Template:Use American English Template:Short description The classical electron radius is a combination of fundamental physical quantities that define a length scale for problems involving an electron interacting with electromagnetic radiation. It links the classical electrostatic self-interaction energy of a homogeneous charge distribution to the electron's relativistic mass-energy. According to modern understanding, the electron is a point particle with a point charge and no spatial extent. Nevertheless, it is useful to define a length that characterizes electron interactions in atomic-scale problems. The classical electron radius is given as
- <math>r_\text{e} = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{e^2}{m_{\text{e}} c^2} = 2.817 940 3227(19) \times 10^{-15} \text{ m} = 2.817 940 3227(19) \text{ fm} ,</math>
where <math>e</math> is the elementary charge, <math>m_{\text{e}}</math> is the electron mass, <math>c</math> is the speed of light, and <math>\varepsilon_0</math> is the permittivity of free space.<ref>David J. Griffiths, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, Prentice-Hall, 1995, p. 155. Template:ISBN</ref> This numerical value is several times larger than the radius of the proton.
The classical electron radius is sometimes known as the Lorentz radius or the Thomson scattering length. It is one of a trio of related scales of length, the other two being the Bohr radius <math>a_0</math> and the reduced Compton wavelength of the electron Template:Math. Any one of these three length scales can be written in terms of any other using the fine-structure constant <math>\alpha</math>:
- <math>r_\text{e} = </math> Template:Math <math>\alpha = a_0 \alpha^2.</math>
DerivationEdit
The classical electron radius length scale can be motivated by considering the energy necessary to assemble an amount of charge <math>q</math> into a sphere of a given radius <math>r</math>.<ref> Template:Cite book</ref> The electrostatic potential at a distance <math>r</math> from a charge <math>q</math> is
- <math>V(r) = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{q}{r} .</math>
To bring an additional amount of charge <math>dq</math> from infinity necessitates putting energy into the system, Template:Tmath, by an amount
- <math>dU = V(r) dq .</math>
If the sphere is assumed to have constant charge density, <math>\rho</math>, then
- <math>q = \rho \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3</math> and <math>dq = \rho 4 \pi r^2 dr .</math>
Integrating for <math>r</math> from zero to the final radius <math>r</math> yields the expression for the total energy Template:Tmath, necessary to assemble the total charge <math>q</math> into a uniform sphere of radius Template:Tmath:
- <math>U = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{3}{5} \frac{q^2}{r} .</math>
This is called the electrostatic self-energy of the object. The charge <math>q</math> is now interpreted as the electron charge, Template:Tmath, and the energy <math>U</math> is set equal to the energy-equivalent of the electron's rest mass, Template:Tmath, and the numerical factor 3/5 is ignored as being specific to the special case of a uniform charge density. The radius <math>r</math> is then defined to be the classical electron radius, Template:Tmath, and one arrives at the expression given above.
Note that this derivation does not say that <math>r_\text{e}</math> is the actual radius of an electron. It only establishes a link between electrostatic self-energy and the energy due to the rest mass of the electron.
DiscussionEdit
The classical electron radius appears in the classical limit of modern theories as well, including non-relativistic Thomson scattering and the relativistic Klein–Nishina formula. Also, <math>r_\text{e}</math> is roughly the length scale at which renormalization becomes important in quantum electrodynamics. That is, at short-enough distances, quantum fluctuations within the vacuum of space surrounding an electron begin to have calculable effects that have measurable consequences in atomic and particle physics.
Based on the assumption of a simple mechanical model, attempts to model the electron as a non-point particle have been described by some as ill-conceived and counter-pedagogic.<ref name="curtis74"> Template:Cite book</ref>
See alsoEdit
ReferencesEdit
Further readingEdit
- Arthur N. Cox, Ed. "Allen's Astrophysical Quantities", 4th Ed, Springer, 1999.