Comprehensive National Power

Template:Short description Comprehensive National Power (CNP; Template:Zh, pinyin: zōnghé guólì) is a measure of the general power of a nation-state. It is a putative measure, important in the contemporary political thought of the People's Republic of China from the 1980s onwards and first introduced into official documents in 1992.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

CNP can be calculated numerically by combining various quantitative indices to create a single number held to measure the power of a nation-state.Template:Sfn These indices take into account military, political, economic and cultural factors.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

About

Inspired by F. Clifford German, J. David Singer, Stuart Bremer and John Stuckey, A.F.K. Organski and Jacek Kugler, and Ray Cline's understanding and formulas for national power assessment.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn It builds upon concepts such as superpower and regional power, as well as soft power, hard power and smart power.Template:Sfn

A 1995 definition of CNP refers to it as "the totality of a country's economic, military and political power in a given period. It signals the country's comprehensive development level and its position in the international system."Template:Sfn

There are a number of methods for calculating CNP devised by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Chinese Military Academy, Chinese Institute of Contemporary International Relations and independent Chinese scholars.Template:Sfn

National strategic resources

Michael Porter lists five major resources, that is, physical, human, infrastructure, knowledge and capital resources. Accordingly, the national strategic resources are divided into eight categories, with 23 indictors.Template:Sfn Those categories constitute CNP:Template:Sfn

• Economic resources
• Natural resources
• Capital resources
• Knowledge and Technology resources
• Government resources
• Military resources
• International resources
• Cultural resources

Adaptations

A fairly simplistic and effective index was developed by Chin-Lung Chang. It uses critical mass, economic capacity and military capacity. Due to its indicators, it is often repeatable and easy to define, making it comparable to the Human Development Index in understanding and reliability.Template:Sfn

See also

• Composite Index of National Capability
• Power in international relations

References

Citations

Works cited

• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Citation
• Template:Citation
• Template:Citation
• {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}

• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book

Further reading

• Michael Pillsbury (January 2000). China Debates the Future Security Environment. National Defense University Press.
• Template:Citation
• Hu Angang, Men Honghua (2002).The Rising of Modern China: Comprehensive National Power and Grand Strategy. Strategy & Management
• Kaushik Basu, Supriyo De, Rangeet Ghosh (2011). The evolving dynamics of global economic power in the postcrisis world: Revelations from a new Index of Government Economic Power. Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
• Ł. Kiczma, M. Sułek (2020). National Power Rankings of Countries 2020 Template:Webarchive. Oficyna Wydawnicza ASPRA-JR, Warszawa 2020. ISBN 978-83-8209-033-8
• {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}