Morphological analysis (problem-solving)

Revision as of 23:32, 23 May 2025 by imported>OAbot (Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot.)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Template:Short description Template:InfoMaps Morphological analysis or general morphological analysis is a method for exploring possible solutions to a multi-dimensional, non-quantified complex problem. It was developed by Swiss astronomer Fritz Zwicky.<ref name = "GMA">Ritchey, T. (1998). General Morphological Analysis: A general method for non-quantified modeling Template:Webarchive.</ref> General morphology has found use in fields including engineering design, technological forecasting, organizational development and policy analysis.<ref>Álvarez, A. & Ritchey, T. (2015). "Applications of General Morphological Analysis: From Engineering Design to Policy Analysis", Acta Morphologica Generalis, Vol.4 No.1. Template:Webarchive</ref>

OverviewEdit

General morphology was developed by Fritz Zwicky, the Bulgarian-born, Swiss-national astrophysicist based at the California Institute of Technology. Among others, Zwicky applied morphological analysis to astronomical studies and jet and rocket propulsion systems. As a problem-structuring and problem-solving technique, morphological analysis was designed for multi-dimensional, non-quantifiable problems where causal modelling and simulation do not function well, or at all.

Zwicky developed this approach to address seemingly non-reducible complexity: using the technique of cross-consistency assessment (CCA),<ref name="GMA" /> the system allows for reduction by identifying the possible solutions that actually exist, eliminating the illogical solution combinations in a grid box (sometimes called a morphological box) rather than reducing the number of variables involved.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

File:Morphological box (bread example).png
An example morphological box illustrating the attributes of different types of bread

Decomposition versus morphological analysisEdit

Problems that involve many governing factors, where most of them cannot be expressed numerically can be well suited for morphological analysis.

The conventional approach is to break a complex system into parts, isolate the parts (dropping the 'trivial' elements) whose contributions are critical to the output and solve the simplified system for desired scenarios. The disadvantage of this method is that many real-world phenomena do not have obviously trivial elements and cannot be simplified.

Morphological analysis works backwards from the output towards the system internals without a simplification step.<ref>Modelling Complex Socio-Technical Systems Using Morphological Analysis (Ritchey 2003-06)[1] Template:Webarchive</ref> The system's interactions are fully accounted for in the analysis.

References in fictionEdit

Robert A. Heinlein has his characters use a "Zwicky box" in Time Enough for Love, to figure out what's available to break the ennui of his 2000-year-old character.

David Brin used "Zwicky Choice Boxes" in Sundiver as a means to help solve a murder mystery.

See alsoEdit

Template:Div col

Template:Div col end

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

Further readingEdit

|CitationClass=web }}

Template:Portal bar