Binary prefix

A binary prefix is a unit prefix that indicates a multiple of a unit of measurement by an integer power of two. The most commonly used binary prefixes are kibi (symbol Ki, meaning Template:Nowrap), mebi (Template:Nowrap), and gibi (Template:Nowrap). They are most often used in information technology as multipliers of bit and byte, when expressing the capacity of storage devices or the size of computer files.

The binary prefixes "kibi", "mebi", etc. were defined in 1999 by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), in the IEC 60027-2 standard (Amendment 2). They were meant to replace the metric (SI) decimal power prefixes, such as "kilo" (Template:Nowrap), "mega" (Template:Nowrap) and "giga" (Template:Nowrap),<ref name="BIPM8" /> that were commonly used in the computer industry to indicate the nearest powers of two. For example, a memory module whose capacity was specified by the manufacturer as "2 megabytes" or "2 MB" would hold Template:Nowrap = Template:Nowrap, instead of Template:Nowrap = Template:Val.

On the other hand, a hard disk whose capacity is specified by the manufacturer as "10 gigabytes" or "10 GB", holds Template:Nowrap = Template:Val bytes, or a little more than that, but less than Template:Nowrap = Template:Val and a file whose size is listed as "2.3 GB" may have a size closer to Template:Nowrap ≈ Template:Val or to Template:Nowrap = Template:Val, depending on the program or operating system providing that measurement. This kind of ambiguity is often confusing to computer system users and has resulted in lawsuits.<ref name="suitxxxx" /><ref name="sand2021" /> The IEC 60027-2 binary prefixes have been incorporated in the ISO/IEC 80000 standard and are supported by other standards bodies, including the BIPM, which defines the SI system,<ref name="BIPM8" />Template:Rp the US NIST,<ref name="NIST1" /><ref name="NIST2" /> and the European Union.

Prior to the 1999 IEC standard, some industry organizations, such as the Joint Electron Device Engineering Council (JEDEC), noted the common use of the terms kilobyte, megabyte, and gigabyte, and the corresponding symbols KB, MB, and GB in the binary sense, for use in storage capacity measurements. However, other computer industry sectors (such as magnetic storage) continued using those same terms and symbols with the decimal meaning. Since then, the major standards organizations have expressly disapproved the use of SI prefixes to denote binary multiples, and recommended or mandated the use of the IEC prefixes for that purpose, but the use of SI prefixes in this sense has persisted in some fields.

Definitions

Specific units of IEC 60027-2 A.2 and ISO/IEC 80000:13-2025

IEC prefix		Representations
Name	Symbol	Base 2	Base 1024	Value	Base 10
kibi	Ki	210	10241	Template:Val	= Template:Val
mebi	Mi	220	10242	Template:Val	≈ Template:Val
gibi	Gi	230	10243	Template:Val	≈ Template:Val
tebi	Ti	240	10244	Template:Val	≈ Template:Val
pebi	Pi	250	10245	Template:Val	≈ Template:Val
exbi	Ei	260	10246	Template:Val	≈ Template:Val
zebi	Zi	270	10247	Template:Val	≈ Template:Val
yobi	Yi	280	10248	Template:Val	≈ Template:Val
robi	Ri	290	10249	Template:Val	≈ Template:Val
quebi	Qi	2100	102410	Template:Val	≈ Template:Val

Template:AnchorIn 2022, the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) adopted the decimal prefixes ronna for 1000⁹ and quetta for 1000¹⁰.<ref name="BIPM2022" /><ref name="gibn2022" /> In 2025, the prefixes robi (Template:Nowrap) and quebi (Template:Nowrap) were adopted by the IEC.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Comparison of binary and decimal prefixes

The relative difference between the values in the binary and decimal interpretations increases, when using the SI prefixes as the base, from 2.4% for kibi vs. kilo to nearly 27% for the quebi vs. quetta.

Prefix		Binary ÷ Decimal		Decimal ÷ Binary
kilo	kibi	1.024 (+2.4%)		0.9766 (−2.3%)
mega	mebi	1.049 (+4.9%)		0.9537 (−4.6%)
giga	gibi	1.074 (+7.4%)		0.9313 (−6.9%)
tera	tebi	1.100 (+10.0%)		0.9095 (−9.1%)
peta	pebi	1.126 (+12.6%)		0.8882 (−11.2%)
exa	exbi	1.153 (+15.3%)		0.8674 (−13.3%)
zetta	zebi	1.181 (+18.1%)		0.8470 (−15.3%)
yotta	yobi	1.209 (+20.9%)		0.8272 (−17.3%)
ronna	robi	1.238 (+23.8%)		0.8078 (−19.2%)
quetta	quebi	1.268 (+26.8%)		0.7889 (−21.1%)

History

Early prefixes

The original metric system adopted by France in 1795 included two binary prefixes named double- (2×) and demi- (Template:Sfrac×).<ref name="frev1795" /> However, these were not retained when the SI prefixes were internationally adopted by the 11th CGPM conference in 1960.

Storage capacity

Main memory

Early computers used one of two addressing methods to access the system memory; binary (base 2) or decimal (base 10).<ref name="weik1961" /> For example, the IBM 701 (1952) used a binary methods and could address 2048 words of 36 bits each, while the IBM 702 (1953) used a decimal system, and could address ten thousand 7-bit words.

By the mid-1960s, binary addressing had become the standard architecture in most computer designs, and main memory sizes were most commonly powers of two. This is the most natural configuration for memory, as all combinations of states of their address lines map to a valid address, allowing easy aggregation into a larger block of memory with contiguous addresses.

While early documentation specified those memory sizes as exact numbers such as 4096, 8192, or Template:Val units (usually words, bytes, or bits), computer professionals also started using the long-established metric system prefixes "kilo", "mega", "giga", etc., defined to be powers of 10,<ref name="BIPM8" /> to mean instead the nearest powers of two; namely, 2¹⁰ = 1024, 2²⁰ = 1024², 2³⁰ = 1024³, etc.<ref name="blais1930" /><ref name="liny1972" /> The corresponding metric prefix symbols ("k", "M", "G", etc.) were used with the same binary meanings.<ref name="real1959" /><ref name="gruen1960" /> The symbol for 2¹⁰ = 1024 could be written either in lower case ("k")<ref name="horak2008" /><ref name="dodd1997" /><ref name="laver1989" /> or in uppercase ("K"). The latter was often used intentionally to indicate the binary rather than decimal meaning.<ref name="amda1964" /> This convention, which could not be extended to higher powers, was widely used in the documentation of the IBM 360 (1964)<ref name="amda1964" /> and of the IBM System/370 (1972),<ref name="IBM1972" /> of the CDC 7600,<ref name="CDC7600" /> of the DEC PDP-11/70 (1975)<ref name="bell1975" /> and of the DEC VAX-11/780 (1977).Template:Citation needed

In other documents, however, the metric prefixes and their symbols were used to denote powers of 10, but usually with the understanding that the values given were approximate, often truncated down. Thus, for example, a 1967 document by Control Data Corporation (CDC) abbreviated "2¹⁶ = Template:Nowrap = Template:Val words" as "65K words" (rather than "64K" or "66K"),<ref name="CDC1967" /> while the documentation of the HP 21MX real-time computer (1974) denoted Template:Nowrap = Template:Nowrap = Template:Val as "196K" and 2²⁰ = Template:Val as "1M".<ref name="frank1974" />

These three possible meanings of "k" and "K" ("1024", "1000", or "approximately 1000") were used loosely around the same time, sometimes by the same company. The HP 3000 business computer (1973) could have "64K", "96K", or "128K" bytes of memory.<ref name="HP1973" /> The use of SI prefixes, and the use of "K" instead of "k" remained popular in computer-related publications well into the 21st century, although the ambiguity persisted. The correct meaning was often clear from the context; for instance, in a binary-addressed computer, the true memory size had to be either a power of 2, or a small integer multiple thereof. Thus a "512 megabyte" RAM module was generally understood to have Template:Nowrap = Template:Val bytes, rather than Template:Val.

Hard disks

In specifying disk drive capacities, manufacturers have always used conventional decimal SI prefixes representing powers of 10. Storage in a rotating disk drive is organized in platters and tracks whose sizes and counts are determined by mechanical engineering constraints so that the capacity of a disk drive has hardly ever been a simple multiple of a power of 2. For example, the first commercially sold disk drive, the IBM 350 (1956), had 50 physical disk platters containing a total of Template:Val sectors of 100 characters each, for a total quoted capacity of 5 million characters.<ref name="IBM1956" />

Moreover, since the 1960s, many disk drives used IBM's disk format, where each track was divided into blocks of user-specified size; and the block sizes were recorded on the disk, subtracting from the usable capacity. For example, the IBM 3336 disk pack was quoted to have a 200-megabyte capacity, achieved only with a single Template:Val-byte block in each of its 808 × 19 tracks.

Decimal megabytes were used for disk capacity by the CDC in 1974.<ref name="CDC1974" /> The Seagate ST-412,<ref name="seag1982" /> one of several types installed in the IBM PC/XT,<ref name="CSN1984" /> had a capacity of Template:Val when formatted as 306 × 4 tracks and 32 256-byte sectors per track, which was quoted as "10 MB".<ref name="mall2011" /> Similarly, a "300 GB" hard drive can be expected to offer only slightly more than Template:Val = Template:Val, bytes, not Template:Nowrap (which would be about Template:Val bytes or "322 GB"). The first terabyte (SI prefix, Template:Val bytes) hard disk drive was introduced in 2007.<ref name="hita2007" /> Decimal prefixes were generally used by information processing publications when comparing hard disk capacities.<ref name="RDD1977" />

Some programs and operating systems, such as Microsoft Windows, still use "MB" and "GB" to denote binary prefixes even when displaying disk drive capacities and file sizes, as did Classic Mac OS. Thus, for example, the capacity of a "10 MB" (decimal "M") disk drive could be reported as "Template:Nowrap", and that of a "300 GB" drive as "279.4 GB". Some operating systems, such as Mac OS X,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Ubuntu,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and Debian,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> have been updated to use "MB" and "GB" to denote decimal prefixes when displaying disk drive capacities and file sizes. Some manufacturers, such as Seagate Technology, have released recommendations stating that properly-written software and documentation should specify clearly whether prefixes such as "K", "M", or "G" mean binary or decimal multipliers.<ref name="seaga2011" /><ref name="seag2010" />

Floppy disks

Floppy disks used a variety of formats, and their capacities was usually specified with SI-like prefixes "K" and "M" with either decimal or binary meaning. The capacity of the disks was often specified without accounting for the internal formatting overhead, leading to more irregularities.

The early 8-inch diskette formats could contain less than a megabyte with the capacities of those devices specified in kilobytes, kilobits or megabits.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref>

The 5.25-inch diskette sold with the IBM PC AT could hold Template:Nowrap = Template:Val bytes, and thus was marketed as "1200 KB" with the binary sense of "KB".<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> However, the capacity was also quoted "1.2 MB",<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> which was a hybrid decimal and binary notation, since the "M" meant 1000 × 1024. The precise value was Template:Val (decimal) or Template:Val (binary).

The 5.25-inch Apple Disk II had 256 bytes per sector, 13 sectors per track, 35 tracks per side, or a total capacity of Template:Val bytes. It was later upgraded to 16 sectors per track, giving a total of Template:Nowrap = Template:Val bytes, which was described as "140KB" using the binary sense of "K".

The most recent version of the physical hardware, the "3.5-inch diskette" cartridge, had 720 512-byte blocks (single-sided). Since two blocks comprised 1024 bytes, the capacity was quoted "360 KB", with the binary sense of "K". On the other hand, the quoted capacity of "1.44 MB" of the High Density ("HD") version was again a hybrid decimal and binary notation, since it meant 1440 pairs of 512-byte sectors, or Template:Nowrap = Template:Val. Some operating systems displayed the capacity of those disks using the binary sense of "MB", as "1.4 MB" (which would be Template:Nowrap ≈ Template:Val). User complaints forced both AppleTemplate:Citation needed and Microsoft<ref name="msoftxxxx" /> to issue support bulletins explaining the discrepancy.

Optical disks

When specifying the capacities of optical compact discs, "megabyte" and "MB" usually meant 1024² bytes. Thus a "700-MB" (or "80-minute") CD has a nominal capacity of about Template:Val, which is approximately Template:Val (decimal).<ref name="cdromcap" />

On the other hand, capacities of other optical disc storage media like DVD, Blu-ray Disc, HD DVD and magneto-optical (MO) have been generally specified in decimal gigabytes ("GB"), that is, 1000³ bytes. In particular, a typical "Template:Val" DVD has a nominal capacity of about Template:Val, which is about Template:Val.<ref name="dvdcap" />

Tape drives and media

Tape drive and media manufacturers have generally used SI decimal prefixes to specify the maximum capacity,<ref name="IBMt2016" /><ref name="ECMA2013" /> although the actual capacity would depend on the block size used when recording.

Data and clock rates

Computer clock frequencies are always quoted using SI prefixes in their decimal sense. For example, the internal clock frequency of the original IBM PC was Template:Val, that is Template:Val.

Similarly, digital information transfer rates are quoted using decimal prefixe. The Parallel ATA "Template:Val" disk interface can transfer Template:Val bytes per second, and a "Template:Val" modem transmits Template:Val bits per second. Seagate specified the sustained transfer rate of some hard disk drive models with both decimal and IEC binary prefixes.<ref name="seaga2011" /> The standard sampling rate of music compact disks, quoted as Template:Val, is indeed Template:Val samples per second.Template:Citation needed A "Template:Val" Ethernet interface can receive or transmit up to 10⁹ bits per second, or Template:Val bytes per second within each packet. A "56k" modem can encode or decode up to Template:Val bits per second.

Decimal SI prefixes are also generally used for processor-memory data transfer speeds. A PCI-X bus with Template:Val clock and 64 bits wide can transfer Template:Val 64-bit words per second, or Template:Val = Template:Val, which is usually quoted as Template:Val. A PC3200 memory on a double data rate bus, transferring 8 bytes per cycle with a clock speed of Template:Val has a bandwidth of Template:Nowrap = Template:Val, which would be quoted as Template:Val.

Ambiguous standards

The ambiguous usage of the prefixes "kilo ("K" or "k"), "mega" ("M"), and "giga" ("G"), as meaning both powers of 1000 or (in computer contexts) of 1024, has been recorded in popular dictionaries,<ref name="webster" /><ref name="metadict" /><ref name="oxford" /> and even in some obsolete standards, such as ANSI/IEEE 1084-1986<ref name="ansi1986" /> and ANSI/IEEE 1212-1991,<ref name="ieee1992" /> IEEE 610.10-1994,<ref name="ieee1994" /> and IEEE 100-2000.<ref name="ieee2000" /> Some of these standards specifically limited the binary meaning to multiples of "byte" ("B") or "bit" ("b").

Early binary prefix proposals

Before the IEC standard, several alternative proposals existed for unique binary prefixes, starting in the late 1960s. In 1996, Markus Kuhn proposed the extra prefix "di" and the symbol suffix or subscript "2" to mean "binary"; so that, for example, "one dikilobyte" would mean "1024 bytes", denoted "K₂B" or "K2B".<ref name="kuhn1996" />

In 1968, Donald Morrison proposed to use the Greek letter kappa (κ) to denote 1024, κ² to denote 1024², and so on.<ref name="morr1968" /> (At the time, memory size was small, and only K was in widespread use.) In the same year, Wallace Givens responded with a suggestion to use bK as an abbreviation for 1024 and bK2 or bK² for 1024², though he noted that neither the Greek letter nor lowercase letter b would be easy to reproduce on computer printers of the day.<ref name="give1968" /> Bruce Alan Martin of Brookhaven National Laboratory proposed that, instead of prefixes, binary powers of two were indicated by the letter B followed by the exponent, similar to E in decimal scientific notation. Thus one would write 3B20 for Template:Nowrap.<ref name="mart1968" /> This convention is still used on some calculators to present binary floating point-numbers today.<ref name="schw1993" />

In 1969, Donald Knuth, who uses decimal notation like 1 MB = 1000 kB,<ref name="knuth2016" /> proposed that the powers of 1024 be designated as "large kilobytes" and "large megabytes", with abbreviations KKB and MMB.<ref name="knuth1999" />

Consumer confusion

The ambiguous meanings of "kilo", "mega", "giga", etc., has caused significant consumer confusion, especially in the personal computer era. A common source of confusion was the discrepancy between the capacities of hard drives specified by manufacturers, using those prefixes in the decimal sense, and the numbers reported by operating systems and other software, that used them in the binary sense, such as the Apple Macintosh in 1984. For example, a hard drive marketed as "1 TB" could be reported as having only "931 GB". The confusion was compounded by fact that RAM manufacturers used the binary sense too.

Legal disputes

The different interpretations of disk size prefixes led to class action lawsuits against digital storage manufacturers. These cases involved both flash memory and hard disk drives.

Early cases

Early cases (2004–2007) were settled prior to any court ruling with the manufacturers admitting no wrongdoing but agreeing to clarify the storage capacity of their products on the consumer packaging. Accordingly, many flash memory and hard disk manufacturers have disclosures on their packaging and web sites clarifying the formatted capacity of the devices or defining MB as 1 million bytes and 1 GB as 1 billion bytes.<ref name="wdc2007" /><ref name="flash2016" /><ref name="sand2013" /><ref name="sd-cap-disclaimer" />

Willem Vroegh v. Eastman Kodak Company

On 20 February 2004, Willem Vroegh filed a lawsuit against Lexar Media, Dane–Elec Memory, Fuji Photo Film USA, Eastman Kodak Company, Kingston Technology Company, Inc., Memorex Products, Inc.; PNY Technologies Inc., SanDisk Corporation, Verbatim Corporation, and Viking Interworks alleging that their descriptions of the capacity of their flash memory cards were false and misleading.

Vroegh claimed that a 256 MB Flash Memory Device had only 244 MB of accessible memory. "Plaintiffs allege that Defendants marketed the memory capacity of their products by assuming that one megabyte equals one million bytes and one gigabyte equals one billion bytes." The plaintiffs wanted the defendants to use the customary values of 1024² for megabyte and 1024³ for gigabyte. The plaintiffs acknowledged that the IEC and IEEE standards define a MB as one million bytes but stated that the industry has largely ignored the IEC standards.<ref name="vreo2005" />

The parties agreed that manufacturers could continue to use the decimal definition so long as the definition was added to the packaging and web sites.<ref name="sand2012" /> The consumers could apply for "a discount of ten percent off a future online purchase from Defendants' Online Stores Flash Memory Device".<ref name="safi2007" />

Orin Safier v. Western Digital Corporation

On 7 July 2005, an action entitled Orin Safier v. Western Digital Corporation, et al. was filed in the Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco, Case No. CGC-05-442812. The case was subsequently moved to the Northern District of California, Case No. 05-03353 BZ.<ref name="gutr2006" />

Although Western Digital maintained that their usage of units is consistent with "the indisputably correct industry standard for measuring and describing storage capacity", and that they "cannot be expected to reform the software industry", they agreed to settle in March 2006 with 14 June 2006 as the Final Approval hearing date.<ref name="zimm2006" />

Western Digital offered to compensate customers with a gratis download of backup and recovery software that they valued at US$30. They also paid Template:Val in fees and expenses to San Francisco lawyers Adam Gutride and Seth Safier, who filed the suit. The settlement called for Western Digital to add a disclaimer to their later packaging and advertising.<ref name="betaxxxx" /><ref name="reim2006" /><ref name="wdc2010" /> Western Digital had this footnote in their settlement. "Apparently, Plaintiff believes that he could sue an egg company for fraud for labeling a carton of 12 eggs a 'dozen', because some bakers would view a 'dozen' as including 13 items."<ref name="bask2006" />

Cho v. Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc.

A lawsuit (Cho v. Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-06-453195) was filed against Seagate Technology, alleging that Seagate overrepresented the amount of usable storage by 7% on hard drives sold between 22 March 2001 and 26 September 2007. The case was settled without Seagate admitting wrongdoing, but agreeing to supply those purchasers with gratis backup software or a 5% refund on the cost of the drives.<ref name="seagb2011" />

Dinan et al. v. SanDisk LLC

On 22 January 2020, the district court of the Northern District of California ruled in favor of the defendant, SanDisk, upholding its use of "GB" to mean Template:Val.<ref name="suitbxxxx" />

IEC 1999 Standard

In 1995, the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry's (IUPAC) Interdivisional Committee on Nomenclature and Symbols (IDCNS) proposed the prefixes "kibi" (short for "kilobinary"), "mebi" ("megabinary"), "gibi" ("gigabinary") and "tebi" ("terabinary"), with respective symbols "kb", "Mb", "Gb" and "Tb",<ref name="iucr1995" /> for binary multipliers. The proposal suggested that the SI prefixes should be used only for powers of 10; so that a disk drive capacity of "500 gigabytes", "0.5 terabytes", "500 GB", or "0.5 TB" should all mean Template:Val, exactly or approximately, rather than Template:Nowrap (= Template:Val) or Template:Nowrap (= Template:Val).

The proposal was not accepted by IUPAC at the time, but was taken up in 1996 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in collaboration with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). The prefixes "kibi", "mebi", "gibi" and "tebi" were retained, but with the symbols "Ki" (with capital "K"), "Mi", "Gi" and "Ti" respectively.<ref name="iucr1996" />

In January 1999, the IEC published this proposal, with additional prefixes "pebi" ("Pi") and "exbi" ("Ei"), as an international standard (IEC 60027-2 Amendment 2)<ref name="iec1999" /><ref name="iucr1999" /><ref name="IEC2000" /> The standard reaffirmed the BIPM's position that the SI prefixes should always denote powers of 10. The third edition of the standard, published in 2005, added prefixes "zebi" and "yobi", thus matching all then-defined SI prefixes with binary counterparts.<ref name="iec2005" />

The harmonized ISO/IEC IEC 80000-13:2025 standard cancels and replaces subclauses 3.8 and 3.9 of IEC 60027-2:2005 (those defining prefixes for binary multiples). The only significant change is the addition of explicit definitions for some quantities.<ref name="niso2008" /> In 2009, the prefixes kibi-, mebi-, etc. were defined by ISO 80000-1 in their own right, independently of the kibibyte, mebibyte, and so on.

The BIPM standard JCGM 200:2012 "International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), 3rd edition" lists the IEC binary prefixes and states "SI prefixes refer strictly to powers of 10, and should not be used for powers of 2. For example, 1 kilobit should not be used to represent Template:Val bits (2¹⁰ bits), which is 1 kibibit."<ref name="jcgm2012" />

The IEC 60027-2 standard recommended operating systems and other software were updated to use binary or decimal prefixes consistently, but incorrect usage of SI prefixes for binary multiples is still common. At the time, the IEEE decided that their standards would use the prefixes "kilo", etc. with their metric definitions, but allowed the binary definitions to be used in an interim period as long as such usage was explicitly pointed out on a case-by-case basis.<ref name="barr1997" />

Other standards bodies and organizations

The IEC standard binary prefixes are supported by other standardization bodies and technical organizations.

The United States National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) supports the ISO/IEC standards for "Prefixes for binary multiples" and has a web page<ref name="NISTbin" /> documenting them, describing and justifying their use. NIST suggests that in English, the first syllable of the name of the binary-multiple prefix should be pronounced in the same way as the first syllable of the name of the corresponding SI prefix, and that the second syllable should be pronounced as bee.<ref name="NIST2" /> NIST has stated the SI prefixes "refer strictly to powers of 10" and that the binary definitions "should not be used" for them.<ref name="taylo2008" />

As of 2014, the microelectronics industry standards body JEDEC describes the IEC prefixes in its online dictionary, but acknowledges that the SI prefixes and the symbols "K", "M" and "G" are still commonly used with the binary sense for memory sizes.<ref name="jedec2021" /><ref name="JEDEC2014" />

On 19 March 2005, the IEEE standard IEEE 1541-2002 ("Prefixes for Binary Multiples") was elevated to a full-use standard by the IEEE Standards Association after a two-year trial period.<ref name="IEEE2003" /><ref name="IEEE2005" /> Template:As of, the IEEE Publications division does not require the use of IEC prefixes in its major magazines such as Spectrum<ref name="walli2008" /> or Computer.<ref name ="gesch2007">Template:Cite journal "The processor has a memory subsystem with separate first-level 32-Kbyte instruction and data caches, and a 512-Kbyte unified second-level cache." Authors are with IBM.</ref>

The International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM), which maintains the International System of Units (SI), expressly prohibits the use of SI prefixes to denote binary multiples, and recommends the use of the IEC prefixes as an alternative since units of information are not included in the SI.<ref name="BIPM8web" /><ref name="BIPM8" />

The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) prohibits the use of SI prefixes with anything but a power-of-1000 meaning, but does not cite the IEC binary prefixes.<ref name="SAE2017" />

The European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC) adopted the IEC-recommended binary prefixes via the harmonization document HD 60027-2:2003-03.<ref name="CENELEC2003" /> The European Union (EU) has required the use of the IEC binary prefixes since 2007.<ref name="CENELECxxxx" />

Current practice

File:Elixir M2U51264DS8HC3G-5T 20060320.jpg

The Template:Val-byte capacity of these RAM modules is stated as "512 MB" on the label.

File:GParted 0.3.5 -- 2008, 06.png

GNOME's partition editor uses IEC prefixes to display partition sizes. The total capacity of the 120 × 10⁹-byte disk is displayed as "111.79 GiB".

File:GNOME System Monitor memory size and network rate.png

GNOME's system monitor uses IEC prefixes to show memory size and networking data rate.

Some computer industry participants, such as Hewlett-Packard (HP),<ref name="hpen2009" /> and IBM<ref name="resp2011" /><ref name="IBMaxxxx" /> have adopted or recommended IEC binary prefixes as part of their general documentation policies.

As of 2023, the use of SI prefixes with the binary meanings is still prevalent for specifying the capacity of the main memory of computers, of RAM, ROM, EPROM, and EEPROM chips and memory modules, and of the cache of computer processors. For example, a "512-megabyte" or "512 MB" memory module holds 512 MiB; that is, 512 × 2²⁰ bytes, not 512 × 10⁶ bytes.<ref name="customxxxx" /><ref name="HP2012" /><ref name="sony2017" /><ref name="forall2012" />

JEDEC continues to include the customary binary definitions of "kilo", "mega", and "giga" in the document Terms, Definitions, and Letter Symbols,<ref name="JEDEC-terms" /> and, Template:As of, still used those definitions in their memory standards.<ref name="JEDEC-ddr3" /><ref name="JEDEC-ddr2" /><ref name="JEDEC-configs" /><ref name="JEDEC-configs-toc" /><ref name="JEDEC-configs-terms" />

On the other hand, the SI prefixes with powers of ten meanings are generally used for the capacity of external storage units, such as disk drives,<ref name="hita2009" /><ref name="sams2011" /><ref name="seag2017" /><ref name="toshi2009" /><ref name="WDC2005" /> solid state drives, and USB flash drives,<ref name="sd-cap-disclaimer" /> except for some flash memory chips intended to be used as EEPROMs. However, some disk manufacturers have used the IEC prefixes to avoid confusion.<ref name="toshi2017" /> The decimal meaning of SI prefixes is usually also intended in measurements of data transfer rates, and clock speeds.Template:Citation needed

Some operating systems and other software use either the IEC binary multiplier symbols ("Ki", "Mi", etc.)<ref name="linux2001" /><ref name="ESR2012" /><ref name="ubuntu2012" /><ref name="ubuntu2012b" /><ref name="snow2009" /><ref name="apple2018" /> or the SI multiplier symbols ("k", "M", "G", etc.) with decimal meaning. Some programs, such as the GNU ls command, let the user choose between binary or decimal multipliers. However, some continue to use the SI symbols with the binary meanings, even when reporting disk or file sizes. Some programs may also use "K" instead of "k", with either meaning.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Other uses

While the binary prefixes are predominantly used with units of data, bits and bytes, they may be used with other unit of measure. For example, in signal processing it may be convenient to use a binary prefix with the unit of frequency, hertz (Hz), to produce a unit such as the kibihertz (KiHz), which is equal to Template:Val.<ref name="pate2011" /><ref name="ains2022" />

See also

• Binary engineering notation
• B notation (scientific notation)
• ISO/IEC 80000
• Nibble
• Octet

Further reading

• {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }} – An introduction to binary prefixes

• {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}

• Template:Cite press release
• {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}—a 1996–1999 paper on bits, bytes, prefixes and symbols

• {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}

• {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}—Another description of binary prefixes

• Template:Cite press release—White-paper on the controversy over drive capacities

External links

• A summary of the organizations, software, and so on that have implemented the new binary prefixes