Argument to moderation

Revision as of 16:30, 30 May 2025 by imported>Peter G Werner (→‎See also)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Template:Short description Template:Use British English Oxford spelling Template:Use dmy datesTemplate:Redirect-synonym Argument to moderation (Template:Langx)—also known as the false compromise, argument from middle ground, fallacy of gray, middle ground fallacy, or golden mean fallacy<ref name="Nizkor">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>—is the fallacy that the truth is always in the middle of two opposites.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

It does not necessarily suggest that an argument for the middle solution or for a compromise is always fallacious, but rather applies primarily in cases where such a position is ill-informed, unfeasible, or impossible, or where an argument is incorrectly made that a position is correct simply because it is in the middle.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

An example of an argument to moderation would be considering two statements about the colour of the sky on Earth during the dayTemplate:Sndone claiming, correctly, that the sky is blue, and another claiming that it is yellowTemplate:Sndand incorrectly concluding that the sky is the intermediate colour, green.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

See alsoEdit

Template:Portal Template:Div col

Template:Div col end

ReferencesEdit

Template:ReflistTemplate:Fallacies

Template:Logic-stub