Mahler measure

Template:Use American English Template:Short description In mathematics, the Mahler measure <math>M(p)</math> of a polynomial <math>p(z) </math> with complex coefficients is defined as

<math display="block">M(p) = |a|\prod_{|\alpha_i| \ge 1} |\alpha_i| = |a| \prod_{i=1}^n \max\{1,|\alpha_i|\},</math> where <math>p(z) </math> factorizes over the complex numbers <math>\mathbb{C}</math> as <math display="block">p(z) = a(z-\alpha_1)(z-\alpha_2)\cdots(z-\alpha_n).</math>

The Mahler measure can be viewed as a kind of height function. Using Jensen's formula, it can be proved that this measure is also equal to the geometric mean of <math>|p(z)| </math> for <math>z</math> on the unit circle (i.e., <math>|z| = 1</math>): <math display="block">M(p) = \exp\left(\int_{0}^{1} \ln(|p(e^{2\pi i\theta})|)\, d\theta \right).</math>

By extension, the Mahler measure of an algebraic number <math>\alpha</math> is defined as the Mahler measure of the minimal polynomial of <math>\alpha</math> over <math>\mathbb{Q}</math>. In particular, if <math>\alpha</math> is a Pisot number or a Salem number, then its Mahler measure is simply <math>\alpha</math>.

The Mahler measure is named after the German-born Australian mathematician Kurt Mahler.

PropertiesEdit

The Mahler measure is multiplicative: <math>\forall p, q, \,\, M(p \cdot q) = M(p) \cdot M(q).</math>
<math display="inline">M(p) = \lim_{\tau \to 0} \|p\|_{\tau}</math> where <math display="inline">\, \|p\|_\tau =\left(\int_0^{1} |p(e^{2\pi i\theta})|^\tau d\theta \right)^{1/\tau} </math> is the <math>L_\tau</math> norm of <math>p</math>.<ref>Although this is not a true norm for values of <math>\tau < 1</math>.</ref>
Kronecker's Theorem: If <math>p</math> is an irreducible monic integer polynomial with <math>M(p) = 1</math>, then either <math>p(z) = z,</math> or <math>p</math> is a cyclotomic polynomial.
(Lehmer's conjecture) There is a constant <math>\mu>1</math> such that if <math>p</math> is an irreducible integer polynomial, then either <math>M(p)=1</math> or <math>M(p)>\mu</math>.
The Mahler measure of a monic integer polynomial is a Perron number.

Higher-dimensional Mahler measureEdit

The Mahler measure <math>M(p)</math> of a multi-variable polynomial <math>p(x_1,\ldots,x_n) \in \mathbb{C}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]</math> is defined similarly by the formula<ref name=Sch224>Template:Harvnb.</ref>

<math display="block">M(p) = \exp\left(\int_0^{1} \int_0^{1} \cdots \int_0^{1} \log \Bigl( \bigl |p(e^{2\pi i\theta_1}, e^{2\pi i\theta_2}, \ldots, e^{2\pi i\theta_n}) \bigr| \Bigr) \, d\theta_1\, d\theta_2\cdots d\theta_n \right).</math> It inherits the above three properties of the Mahler measure for a one-variable polynomial.

The multi-variable Mahler measure has been shown, in some cases, to be related to special values of zeta-functions and <math>L</math>-functions. For example, in 1981, Smyth<ref>Template:Harvnb.</ref> proved the formulas <math display="block"> m(1+x+y)=\frac{3\sqrt{3}}{4\pi}L(\chi_{-3},2)</math> where <math>L(\chi_{-3},s)</math> is a Dirichlet L-function, and <math display="block"> m(1+x+y+z)=\frac{7}{2\pi^2}\zeta(3),</math> where <math>\zeta</math> is the Riemann zeta function. Here <math> m(P)=\log M(P)</math> is called the logarithmic Mahler measure.

Some results by Lawton and BoydEdit

From the definition, the Mahler measure is viewed as the integrated values of polynomials over the torus (also see Lehmer's conjecture). If <math>p</math> vanishes on the torus <math>(S^1)^n</math>, then the convergence of the integral defining <math>M(p)</math> is not obvious, but it is known that <math>M(p)</math> does converge and is equal to a limit of one-variable Mahler measures,<ref name=Law83>Template:Harvnb.</ref> which had been conjectured by Boyd.<ref name=Boyd1981a>Template:Harvnb.</ref><ref name=Boyd1981b>Template:Harvnb.</ref>

This is formulated as follows: Let <math>\mathbb{Z}</math> denote the integers and define <math>\mathbb{Z}^N_+=\{r=(r_1,\dots,r_N)\in\mathbb{Z}^N:r_j\ge0\ \text{for}\ 1\le j\le N\}</math> . If <math>Q(z_1,\dots,z_N)</math> is a polynomial in <math>N</math> variables and <math>r=(r_1,\dots,r_N)\in\mathbb{Z}^N_+</math> define the polynomial <math>Q_r(z)</math> of one variable by

and define <math>q(r)</math> by <math display="block">q(r) := \min \left\{H(s):s=(s_1,\dots,s_N)\in\mathbb{Z}^N, s\ne(0,\dots,0)~\text{and}~\sum^N_{j=1} s_j r_j = 0 \right\}</math>

where <math>H(s)=\max\{|s_j|:1\le j\le N\}</math>.

Template:Math theorem

Boyd's proposalEdit

Boyd provided more general statements than the above theorem. He pointed out that the classical Kronecker's theorem, which characterizes monic polynomials with integer coefficients all of whose roots are inside the unit disk, can be regarded as characterizing those polynomials of one variable whose measure is exactly 1, and that this result extends to polynomials in several variables.<ref name=Boyd1981b />

Define an extended cyclotomic polynomial to be a polynomial of the form <math display="block">\Psi(z)=z_1^{b_1} \dots z_n^{b_n}\Phi_m(z_1^{v_1}\dots z_n^{v_n}),</math> where <math>\Phi_m(z)</math> is the m-th cyclotomic polynomial, the <math>v_i</math> are integers, and the <math>b_i = \max(0, -v_i\deg\Phi_m)</math> are chosen minimally so that <math>\Psi(z)</math> is a polynomial in the <math>z_i</math>. Let <math>K_n</math> be the set of polynomials that are products of monomials <math>\pm z_1^{c_1}\dots z_n^{c_n}</math> and extended cyclotomic polynomials.

Template:Math theorem

This led Boyd to consider the set of values <math display="block">L_n:=\bigl\{m(P(z_1,\dots,z_n)):P\in\mathbb{Z}[z_1,\dots,z_n]\bigr\},</math> and the union <math display="inline">{L}_\infty = \bigcup^\infty_{n=1}L_n</math>. He made the far-reaching conjecture<ref name=Boyd1981a /> that the set of <math>{L}_\infty</math> is a closed subset of <math>\mathbb R</math>. An immediate consequence of this conjecture would be the truth of Lehmer's conjecture, albeit without an explicit lower bound. As Smyth's result suggests that <math>L_1\subsetneqq L_2</math> , Boyd further conjectures that <math display="block">L_1\subsetneqq L_2\subsetneqq L_3\subsetneqq\ \cdots .</math>

Mahler measure and entropyEdit

An action <math>\alpha_M</math> of <math>\mathbb{Z}^n</math> by automorphisms of a compact metrizable abelian group may be associated via duality to any countable module <math>N</math> over the ring <math>R=\mathbb{Z}[z_1^{\pm1},\dots,z_n^{\pm1}]</math>.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The topological entropy (which is equal to the measure-theoretic entropy) of this action, <math>h(\alpha_N)</math>, is given by a Mahler measure (or is infinite).<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> In the case of a cyclic module <math>M=R/\langle F\rangle</math> for a non-zero polynomial <math> F(z_1,\dots,z_n)\in\mathbb{Z}[z_1,\ldots,z_n]</math> the formula proved by Lind, Schmidt, and Ward gives <math>h(\alpha_N)=\log M(F)</math>, the logarithmic Mahler measure of <math>F</math>. In the general case, the entropy of the action is expressed as a sum of logarithmic Mahler measures over the generators of the principal associated prime ideals of the module. As pointed out earlier by Lind in the case <math>n=1</math> of a single compact group automorphism, this means that the set of possible values of the entropy of such actions is either all of <math>[0,\infty]</math> or a countable set depending on the solution to Lehmer's problem. Lind also showed that the infinite-dimensional torus <math>\mathbb{T}^{\infty}</math> either has ergodic automorphisms of finite positive entropy or only has automorphisms of infinite entropy depending on the solution to Lehmer's problem.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>