Russell Group

Revision as of 13:38, 31 May 2025 by imported>Mb2437 (ce, verified in related section)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates Template:Use British English Template:Infobox organization The Russell Group is a self-selected association of twenty-four public research universities in the United Kingdom. The group is headquartered in Cambridge and was established in 1994 to represent its members' interests, principally to government and Parliament. It was incorporated in 2007.<ref name=About>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Its members are often perceived as being the UK's best universities, which has been widely disputed.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Template:As of Russell Group members receive over three-quarters of all university research grant and contract income in the United Kingdom.<ref name=profile>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Russell Group members award 60% of all doctorates gained in the United Kingdom.<ref name=profile/> In the 2021 Research Excellence Framework, Russell Group universities accounted for 65% of all world-leading (4*) research conducted in the UK, and 91% of the Russell Group's research was judged to be world-leading (4*) or internationally excellent (3*).<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In the 2023 Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework (TEF), of the 20 English Russell Group universities which were assessed, 7 hold gold awards (35%) and 13 silver (65%). This compares to proportions across 128 higher education institutions of which 29% hold gold, 62% silver, and 9% bronze.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Their graduates hold 61% of all UK jobs that require a university degree, despite being only 17% of all higher education graduates.<ref>Template:Cite press release</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

The Russell Group is named after the location of the first informal meetings of the Group, which took place at the Hotel Russell in Russell Square, London.<ref name="bbc12312">Template:Cite news</ref>

HistoryEdit

The Russell Group of universities was formed in 1994 by 17 British research universities – Birmingham, Bristol, Cambridge, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Imperial College London, Leeds, Liverpool, London School of Economics, Manchester, Newcastle, Nottingham, Oxford, Sheffield, Southampton, University College London and Warwick, who originally met at Hotel Russell shortly before meetings of the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (now Universities UK) in nearby Tavistock Square, close to the University of London buildings and, particularly, Senate House.<ref name="bbc12312" /><ref name="guardian2012" /> With the exception of Warwick (established in the 1960s), the founder members of the group were all universities or university colleges prior to World War I, including most of Britain's ancient universities and "redbrick universities". In 1998, Cardiff University and King's College London joined the group.<ref name="kclandcardiff">Template:Cite news</ref>

In March 2001, the Russell Group decided against selecting a preferred option for the future funding of higher education, stating that endowments, a graduate contribution, increased public funding and top-up fees should all remain options.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> In December 2005, it was announced that the Russell Group would be appointing its first full-time director-general as a result of a planned expansion of its operations, including commissioning and conducting its own policy research.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> In November 2006, Queen's University Belfast was admitted as the twentieth member of the group.<ref name="the91106">Template:Cite news</ref> In the same month Wendy Piatt, the then deputy director in the Prime Minister's strategy unit, was announced as the group's new Director General and chief executive.<ref name="the91106" />

In March 2012, it was announced that four universities – Durham, Exeter, Queen Mary University of London; and York – would become members of the Russell Group in August of the same year.<ref name="bbc12312" /> All of the new members had previously been members of the 1994 Group of British universities.<ref name="bbc12312" />

In January 2013, it was announced that the Russell Group would establish an academic board to advise the English exams watchdog Ofqual on the content of A-Levels.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> In 2019, the group launched the website "Informed Choices" to advise school children on which A-level subject choices were useful for various degree courses, replacing an earlier teachers' guide of the same name from 2011 that had identified a list of "facilitating subjects'.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

OrganisationEdit

Template:Location map+

ObjectivesEdit

The Russell Group states that "its aim is to help ensure that our universities have the optimum conditions in which to flourish and continue to make social, economic and cultural impacts through their world-leading research and teaching".<ref name=About/>

It works towards this by lobbying the UK government and parliament; commissioning reports and research; creating a forum in which its member institutions can discuss issues of common concern; and identify opportunities for them to work together.

LeadershipEdit

The Russell Group is led by Chief Executive Tim Bradshaw and chaired by Chris Day, Vice-Chancellor of the University of Newcastle.<ref name="Chair_Day"/>

Russell Group chairs 2000–2026
Name Dates Institution
Colin Lucas 2000–2003 Oxford
Michael Sterling 2003–2006 Birmingham
Malcolm Grant 2006–2009 UCL
Michael Arthur 2009–2012 Leeds
David Eastwood 2012–2015 Birmingham
David Greenaway 2015–2017 Nottingham
Anton Muscatelli 2017–2020 Glasgow
Nancy Rothwell 2020–2023 Manchester
Chris Day 2023–2026 Newcastle

MembersEdit

The Russell Group currently has twenty-four members,<ref name=guardian2012>Template:Cite news</ref> of which twenty are from England, two from Scotland, and one from each of Wales and Northern Ireland. Of the English members, five are from Greater London; three from the Yorkshire and the Humber region; two from each of the North East, North West, West Midlands, South West and South East regions; and one from each of the East Midlands and East regions. Four Russell Group members are constituent colleges of the University of London and a fifth London institution, Imperial College London, was part of the University of London until 2007.

The table below gives the members of the group, along with when they joined, their student and staff numbers, and their latest Teaching Excellence Framework overall rating (non-English universities were not assessed).

University Nation Year of joining Undergraduate students (2021/22)<ref name="HESAStudents">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

Postgraduate students (2021/22)<ref name="HESAStudents"/> Total students (2021/22)<ref name="HESAStudents"/> Total academic staff (2022/23)<ref name="HESAStaff">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

TEF award<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

Template:BUni England 1994 25,150 12,840 37,990 3,195 Silver†
Template:BUni England 1994 23,055 8,425 31,485 2,830 Silver
Template:BUni England 1994 13,645 8,960 22,610 4,935 Gold*
Template:BUni Wales 1998 23,765 10,220 33,985 2,540 Template:N/a
Template:BUni England 2012 17,395 4,835 22,230 1,745 Silver
Template:BUni Scotland 1994 26,000 15,245 41,250 4,200 Template:N/a
Template:BUni England 2012 23,755 8,710 32,465 2,320 Gold*
Template:BUni Scotland 1994 23,460 19,520 42,980 3,155 Template:N/a
Template:BUni England 1994 11,740 9,730 21,470 3,715 Gold
Template:BUni England 1998 23,225 18,270 41,490 3,850 Silver
Template:BUni England 1994 27,015 10,175 37,190 3,040 Silver†
Template:BUni England 1994 22,265 6,415 28,680 2,440 Gold
Template:BUni England 1994 5,575 7,400 12,975 1,095 Silver
Template:BUni England 1994 30,900 15,505 46,410 4,195 Silver
Template:BUni England 1994 20,760 6,520 27,280 2,525 Silver†
Template:BUni England 1994 28,690 8,570 37,260 2,870 Silver
Template:BUni England 1994 15,685 11,610 27,290 6,005 Gold*
Template:BUni England 2012 17,430 8,615 26,045 2,065 Silver†
Template:BUni N. Ire. 2006 17,970 7,325 25,295 1,775 Template:N/a
Template:BUni England 1994 20,040 10,820 30,860 2,855 Silver
Template:BUni England 1994 15,110 8,685 23,795 2,060 Silver
Template:BUni England 1994 23,800 23,030 46,830 6,460 Silver
Template:BUni England 1994 18,955 9,870 28,825 2,270 Gold*
Template:BUni England 2012 15,350 8,070 23,420 1,810 Gold

Notes:
Member institution of the University of London, awarding its own degrees
* Achieved 'Gold' rating in all three categories of the assessment
Achieved overall 'Silver' rating with one category rated 'Bronze'

StatusEdit

ResearchEdit

In 2022/23, following the 2021 Research Excellence Framework (REF), the English universities of the Russell Group saw their share of recurring research funding from Research England drop by 2.71 percentage points from the 2021/22 funding (based on the previous 2014 REF) to 68.21 per cent, although most institutions saw a rise in actual funding levels due to an overall increase in funding. The top 19 English institutions in terms of funding continued to all be from the Russell Group, with the top 20 being rounded off, as before, by Lancaster. The LSE was, as in previous REF rounds, the exception, ranking 31st in terms of funding (down from 23rd in 2021/11) and seeing a nine per cent fall (£1.7 million) in its allocation.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

In 2015/16, following the 2014 REF, the 19 English universities with HEFCE research funding allocations (excluding transitional funding) in excess of £20 million were all members of the Russell Group. The only English Russell Group institution to receive an allocation below £20 million was the LSE (£18.6 million), which ranked 22nd behind the Universities of Leicester and Lancaster (both on £19 million).<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

In 2010/11, 19 of the 20 UK universities with the highest income from research grants and contracts were members of the Russell Group.<ref name=thefindat>Template:Cite news</ref> In terms of total research funding allocations from the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) in 2007/8, the top 15 universities were all Russell Group institutions.<ref name="education.guardian.co.uk">Template:Cite news</ref> LSE was 21st, due to its focus on less costly social sciences research. Queen's University Belfast, Cardiff, Glasgow and Edinburgh, were not included in this table, as they are not English institutions. The Russell Group institutions received 82% of the total HEFCE research funding allocation.<ref name="education.guardian.co.uk"/>

The research funding figures depend on factors other than the quality of research, in particular there are variations due to institutional size and subject spread (e.g. science, technology and medicine tend to attract more money).

In 2008, 18 of the then 20 members were positioned in the top 20 of Research Fortnight's Research Assessment Exercise 'Power' Table. The other two places were occupied by Durham University and Queen Mary University of London, which were not then Russell Group members but have since joined. The two Russell Group institutions outside the top 20 were QUB (21st) and the LSE (27th), while the other two universities to have since joined were York (22nd) and Exeter (25th).<ref name="Research Fortnight">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In the equivalent table for the 2014 Research Excellence Framework, the 24 Russell Group members occupied the top 24 positions, with the University of Lancaster in 25th being the highest-ranked non-Russell Group university.<ref name="Research Fortnight 2014">Template:Cite news</ref>

RankingsEdit

Template:See also

In 2023, all eight UK universities in the ARWU top 100, seventeen of the eighteen in the QS top 100 (the other place being occupied by the University of St Andrews), and all ten in the THE top 100 are members of the Russell Group. The Russell Group provides seven of the top ten in the Complete, Guardian, and Times/Sunday Times.

University ARWU 2024 (Global)<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

QS 2025 (Global)<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

THE 2024 (Global)<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

Complete 2025 (National)<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

Guardian 2025 (National)<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

Times/Sunday Times 2024 (National)<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

University of Birmingham 151–200 80= 101 12 36 22
University of Bristol 97 54 81 16 16 16
University of Cambridge 5 5 5 1 3 3
Cardiff University 151–200 186 190 27 46 25
Durham University 301–400 89= 174 6 6 7
University of Edinburgh 40 27 30= 15 15 13
University of Exeter 151–200 169= 177= 14 18 11
University of Glasgow 101–150 78 87= 29 14 12
Imperial College London 25 2 8 5 5 5
King's College London 53 40= 38= 24 28 27
University of Leeds 151–200 82= 129 23 37 24
University of Liverpool 101–150 165= 168= 18= 27 29=
London School of Economics 151–200 50= 46 3 4 4
University of Manchester 52 34= 51 22 31 23
Newcastle University 201–300 129 168= 26 63 37
University of Nottingham 101–150 108 130= 30 62 32
University of Oxford 6 3 1 2 1 2
Queen Mary University of London 201–300 120= 135 50 74 46
Queen's University Belfast 301–400 206= 201–250 25 43 31
University of Sheffield 151–200 105= 105 18= 20 18
University of Southampton 151–200 80= 97= 20 22 17
University College London 16 9 22 9 9 6
University of Warwick 101–150 69= 106= 10 8 9
University of York 301–400 184 147 17 25 15

SelectivityEdit

All but two of the universities in the Russell Group are part of the Sutton Trust's group of 30 highly selective universities, the Sutton 30 (the absent members being Queen Mary University of London and Queen's University Belfast).<ref>Template:Cite report</ref> The Sutton 13 group of the 13 most highly selective universities only includes one non-Russell Group member, the University of St Andrews.<ref>Template:Cite report</ref>

The top 10 by average UCAS points of new undergraduate students in 2021–22 included three non-Russell Group universities: St Andrews (1st: 212 points), Strathclyde (2nd: 210 points), and Aberdeen (joint 10th with Durham: 185 points).<ref name="Entry Standards"/> The top 10 by lowest offer rate to new undergraduate students in 2024-25 included three non-Russell Group universities: St Andrews (4th; 30.0%), St George's (7th; 42.0%) and University of the Arts London (10th; 48.4%). The average offer rate, including conditional and unconditional offers, across 'higher tariff' UK institutions (as defined by UCAS) was 63.3% in 2024.<ref name="offer rate"/>

University Average
Entry Tariff
a<ref name="Entry Standards">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

Offer Rate (%)b<ref name="offer rate">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

University of Birmingham 158 69.6
University of Bristol 174 67.6
University of Cambridge 209 24.5
Cardiff University 153 73.4
Durham University 185 67.6
University of Edinburgh 197 43.6
University of Exeter 164 85.1
University of Glasgow 209 66.5
Imperial College London 206 32.8
King's College London 171 44.3
University of Leeds 162 59.9
University of Liverpool 147 73.2
London School of Economics 195 21.0
University of Manchester 167 57.7
Newcastle University 151 80.2
University of Nottingham 154 70.1
University of Oxford 205 20.3
Queen Mary University of London 151 64.5
Queen's University Belfast 156 73.5
University of Sheffield 157 77.7
University of Southampton 156 76.5
University College London 190 35.2
University of Warwick 173 70.8
University of York 157 79.3

Notes:
a The average UCAS tariff achieved by new undergraduate students entering the university in 2021–22. This is based on qualifications achieved, for example A-levels: A* = 56, A = 48, B = 40 UCAS points; IBO Certificate in Higher Level: H7 = 56, H6 = 48, H5 = 32.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
b The average offer rate for June deadline undergraduate applicants (all ages) in 2024.

FinancesEdit

The Russell Group accounted for 49.1% of the income of the higher education sector in the UK in 2013–14, having risen from 44.7% of the total in 2001–02. Over the same period the total income of Russell Group universities rose by 69.9% in real terms, compared to a sector average of 54.4%.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Russell Group universities are also seen as "particularly creditworthy" due to their membership of the group, allowing them to borrow money at low interest rates.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

The total annual income for Russell Group members for 2023/24 was £25.31 billion (2020/21 – £20.30 billion) of which £5.67 billion (2020/21 – £4.77 billion) was from research grants and contracts, with an operating surplus of £6.50 billion (2020/21 – £1.15 billion). Russell Group universities hold a total endowment value of £6.66 billion excluding colleges (2020/21 – £6.18 billion) and net assets of £41.08 billion (2020/21 – £31.52 billion). The table below is a record of each Russell Group member's financial data for the 2023/24 financial year.

University Government funding body grants (£m) Teaching income (£m) Teaching income as % of total income Research income (£m) Research income as % of total income Total income (£m) Operating surplus (£m) Surplus as % of total income Endowment value (£m) Total net assets (£m)
University of Birmingham<ref name="Birmingham Financial Statement 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

109.5 456.3 49.3% 205.2 22.2% 926.0 199.5 21.5% 155.8 1,309.7
University of Bristol<ref name="Bristol Financial Statement 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

119.0 459.9 43.4% 294.1 27.7% 1,060.1 291.4 27.5% 98.7 1,580.8
University of Cambridge<ref name="Cambridge Financial Statement 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

202.5 394.9 16.1% 568.8 23.2% 2,449.4 387.5 15.8% 2,259.0 7,254.7
Cardiff University<ref name="Cardiff Financial Statements 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

83.2 328.3 51.5% 126.6 19.8% 638.0 137.6 21.6% 53.1 852.6
Durham University<ref name="Durham Financial Statement 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

48.2 301.9 58.8% 60.7 11.8% 513.4 120.4 23.5% 106.6 544.3
University of Edinburgh<ref name="Edinburgh Financial Statements 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

208.7 527.2 38.0% 365.2 26.4% 1,385.8 400.1 28.9% 580.4 3,002.6
University of Exeter<ref name="Exeter Financial Statement 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

72.8 350.6 52.6% 129.2 19.4% 666.6 186.1 27.9% 51.6 616.6
University of Glasgow<ref name="Glasgow Financial Statement 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

182.7 387.8 40.8% 221.1 23.2% 950.0 291.4 30.7% 262.4 1,409.0
Imperial College London<ref name="Imperial Financial Statements 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

165.4 507.5 38.8% 396.2 30.3% 1,309.3 258.1 19.7% 235.2 2,081.8
King's College London<ref name="KCL Financial Statements 2023/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

144.9 630.5 49.6% 256.9 20.2% 1,270.7 326.7 25.7% 324.8 1,670.9
University of Leeds<ref name="Leeds Financial Statements 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

101.8 563.8 53.8% 190.9 18.2% 1,047.8 299.7 28.6% 94.8 1,264.6
University of Liverpool<ref name="Liverpool Financial Statement 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

93.4 367.1 52.1% 123.3 17.5% 705.3 189.5 26.9% 193.8 885.6
London School of Economics<ref name="LSE Financial Statement 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

26.8 316.4 60.2% 41.4 7.9% 525.6 181.2 34.5% 255.5 1,008.8
University of Manchester<ref name="Manchester Financial Statements 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

151.0 714.3 52.3% 287.9 21.1% 1,365.2 340.0 24.9% 240.2 2,214.7
Newcastle University<ref name="Newcastle Financial Statement 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

88.7 307.4 49.6% 126.1 20.4% 619.8 144.8 23.4% 94.8 627.2
University of Nottingham<ref name="Nottingham Financial Statement 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

120.7 437.5 52.4% 141.6 17.0% 834.7 219.4 26.3% 78.1 783.5
University of Oxford<ref name="Oxford Financial Statement 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

224.7 524.7 18.6% 777.8 27.5% 2,829.1 766.6 27.1% 1,198.7 6,250.5
Queen Mary University of London<ref name="QMUL Financial Statement 2023-24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

86.9 390.0 54.8% 146.8 20.6% 712.2 189.7 26.6% 48.0 859.2
Queen's University Belfast<ref name="QUB Financial Statement 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

107.5 160.0 33.7% 105.2 22.2% 474.2 128.3 27.1% 70.9 658.0
University of Sheffield<ref name="Sheffield Financial Statement 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

109.1 401.8 45.3% 185.8 20.9% 887.9 236.5 26.6% 55.2 1,885.7
University of Southampton<ref name="Southampton Financial Statements 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

84.0 369.7 49.8% 136.5 18.4% 742.4 220.1 29.7% 12.4 929.3
University College London<ref name="UCL Financial Statements 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

228.1 971.2 47.9% 538.8 26.6% 2,028.6 558.2 27.5% 174.8 2,186.4
University of Warwick<ref name="Warwick Financial Statements 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

74.4 459.6 54.0% 146.5 17.2% 850.5 290.9 34.2% 7.3 733.3
University of York<ref name="York Financial Statement 23/24">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

54.8 260.1 50.5% 100.4 19.5% 515.5 136.1 26.4% 7.8 472.7
Overall 2,888.8 10,588.5 41.8% 5,673.0 22.4% 25,308.1 6,449.8 25.7% 6,659.9 41,082.5

Notes:
exclusive of colleges

CriticismsEdit

'Elite' status questionedEdit

In a statement made in 2014 to the Higher Education Policy Institute, David Watson of the University of Oxford suggested that the Russell Group's claim to represent 24 'leading universities' was "a real stretch". In the context of the Russell Group's reputation in the sector, he continued: "particularly dangerous, I think, is the bottom half of the Russell Group...The problem with the Russell Group is that it represents neither the sector as a whole [nor], in many cases, the best of the sector". Performance in research intensity showed that there were dozens of other UK universities "above the bottom Russellers".<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

A Durham University academic, Vikki Boliver, published a report in 2015 claiming that the prestigious position of the Russell Group was not based on evidence, but rather successful marketing. Only the universities of Oxford and Cambridge were significantly more elite than the majority of "old" universities when a grouping analysis was performed using data on academic selectivity, research activity, teaching quality, socio-economic exclusivity and economic resources. The other 22 members of the Russell Group sit in a second tier of universities along with 17 other "old" universities (Aberdeen, Bath*, Dundee, East Anglia*, Goldsmiths*, Heriot-Watt, Kent, Lancaster*, Leicester*, Loughborough*, Reading*, Royal Holloway*, St Andrews*, SOAS*, Strathclyde, Surrey* and Sussex*), mostly comprising former members of the defunct 1994 Group (shown by asterisks). Another 13 "old" universities and 54 "new" universities made up a third tier, with a fourth tier of 19 "new" universities. Within each tier, the differences between the institutions were less significant than the differences between the tiers.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> This reflected an earlier result from 2010 that, when the "Golden Triangle" universities (defined in the study as Oxford, Cambridge, Imperial, LSE, and UCL) were omitted, the remaining (then) members of the Russell Group were outperformed by the (then) members of the 1994 Group.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

Ant Bagshaw from the Wonkhe think-tank has criticised the use of Russell Group membership as a proxy for selectivity in official Department for Education reports and statistics, as better measures of selectivity are available from UCAS data. He states that the idea that "Russell Group membership is synonymous with 'bestTemplate:'" is "persistent, but unverified". He also notes that this may lead to less scrutiny of the performance of non-Russell Group selective universities with respect to widening participation and improving access.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

ProtectionismEdit

The Institute of Economic Affairs has argued that the Russell Group acts out of protectionist interests. It is claimed that this will "restrict competition, discourage innovation and encourage inefficiency, thereby depriving students of lower prices and/or greater choice".<ref name=Stanfield>Institute of Economic Affairs: Template:Webarchive James Stanfield</ref>

SustainabilityEdit

The twenty-four universities in the Russell Group are responsible for around half of the Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions of the UK university sector.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Better source needed The Group as a whole has been criticised for an inconsistent and inadequate response to the need to identify emissions and take reduction measures.<ref>Bill Spence (19 April 2021). "Elite universities are falling short on their green promises" Times Higher Education.</ref> An Environmental Sustainability Network was announced by the Russell Group in December 2019;<ref>Russell Group December 2019, Joint statement on environmental sustainability Template:Webarchive.</ref> as of November 2021 no outcomes from this had been announced.

Widening accessEdit

Analysis by the Labour Party in 2018 found that the number of students from disadvantaged areas has only increased by one percentage point since 2010.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

In 2015, Durham academic Vikki Bolívar published a paper, Lies, damned lies, and statistics on widening access to Russell Group universities, criticising the statistical analysis in the Russell Group publication Opening Doors. This had said that "real progress has been made over the last few years" in widening access, but Bolívar highlighted four areas where the statistics used to justify this claim were misleading. She also pointed out that there was "a growing body of statistical research evidence which indicates that one important barrier to widening access at Russell Group universities is that applicants from less advantaged social backgrounds are less likely to be offered places at these universities than comparably qualified applicants from more advantaged social groups" that had not been mentioned in the Russell Group report.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

citation
CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

POLAR4 Q1 (lowest participation 20% neighbourhoods) POLAR4 Q5 (highest participation 20% neighbourhoods)
University Offer rate differencea Flagb % of all offers Offer rate differencea Flagb % of all offers
Birmingham +2.3 + 9.2 +0.9 + 39.8
Bristol +5.6 + 7.3 -1.9 - 48.3
Cambridge +1.2 5.4 -0.2 50.2
Cardiff -1.6 9.4 +0.6 + 37.4
Durham +37.4 + 12.3 -12.7 - 38.4
Edinburgh +6.8 + 6.1 -1.4 - 49.9
Exeter +7.9 + 6.9 -3.2 - 46.3
Glasgow +3.2 + 5.8 +0.3 47.6
Imperial +6.8 + 7.4 -2.1 - 44.0
King's +6.6 + 7.1 -1.4 - 41.3
Leeds +8.9 + 10.4 -2.2 - 42.1
Liverpool +1.0 10.9 +0.7 + 37.9
LSE +21.6 + 9.0 -4.3 - 44.0
Manchester +4.9 + 10.3 -0.4 40.2
Newcastle -0.2 9.3 +0.4 41.5
Nottingham +1.0 8.6 +0.6 + 42.8
Oxford +8.3 8.2 -2.2 - 47.2
Queen Mary +1.0 5.0 -0.2 37.5
Queen's Belfast -3.5 - 9.4 +0.8 38.5
Sheffield -1.6 - 10.8 +0.9 + 37.7
Southampton -0.4 7.9 +0.9 + 41.3
UCL +4.9 + 6.3 -0.2 48.9
Warwick +2.0 + 7.0 +0.5 43.8
York +0.8 10.3 +0.1 37.9
All higher tariff providers +4.4 + 8.6 -1.0 - 42.1
All UK providers 0.6 11.6 -0.2 32.0

a – difference between the actual offer rate and the offer rate expected if predicted grades and subject choice were the only factors
b – indicates significantly higher (+), significantly lower (-) or no significant difference from expected rate (blank)

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

External linksEdit

Template:Russell Group Template:Navboxes