Modern primitive

Revision as of 13:42, 30 May 2025 by 2a00:23c5:fe1c:3701:34d8:c7fd:3f0a:473e (talk)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Template:Short description {{#invoke:other uses|otheruses}}

File:Scarification by Lestyn Flye.jpg
Scarification is one form of modern Western body modification, allegedly derived from what adherents consider "traditional", non-Western cultures.
File:Arnizsanz.jpg
Facial piercings and facial tattoos are popular among those who see themselves as outsiders to mainstream Western society.

Modern primitives or urban primitives are adherents of an alternative subculture in developed, Western countries who engage in body modification rituals and practices inspired by the ceremonies, rites of passage, or bodily ornamentation in what they consider "traditional", non-Western cultures.<ref>National Geographic - Ancient and Modern Tattoos Celebrated in Photography Book</ref> These practices may include body piercing, tattooing, play piercing, flesh hook suspension, corset training, scarification, branding, and cutting.

OriginsEdit

Roland Loomis, also known by his chosen name Fakir Musafar, was one of the founders of the modern primitive movement.<ref>Gauntlet – decorating the Modern Primitive Template:Webarchive</ref> The 1989 RE/Search book Modern Primitives is considered as one of the first studies on of the concept of modern primitivism.

Modern primitives identify with a connection between what they see as "the primitive" and authenticity; "in opposition to the corruptions of mainstream society".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Modern primitives may have a loose set of beliefs about their way of life, including

  • Modification of the body in order to sculpt their self-image.
  • Activities which reject society at large. Exploring the self is a personal statement, which society rejects.
  • Resisting what they see as colonialism, and identification with anti-colonial struggles.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

CriticismsEdit

Urban primitivism has been suggested as cultural appropriation and misrepresenting or "bundling" cultures together in a "primitive" setting.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> These have been debated, with adherents believing that these criticisms are based largely on the views of Roland Loomis rather than the culture as a whole.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

Further readingEdit

External linksEdit

Template:Sister project


Template:Bodymodification-stub