Euler's identity

Revision as of 13:10, 10 April 2025 by imported>Anonimowy 2 (Undid revision 1284903621 by 160.237.144.133 (talk))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Template:Short description {{#invoke:other uses|otheruses}} Template:E (mathematical constant) In mathematics, Euler's identity<ref group="note">The term "Euler's identity" (or "Euler identity") is also used elsewhere to refer to other concepts, including the related general formula Template:Math,<ref>Dunham, 1999, p. xxiv.</ref> and the Euler product formula.<ref name=EOM>Template:Eom</ref> See also List of topics named after Leonhard Euler. </ref> (also known as Euler's equation) is the equality <math display=block>e^{i \pi} + 1 = 0</math> where

<math>e</math> is Euler's number, the base of natural logarithms,
<math>i</math> is the imaginary unit, which by definition satisfies <math>i^2 = -1</math>, and
<math>\pi</math> is pi, the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter.

Euler's identity is named after the Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler. It is a special case of Euler's formula <math>e^{ix} = \cos x + i\sin x</math> when evaluated for <math>x = \pi</math>. Euler's identity is considered an exemplar of mathematical beauty, as it shows a profound connection between the most fundamental numbers in mathematics. In addition, it is directly used in a proof<ref>Template:Citation</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> that Template:Pi is transcendental, which implies the impossibility of squaring the circle.

Mathematical beautyEdit

Euler's identity is often cited as an example of deep mathematical beauty.<ref name=Gallagher2014>Template:Cite news</ref> Three of the basic arithmetic operations occur exactly once each: addition, multiplication, and exponentiation. The identity also links five fundamental mathematical constants:<ref>Paulos, 1992, p. 117.</ref>

The equation is often given in the form of an expression set equal to zero, which is common practice in several areas of mathematics.

Stanford University mathematics professor Keith Devlin has said, "like a Shakespearean sonnet that captures the very essence of love, or a painting that brings out the beauty of the human form that is far more than just skin deep, Euler's equation reaches down into the very depths of existence".<ref>Nahin, 2006, p. 1.</ref> Paul Nahin, a professor emeritus at the University of New Hampshire who wrote a book dedicated to Euler's formula and its applications in Fourier analysis, said Euler's identity is "of exquisite beauty".<ref>Nahin, 2006, p. xxxii.</ref>

Mathematics writer Constance Reid has said that Euler's identity is "the most famous formula in all mathematics".<ref>Reid, chapter e.</ref> Benjamin Peirce, a 19th-century American philosopher, mathematician, and professor at Harvard University, after proving Euler's identity during a lecture, said that it "is absolutely paradoxical; we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means, but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth".<ref>Maor, p. 160, and Kasner & Newman, p. 103–104.</ref>

A 1990 poll of readers by The Mathematical Intelligencer named Euler's identity the "most beautiful theorem in mathematics".<ref>Wells, 1990.</ref> In a 2004 poll of readers by Physics World, Euler's identity tied with Maxwell's equations (of electromagnetism) as the "greatest equation ever".<ref>Crease, 2004.</ref>

At least three books in popular mathematics have been published about Euler's identity:

ExplanationsEdit

Imaginary exponentsEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Template:See also

File:ExpIPi.gif
In this animation Template:Mvar takes various increasing values from 1 to 100. The computation of Template:Math is displayed as the combined effect of Template:Mvar repeated multiplications in the complex plane, with the final point being the actual value of Template:Math. It can be seen that as Template:Mvar gets larger Template:Math approaches a limit of −1.

Euler's identity asserts that <math>e^{i\pi}</math> is equal to −1. The expression <math>e^{i\pi}</math> is a special case of the expression <math>e^z</math>, where Template:Math is any complex number. In general, <math>e^z</math> is defined for complex Template:Math by extending one of the definitions of the exponential function from real exponents to complex exponents. For example, one common definition is:

<math>e^z = \lim_{n\to\infty} \left(1+\frac z n \right)^n.</math>

Euler's identity therefore states that the limit, as Template:Math approaches infinity, of <math>(1 + \tfrac {i\pi}{n})^n</math> is equal to −1. This limit is illustrated in the animation to the right.

File:Euler's formula.svg
Euler's formula for a general angle

Euler's identity is a special case of Euler's formula, which states that for any real number Template:Math,

<math>e^{ix} = \cos x + i\sin x</math>

where the inputs of the trigonometric functions sine and cosine are given in radians.

In particular, when Template:Math,

<math>e^{i \pi} = \cos \pi + i\sin \pi.</math>

Since

<math>\cos \pi = -1</math>

and

<math>\sin \pi = 0,</math>

it follows that

<math>e^{i \pi} = -1 + 0 i,</math>

which yields Euler's identity:

<math>e^{i \pi} +1 = 0.</math>

Geometric interpretationEdit

Any complex number <math>z = x + iy</math> can be represented by the point <math>(x, y)</math> on the complex plane. This point can also be represented in polar coordinates as <math>(r, \theta)</math>, where Template:Mvar is the absolute value of Template:Mvar (distance from the origin), and <math>\theta</math> is the argument of Template:Mvar (angle counterclockwise from the positive x-axis). By the definitions of sine and cosine, this point has cartesian coordinates of <math>(r \cos \theta, r \sin \theta)</math>, implying that <math>z = r(\cos \theta + i \sin \theta)</math>. According to Euler's formula, this is equivalent to saying <math>z = r e^{i\theta}</math>.

Euler's identity says that <math>-1 = e^{i\pi}</math>. Since <math>e^{i\pi}</math> is <math>r e^{i\theta}</math> for Template:Mvar = 1 and <math>\theta = \pi</math>, this can be interpreted as a fact about the number −1 on the complex plane: its distance from the origin is 1, and its angle from the positive x-axis is <math>\pi</math> radians.

Additionally, when any complex number Template:Mvar is multiplied by <math>e^{i\theta}</math>, it has the effect of rotating <math>z</math> counterclockwise by an angle of <math>\theta</math> on the complex plane. Since multiplication by −1 reflects a point across the origin, Euler's identity can be interpreted as saying that rotating any point <math>\pi</math> radians around the origin has the same effect as reflecting the point across the origin. Similarly, setting <math>\theta</math> equal to <math>2\pi</math> yields the related equation <math>e^{2\pi i} = 1,</math> which can be interpreted as saying that rotating any point by one turn around the origin returns it to its original position.

GeneralizationsEdit

Euler's identity is also a special case of the more general identity that the Template:Mvarth roots of unity, for Template:Math, add up to 0:

<math>\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} e^{2 \pi i \frac{k}{n}} = 0 .</math>

Euler's identity is the case where Template:Math.

A similar identity also applies to quaternion exponential: let Template:Math be the basis quaternions; then,

<math>e^{\frac{1}{\sqrt 3}(i \pm j \pm k)\pi} + 1 = 0. </math>

More generally, let Template:Mvar be a quaternion with a zero real part and a norm equal to 1; that is, <math>q=ai+bj+ck,</math> with <math>a^2+b^2+c^2=1.</math> Then one has

<math>e^{q\pi} + 1 = 0. </math>

The same formula applies to octonions, with a zero real part and a norm equal to 1. These formulas are a direct generalization of Euler's identity, since <math>i</math> and <math>-i</math> are the only complex numbers with a zero real part and a norm (absolute value) equal to 1.

HistoryEdit

Euler's identity is a direct result of Euler's formula, published in his monumental 1748 work of mathematical analysis, Introductio in analysin infinitorum,<ref>Conway & Guy, p. 254–255.</ref> but it is questionable whether the particular concept of linking five fundamental constants in a compact form can be attributed to Euler himself, as he may never have expressed it.<ref name=Sandifer2007>Sandifer, p. 4.</ref>

Robin Wilson writes:<ref>Wilson, p. 151-152.</ref> Template:Quote

See alsoEdit

Template:Portal

NotesEdit

Template:Reflist

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

SourcesEdit

External linksEdit

Template:Sister project

Template:Leonhard Euler

de:Eulersche Formel#Eulersche Identit.C3.A4t pl:Wzór Eulera#Tożsamość Eulera