Boll weevil
Template:Short description {{#invoke:other uses|otheruses}} Template:Speciesbox
The boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis) is a species of beetle in the family Curculionidae. The boll weevil feeds on cotton buds and flowers. Thought to be native to Central Mexico,<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> it migrated into the United States from Mexico in the late 19th century and had infested all U.S. cotton-growing areas by the 1920s, devastating the industry and the people working in the American South. During the late 20th century, it became a serious pest in South America as well. Since 1978, the Boll Weevil Eradication Program in the U.S. allowed full-scale cultivation to resume in many regions.
DescriptionEdit
The adult insect has a long snout, a grayish color, and is usually less than Template:Convert in length.
Life cycleEdit
_(20402387206).jpg){kind=link}
Adult weevils overwinter in well-drained areas in or near cotton fields, and farms after diapause. They emerge and enter cotton fields from early spring through midsummer, with peak emergence in late spring, and feed on immature cotton bolls.
The boll weevil lays its eggs inside buds and ripening bolls (fruits) of the cotton plants. The female can lay up to 200 eggs over a 10- to 12-day period. The oviposition leaves wounds on the exterior of the flower bud. The eggs hatch in 3 to 5 days within the cotton squares (larger buds before flowering), feed for 8 to 10 days, and then pupate. The pupal stage lasts another 5 to 7 days. The lifecycle from egg to adult spans about three weeks during the summer. Under optimal conditions, 8 to 10 generations per season may occur.
Boll weevils begin to die at temperatures at or below Template:Convert. Research at the University of Missouri indicates they cannot survive more than an hour at Template:Convert. The insulation offered by leaf litter, crop residues, and snow may enable the beetle to survive when air temperatures drop to these levels.
Other limitations on boll weevil populations include extreme heat and drought. The weevil's natural predators include fire ants, other insects, spiders, birds, and a parasitoid wasp, Catolaccus grandis. The weevils sometimes emerge from diapause before cotton buds are available.
InfestationEdit
The insect crossed the Rio Grande near Brownsville, Texas, to enter the United States from Mexico in 1892<ref name="msstate"/> and reached southeastern Alabama in 1909. By the mid-1920s, it had entered all cotton-growing regions in the U.S., traveling 40 to 160 miles per year. It remains the most destructive cotton pest in North America. Since the boll weevil entered the United States, it has cost U.S. cotton producers about $13 billion, and in recent times about $300 million per year.<ref name="msstate">Economic impacts of the boll weevil: {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
The boll weevil contributed to Southern farmers' economic woes during the 1920s, a situation exacerbated by the Great Depression in the 1930s.
The boll weevil appeared in Venezuela in 1949 and Colombia in 1950.<ref name="ICAC">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The Amazon Rainforest was thought to present a barrier to the insect's further spread, until it was detected in Brazil in 1983. An estimated 90% of the cotton farms in Brazil are now infested. During the 1990s, the weevil spread to Paraguay and Argentina. The International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC) has proposed a control program similar to that used in the U.S.<ref name="ICAC"/>
ControlEdit
During early years of the weevil's presence, growers sought relatively warm soils and early-ripening cultivars. Following World War II, the development of new pesticides such as DDT enabled U.S. farmers again to grow cotton as an economic crop. DDT was initially extremely effective, but U.S. weevil populations developed resistance by the mid-1950s.<ref name=scho>Template:Cite book</ref> Methyl parathion, malathion, and pyrethroids were subsequently used, but environmental and resistance concerns arose as they had with DDT, and control strategies changed.<ref name=scho/>
While many control methods have been investigated since the boll weevil entered the United States, insecticides have always remained the main control methods. In the 1980s, entomologists at Texas A&M University pointed to the spread of another invasive pest, the red imported fire ant, as a factor in the weevils' population decline in some areas.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Other avenues of control that have been explored include weevil-resistant strains of cotton,<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> the parasitoid wasp Catolaccus grandis,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> the fungus Beauveria bassiana,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and the Chilo iridescent virusTemplate:Cn. Genetically engineered Bt cotton is not protected from the boll weevil.<ref>Bt susceptibility of insect species Template:Webarchive</ref>
- "Beat the boll weevil...With a little more care at every step you- not the weevils- get the crop. Get a good cotton... - NARA - 512572.jpg
"Beat the boll weevil..." (U.S. Food Administration, Educational div., Advertising section, 1918–1919)
- Boll weevil eradication.jpg
Eradication map (USDA, 2006)
Although it was possible to control the boll weevil, the necessary insecticide was costly. The goal of many cotton entomologists was to eventually eradicate the pest from U.S. cotton. In 1978, a large-scale test was begun in eastern North Carolina and in adjacent Southampton County, Virginia, to determine the feasibility of eradication. Based on the success of this test, area-wide programs were begun in the 1980s to eradicate the insect from whole regions. These are based on cooperative effort by all growers together with the assistance of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).Template:Citation needed
Research methods were developed. The ability to distinguish between individuals which had eaten certain substances and those which had not was needed, to determine effectiveness of the active ingredients used. Lindig et al. 1980 studied several dietary dyes as markers. They find Calco Oil Red N-1700 to persist from larval feeding to adulthood, and for females to their eggs, although the resulting first instar was too faintly pink to be distinguishable.<ref name="Hagler-Jackson-2001">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="Silver-2008">Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp
The program has been successful in eradicating boll weevils from all cotton-growing states with the exception of Texas, and most of this state is free of boll weevils.Template:Citation needed Problems along the southern border with Mexico have delayed eradication in the extreme southern portions of this state. Follow-up programs are in place in all cotton-growing states to prevent the reintroduction of the pest. These monitoring programs rely on pheromone-baited traps for detection.Template:Citation needed The boll weevil eradication program, although slow and costly, has paid off for cotton growers in reduced pesticide costs. This program and the screwworm program of the 1950s are among the biggest and most successful insect control programs in history.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
ImpactEdit
The Library of Congress American Memory Project contains a number of oral history materials on the boll weevil's impact.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
It devastated African Americans disproportionately because most were directly financially dependent on cotton as a cash crop. Because they were more likely to labor as tenant farmers or sharecroppers on cotton plantations in the Southern United States - the epicenter of the Boll Weevil infestation, black farmers, suffered disproportionately. Additionally, Government intervention such as the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, resulted in the abandonment and loss of cropland for black farmers.
By 1922 it was taking 8% of the cotton in the country annually. This failure of the south's primary crop became a major impetus for the Great Migration of the time, although not the only one. Thereby it was one of the factors in the birth of the Harlem Renaissance - including the culture of the Cotton Club.<ref name="Jabbar-Obstfeld-2007">Template:Cite book</ref> A 2009 study found "that as the weevil traversed the American South [in the period 1892-1932], it seriously disrupted local economies, significantly reduced the value of land (at this time still the most important asset in the American South), and triggered substantial intraregional population movements."<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> A 2020 Journal of Economic History study found that the boll weevil spread between 1892 and 1922 had a beneficial impact on educational outcomes, as children were less likely to work on cultivating cotton.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> A 2020 NBER paper found that the boll weevil spread contributed to fewer lynchings, less Confederate monument construction, less KKK activity, and higher non-white voter registration.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
The boll weevil infestation has been credited with bringing about economic diversification in the Southern US, including the expansion of peanut cropping. The citizens of Enterprise, Alabama, erected the Boll Weevil Monument in 1919, perceiving that their economy had been overly dependent on cotton, and that mixed farming<ref>"History of Enterprise". City of Enterprise, Alabama. Archived from the original on 2013-07-03. Retrieved December 21, 2020.</ref> and manufacturing were better alternatives.Template:Clear left
In popular cultureEdit
Music
- "Boll Weevil" is a traditional blues song covered by artists including Huddie “Lead Belly” Ledbetter, Buster “Bus” Ezel, Woody Guthrie.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}</ref> It reached #2 on the Billboard chart in 1961 in a recording by Brook Benton.<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref>
- In their self-titled debut album, The Presidents of the United States of America made reference to a wide range of animals including on the track, Boll Weevil. Music critic Michael Sun wrote, "By the time track five, ‘Boll Weevil’, rolls around, there's been enough cameos from birds, spiders, monkeys, fish, frogs, pigs, and beetles to fill a zoo, all referenced without agenda or coded meaning — just fun, plain and simple."<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}</ref>
- The Bollweevils are a Chicago based punk band
Sports
- The boll weevil is the mascot for the University of Arkansas at Monticello and is listed on several "silliest" or "weirdest" mascots of all time.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> It was also the mascot of a short-lived minor league baseball team, the Temple Boll Weevils, which were alternatively called the "Cotton Bugs".
See alsoEdit
- Lixus concavus, the rhubarb curculio weevil
- Female sperm storage
- Black Belt in the American South
ReferencesEdit
Notes Template:Reflist
Further reading
- Dickerson, Willard A., et al., Ed. Boll Weevil Eradication in the United States Through 1999. The Cotton Foundation, Memphis, Tn 2001. 627 pp.
- Lange, Fabian, Alan L. Olmstead, and Paul W. Rhode, "The Impact of the Boll Weevil, 1892–1932", Journal of Economic History, 69 (Sept. 2009), 685–718.
External linksEdit
Template:Sister project Template:Sister project
- Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation
- Boll weevil life cycle
- Boll weevil biology Template:Webarchive
- Arkansas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation
- Hunter and Coad, "The boll-weevil problem", U.S. Department of Agriculture Farmers' Bulletin, (1928). Hosted by the University of North Texas Libraries Digital Collections
- Alabama Tourism Board
- Boll Weevil in Georgia Template:Webarchive
- A 1984 paper on the effect of a parasitic wasp on the boll weevil