into private matters beyond their purview.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Siahkal attack and afterEdit

A turning point in SAVAK's reputation for ruthless brutality was reportedly an attack on a gendarmerie post in the Caspian village of Siahkal by a small band of armed Marxists in February 1971, although it is also reported to have tortured to death a Shia cleric, Ayatollah Muhammad Reza Sa'idi, in 1970.<ref>Momen, Moojan, An Introduction to Shi'i Islam (Yale University Press, 1985), p. 255.</ref><ref>Bill, James A., Tragedy of American-Iranian Relations Template:Webarchive(Yale University Press, 1989), p. 181–82</ref> According to Iranian political historian Ervand Abrahamian, after this attack SAVAK interrogators were sent abroad for "scientific training to prevent unwanted deaths from 'brute force.'" Brute force was supplemented with the bastinado; sleep deprivation; extensive solitary confinement; glaring searchlights; standing in one place for hours on end; nail extractions; snakes (favored for use with women); electrical shocks with cattle prods, often into the rectum; cigarette burns; sitting on hot grills; acid dripped into nostrils; near-drownings; mock executions; and an electric chair with a large metal mask to muffle screams while amplifying them for the victim. This latter contraption was dubbed the Apollo—an allusion to the American spacecraft of the same name. Prisoners were also humiliated by being raped, urinated on, and forced to stand naked.<ref>Ervand Abrahamian, Tortured Confessions (University of California Press, 1999), p. 106.</ref> Despite the new 'scientific' methods, the torture of choice remained the traditional bastinado used to beat soles of the feet. The "primary goal" of those using the bastinados "was to locate arms caches, safe houses and accomplices ..."<ref>Abrahamian, Tortured Confessions, p. 106.</ref>

Abrahamian estimates that SAVAK (and other police and military) killed 368 guerrillas including the leadership of the major urban guerrilla organizations (Organization of Iranian People's Fedai Guerrillas, People's Mujahedin of Iran) such as Hamid Ashraf between 1971–1977 and executed up to 100 political prisoners between 1971 and 1979—the most violent era of the SAVAK's existence.<ref>Abrahamian, Tortured Confessions, pp. 103, 169.</ref>

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

One well known writer was arrested, tortured for months, and finally placed before television cameras to 'confess' that his works paid too much attention to social problems and not enough to the great achievements of the White Revolution. By the end of 1975, twenty-two prominent poets, novelist, professors, theater directors, and film makers were in jail for criticizing the regime. And many others had been physically attacked for refusing to cooperate with the authorities.<ref>Abrahamian, Iran Between Two Revolutions, pp. 442–43.</ref>{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

The repression was softened thanks to publicity and scrutiny by "numerous international organizations and foreign newspapers." Jimmy Carter became president of the United States and he raised the issue of human rights in the Imperial State of Iran. Overnight prison conditions changed. Inmates dubbed this the dawn of "jimmykrasy".<ref>Abrahamian, Tortured Confessions, p. 119.</ref>

DirectorsEdit

Template:Officeholder table start Template:Officeholder table Template:Officeholder table Template:Officeholder table Template:Officeholder table Template:Officeholder table end

Number of employeesEdit

Over the years, the question of the number of employees of SAVAK has been the subject of debate by many historians and researchers. Given the fact that Iran has never disclosed data on the number of employees of the secret agency - many historians gave conflicting figures for the number of SAVAK personnel - 6,000,<ref>Sullivan, William H., Mission to Iran, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1981, pp. 96–97.</ref> 20,000,<ref>Sullivan, William H., Mission to Iran, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, (1981), p. 97.</ref> 30,000 and 60,000.<ref>Graham, Robert, Iran: The Illusion of Power, New York: St. Martin’s Press, (1978), p. 146.</ref>

In one of his interviews, on February 4, 1974, the Shah stated that he did not know the exact number of employees of SAVAK. However, he estimated their total number to be less than 2,000 employees.<ref>Gérard de Villiers: Der Schah. (1976), Seite 396 und 410.</ref> To the frequently asked question about “torture and atrocities” in SAVAK, the shah answered negatively, designating newspaper reports about the “arbitrariness and cruelty of SAVAK” as a lie and slander.<ref>Gérard de Villiers: Der Schah. (1976), Seite 408.</ref> Leaflets circulated after the Islamic Revolution indicated that 15,000 Iranians officially served in SAVAK, not to mention the many unofficial employees.

OperationsEdit

During the height of its power, SAVAK had virtually unlimited powers. It operated its own detention centers, such as Evin Prison. In addition to domestic security, the service's tasks extended to the surveillance of Iranians abroad, notably in the United States, France, and the United Kingdom, and especially students on government stipends. The agency also closely collaborated with the CIA by sending their agents to an air force base in New York to share and discuss interrogation tactics.<ref>Fisk. Great War for Civilisation, p. 112.</ref>

Teymur Bakhtiar was assassinated by SAVAK agents in 1970,<ref>Reeva S. Simon, Philip Mattar, Richard W. Bulliet. Encyclopedia of the Modern Middle East: A-C. Macmillan Reference USA, (1996), p. 294.</ref> and Mansur Rafizadeh, SAVAK's United States director during the 1970s, reported that General Nassiri's phone was tapped.<ref>Rodney Carlisle. "Encyclopedia of Intelligence and Counterintelligence". (2005), p. 325.</ref> Mansur Rafizadeh later wrote of his life as a SAVAK man and detailed the human rights violations of the Shah in his book Witness: From the Shah to the Secret Arms Deal: An Insider's Account of U.S. Involvement in Iran. Mansur Rafizadeh was suspected to have been a double agent also working for the CIA.<ref>Henry Robinson Luce. "Time", Volume 129. Time Incorporated, (1987), p. 327.</ref>

SAVAK was additionally involved in supporting Jamiat-e Islami militants during the 1975 Panjshir Valley uprising and 1975 Laghman uprising in the Republic of Afghanistan, in collaboration with the CIA and the Pakistani ISI, although Afghan–Iranian relations later improved in 1976 under Mohammad Daoud Khan.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Two days before the Saur Revolution in 1978, the KGB were informed of the coup by Afghan Army leaders Mohammed Rafie and Sayed Mohammad Gulabzoy. As a result, the KGB mistakenly informed its operatives in Kabul that SAVAK tricked the PDPA into starting a rebellion, expecting it to be crushed and for the rebels to fail.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

According to Polish author Ryszard Kapuściński, SAVAK was responsible for: Censorship of press, books, and films; Interrogation and often torture of prisoners; and Surveillance of political opponents.<ref>Kapuściński, Ryszard, Shah of Shahs, pp. 46, 50, 76</ref>

VictimsEdit

Writing at the time of the Shah's overthrow, Time magazine on February 19, 1979, described SAVAK as having "long been Iran's most hated and feared institution" which had "tortured and murdered thousands of the Shah's opponents".<ref name="TIMEsavak"/> The Federation of American Scientists also found it guilty of "the torture and execution of thousands of political prisoners" and symbolising "the Shah's rule from 1963–79." The FAS list of SAVAK torture methods included "electric shock, whipping, beating, inserting broken glass and pouring boiling water into the rectum, tying weights to the testicles, and the extraction of teeth and nails".<ref>Ministry of Security SAVAK Template:Webarchive, Federation of American Scientists.</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Fardoust and security and intelligence after the revolutionEdit

Template:Further

SAVAK was closed down shortly before the overthrow of the monarchy and the coming to power of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the February 1979 Iranian Revolution. Following the departure of the Shah in January 1979, SAVAK's more than 3,000 strong central staff and its agents were targeted for reprisals. However, it is believed that Khomeini may have changed his mind and may have retained them into the new SAVAMA.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Hossein Fardoust, a former classmate of the Shah, was a deputy director of SAVAK until he was appointed head of the Imperial Inspectorate, also known as the Special Intelligence Bureau, to watch over high-level government officials, including SAVAK directors. Fardoust later switched sides during the revolution and managed to salvage the bulk of the SAVAK organization.<ref>Robert Dreyfuss, Hostage to Khomeini 1981 and The Devils Game: How the United States Unleashed Fundamentalist Islam, 2004</ref> According to author Charles Kurzman, SAVAK was never dismantled but rather changed its name and leadership and continued on with the same codes of operation, and a relatively unchanged "staff."<ref name="britannica">Intelligence (international relations) : Iran Template:Webarchive. (2008). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved July 26, 2008.</ref><ref>Charles Kurzman, The Unthinkable Revolution (Harvard University Press), p. ?</ref>

SAVAK was replaced by the "much larger"<ref>Abrahamian, History of Modern Iran, (2008), p. 176</ref> SAVAMA, Sazman-e Ettela'at va Amniat-e Melli-e Iran, also known as the Ministry of Intelligence and National Security of Iran.<ref>The ministry is also referred to as VEVAK, Vezarat-e Ettela'at va Amniat-e Keshvar, though Iranians and the Iranian press never employ this term, using instead the official Ministry title.Template:Citation needed</ref> After the Iranian Revolution, a museum was opened in the former Towhid Prison in central Tehran called "Ebrat". The museum displays and exhibits the documented atrocities of SAVAK.

See alsoEdit

Template:Portal

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

External linksEdit

Template:Sister project

Template:SAVAK