Sepoy

Revision as of 19:45, 30 May 2025 by imported>RegentsPark (→‎Sepoys in British service: specify periodicity)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Template:Morerefs Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates Template:Use Indian English Template:Infobox military unit Template:Wikt Sepoy (Template:IPAc-en), related to sipahi, is a term denoting professional Indian infantrymen, traditionally armed with a musket, in the armies of the Mughal Empire and the Maratha.

In the 18th century, the French East India Company and its other European counterparts employed locally recruited soldiers within India, mainly consisting of infantry designated as "sepoys". The largest sepoy force, trained along European lines, served the British East India Company.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Presidency armies</ref>

The term "sipahi" (or sometimes "sepoy") continues in use in the Indian, Pakistan and Nepalese armies, where it denotes the rank of private.

EtymologyEdit

In Persian {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (Aspa) means horse and Ispahai is also the word for cavalrymen.

The term sepoy is the anglicised form of the Persian word {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (Template:Wikt-lang), meaning the traditional "infantry soldier" in the Mughal Empire.

In the Ottoman Empire the term {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} was used to refer to cavalrymen.<ref name="Philip Mason, 1974">Template:Cite book</ref>

Historical usageEdit

The term sepoy came into common use in the forces of the British East India Company in the eighteenth century, where it was one of a number of names, such as peons, gentoos, mestees and topasses, used for various categories of native soldier. Initially it referred to Hindu or Muslim soldiers without regular uniforms or discipline. It later generically referred to all native soldiers in the service of the European powers in India.<ref name="Philip Mason, 1974"/> Close to ninety-six percent of the British East India Company's army of 300,000 men were native to India and these sepoys played a crucial role in securing the subcontinent for the company.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

EquipmentEdit

File:The Nawab's artillery at Plassey.jpg
Sepoy units loyal to the Nawab of Bengal armed with artillery pieces, and War elephant.

The earliest sepoys used matchlock muskets and operated bulky and inefficient cannons to a limited extent during the reigns of Babur Akbar when archery and fighting from horseback was more common. By the time of Aurangzeb the Mughal armies had advanced significantly and utilized a wider range of weapons to win battles.

During the Carnatic Wars and Anglo-Mysore Wars the sepoys of the Mughal Empire employed more advanced types of musket, as well as blunderbuss and rocket weapons.

HistoryEdit

Mughal Empire 16th–18th centuriesEdit

A Sipahi or a sepoy was an infantryman armed with a musket in the army of the Mughal Empire.

The earliest sepoys were armed with daggers, talwars and matchlocks.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> By the mid to late 17th century they began to utilize more upgraded forms of muskets and even rockets. These sepoys also operated and mounted artillery pieces and sharpshooter upon war elephants which were also used for transport, hauling artillery and in combat.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

By the 18th century individual Nawabs employed their own sepoy units as did the European merchant companies established in parts of India.

Sepoys became more visible when they gained European arms and fought for various fragmented polities of the Mughal Empire during the Carnatic Wars and the Bengal War. After which the importance of the local sepoy diminished and were replaced by the "European hired Sepoy".

Sepoys in British serviceEdit

The East India Company initially recruited sepoys from the local communities in the Madras and Bombay Presidencies. The emphasis here favored tall and soldierly recruits, broadly defined as being "of a proper caste and of sufficient size".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> In the Bengal Army however, recruitment was only amongst high caste Brahmin and Rajput communities, mainly from the present day Uttar Pradesh and Bihar regions. Recruitment was undertaken locally by battalions or regiments often from the same community, village and even family. The commanding officer of a battalion became a form of substitute for the village chief or gaon bura. He was the mai-baap or the "father and mother" of the sepoys making up the paltan (from "platoon"). There were many family and community ties amongst the troops and numerous instances where family members enlisted in the same battalion or regiment. The izzat ("honour") of the unit was represented by the regimental colours; the new sepoy having to swear an oath in front of them on enlistment. These colours were stored in honour in the quarter guard and frequently paraded before the men. They formed a rallying point in battle. The oath of fealty by the sepoy was given to the East India Company and included a pledge of faithfulness to the salt that one has eaten.<ref name="Philip Mason, 1974"/>

The salary of the sepoys employed by the East India Company, while not substantially greater than that paid by the rulers of Indian states, was usually paid regularly. Advances could be given and family allotments from pay due were permitted when the troops served abroad. There was a commissariat and regular rations were provided. Weapons, clothing and ammunition were provided centrally, in contrast to the soldiers of local kings whose pay was often in arrears. In addition local rulers usually expected their sepoys to arm themselves and to sustain themselves through plunder.<ref name="Philip Mason, 1974"/>

This combination of factors led to the development of a sense of shared honour and ethos amongst the well drilled and disciplined Indian soldiery who formed the key to the success of European feats of arms in India and abroad.<ref name="Philip Mason, 1974"/>

Following the Indian Rebellion of 1857 the surviving East India Company regiments were merged into a new Indian Army under the direct control of the British Crown. The designation of "sepoy" was retained for Indian soldiers below the rank of lance naik, except in cavalry where the equivalent ranks were sowar or "trooper".

Presidency Monthly Salary In Rupees (1760s)
Bengal citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

Bombay 7<ref name=":0" />
Madras 7<ref name=":0" />

Sepoys in French serviceEdit

Following the formation of the French East India Company ({{#invoke:Lang|lang}}) in 1719, companies of Indian sepoys (Template:Wikt-lang) were raised to augment the French regulars and Swiss mercenary troops available. By 1720 the sepoys in French service numbered about 10,000.<ref>Rene Chartrand, Louis XV's Army – Colonial and Naval Troops, Template:ISBN</ref> Although much reduced in numbers after their decisive defeat in India at the Battle of Wandewash in 1760, France continued to maintain a Military Corps of Indian Sepoys ({{#invoke:Lang|lang}}) in Pondicherry until it was disbanded and replaced by a locally recruited gendarmerie in 1898.<ref> {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, Template:ISBN, pp. 50–51</ref> The 19th century diplomat Sir Justin Sheil commented about the British East India Company copying the French Indian army in raising an army of Indians: Template:Quote

Sepoys in Portuguese serviceEdit

Sepoys were also recruited in Portuguese India. The term {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (sepoy) was also applied by the Portuguese to African soldiers in Angola, Mozambique and Portuguese Guinea, plus African rural police officers. {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} from Angola provided part of the garrison of Goa during the final years of Portuguese rule of that Indian territory.

Contemporary sepoysEdit

The title of "sepoy" is still retained in the modern Nepali Army, Indian Army and Pakistan Army. In each of these it designates the rank of private.<ref>John Keegan, Armies of the World, Template:ISBN, pp. 312, 545.</ref>

Other usagesEdit

The same Persian word reached English via another route in the forms of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}. {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, the Basque version of the word, is used by leftist Basque nationalists as an insult for members of the Basque Police,<ref name="Deia">La AN condena a dos años de cárcel al autor de los destrozos en el "bosque de Oma"Template:Dead link, Deia, 12 January 2005. Quoting a sentence from the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}: {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}</ref> implying that they are not a national police of the Basque Country due to their connection with the Spanish government.

In Hispanic American countries, especially in Argentina, the word {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} has historically been used as a pejorative colloquial expression referring to individuals considered as serving foreign interests, as opposed to serving their own country.<ref>Qué significan cipayo, gorila fondos bruite y otras palabras que todos repiten y pocos conocen. Apertura.com</ref>

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

External linksEdit