Template:Short description {{#invoke:other uses|otheruses}} Template:Use dmy dates Template:Political corruption sidebar Template:Canon law
Simony (Template:IPAc-en) is the act of selling church offices and roles or sacred things. It is named after Simon Magus,<ref>The Reader's Encyclopedia (1965), New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, vol.2, p.932, "Simon."</ref> who is described in the Acts of the Apostles as having offered two disciples of Jesus payment in exchange for their empowering him to impart the power of the Holy Spirit to anyone on whom he would place his hands.<ref name=Acts8>Template:Bibleverse</ref> The term extends to other forms of trafficking for money in "spiritual things".Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn
OriginEdit
The earliest church legislation against simony may be that of the forty-eighth canon of the Synod of Elvira (Template:Circa), against the practice of making a donation following a baptism.<ref name=Weber1909/>Template:Rp
Following the Edict of Milan (313), the increased power and wealth of the church hierarchy attracted simony.<ref name=Weber1909/>Template:Rp There are several accusations of simony (not by that name) against Arians, from Athanasius of Alexandria, Hilary of Poitiers, Pope Liberius and Gregory of Nazianzus.<ref name=Weber1909>Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp Many Church Fathers, such as Ambrose, spoke out against the selling of ministries.<ref name=Weber1909/>Template:Rp
Anti-simony provisions in Church Council canons (and papal bulls) became common: the First Council of Nicaea (325), the Synod of Antioch (341), and the Councils of Serdica (343–344), Chalcedon (451), and Orléans (533), etc.<ref name=Weber1909/>Template:Rp
The purchase or sale of ecclesiastical office was associated with the figure of Simon Magus in the Acts of the Apostles and his name came into use as a term.<ref name=Acts8/> Important in popularizing the word 'Simony' was Pope Gregory I (590–604), who called such exchanges the "simoniac heresy".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
In the Middle AgesEdit
Although considered a serious offense against canon law, simony is thought to have become widespread in the Catholic Church during the 9th and 10th centuries.<ref>Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions, edited by Wendy Doniger, 1999</ref> In the eleventh century, it was the focus of a great deal of debate.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Central to this debate was the validity of simoniacal orders: that is, whether a cleric who had obtained their office through simony was validly ordained.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
The {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}<ref>Template:Harvnb cites Pt. ii. cause i. quest. 3</ref> and the Decretals of Gregory IX<ref>Template:Harvnb cites Bk. v. tit. 3.</ref> all dealt with the subject. The offender, whether {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (the perpetrator of a simoniacal transaction) or {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (the beneficiary of a simoniacal transaction), was liable to deprivation of his benefice and deposition from orders if a secular priest, or to confinement in a stricter monastery if a regular. No distinction seems to have been drawn between the sale of an immediate and of a reversionary interest. The innocent {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} was, apart from dispensation, liable to the same penalties as though he were guilty.Template:SfnTemplate:Clarify
In 1494, a member of the Carmelite order, Adam of Genoa, was found murdered in his bed with twenty wounds after preaching against the practice of simony.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
- Abbé pratiquant la simonie.jpg
Abbot practising simony (France, 12th century)
- Tizian 109.jpg
Girolamo and cardinal Marco Corner investing Marco, abbot of Carrara, with his benefice, Titian, Template:C.
In literatureEdit
In the 14th century, Dante Alighieri depicted the punishment of many "clergymen, and popes and cardinals" in hell for being avaricious or miserly.<ref>Inferno, Canto VII, line 47, Mandelbaum translation.</ref>
He also criticised certain popes and other simoniacs:<ref>Inferno, Canto XIX, lines 2–6, Mandelbaum translation</ref>
In the Catholic ChurchEdit
Simony remains prohibited in Roman Catholic canon law. In the Code of Canon Law, Canon 149.3 notes that "Provision of an office made as a result of simony is invalid by the law itself."<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
Church of EnglandEdit
The Church of England struggled with the practice after its separation from Rome. For the purposes of English law, simony is defined by William Blackstone as "obtain[ing] orders, or a licence to preach, by money or corrupt practices"<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> or, more narrowly, "the corrupt presentation of any one to an ecclesiastical benefice for gift or reward".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> While English law recognized simony as an offence,<ref>3 Coke's Institutes 153–156</ref> it treated it as merely an ecclesiastical matter, rather than a crime, for which the punishment was forfeiture of the office or any advantage from the offence and severance of any patronage relationship with the person who bestowed the office. Both Edward VI and Elizabeth I promulgated statutes against simony, in the latter case through the Simony Act 1588 (31 Eliz. 1. c. 6) and Simony Act 1688. The cases of Bishop of St. David's Thomas Watson in 1699Template:Sfn and of Dean of York William Cockburn in 1841 were particularly notable.<ref name="times410410">The Times, 10 April 1841, p. 6 col.b, reprinted from the Cambridge Advertiser</ref>
By the Benefices Act 1892,Template:Which a person guilty of simony is guilty of an offence for which he may be proceeded against under the Clergy Discipline Act 1892 (55 & 56 Vict. c. 32). An innocent clerk is under no disability, as he might be by the canon law. Simony may be committed in three ways – in promotion to orders, in presentation to a benefice, and in resignation of a benefice. The common law (with which the canon law is incorporated, as far as it is not contrary to the common or statute law or the prerogative of the Crown) has been considerably modified by statute. Where no statute applies to the case, the doctrines of the canon law may still be of authority.Template:Sfn
Template:As of, simony remains an offence.<ref>Template:Harvnb</ref>Template:Better source needed An unlawfully bestowed office can be declared void by the Crown, and the offender can be disabled from making future appointments and fined up to £1,000.<ref>Simony Act 1588, s.4</ref> Clergy are no longer required to make a declaration as to simony on ordination, but offences are now likely to be dealt with under the Clergy Discipline Measure 2003 (No. 3).<ref>2003 No. 3</ref>Template:Full citation needed<ref>r.8.Template:Harvnb</ref>
See alsoEdit
- Civil law (common law)
- Concordat of Worms
- Corruption in religion
- Gregorian Reform
- Indulgence, a Church doctrine widely abused in the late medieval period
- For papal simony, see Papal selection before 1059 § Ostrogothic rule (493–537)
- Simony Act 1688
- Simony Act 1713
CitationsEdit
General and cited referencesEdit
- Template:Cite book See also current updates.
- Template:Cite ODNB
- Template:Cite encyclopedia
Attribution:
- {{#if: |
|{{#ifeq: Simony |
|{{#ifeq: |
|
|
}}
|
}}
}}{{#ifeq: |
|{{#ifeq: |
|This article
|One or more of the preceding sentences
}} incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain:
}}{{#invoke:template wrapper|{{#if:|list|wrap}}|_template=cite EB1911
|_exclude=footnote, inline, noicon, no-icon, noprescript, no-prescript, _debug
| noicon=1
}}{{#ifeq: ||}}
Further readingEdit
- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}