Template:Short description Template:Automatic taxobox
Orthacanthus is an extinct genus of fresh-water xenacanthiform cartilaginous fish, named by Louis Agassiz in 1843,<ref name=":10">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name=":0">Template:Cite journal</ref> ranging from the Upper Carboniferous<ref name=":10" /> into the Lower Permian.<ref name="hampe" /> Orthacanthus had a nektobenthic life habitat, with a carnivorous diet.<ref name=":1">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Multiple authors have also discovered evidence of cannibalism in the diet of Orthacanthus and of "filial cannibalism" where adult Orthacanthus preyed upon juvenile Orthacanthus.<ref name="Gogáin2016">Template:Cite journal</ref> Synonyms of the genus Orthacanthus are Dittodus Owen, 1867, Didymodus Cope, 1883, Diplodus Agassiz, 1843,<ref name=":1" /> Chilodus Giebel, 1848 (preoccupied by Chilodus Müller & Troschel, 1844).<ref name=":10" />
During the Late Carboniferous-Early Permian, Orthacanthus was an apex predator of freshwater swamps and bayous in Europe and North America.<ref name="Gogáin2016" /> Mature Orthacanthus reached nearly 3 meters (10 feet) in length.<ref name="Gogáin2016" /> Orthacanthus teeth have a minimum of three cusps, two principal cusps, and an intermediate cusp, where the principal cusps are variously serrated, with complex base morphology.<ref name=":2">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name=":0" /> Additionally, Orthacanthus can be diagnosed by major transverse axes of proximal ends at a 45-degree angle to and often almost parallel to the labial margin of the base between the cusps.<ref name=":0" /> Deformed teeth are characteristic of the xenacanthiform sharks and of Orthacanthus.<ref name=":3">Template:Cite journal</ref>
Discovery and historyEdit
The two genera Orthacanthus and Pleuracanthus were erected by Louis Agassiz based on isolated "ichthyodorulites" from the British Carboniferous System, and at the time were mistakenly thought of as the first indicators of skates.<ref name=":6">Template:Cite journal</ref> They were initially found in the United Kingdom in Dudley, Leeds, North Wales, Carluke, and Edinburgh.<ref name=":6" /> Three additional species from the Carboniferous formation of Ohio were described by John Strong Newberry, but two of them were junior homonyms of another species, Orthacanthus gracilis (Giebel, 1848). Accordingly, these two species received replacement names, O. adamas Babcock 2024 and O. lintonensis Babcock, 2024.<ref name=":10" /> Teeth associated with Diplodus, a genus of sharks, was found in the Carboniferous slates of England in Stafford, Carluke, and Burdiehouse, and in Nova Scotia.<ref name=":6" /> A well preserved impression from Ruppelsdorf, Bohemia, was described by Goldfuss, and in a separate paper, the same specimen was described under the name Xenacanthus dechenii. One year later, in 1849, Dr. Jordan mistakenly identified this specimen as the remains of a fossil shark, Triodus sessilis. This mistake was corrected and the specimen was identified as Xenacanthus by Mr. Schnur.<ref name=":6" />
DescriptionEdit
TeethEdit
The larger teeth of Orthacanthus compressus and Orthacanthus texensis are differentiated by a more pronounced basal tubercle in O. compressus.<ref name=":2" /> The basal tubercle of a typical tooth file is on the apical button of the underlying tooth.<ref name=":3" /> The larger adult teeth of O. compressus have a wider rather than longer base, similar to O. texensis, and tend to have serrations on both carinae of each cusp, while the medial carinae of smaller adult teeth are not serrated.<ref name=":2" /> The juvenile teeth of O. compressus are longer than wide, have a thinner base, and lack serrations, similar to O. platypternus teeth.<ref name=":2" />
Orthacanthus platypternus from the Craddock Bonebed shark layer in Texas, USA, shows evidence of resorption, and the equivalent of an "enamel pearl."<ref name=":3" /> Some of the teeth specimens found at this location show evidence of resorption, which has not been previously observed in other faunal members at the same location.<ref name=":3" /> Where the superjacent basal tubercle is expected to be resorbed if the teeth were to undergo resorption, the apical button is resorbed instead.<ref name=":3" />
Sexual DimorphismEdit
The difference in characteristics between the large and small O. compressus adult teeth might indicate sexual dimorphism.<ref name=":2" />
The spines of O. platypternus showing 3 to 4 dentine layers are interpreted to be subadults or young adults, and are separated into two size classes where females have the largest spines in comparison to males, indicating sexual dimorphism.<ref name=":4">Template:Cite journal</ref>
Dorsal spine, dentine, and denticlesEdit
The dorsal spines of Orthacanthus platypternus from the Craddock Bone Bed in Texas, USA, preserve a highly vascularized wall mainly composed of centrifugally growing dentine (the outer layer of the wall of the spine) in a succession of inwardly growing dentine layers that line the pulp cavity.<ref name=":4" /> These dentine layers are likely deposited periodically in accordance with seasonal variations in water temperature and food availability.<ref name=":4" /> More specifically, the periodic nature of the dentine layer deposits could be due to variation in calcium phosphate deposition following the changes in water temperature.<ref name=":5">Template:Cite journal</ref> Spines of individuals with 1-2 dentine layers are likely juveniles and result in the smallest sizes, whereas individuals showing at least 3-4 dentine layers result in two separate size classes.<ref name=":4" /> The cross section is oval near the opening of the pulp cavity and circular/subtriangular in the distal part of the non-denticulated region and circular in the denticulated region.<ref name=":4" /> The pulp cavity of the spine is filled with calcite, quartz, and opaque minerals.<ref name=":4" />
Occipital spine and denticlesEdit
The spine is superficially inserted in the skin, where it grows and moves from a deep position in the dermis where trabecular dentine forms, to a superficial location where centrifugally growing lamellar dentine forms.<ref name=":5" /> The number of denticles per annual cycle vary with growth rate, and are independent dermal elements formed by the dermal papilla and secondarily attached by dentine to the spine proper.<ref name=":5" /> The density of denticulation also varies with the growth rate of the occipital spine.<ref name=":5" /> The ratio of length of denticulated region to total length of the spine changes throughout ontogeny.<ref name=":5" />
ClassificationEdit
The teeth of Orthacanthus texensis and Orthacanthus platypternus from bonebeds from the Lower Permian of Texas, and the teeth of Orthacanthus compressus from the Upper Pennsylvanian of Nebraska and Dunkard Basin of the central Appalachians were used to determine the origin of O. texensis and O. platypternus.<ref name=":2" /> It has been proposed that both O. texensis and O. platypternus could be derived from O. compressus, where juvenile features of O. compressus are retained in the adult teeth of O. platypternus via paedomorphosis, and the juvenile features of O. compressus teeth are observed in the adult teeth of O. texensis.<ref name=":2" />
Orthacanthus is placed within the broader order Xenacanthiformes, along with a number of other similar shark-like cartilaginous fish. The following cladogram follows a 2021 analysis by Luccisano and colleagues.<ref name=":72">Template:Cite journal</ref>Template:Clade
PaleobiologyEdit
A 2013 analysis of oxygen and strontium isotope composition of the teeth and spines of Late Carboniferous and Early Permian shark taxa was performed to infer the hydrochemistry of their ambient water, thus contributing to the controversy between an obligate freshwater or euryhaline diadromous lifestyle.<ref name=":8">Template:Cite journal</ref> Facies interpretations in the Permian of North America suggested that salinity tolerances of xenacanthiforms were restricted to near marine environments whereas only Orthacanthus could tolerate brackish water environments.<ref name=":8" /> A study covering the morphology and histology of dorsal spines of Orthacanthus platypternus also reported that "The comparative analyses of the ontogenetic stages of the recorded specimens of O. platypternus and their distribution along different facies and localities indicate that this species was euryhaline, diadromous with a catadromous life-cycle which was strongly regulated by the semi-arid, seasonally dry tropical climate affecting western Pangea during the Early Permian.<ref name=":4" />" The 2013 analysis provided evidence leaning towards an obligate freshwater lifestyle of the sharks from Variscan European basins, and nonmarine ratios suggested tooth formation was influenced by meteoric waves enriched by evaporation.<ref name=":8" /> Euryhaline adaptation was not confirmed in the 2013 analysis.<ref name=":8" /> Paired bioapatite δ18O, δ13C, and δ34S analysis of O. buxieri suggested that the species was an inhabitant of freshwater lakes.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Predator-Prey relationshipEdit
Orthacanthus and Triodus have a predator-prey relationship in which Orthacanthus preyed on Triodus.<ref name=":7">Template:Cite journal</ref> Cranial remains of specimens of both Orthacanthus and Triodus from the Upper Carboniferous in Puertollano basin, Spain, give evidence of this predator-prey relationship.<ref name=":7" /> Numerous and well preserved cephalic elements of Triodus were associated with the cranial remains of Orthacanthus, and is explained by the inclusion of occipital spines of Triodus in the buccal cavity of Orthacanthus.<ref name=":7" /> Additional evidence is the co-occurrence of one Orthacanthus spine with many Triodus spines, which likely penetrated the soft tissue and cartilage of the mouth of Orthacanthus, similarly to modern sharks that feed on stingrays where the spines of stingrays have been found within and around the buccal cavities of Carcharhinus, Galeocerdo, Negaprion and Sphyrna.
Examination of Orthacanthus coprolites from Canada by Aodhan O' Gogain et al. revealed that in times of hardship, Orthacanthus was likely cannibalistic, as teeth from juvenile Orthacanthus were found within the coprolites of adults.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Orthacanthus had a diet that consisted of actinopterygians, acanthodians, dipnoans, xenacanthids and tetrapods, based on analysis of coprolites and gut contents.<ref name="Gogáin2016" /> There have also been suspicions of filial cannibalism due to the presence of juvenile Orthacanthus teeth inside an Orthacanthus coprolite. The feces of Orthacanthus has a spiral shape due to a corkscrew-shaped rectum.<ref name="Gogáin2016" />
PaleoecologyEdit
The paleobiogeographical distribution of O. platypternus suggests ontogenetic habitat partitioning.<ref name=":4" /> Ontogenetic niche theory predicts that individuals may change their habitat or diet to maintain optimal growth rates or to improve trade-offs between mortality risk and growth.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> While smaller individuals likely lived in shallower waters such as in small ponds and stream channels of the coastal plain, larger individuals likely lived in deeper water such as the fluvio-lacustrine (rivers and lakes) and marginal marine areas.<ref name=":4" />
The oldest known specimen of Orthacanthus, Diplodus problematicus, was found in New Brunswick, Canada, in the Lower Devonian (Emsian, c. 407 to 393 million years ago).<ref name=":1" /> Other specimens have been found in locations including the US, the United Kingdom, Poland, and France.<ref name=":1" /><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
ReferencesEdit
Template:Sister project Template:Reflist
Template:Portal Template:Chondrichthyan genera Template:Taxonbar