Line of Control

Template:Short description Template:Pp-30-500 Template:EngvarB Template:Use dmy dates Template:Coord Template:Infobox border Template:Campaignbox Indo-Pakistani Wars

File:Un-kashmir-jammu.png

United Nations map of the Line of Control. The LoC is not defined near Siachen Glacier.

The Line of Control (LoC) is a military control line between the Indian Template:Hyphen and Pakistani Template:Hyphencontrolled parts of the former princely state of Jammu and Kashmir—a line which does not constitute a legally recognized international boundary, but serves as the de facto border. It was established as part of the Simla Agreement at the end of the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971. Both nations agreed to rename the ceasefire line as the "Line of Control" and pledged to respect it without prejudice to their respective positions.<ref>Template:Harvnb: 'With particular reference to Kashmir, they agreed that: ... in J&K, the Line of Control resulting from the ceasefire of 17 December 1971, shall be respected by both sides without prejudice to the recognised position of either side.'</ref> Apart from minor details, the line is roughly the same as the original 1949 cease-fire line.

The part of the former princely state under Indian control is divided into the union territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. The Pakistani-controlled section is divided into Azad Kashmir and Gilgit–Baltistan. The northernmost point of the Line of Control is known as NJ9842, beyond which lies the Siachen Glacier, which became a bone of contention in 1984. To the south of the Line of Control, (Sangam, Chenab River, Akhnoor), lies the border between Pakistani Punjab and the Jammu province, which has an ambiguous status: India regards it as an "international boundary", and Pakistan calls it a "working border".Template:Sfn

Another ceasefire line separates the Indian-controlled state of Jammu and Kashmir from the Chinese-controlled area known as Aksai Chin. Lying further to the east, it is known as the Line of Actual Control (LAC).Template:Sfn

BackgroundEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} After the partition of India, present-day India and Pakistan contested the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir – India because of the ruler's accession to the country, and Pakistan by virtue of the state's Muslim-majority population. The First Kashmir War in 1947 lasted more than a year until a ceasefire was arranged through UN mediation. Both sides agreed on a ceasefire line.Template:Sfn

After another Kashmir War in 1965, and the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 (which saw Bangladesh become independent), only minor modifications had been effected in the original ceasefire line. In the ensuing Simla Agreement in 1972, both countries agreed to convert the ceasefire line into a "Line of Control" (LoC) and observe it as a de facto border that armed action should not violate. The agreement declared that "neither side shall seek to alter it unilaterally, irrespective of mutual differences and legal interpretations".Template:Sfn<ref name="MEA_site">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) had the role of investigating ceasefire violations (CFVs), however their role decreased after 1971.Template:Sfnp In 2000, US President Bill Clinton referred to the Indian subcontinent and the Kashmir Line of Control, in particular, as one of the most dangerous places in the world.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

CharacteristicsEdit

TerrainEdit

The LoC from Kargil to Gurez comprises mountain passes and valleys with small streams and rivers.Template:Sfn The area up to around Template:Convert is wooded while the peaks rise higher.Template:Sfn Winter is snowy while summers are mild. From Gurez to Akhnoor, the area is mountainous and hilly respectively and is generally forested. There are tracks and minor roads connecting settlements.Template:Sfn The mix of flora and elevation affects visibility and line of sight significantly.Template:Sfn

Ceasefire violationsEdit

In 2018, two corps and a number of battalions of the Border Security Force manned the Indian side of the LoC.Template:Sfnp The Rawalpindi Corps manned the Pakistani side.Template:Sfnp Ceasefire violations (CFV's) are initiated and committed by both sides and show a symmetry.Template:Sfnp Template:Sfnp The response to a CFV at one location can lead to shooting at an entirely different area.Template:Sfnp Weapons used on the LoC include small arms, rocket-propelled grenades, recoilless rifles, mortars, automatic grenade launchers, rocket launchers and a number of other direct and indirect weaponry.Template:Sfnp Military personnel on both sides risk being shot by snipers in moving vehicles, through bunker peepholes and during meals.Template:Sfnp

The civilian population at the LoC, at some points ahead of the forward most post, has complicated the situation.Template:Sfnp Shelling and firing by both sides along the LoC has resulted in civilian deaths.Template:Sfnp<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Bunkers have been constructed for these civilian populations for protection during periods of CFV's.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> India and Pakistan usually report only casualties on their own sides of the LoC,Template:Sfn with the media blaming the other side for the firing and each side claiming an adequate retaliation.Template:Sfn

According to Happymon Jacob, the reasons for CFVs along the LoC includeTemplate:Sfn operational reasons (defence construction like observation facilities, the rule of the gun, lack of bilateral mechanisms for border management, personality traits and the emotional state of soldiers and commanders),Template:Sfn politico-strategic reasons,Template:Sfn proportional response (land grab, sniping triggered, "I am better than you", revenge firing),Template:Sfn accidental CFVs (civilian related, lack of clarity where the line is)Template:Sfn and other reasons (like testing the new boys, honour, prestige and humiliation, fun, gamesmanship).Template:Sfn Jacob ranks operational reasons as the main cause for CFVs, followed by retributive and politico-strategic reasons .Template:Sfn

Landmines and IEDsEdit

Mines have been laid across the India–Pakistan border and the LoC in 1947, 1965, 1971 and 2001.Template:Sfnp The small stretch of land between the rows of fencing is mined with thousands of landmines.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> During the 2001–2002 India–Pakistan standoff thousands of acres of land along the LoC were mined.Template:Sfnp Both civilians and military personnel on both sides have died in mine and improvised explosive device (IED)-related blasts, and many more have been injured.Template:Sfnp Between January 2000 to April 2002, 138 military personnel were killed on the Indian side.Template:Sfnp

Posts and bunkersEdit

Reinforced sandbagged and concrete posts and bunkers are among the first line of defence along the LoC.Template:Sfnp<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Armed soldiers man these positions with enough supplies for at least a week.Template:Sfnp The posts and bunkers allow soldiers to sleep, cook, and keep a watch on enemy positions round the clock.Template:Sfnp Some posts are located in remote locations. Animals are sometimes used to help transport loads, and at some posts animals are reared.Template:Sfnp The living quarters and the forward facing bunker are located at some distance apart.Template:Sfnp The locations of some posts do not follow any pre-ordained plan, rather they are in locations used during the First Kashmir War and the following cease-fire line, with minor adjustments made in 1972.Template:Sfnp

Indian LoC fencingEdit

File:Line of Control LoC.png

Indian fencing relative to the zero line, villages and posts/bunkers along the LoC.

India constructed a Template:Convert barrier along the Template:Convert<ref name=":length" />–Template:Convert Template:Sfn LoC by 2004.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name=":1" /> The fence generally remains about Template:Convert on the Indian-controlled side. Its stated purpose is to exclude arms smuggling and infiltration by Pakistani-based separatist militants. The barrier, referred to as an Anti-Infiltration Obstacle System (AIOS), consists of double-row of fencing and concertina wire Template:Convert in height, and is electrified and connected to a network of motion sensors, thermal imaging devices, lighting systems and alarms. They act as "fast alert signals" for the Indian troops, who can be alerted and ambush the infiltrators trying to sneak in.<ref name="thehindu_Fence">Template:Cite news</ref><ref name=":0">Template:Cite news</ref>

The barrier's construction began in the 1990s but slowed in the early 2000s as hostilities between India and Pakistan increased. After a November 2003 ceasefire agreement, building resumed and was completed in late 2004. LoC fencing was completed in the Kashmir Valley and Jammu region on 30 September 2004.<ref name=":1">Template:Cite news</ref> According to Indian military sources, the fence has reduced the numbers of militants who routinely cross into the Indian side of the disputed region by 80%.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In 2017, a proposal for an upgraded smart fence on the Indian side was accepted.<ref name=":0" />

Border villagesEdit

A number of villages lie between the Indian fence and the zero line. Pakistan has not constructed a border fence, however a number of villages lie near the zero line.Template:Sfnp In the Tithwal area, 13 villages are in front of the Indian fence.Template:Sfnp The total number between the fence and zero line on the Indian side is estimated to be 60 villages and at least one million people are spread over the districts adjacent to the LoC from Rajouri to Bandipora.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Infiltration and military cross-LoC movementEdit

According to the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs, 1,504 "terrorists" attempted to infiltrate India in 2002.Template:Sfn Infiltration was one of India's main issues during the 2001–2002 India–Pakistan standoff.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> There has been a decrease in infiltration over the years. Only a select number of individuals are successful; in 2016, the Ministry reported 105 successful infiltrations.Template:Sfn The Indian LoC fence has been constructed with a defensive mindset to counter infiltration.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The reduction in infiltration also points to a reduction in support of such activities within Pakistan.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }} SIPRI Policy Paper No. 11</ref> During the 2019 Balakot airstrike, Indian planes crossed the LoC for the first time in 48 years.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Crossing pointsEdit

Template:OSM Location map Pakistan and India officially designated five crossing points following the 2005 Kashmir earthquake—Nauseri-Tithwal; Chakoti-Uri; Hajipur-Uri; Rawalakot-Poonch and Tattapani-Mendhar.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

According to Azad Jammu and the Kashmir Cross LoC Travel and Trade Authority Act, 2016, the following crossing points are listed:<ref>Azad Jammu and Kashmir Cross LoC Travel and Trade Authority Act, 2016 Template:Webarchive. Act XVI of 2016. Law, Justice, Parliamentary Affairs and Human Rights Department, AJK Government. Retrieved 26 August 2021.</ref><ref name="Archived copy" />

Rawalakot–Poonch
Chakothi–Uri
Chaliana–Tithwal
Tatta Pani–Mendher
Haji Peer–Silli Kot

Trade points include: Chakothi – Salamabad and Rawalakot (Titrinote) – Poonch (Chakkan-da-Bagh). The ordinance passed in 2011.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Between 2005 and 2017, and according to Travel and Trade Authority figures, Muzaffarabad, Indian Kashmiris crossing over into Pakistan was about 14,000, while about 22,000 have crossed over to the Indian side.Template:Sfnp Crossing legally for civilians is not easy. A number of documents are required and verified by both countries, including proof of family on the other side.Template:Sfn Even a short-term, temporary crossing invites interrogation by government agencies.Template:Sfn The Indian and Pakistani military use these crossing points for flag meetings and to exchange sweets during special occasions and festivals.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> On 21 October 2008, for the first time in 61 years, cross-LoC trade was conducted between the two sides.Template:Sfn Trade across the LoC is barter trade.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> In ten years, trade worth nearly PKR 11,446 crore or Template:INRConvert has passed through the Chakothi – Salamabad crossing.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Chilliana – TeetwalEdit

Template:Multiple image The Teetwal crossing is across the Neelum River between Muzaffarabad and Kupwara. It is usually open only during the summer months,<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> and unlike the other two crossings is open only for the movement of people, not for trade.<ref name="Archived copy">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The Tithwal bridge, first built in 1931, has been rebuilt twice.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

Chakothi – SalamabadEdit

The Salamabad crossing point, or the Kamran Post, is on the road between Chakothi and Uri in the Baramulla district of Jammu and Kashmir along the LoC.<ref>Template:Cite press release</ref><ref name="ET_Cross_Goods">Template:Cite news</ref> It is a major route for cross LoC trade and travel. Banking facilities and a trade facilitation centre are being planned on the Indian side.<ref name="ET_CrossLOC"/> The English name for the bridge in Uri translates as "bridge of peace". The Indian Army rebuilt it after the 2005 Kashmir earthquake when a mountain on the Pakistani side caved in.<ref name="HT_inaugurate">Template:Cite news</ref> This route was opened for trade in 2008 after being closed for 61 years.<ref name="livemint_Trucks">Template:Cite news</ref> The Srinagar–Muzaffarabad Bus crosses this bridge on the LoC.<ref name="OutlookKaman">Template:Cite news</ref>

Tetrinote – Chakan Da BaghEdit

A road connects Kotli and Tatrinote on the Pakistan side of the LoC to the Indian Poonch district of Jammu and Kashmir through the Chakan Da Bagh crossing point.<ref name="ET_Cross_Goods"/><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> It is a major route for cross LoC trade and travel. Banking facilities and a trade facilitation centre are being planned on the Indian side for the benefit of traders.<ref name="ET_CrossLOC">Template:Cite news</ref>

Most of the flag meetings between Indian and Pakistani security forces are held here.<ref name="TH_Flagmeeting">Template:Cite news</ref>

Tattapani – MendharEdit

The fourth border crossing between Tattapani and Mendhar was opened on 14 November 2005.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Impact on civiliansEdit

The Line of Control divided the Kashmir into two and closed the Jhelum valley route, the only way in and out of the Kashmir Valley from Pakistani Punjab. This ongoing territorial division severed many villages and separated family members.<ref>Ranjan Kumar Singh, Sarhad: Zero Mile, (Hindi), Parijat Prakashan, Template:ISBN</ref><ref name="loc kashmir">Template:Cite book</ref> Some families could see each other along the LoC in locations such as the Neelum River, but were unable to meet.Template:Sfn In certain locations, women on the Pakistan side on the LoC have been instrumental in influencing infiltration and ceasefire violations; they have approached nearby Pakistani Army camps directly and insisted infiltration stop, which reduces India's cross LoC firing.Template:Sfn

In popular cultureEdit

Documentaries covering the LoC and related events include A journey through River Vitasta,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Raja Shabir Khan's Line of Control<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and HistoryTV18's Kargil: Valour & Victory.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> A number of Bollywood films on the 1999 Kargil conflict have involved depictions and scenes of the line of control including LOC: Kargil (2003),Template:Sfn Lakshya (2004)<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and Gunjan Saxena: The Kargil Girl (2020).<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Other Bollywood films include Uri: The Surgical Strike (2019)<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and Bajrangi Bhaijaan (2015),<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and streaming television shows such as Avrodh (2020).<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

ReferencesEdit

Notes

Template:Notelist

Citations

Template:Reflist

Bibliography

Template:Citation (Page numbers cited per the e-document)
Template:Cite book
— Template:Citation
Template:Cite book (print version)
— Template:Cite book (e-book version)
Template:Cite book
Template:Cite journal
Template:Citation
Template:Citation