Bruce Nuclear Generating Station

Bruce Nuclear Generating Station is a nuclear power station located on the eastern shore of Lake Huron in Ontario, Canada. It occupies 932 ha (2300 acres) of land.<ref name="Global Security">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The facility derives its name from Bruce Township,<ref name="Canteach Candu History" /> the local municipality when the plant was constructed, now Kincardine due to amalgamation. With eight CANDU pressurized heavy-water reactors, until 2016, it was the world's largest fully operational nuclear generating station by total reactor count and the number of currently operational reactors. In 2016, it was exceeded in nameplate capacity by South Korea's Kori Nuclear Power Plant. The station is the largest employer in Bruce County, with over 4000 workers.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Formerly known as the Bruce Nuclear Power Development (BNPD),<ref name="Global Security" /> the facility was constructed in stages between 1970 and 1987 by the provincial Crown corporation, Ontario Hydro. In April 1999 Ontario Hydro was split into 5 component Crown corporations with Ontario Power Generation (OPG) taking over all electrical generating stations. In June 2000, OPG entered into a long-term lease agreement with private sector consortium Bruce Power to take over operation. In May 2001, Bruce Power began operations. The lease was for 18 years until 2019 with an option to extend another 25 years to 2044.<ref name="Bruce A Refurb 2161">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

In November 2009, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) renewed Bruce Power's operating licences for 5 years until 2014 and gave permission to refuel units 1 and 2.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In May 2014, the CNSC extended the licence to May 2015 and public hearings were scheduled for early 2015 in Ottawa and Kincardine.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> A new operating licence was granted for 1 June 2015, until 31 May 2020<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and was renewed again from 1 October 2018 until 30 September 2028.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

In 2023, it was announced that the site could potentially open a third nuclear power station. Bruce C was first proposed in the late 2000s, however it was not proceeded with at the time.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />

In 2023, the Bruce generating station produced more than 45 billion kWh, about 7% of the total Canadian electricity consumption.Template:Cn

Description

The power plant comprises eight CANDU pressurized heavy-water reactors arranged into two plants (A and B) with four reactors each. Each reactor stands within a reinforced concrete containment. The steam generators are 12 m tall, and weigh 100 tonnes each. Each plant uses three fueling machines, shared between the four reactors, which travel in a duct cut through solid rock beneath the reactors, traversing the entire plant. The duct doubles as part of the pressure relief system, connected to the vacuum building.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Each reactor has its own turbine generator set, with one high-pressure turbine and three low-pressure turbines driving one generator.<ref name="Reporter's Guide to Bruce Power">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>[1] Template:Webarchive</ref> The turbine hall is about 400 m long at each plant and houses the four turbine generator sets. Cooling water is taken from Lake Huron.<ref name="Bruce A Refurb 2161" /> There is (originally) one control room per 4 reactors.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

File:Bruce Nuclear Generating Station.jpg

Bruce A, from across Baie Du Dor

Bruce A

Construction of Bruce A began in 1969, making it the successor to the Pickering A plant.<ref name="Reporter's Guide to Bruce Power" /> Bruce A units were originally rated at 750 MWe net / 805 MWe gross,<ref name="candu.org specs">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> which was later increased to 769 MWe net / 825 MWe gross.<ref name="Bruce A Refurb 2161" /> Template:As of the Bruce A units were capable of producing up to 779 MWe net according to IESO generator data. Each reactor requires 6240 fuel bundles that weigh 22.5 kg each, or about 140 tonnes of fuel. There are 480 fuel channels per reactor, containing 13 bundles each. There is storage capacity for about 23,000 bundles. Approximately 18 bundles are discharged per reactor per day.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

The original Bruce A steam generators utilized a separate large horizontal shared steam drum (with one steam drum common to four steam generators), a design dropped in most other plants at the time. Issues related to the AECL requested design of the tube supports caused repair and delay costs, which exceeded the net worth of the builder Babcock & Wilcox Canada.<ref name="Evolution Steam Generators">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Until they were removed in 1998, Bruce A reactors used unique booster rods to control reactivity.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Booster rods contained 93% uranium-235, and were inserted to overcome reactor poisoning. Bruce B and all other Ontario Hydro reactors instead use absorber rods called "adjusters" which are normally inserted and are removed to overcome xenon poisoning.<ref name=ONSR />

Bruce A demonstrated an "excellent" early operating history. Together with Pickering A, the eight units achieved an overall average capability factor of 83% over the initial five-year period.<ref name="Canteach Candu History">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> However, by 2001, when Bruce Power took the lease, all Bruce A units were laid-up.<ref name="Bruce A Refurb 2161" />

In 1981, Unit 1 was ranked the top reactor in the world with a 97% availability factor.<ref name="brucepower.com">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="PRIS A1" /> In December 1997, after about 20 years of operation, it was out of service. In 2005 (after 7 years of being idle) refurbishment started. In September 2012 (15 years out of service) it resumed operation.<ref name=nei-20120924/>

In 1982, Unit 2 was temporarily shut down due to a pressure-tube leak. In 1986, a fuel channel failed while the reactor was shut down; some of the fuel elements were swept into the moderator (calandria) and were difficult to remove.<ref name=CNHChronolgy>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name=ONSR>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

In 1986, maintenance workers accidentally left a protective lead blanket in the steam generator of Unit 2. By the time the mistake was discovered six years later, the blanket had melted, severely damaging the boiler.<ref name="Power Mag 2nd Acts">Template:Cite magazine</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In October 1995, after about 18 years of operation, unit 2 was taken out of service.<ref name="PRIS A2" /> In 2005 (after 9 years of being idle) refurbishment started. In October 2012, it resumed operation.<ref name=nei-20120924/><ref name="PRIS A2" />

In 1982, Unit 3 set a then world record of 494 days of continuous operation and Template:As of Bruce A was the most reliable multi-unit station in the world.<ref name="Power Mag 2nd Acts" /> From April 1998 onward, Bruce A3 remained idle for 6 years, returning to service in January 2004 (at which time the unit was 32 years old).<ref name="PRIS A3">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Refurbishment in unit 3 began in March 2023, with the plan being to return to service in 2026.<ref name='BP MCR3 begin'>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="Ontario LTEP-2013 AchievingBalance" /><ref name="BPRO-gen">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="NERA-opinion">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

In 1990, a software error in unit 4 caused a fueling-machine error, damaging a fuel channel.<ref name=CNHChronolgy /><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In 1993, reactor power was reduced to 60% until various loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) scenarios could be addressed. Subsequently, Bruce A units returned to 89% of rated power.<ref name=CNHChronolgy /> In March 1998, after about 19 years of operation, unit 4 was taken out of service.<ref name="PRIS A4">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> It returned to service in October 2003, after 6 years of being idle (at which time the unit was 31 years old).<ref name="PRIS A4" /> Planned refurbishment of unit 4 to begin in 2025 (when the unit will be 53 years old).<ref name="Ontario LTEP-2013 AchievingBalance" /><ref name="BPRO-gen" /><ref name="NERA-opinion" />

Bruce B

Bruce B units, located to the south of Bruce A, are of a slightly larger capacity: 817 MW net, 840 MW gross.<ref name="candu.org specs" /> which is attributed to an improved steam generator design, where the steam drum is integral to each steam generator in a "light bulb" arrangement, eliminating the horizontal cross-drum.<ref name="cnwc-cctn.ca">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="Evolution Steam Generators" /> In 1990, a nine-week "impairment" of Bruce B was created when a technician incorrectly set the calibration on radioactivity monitors.<ref name="Better Never Than Late" /> In 2007, Bruce B 7 was the top performing nuclear reactor in Ontario with 97.2% performance.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and in 2009, Bruce B 5 was first with 95.4% performance.<ref name="CNA Booklet 2010">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Bruce B 5

• Construction began 1 June 1978.<ref name="PRIS B5">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

• On 15 November 1984 it reached first criticality.<ref name="PRIS B5" />
• Commercial operation began on 1 March 1985.<ref name="PRIS B5" />
• Originally scheduled to be shut down in 2016 (unit would have been 31 years old).<ref name="Better Never Than Late" />
• Planned refurbishment to begin in 2026 (unit will be 41 years old).<ref name="Ontario LTEP-2013 AchievingBalance" /><ref name="BPRO-gen" /><ref name="NERA-opinion" />

Bruce B 6

• Construction began 1 January 1978.<ref name="PRIS B6">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

• On 29 May 1984 it reached first criticality.<ref name="PRIS B6" />
• Commercial operation began on 14 September 1984.<ref name="PRIS B6" />
• Originally scheduled to be shut down in 2018 (unit would have been 34 years old).
• Refurbishment began in January of 2020<ref name="Bruce Power MCR">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref> (unit was 36 years old).<ref name="Ontario LTEP-2013 AchievingBalance" /><ref name="BPRO-gen" /><ref name="NERA-opinion" /> Return to service took place on September 14, 2023.<ref name="Bruce MCR Update">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Bruce B 7

• Construction began 1 May 1979.<ref name="PRIS B7">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="Reporter's Guide to Bruce Power" />

• On 7 January 1986 it reached first criticality.<ref name="PRIS B7" />
• Commercial operation began on 10 April 1986.<ref name="PRIS B7" />
• Originally scheduled to be shut down in 2015 (unit would have been 29 years old).
• Planned refurbishment to begin in 2028 (unit will be 42 years old).<ref name="Ontario LTEP-2013 AchievingBalance" /><ref name="BPRO-gen" /><ref name="NERA-opinion" />

Bruce B 8

• Construction began 1 August 1979.<ref name="PRIS B8">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

• On 15 February 1987 it reached first criticality.<ref name="PRIS B8" />
• Commercial operation began on 22 May 1987.<ref name="PRIS B8" />
• Originally scheduled to be shut down in 2019 (unit would have been 32 years old).
• Planned refurbishment to begin in 2030 (unit will be 43 years old).<ref name="Ontario LTEP-2013 AchievingBalance" /><ref name="BPRO-gen" /><ref name="NERA-opinion" />

Electrical output

The graph represents the annual electricity generation at the site (A and B combined) in GWh.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In 2013, it was about 30% of Ontario's production.<ref name="Annual Review 2013">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

<timeline> ImageSize = width:630 height:580 PlotArea = left:50 right:20 top:25 bottom:30 TimeAxis = orientation:vertical AlignBars = late Colors =

 id:linegrey2 value:gray(0.9)
 id:linegrey value:gray(0.7)
 id:cobar value:rgb(0.2,0.7,0.8)
 id:cobar2 value:rgb(0.6,0.9,0.6)

DateFormat = yyyy Period = from:0 till:50000 ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:1000 start:0 gridcolor:linegrey ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:500 start:0 gridcolor:linegrey2 PlotData =

 color:cobar width:19 align:left
 bar:2001	from:0	till:24193
 bar:2002	from:0	till:21021
 bar:2003	from:0	till:24678
 bar:2004	from:0	till:33783
 bar:2005	from:0	till:33048
 bar:2006	from:0	till:36601
 bar:2007	from:0	till:35529
 bar:2008	from:0	till:35386
 bar:2009	from:0	till:34701
 bar:2010	from:0	till:36180
 bar:2011	from:0	till:36261
 bar:2012	from:0	till:35627
 bar:2013	from:0	till:45281
 bar:2014	from:0	till:45675
 bar:2015	from:0	till:46652
 bar:2016	from:0	till:45293
 bar:2017	from:0	till:49019
 bar:2018	from:0	till:48392
 bar:2019	from:0	till:46111
 bar:2020	from:0	till:43174
 bar:2021	from:0	till:42464
 bar:2022	from:0	till:42619
 bar:2023  from:0  till:42313

TextData=

fontsize:S pos:(20,20)
text: Bruce Nuclear Generating Station

</timeline>

As of the end of 2023, the total lifetime output of the facility was 1,606,926 GWh.

Notable Achievements

In 2009 total site output hit 1,002 TWh, making it the first nuclear power plant in the world to produce 1 PWh (1,000 TWh). Gravelines in France achieved the same in 2010.<ref name="IAEA PRIS Database">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

As of the end of 2020, the 8 Bruce units had produced a combined total of 1,479.59 TWh.<ref name="IAEA PRIS Database"/>

After Units 1–2 completed refurbishment activities and were brought back online in 2012, Bruce became the largest operating nuclear generation facility in the world by both the number of currently operational reactors and total net output capacity, having a total of 8 operational CANDU nuclear reactors with a combined output of 6,384 MW_e net (7,276 MW_e gross) when all units are online,<ref name="World's Largest Power Plants">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="CNA Nuclear Power in Canada">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> surpassed now by two South-Korean plants: Kori NPP since 2019 and Hanul NPP since 2022. The Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant in Japan had a larger total output capacity, but it has been out of service since 2011.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Transmission Lines

As of 2008, the Bruce station had three double-circuit 500 kV transmission lines to feed the major load centres in southern Ontario, in addition to three double-circuit 230 kV lines serving the local area.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}Template:Dead link</ref> These circuits are connected via two high voltage switchyards owned and operated by Hydro One.

In 2006, OPA had proposed increasing transmission line capacity, at a cost of between $200–600 million,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> described as "the largest electricity transmission investment in Ontario in the last 20 years".<ref name="OPA Long-Term Plan">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The line was completed in June 2012, several months ahead of schedule, with over 700 towers built for the 180 kilometre line to Milton. The project ranked 45th in Renew Canada's annual list.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Comparison with Pickering

Compared to the other major Canadian nuclear power plant built earlier, Pickering station, the Bruce reactors have higher power output, achieved by: increasing the number of fuel channels, increasing the number of bundles per channel, and a change in the fuel bundle itself.

At Bruce, the fuelling equipment is shared by the four reactors of each plant, while at Pickering each reactor had a fuelling machine. The Bruce fuelling machine and fuel channel end fitting design (mostly by Canadian General Electric) is based on the Nuclear Power Demonstration design. The Pickering design by AECL was based on Douglas Point.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

The building design of the reactor differs: Bruce uses a squarish "close-in" design, in which as much of the equipment as possible is arranged outside the main containment envelope for easier access during maintenance and emergencies.<ref name=ONSR /> The steam generators penetrate the containment. The primary coolant pumps and primary piping systems are inside the containment enclosure, but the pump motors are outside containment and the drive shaft seals form the containment boundary.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Pickering has round domes which enclose much of the secondary cooling equipment.<ref name="CT19720110">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

• The Pickering A system did not originally have a second independent shutdown system. The Bruce containment concept differs: the reactor's reactivity mechanism deck serves as a part of the containment boundary, is closer to the reactor, and more prone to damage in the event of an accident ("accidental physical disassembly"). The designers therefore foresaw the need for a second safety system to reduce the risk of an accident. Bruce received a second, fully independent Safety Shutdown System (SDS2) which uses a liquid neutron poison injection method.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

• The Bruce system also has a high-pressure Emergency Coolant Injection System (ECIS).<ref name="Canteach Candu History" />
• Each Bruce "4 pack" has its own Vacuum Building, while Pickering has one per eight reactors.<ref name="Canteach Candu History" />
• At Pickering, the vacuum duct was closed by nonreturn valves, to prevent flow of the steam/air mixture from the duct to a non-accident reactor unit following a LOCA. In the Bruce concept, there is no such non-return valve; the reactor buildings are all interconnected during normal operation.<ref name=ONSR />
• Bruce uses single-circuit heat transport system, while Pickering had two circuits.<ref name=ONSR />
• The first two reactor units of Pickering A originally used Zircaloy-2 pressure tubes. All subsequent CANDU units use a zirconium – 2.5% niobium alloy.<ref name=ONSR />
• Bruce uses a pressurizer to maintain coolant pressure, Pickering a different system.Template:Vague
• The Pickering design utilized 12 small steam generators operated in groups of three which can be individually valved out of the heat transport loop, as can the 16 pumps per reactor, with 4 being spare. At Bruce, the number of steam generators and coolant pumps was reduced to 8 and 4 respectively, without any spare pumps, thereby simplifying the piping. The Bruce system permits reactor power level to be adjusted more quickly and easily.<ref name=ONSR /><ref name="Canada Enters the Nuclear Age">Template:Cite book</ref>

Construction costs

Bruce A was projected to cost Template:Currency billion in 1969. Actual cost was $1.8 billion (in 1979 dollars).<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Adjusted for inflation, the $930 million estimate in 1979 dollars is $1.88 billion, putting Bruce A under budget.

Bruce B was projected to cost $3.929 billion in 1976. Actual cost was $5.994 billion (in 1987 dollars).<ref name="Better Never Than Late">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="Pembina">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Adjusted for inflation, the $3.929 billion estimate in 1987 dollars is $8.667 billion, putting Bruce B under budget.

Cost of generated electricity

In 2010, Bruce Power was paid approximately $60 million for contracted, but unused power.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

On 1 January 2016, Bruce Power began receiving a single contracted price for all output from the site of Template:CA$ per megawatt-hour (MWh).<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> This price is partially adjusted annually to account for inflation and wage growth, with additional monthly fuel cost adjustments, and it includes a small payment for Bruce's unique ability to curtail up to 2400 MW of generation (total across all eight units – up to 300 MW per individual unit) via steam bypass operation during periods of surplus generation.<ref name="FAO Fall 2017">Template:Cite report</ref>

During the course of the refurbishment of Units 3–6, the price will be raised in steps to cover individual reactor refurbishment costs, with each increase starting 12 months prior to the start of each individual refurbishment. Each increase will last only until that unit's refurbishment costs, which are fixed prior to refurbishment start, have been recovered. The average price per MWh that will be paid to Bruce Power for all electricity generated from 2016 to 2064 (covering the entire refurbishment period for Units 3–6 plus the entire expected remaining post-refurbishment lifetimes of all eight Bruce Power reactors (including the two that were already refurbished) was estimated to be approximately Template:CA$/MWh in 2017 dollars by the Financial Accountability Office of Ontario. In contrast, the estimated average price of nuclear electricity from all three Ontario nuclear plants during that same 2016–2064 period was estimated to be Template:CA$/MWh in 2017 dollars, the 2017–2018 unit cost of Ontario nuclear power was Template:CA$/MWh, and the current price of electricity for "most residential and small business customers" was Template:CA$/MWh (prior to the Fair Hydro Plan) or Template:CA$ (after the Fair Hydro Plan).<ref name="FAO Fall 2017" />

Blackout of 2003

During the Northeast Blackout of 2003 three Bruce B units continued running at 60% reactor power and 0% grid electrical power. They were able to do so for hours, because they had steam bypass systems designed to de-couple the reactor output from the generator electrical output.<ref name="OSPE ElectricalGrid" /> The three units were reconnected to the grid within 5 hours.<ref name="CNHChronolgy" /> Bruce A and B stations were designed to operate indefinitely while disconnected from the grid.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

"Contrary to popular belief, the electrical generators of nuclear plants can follow the load demands of the electrical grid provided specific engineered systems to permit this mode of operation are included in the plant design."<ref name="OSPE ElectricalGrid">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }} from original 13 July 2014, Retrieved 16 December 2023</ref>

Cobalt-60 production

Cobalt-60 (⁶⁰Co) can be produced in a CANDU reactor by using adjuster rods made primarily out of ⁵⁹Co (instead of the normal stainless steel), which is slowly transmuted into ⁶⁰Co via neutron activation (⁵⁹Co + n → ⁶⁰Co).<ref name="CNW June 2017">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="TCNF 2017">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> These now-intensely-radioactive cobalt-60 adjuster rods are then "harvested" (removed and replaced with fresh ⁵⁹Co adjuster rods) after one to three years of use in the reactor during a routine reactor shutdown, and are later processed into sealed ⁶⁰Co sources of varying intensities by Nordion.<ref name="CNW June 2017" /><ref name="OSST">Template:Cite news</ref><ref name="TRNPAF">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="BP 60Co longquote">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The Bruce nuclear power plant has been producing ⁶⁰Co since the 1980s, and almost all of the world's supply of ⁶⁰Co comes from various CANDU nuclear reactors, with Bruce being the single largest supplier.<ref name="Nordion 2064 PR">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="WNA Canada">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="ETF Apr 2010">Template:Cite news</ref><ref name="WNN Nov 2016">Template:Cite news</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Template:As of, Bruce supplied over 40% of the world's ⁶⁰Co.<ref name="Reporter's Guide to Bruce Power" /> This rose to over 50% by 2016, with Pickering supplying approximately another 20% of global demand.<ref name="WNN Nov 2016" /> In 2016, Bruce extended their contract with Nordion for the continued supply of ⁶⁰Co to cover the entire projected post-refurbishment life of the Bruce reactors, which are expected to operate until 2064.<ref name="WNN Nov 2016" />

Bruce also began producing High Specific Activity (HSA) ⁶⁰Co in 2016, which is designed for highly specialized medical uses such as cancer treatment and had been primarily produced at the NRU reactor for the past 60+ years (which was originally scheduled to be shut down in 2016, but will be kept online until 31 March 2018 due to the general worldwide lack of sufficient replacement medical isotope production capacity for several critical isotopes such as molybdenum-99).<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name="WNN Oct 2015">Template:Cite news</ref><ref name="HN">Template:Cite news</ref><ref name="pmid26811359">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="OCN Aug 2017">Template:Cite news</ref> As the NRU produces over two-thirds of the world's HSA ⁶⁰Co, Bruce's ability to supply HSA ⁶⁰Co will become critical to help fill the immense production gap left by the NRU once it is decommissioned in 2018.<ref name="HN" /><ref name="pmid26811359" /><ref name="OCN Aug 2017" /><ref name="CNS Nordion 2016">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> OPG and Bruce Power are collaborating on an effort to expand ⁶⁰Co production to the Bruce A and Darlington reactors in order to fully cover Pickering's production (which will end when the plant is decommissioned in 2024) in addition to the inevitable gaps in ⁶⁰Co production capacity that will be caused by the upcoming refurbishments of six of Bruce's reactors (Units A 3–4 & Units B 5–8), as well as all four of Darlington's reactors.<ref name="WNN Nov 2016" /> They are also working on expanding the production of HSA ⁶⁰Co to more reactors.<ref name="OPG Q2 17">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

In 2017, Bruce Power became the first Canadian recipient of a Top Innovative Practice (TIP) award from the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) for its ongoing work with Nordion to produce cobalt-60.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name="NEI TIP 2017">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Radioisotope production project

Bruce Power is working with Framatome to develop the capability to "produce shorter half-life radioisotopes (such as molybdenum-99, lutetium-177 and iridium-192)" using Areva's proprietary technology for the on-line production of radioisotopes in heavy water reactors.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="WNN Areva Aug 2017">Template:Cite news</ref> Areva will design and supply the system for installation in the existing Bruce units.<ref name="WNN Areva Aug 2017" />

In June 2018, Bruce Power and ITG (a subsidiary of Isotopen Technologien München (ITM)) announced the start of a joint effort to explore producing lutetium-177 in Bruce's reactors, with ITG planned to manage the development, processing, and distribution of lutetium-177.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> The initial Isotope Production System (IPS), producing Lu-177, came online in January 2022.<ref name="NSlu-177">Template:Cite news</ref>

Refurbishment of Units 1–2, 1995–2012

File:Bruce A Turbine Hall December 2002.JPG

Bruce A Turbine Hall during the 2002–04 restart project

Retubing of Bruce A units was planned in 1992, but deferred, as Ontario Hydro had a surplus of generation at the time.<ref name="Reporter's Guide to Bruce Power" />

In late 2005, Bruce Power and the Government of Ontario committed to return units 1 and 2 to service, to help meet increasing energy demand in the province of Ontario.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> The project was originally estimated to cost $4.25 billion.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> It was determined that while units 1 & 2 could have been restarted without refurbishment, it was economically advantageous to do so, since refurbishment would have been soon required.<ref name="Bruce A Refurb 2161" /> The goal is to keep units 1 & 2 in service until 2043, 66 years after original commissioning.<ref name="Bruce A Refurb 2161" />

The refurbishment required pressure tube and calandria tube replacement, steam generator replacement, shutdown System 2 (SDS2) enhancement, an upgrade of turbine control systems, replacing original analog controls with a DCS<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> and significant other work and maintenance (for example, replacement of 30 transformers containing PCBs).Template:Citation needed

A new fuel bundle design (Low Void Reactivity Fuel, LVRF) was considered, using slightly enriched 1% U-235 fuel pellets, within a CANFLEX 43-element bundle compared to the existing 37-element bundle.<ref name="Bruce A Refurb 2161" />

In 2006 and 2007, the restart project was judged to be the largest infrastructure project in Canada by ReNew Canada magazine.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In April 2007, the auditor general reviewed the refurbishment deal<ref name="Auditor General 2007">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In August 2007, estimated cost for the project had grown to $5.25 billion when Bruce Power decided to replace all 480 fuel channels in Unit 4, which will extend its working life to 2036, in line with the other 3 units of Bruce A.<ref>Template:Cite newsTemplate:Dead linkTemplate:Cbignore</ref> In 2008, due to difficulties developing the necessary robotics, the estimated cost of restarting Units 1 and 2 rose between $400 and $700 million.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> As of 2008, the project remained on schedule.<ref>Template:Cite newsTemplate:Dead linkTemplate:Cbignore</ref><ref>Template:Cite newsTemplate:Dead linkTemplate:Cbignore</ref>

In January 2010, up to 217 workers were potentially exposed to radiation during the refurbishment.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> 27 workers may have received 5 mSv, a level well below the level that can affect human health. Only one lab in Canada (at Chalk River) was qualified to do the testing. Bruce Power had to seek permission to use alternative labs.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}Template:Dead linkTemplate:Cbignore</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

In 2010, a plan to transport decommissioned, low-level radioactive steam generators to Sweden via the Great Lakes caused controversy.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> The CNSC approved the plan in February 2011.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

As of January 2011, fuel channel installation in Unit 2 was complete.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The CNSC gave the operator the green light to restart Unit 2 on 16 March 2012.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> However, the reactor was shut down the next day after a leak was discovered in the moderator system.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

In 2011, refurbishment of Unit 1 and 2, scheduled to be complete 2009, was predicted for 2012. In 2011, the cost had totaled $3.8 billion; the final cost was expected to be $4.8 billion. The original 2005 estimate was $2.75 billion.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}Template:Dead linkTemplate:Cbignore</ref>

In September 2012, Unit 1 began generating power again.<ref name=nei-20120924>Template:Cite news</ref>

On 16 October 2012, Unit 2 was connected to the provincial electricity grid for the first time in 17 years.<ref>Bruce Power unit sends power to Ontario grid for 1st time in 17 years Template:Webarchive The Canadian Press, 17 October 2012</ref> In 2013, final costs were estimated at $4.8 billion, up from an original estimate of $2.75 billion, and the project ran "far behind" schedule.<ref name="TorStar Darlington">Template:Cite news</ref>

Refurbishment of Units 3–8, 2016–present

In October 2013, under the Ontario Long Term Energy Plan (LTEP) 2013, Ontario announced plans to refurbish six reactors at the Bruce plant beginning with Bruce A4 in 2016. Other units would follow at intervals. Bruce Power estimated the cost at about $2 billion per unit, or $12 billion for six. The price of the power from these units was expected to be in the range of ~$60–$70 per MWh.<ref name="Ontario LTEP-2013 AchievingBalance">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="Bruce LTEP 2013">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

In 2016, Bruce Power started a $13 billion refurbishment program for "major component replacement on Units 3–8 in 2020, starting in Unit 6".<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> According to Bruce Power, this multi-year plan "will generate between 1,500 and 2,500 jobs on site annually – and 18,000 across Ontario directly and indirectly – while injecting up to $4 billion annually into Ontario's economy".<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Renew Canada rated the project as the biggest infrastructure upgrade in Canada for 2017.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

• In January of 2020, Unit 6 went down for refurbishment.<ref name="Bruce Power MCR"/> It returned to service on 8 September 2023 when it re-synchronized to the Ontario power grid. It was announced that Bruce 6 had completed its refurbishment ahead of schedule and on-budget.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

• In March of 2023, Unit 3 went down for refurbishment.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Waste storage

The Bruce station area is the site of OPG's Western Waste Management Facility (WWMF). The WWMF stores the low-level waste and intermediate level nuclear waste from operating its 20 nuclear reactors, including those leased to Bruce Power. As of 2009, there were 11 low level storage buildings.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

The WWMF provides dry nuclear fuel storage for the Bruce reactors. The Nuclear Waste Management Organization was mandated in 2002 by the Nuclear Fuel Waste Act to submit a proposal for the long-term management, which was submitted to the Minister of Natural Resources in November 2005 and approved by the government in June 2007.<ref name=opg>Nuclear Waste Management. Types of Waste: Long-term management of used fuel Template:Webarchive Ontario Power Generation Inc., 2017, retrieved 30 May 2017</ref> Template:As of it is seeking a separate site in Canada for a permanent repository for the used fuel from all of Canada's nuclear reactors.<ref name=opg/>

In 2013, OPG proposed to construct a Deep Geologic Repository (DGR) for long-term storage of low-and-intermediate level waste on lands adjacent to WWMF. The proposed DGR would be about 680 metres below surface.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Future development

In 2007, the Ontario Power Authority had recommended in a plan submitted to the Ontario Energy Board, to build a new nuclear power station consisting of at least two reactors.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> The leading candidate was AECL's Advanced CANDU Reactor.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Since 2008, environmental assessments have been underway both at Bruce and at Ontario Power Generation's Darlington Nuclear Generating Station.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> In 2009, Bruce Power withdrew its application to the CNSC for the Bruce C plant.<ref name=":1">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name=":2">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

New station

In July 2023, Ontario Minister of Energy Todd Smith announced an intent to build 4.8 GW of new nuclear on the Bruce site, effectively re-starting the plans for Bruce C.<ref name=":0">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> It would be the first large-scale nuclear build in Canada for more than three decades, to prepare for increasing electricity demand in the long term.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Upgrades

• On 26 October 2016, Bruce Power announced an uprate from 6,384 MWe to 6,400 MWe.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

• On 11 July 2019, Bruce Power announced another uprate to the facility, adding 22 MW of output to Unit 3, bringing overall site output to 6,430 MWe.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

• The March 2019,Bruce Power Major Component Replacement Project: Economic Impact Analysis indicates a target capacity of 7,000 MWe by mid-2033.<ref name= Bruce_Power_MCR>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

• On 14 October 2021, Bruce Power announced an uprate to 6,550 MWe.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

• On 23 March 2022, Bruce Power announced an uprate to Unit 1 to 821 MWe <ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

• On 6 May 2022, Bruce Power announced an uprate to Unit 2 to 823MWe, adding 39MW of capacity to the 784MWe it was producing previously.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Other features on site

File:NPP Bruce A.jpg

Bruce A looking Southwest across Baie Du Dor

There are more than 56 kilometres of roads on site, and at least 25 major structures. The site has its own fire department, laundry and medical centre.<ref name="Reporter's Guide to Bruce Power" />

Douglas Point, 1960–1984

Encompassed by the Bruce site is the shut-down Douglas Point reactor, an earlier version of the CANDU design. Construction began in 1960; was operational in 1967; and was shut down in 1984.<ref name="Reporter's Guide to Bruce Power" /> The present Bruce reactors each are roughly 4 times the capacity of the 200 MW Douglas Point unit.

Bruce Heavy Water Plant, 1973–1997

The Bruce Heavy Water Plant (BHWP) also occupied the site. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited contracted the Lummus Company of Canada Limited in 1969 to design and construct the first phase of the plant, while Ontario Hydro was responsible for commissioning and operating.<ref name=pubs.acs.org>Template:Cite book</ref>

It was planned to consist of four sub-plants, A through D:

• A was in production in 1973, shutdown in 1984, and demolished in 1993;
• B was in production in 1979, partially shutdown in 1993, completely closed in 1997, and subsequently demolished;
• C was cancelled, and never built;
• D was 70% completed when cancelled, and subsequently demolished in 1995.

During its lifetime, BHWP produced 16,000 tonnes of reactor grade heavy water. Capacity of each sub-plant was planned to be 800 tonnes/annum. The plant size was approximately 960 m by 750 m.<ref name="Global Security" /> The heavy water was 99.75% pure.<ref name="pubs.acs.org"/> The production of a single kilogram of heavy water required 340 tonnes of feed water.<ref name="FAS Heavy Water">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Bruce Bulk Steam System, 1972–2006

Steam from Bruce A could be diverted to the Bruce Bulk Steam System (BBSS) to provide energy for the production of heavy water (750 MW thermal), to heat buildings within the development (15 MW th), or to provide energy (72 MW th) for the adjacent Bruce Energy Centre (BEC). The BEC supported industries such as greenhouses and plastic manufacturers. As one of the largest bulk steam systems in the world, this system could produce 5,350 MW of medium-pressure process steam, and had over 6 km of piping.<ref name="IAEA BBSS2">Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp It was demolished by the end of 2006. Because of the requirement to provide steam, the Bruce A turbines were undersized relative to the reactor power.<ref name="brucepower.com" /><ref name="cnwc-cctn.ca"/>Template:Dead link<ref name="IAEA BBSS">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="Canteach BBSS">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="Kincardine BEC">Template:Cite document</ref>

Inverhuron Provincial Park, 1950–present

OPG owns the nearby 288 ha Inverhuron Provincial Park on Lake Huron, bordering Inverhuron, 14 km north-east of Kincardine, which is not part of the Bruce site proper, and leases it to the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. As a condition of the operating licence for Bruce Nuclear, OPG retained a 914 m radius exclusion zone in the northwest corner of the park. After operating over 25 years the park campground was phased out in 1976, because of safety concerns related to the heavy water production. When heavy water was no longer produced, the park campground was allowed to re-open in 2000 on the same spot.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Rp

Eagles

The heated water released back into Lake Huron by the plant prevents the surrounding shoreline from freezing over during winter and attracts an inordinate concentration of lake fish, which in turn attracts droves of bald eagles wintering in the area. Numbers peak around late February to early March and it is not uncommon for visitorsTemplate:Who to observe several dozen eagles in and around the general vicinity of the plant at any given timeTemplate:When during these months.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Rob Gowan Eagles create stir Template:Webarchive, Owen Sound Sun Times, 13 January 2013</ref>

Security and safety

File:Bruce Nuclear Generating Station From Plane.jpg

Bruce Power as seen from a passenger aircraft

In 1977, three Greenpeace activists canoed into the site to demonstrate the lack of security.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> On 23 September 2001, the plant suffered another PR blow when a man whose boat capsized on Lake Huron near the Bruce complex squeezed through a gate, entered an office building and phoned for help—all undetected.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Before the 2001 September 11 attacks, mandate of the security team was to delay attackers for 17 minutes, until local police could respond. Reliance was on passive measures such as fencing and locks.<ref name="Better Never Than Late" /> The "transformed" post-9/11 security team is described as being larger than the police force of the city of Kingston, i.e. equivalent to the force of a city of 100,000. Force members are permitted to carry firearms, and have powers of arrest. The force possesses armoured vehicles, water craft, and the plant is now triple-fenced.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In May 2008, the Bruce Nuclear Response Team (NRT) won the U.S. National SWAT Championship (USNSC), defeating 29 other teams from 4 countries, the first time a Canadian team won an international SWAT event. They won again in 2009, 2010, and 2011.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>[2] Template:Webarchive</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}Template:Dead link</ref> After 9/11, tours of the plant area were discontinued, although there is a visitor centre outside of the site.<ref name="Reporter's Guide to Bruce Power" />

According to the Bruce County emergency plan, "The Municipality of Kincardine will coordinate the emergency response concerns of a nuclear emergency situation resulting from an accident at the Bruce Power Site in the Municipality of Kincardine".<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Kincardine is required to maintain a warning system within 3 km of the plant, and has a network of 10 warning stations equipped with sirens and strobes.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

A variety of radiation monitoring measures are in place. Milk samples from local farms are collected weekly. Drinking water at treatment plants in Kincardine and Southampton is sampled twice daily, and tested weekly. Ground water is sampled from several surface water, shallow and deep well locations. Aquatic sediment and fish are analysed, as well as livestock feed, honey, eggs, fruits and vegetables.<ref name="Radiological Data 2009">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}Template:Dead link</ref>

Reactor data

The Bruce Generating Station consist of 8 operational reactors. Template:Mw-datatable

List of units in the Bruce Generating Station

Phase	Unit No.	Reactor		Status	Capacity in MWe		Construction start	First criticality	Commercial operation	Closure
		Type	Model		Net	Gross
A	1	PHWR	CANDU 791	Template:Yes	774	830	citation	CitationClass=web }}</ref> || 17 December 1976<ref name="PRIS A1"/>|| Template:Dts<ref name="PRIS A1"/> || (Template:Dts)
	2	PHWR	CANDU 791	Template:Yes	777	830	citation	CitationClass=web }}</ref> || 27 July 1976<ref name="PRIS A2"/>|| Template:Dts<ref name="PRIS A2"/> || (Template:Dts)
	3	PHWR	CANDU 750A	Template:Yes	770	830	July 1972	28 November 1977<ref name="PRIS A3" />	Template:Dts	(Template:Dts)
	4	PHWR	CANDU 750A	Template:Yes	769	830	September 1972	10 December 1978<ref name="PRIS A4" />	Template:Dts	(Template:Dts)
B	5	PHWR	CANDU 750B	Template:Yes	817	872	June 1978		Template:Dts	(Template:Dts)
	6	PHWR	CANDU 750B	Template:Yes	817	891	January 1978		Template:Dts	(Template:Dts)
	7	PHWR	CANDU 750B	Template:Yes	817	872	May 1979		Template:Dts	(Template:Dts)
	8	PHWR	CANDU 750B	Template:Yes	817	872	August 1979		Template:Dts	(Template:Dts)

See also

• Nuclear power in Canada
  • Darlington Nuclear Generating Station
  • Pickering Nuclear Generating Station
• List of largest power stations in Canada
• List of largest power stations
• Huron Wind

Further reading

• Parr, Joy (2010). Sensing Changes: Technologies, Environments, and the Everyday, 1953–2003. Vancouver: UBC Press.

External links

• Bruce Power – plant operator
• Ontario Power Generation (OPG) – site owner, operates WWMF
• Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) – Ontario's ISO
• Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO)
• Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) – involved with design, owns Douglas Point
• Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) – federal regulator
• Kincardine – host municipality Template:Webarchive