Incubator escapee wiki

Bra–ket notation

Article Discussion

Template:Short description Template:Cleanup reorganize Template:Quantum mechanics

Bra–ket notation, also called Dirac notation, is a notation for linear algebra and linear operators on complex vector spaces together with their dual space both in the finite-dimensional and infinite-dimensional case. It is specifically designed to ease the types of calculations that frequently come up in quantum mechanics. Its use in quantum mechanics is quite widespread.

Bra–ket notation was created by Paul Dirac in his 1939 publication A New Notation for Quantum Mechanics. The notation was introduced as an easier way to write quantum mechanical expressions.<ref name=Dirac>Template:Harvnb</ref> The name comes from the English word "bracket".

Quantum mechanicsEdit

In quantum mechanics and quantum computing, bra–ket notation is used ubiquitously to denote quantum states. The notation uses angle brackets, Template:Char and Template:Char, and a vertical bar Template:Char, to construct "bras" and "kets".

A ket is of the form <math>|v \rangle</math>. Mathematically it denotes a vector, <math>\boldsymbol v</math>, in an abstract (complex) vector space <math>V</math>, and physically it represents a state of some quantum system.

A bra is of the form <math>\langle f|</math>. Mathematically it denotes a linear form <math>f:V \to \Complex</math>, i.e. a linear map that maps each vector in <math>V</math> to a number in the complex plane <math>\Complex</math>. Letting the linear functional <math> \langle f|</math> act on a vector <math>|v\rangle</math> is written as <math>\langle f | v\rangle \in \Complex</math>.

Assume that on <math>V</math> there exists an inner product <math>(\cdot,\cdot)</math> with antilinear first argument, which makes <math>V</math> an inner product space. Then with this inner product each vector <math>\boldsymbol \phi \equiv |\phi\rangle</math> can be identified with a corresponding linear form, by placing the vector in the anti-linear first slot of the inner product: <math>(\boldsymbol\phi,\cdot) \equiv \langle\phi|</math>. The correspondence between these notations is then <math>(\boldsymbol\phi, \boldsymbol\psi) \equiv \langle\phi|\psi\rangle</math>. The linear form <math>\langle\phi|</math> is a covector to <math>|\phi\rangle</math>, and the set of all covectors forms a subspace of the dual vector space <math> V^\vee</math>, to the initial vector space <math>V</math>. The purpose of this linear form <math>\langle\phi|</math> can now be understood in terms of making projections onto the state <math>\boldsymbol \phi,</math> to find how linearly dependent two states are, etc.

For the vector space <math>\Complex^n</math>, kets can be identified with column vectors, and bras with row vectors. Combinations of bras, kets, and linear operators are interpreted using matrix multiplication. If <math>\Complex^n</math> has the standard Hermitian inner product <math>(\boldsymbol v, \boldsymbol w) = v^\dagger w</math>, under this identification, the identification of kets and bras and vice versa provided by the inner product is taking the Hermitian conjugate (denoted <math> \dagger</math>).

It is common to suppress the vector or linear form from the bra–ket notation and only use a label inside the typography for the bra or ket. For example, the spin operator <math>\hat \sigma_z</math> on a two-dimensional space <math>\Delta</math> of spinors has eigenvalues <math display="inline">\pm \frac{1}{2}</math> with eigenspinors <math>\boldsymbol \psi_+,\boldsymbol \psi_- \in \Delta</math>. In bra–ket notation, this is typically denoted as <math>\boldsymbol \psi_+ = |+\rangle</math>, and <math>\boldsymbol \psi_- = |-\rangle</math>. As above, kets and bras with the same label are interpreted as kets and bras corresponding to each other using the inner product. In particular, when also identified with row and column vectors, kets and bras with the same label are identified with Hermitian conjugate column and row vectors.

Bra–ket notation was effectively established in 1939 by Paul Dirac;<ref name=Dirac /><ref>Template:Harvnb</ref> it is thus also known as Dirac notation, despite the notation having a precursor in Hermann Grassmann's use of <math>[\phi{\mid}\psi]</math> for inner products nearly 100 years earlier.<ref name="Grassmann">Template:Harvnb</ref><ref>Lecture 2 | Quantum Entanglements, Part 1 (Stanford), Leonard Susskind on complex numbers, complex conjugate, bra, ket. 2006-10-02.</ref>

Vector spacesEdit

Vectors vs ketsEdit

In mathematics, the term "vector" is used for an element of any vector space. In physics, however, the term "vector" tends to refer almost exclusively to quantities like displacement or velocity, which have components that relate directly to the three dimensions of space, or relativistically, to the four of spacetime. Such vectors are typically denoted with over arrows (<math>\vec r</math>), boldface (<math>\mathbf{p}</math>) or indices (<math>v^\mu</math>).

In quantum mechanics, a quantum state is typically represented as an element of a complex Hilbert space, for example, the infinite-dimensional vector space of all possible wavefunctions (square integrable functions mapping each point of 3D space to a complex number) or some more abstract Hilbert space constructed more algebraically. To distinguish this type of vector from those described above, it is common and useful in physics to denote an element <math>\phi</math> of an abstract complex vector space as a ket <math>|\phi\rangle</math>, to refer to it as a "ket" rather than as a vector, and to pronounce it "ket-<math>\phi</math>" or "ket-A" for Template:Math.

Symbols, letters, numbers, or even words—whatever serves as a convenient label—can be used as the label inside a ket, with the <math>|\ \rangle</math> making clear that the label indicates a vector in vector space. In other words, the symbol "Template:Math" has a recognizable mathematical meaning as to the kind of variable being represented, while just the "Template:Math" by itself does not. For example, Template:Math is not necessarily equal to Template:Math. Nevertheless, for convenience, there is usually some logical scheme behind the labels inside kets, such as the common practice of labeling energy eigenkets in quantum mechanics through a listing of their quantum numbers. At its simplest, the label inside the ket is the eigenvalue of a physical operator, such as <math>\hat x</math>, <math>\hat p</math>, <math>\hat L_z</math>, etc.

NotationEdit

Since kets are just vectors in a Hermitian vector space, they can be manipulated using the usual rules of linear algebra. For example:

<math>\begin{align}

|A \rangle &= |B\rangle + |C\rangle \\ |C \rangle &= (-1+2i)|D \rangle \\ |D \rangle &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-x^2} |x\rangle \, \mathrm{d}x \,. \end{align}</math>

Note how the last line above involves infinitely many different kets, one for each real number Template:Math.

Since the ket is an element of a vector space, a bra <math>\langle A|</math> is an element of its dual space, i.e. a bra is a linear functional which is a linear map from the vector space to the complex numbers. Thus, it is useful to think of kets and bras as being elements of different vector spaces (see below however) with both being different useful concepts.

A bra <math>\langle\phi|</math> and a ket <math> |\psi\rangle</math> (i.e. a functional and a vector), can be combined to an operator <math>|\psi\rangle\langle\phi|</math> of rank one with outer product

<math>|\psi\rangle\langle\phi| \colon |\xi\rangle \mapsto |\psi\rangle\langle\phi|\xi\rangle ~.</math>

Inner product and bra–ket identification on Hilbert spaceEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}

The bra–ket notation is particularly useful in Hilbert spaces which have an inner product<ref>Lecture 2 | Quantum Entanglements, Part 1 (Stanford), Leonard Susskind on inner product, 2006-10-02.</ref> that allows Hermitian conjugation and identifying a vector with a continuous linear functional, i.e. a ket with a bra, and vice versa (see Riesz representation theorem). The inner product on Hilbert space <math>(\ , \ )</math> (with the first argument anti linear as preferred by physicists) is fully equivalent to an (anti-linear) identification between the space of kets and that of bras in the bra–ket notation: for a vector ket <math>\psi = |\psi\rangle </math> define a functional (i.e. bra) <math>f_\phi = \langle\phi|</math> by

<math>(\phi,\psi) = (|\phi\rangle, |\psi\rangle) =: f_\phi(\psi) = \langle\phi| \, \bigl(|\psi\rangle\bigr) =: \langle\phi{\mid}\psi\rangle </math>

Bras and kets as row and column vectorsEdit

In the simple case where we consider the vector space <math>\Complex^n</math>, a ket can be identified with a column vector, and a bra as a row vector. If, moreover, we use the standard Hermitian inner product on <math>\Complex^n</math>, the bra corresponding to a ket, in particular a bra Template:Math and a ket Template:Math with the same label are conjugate transpose. Moreover, conventions are set up in such a way that writing bras, kets, and linear operators next to each other simply imply matrix multiplication.<ref name="bra–ket Notation Trivializes Matrix Multiplication">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In particular the outer product <math>|\psi\rangle\langle\phi| </math> of a column and a row vector ket and bra can be identified with matrix multiplication (column vector times row vector equals matrix).

For a finite-dimensional vector space, using a fixed orthonormal basis, the inner product can be written as a matrix multiplication of a row vector with a column vector: <math display="block"> \langle A | B \rangle \doteq A_1^* B_1 + A_2^* B_2 + \cdots + A_N^* B_N = \begin{pmatrix} A_1^* & A_2^* & \cdots & A_N^* \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} B_1 \\ B_2 \\ \vdots \\ B_N \end{pmatrix}</math> Based on this, the bras and kets can be defined as: <math display="block">\begin{align} \langle A | &\doteq \begin{pmatrix} A_1^* & A_2^* & \cdots & A_N^* \end{pmatrix} \\ | B \rangle &\doteq \begin{pmatrix} B_1 \\ B_2 \\ \vdots \\ B_N \end{pmatrix} \end{align}</math> and then it is understood that a bra next to a ket implies matrix multiplication.

The conjugate transpose (also called Hermitian conjugate) of a bra is the corresponding ket and vice versa: <math display="block">\langle A |^\dagger = |A \rangle, \quad |A \rangle^\dagger = \langle A |</math> because if one starts with the bra <math display="block">\begin{pmatrix} A_1^* & A_2^* & \cdots & A_N^* \end{pmatrix} \,,</math> then performs a complex conjugation, and then a matrix transpose, one ends up with the ket <math display="block">\begin{pmatrix} A_1 \\ A_2 \\ \vdots \\ A_N \end{pmatrix}</math>

Writing elements of a finite dimensional (or mutatis mutandis, countably infinite) vector space as a column vector of numbers requires picking a basis. Picking a basis is not always helpful because quantum mechanics calculations involve frequently switching between different bases (e.g. position basis, momentum basis, energy eigenbasis), and one can write something like "Template:Math" without committing to any particular basis. In situations involving two different important basis vectors, the basis vectors can be taken in the notation explicitly and here will be referred simply as "Template:Math" and "Template:Math".

Non-normalizable states and non-Hilbert spacesEdit

Bra–ket notation can be used even if the vector space is not a Hilbert space.

In quantum mechanics, it is common practice to write down kets which have infinite norm, i.e. non-normalizable wavefunctions. Examples include states whose wavefunctions are Dirac delta functions or infinite plane waves. These do not, technically, belong to the Hilbert space itself. However, the definition of "Hilbert space" can be broadened to accommodate these states (see the Gelfand–Naimark–Segal construction or rigged Hilbert spaces). The bra–ket notation continues to work in an analogous way in this more general context.

Banach spaces are a different generalization of Hilbert spaces. In a Banach space Template:Math, the vectors may be notated by kets and the continuous linear functionals by bras. Over any vector space without a given topology, we may still notate the vectors by kets and the linear functionals by bras. In these more general contexts, the bracket does not have the meaning of an inner product, because the Riesz representation theorem does not apply.

Usage in quantum mechanicsEdit

The mathematical structure of quantum mechanics is based in large part on linear algebra:

Since virtually every calculation in quantum mechanics involves vectors and linear operators, it can involve, and often does involve, bra–ket notation. A few examples follow:

Spinless position–space wave functionEdit

Template:Multiple image

The Hilbert space of a spin-0 point particle can be represented in terms of a "position basis" Template:Math, where the label Template:Math extends over the set of all points in position space. These states satisfy the eigenvalue equation for the position operator: <math display="block"> \hat{\mathbf{r}}|\mathbf{r}\rangle = \mathbf{r}|\mathbf{r}\rangle.</math> The position states are "generalized eigenvectors", not elements of the Hilbert space itself, and do not form a countable orthonormal basis. However, as the Hilbert space is separable, it does admit a countable dense subset within the domain of definition of its wavefunctions. That is, starting from any ket Template:Math in this Hilbert space, one may define a complex scalar function of Template:Math, known as a wavefunction, <math display="block">\Psi(\mathbf{r}) \ \stackrel{\text{def}}{=}\ \lang \mathbf{r}|\Psi\rang \,.</math>

On the left-hand side, Template:Math is a function mapping any point in space to a complex number; on the right-hand side, <math display="block">\left|\Psi\right\rangle = \int d^3\mathbf{r} \, \Psi(\mathbf{r}) \left|\mathbf{r}\right\rangle</math> is a ket consisting of a superposition of kets with relative coefficients specified by that function.

It is then customary to define linear operators acting on wavefunctions in terms of linear operators acting on kets, by <math display="block">\hat A(\mathbf{r}) ~ \Psi(\mathbf{r}) \ \stackrel{\text{def}}{=}\ \lang \mathbf{r}|\hat A|\Psi\rang \,.</math>

For instance, the momentum operator <math>\hat \mathbf {p}</math> has the following coordinate representation, <math display="block">\hat{\mathbf{p} } (\mathbf{r}) ~ \Psi(\mathbf{r}) \ \stackrel{\text{def}}{=}\ \lang \mathbf{r} |\hat \mathbf{p}|\Psi\rang = - i \hbar \nabla \Psi(\mathbf{r}) \,.</math>

One occasionally even encounters an expression such as <math >\nabla |\Psi\rang </math>, though this is something of an abuse of notation. The differential operator must be understood to be an abstract operator, acting on kets, that has the effect of differentiating wavefunctions once the expression is projected onto the position basis, <math>\nabla \lang\mathbf{r}|\Psi\rang \,,</math> even though, in the momentum basis, this operator amounts to a mere multiplication operator (by Template:Math). That is, to say, <math display="block"> \langle \mathbf{r} |\hat \mathbf{p} = - i \hbar \nabla \langle \mathbf{r}| ~,</math> or <math display="block"> \hat \mathbf{p} = \int d^3 \mathbf{r} ~| \mathbf{r}\rangle ( - i \hbar \nabla) \langle \mathbf{r}| ~.</math>

Overlap of statesEdit

In quantum mechanics the expression Template:Math is typically interpreted as the probability amplitude for the state Template:Math to collapse into the state Template:Math. Mathematically, this means the coefficient for the projection of Template:Math onto Template:Math. It is also described as the projection of state Template:Math onto state Template:Math.

Changing basis for a spin-1/2 particleEdit

A stationary [[spin-1/2|spin-Template:1/2]] particle has a two-dimensional Hilbert space. One orthonormal basis is: <math display="block">|{\uparrow}_z \rangle \,, \; |{\downarrow}_z \rangle</math> where Template:Math is the state with a definite value of the [[angular momentum operator|spin operator Template:Math]] equal to +Template:1/2 and Template:Math is the state with a definite value of the [[angular momentum operator|spin operator Template:Math]] equal to −Template:1/2.

Since these are a basis, any quantum state of the particle can be expressed as a linear combination (i.e., quantum superposition) of these two states: <math display="block">|\psi \rangle = a_{\psi} |{\uparrow}_z \rangle + b_{\psi} |{\downarrow}_z \rangle</math> where Template:Math and Template:Math are complex numbers.

A different basis for the same Hilbert space is: <math display="block">|{\uparrow}_x \rangle \,, \; |{\downarrow}_x \rangle</math> defined in terms of Template:Math rather than Template:Math.

Again, any state of the particle can be expressed as a linear combination of these two: <math display="block">|\psi \rangle = c_{\psi} |{\uparrow}_x \rangle + d_{\psi} |{\downarrow}_x \rangle</math>

In vector form, you might write <math display="block">|\psi\rangle \doteq \begin{pmatrix} a_\psi \\ b_\psi \end{pmatrix} \quad \text{or} \quad |\psi\rangle \doteq \begin{pmatrix} c_\psi \\ d_\psi \end{pmatrix} </math> depending on which basis you are using. In other words, the "coordinates" of a vector depend on the basis used.

There is a mathematical relationship between <math>a_\psi</math>, <math>b_\psi</math>, <math>c_\psi</math> and <math>d_\psi</math>; see change of basis.

Pitfalls and ambiguous usesEdit

There are some conventions and uses of notation that may be confusing or ambiguous for the non-initiated or early student.

Separation of inner product and vectorsEdit

A cause for confusion is that the notation does not separate the inner-product operation from the notation for a (bra) vector. If a (dual space) bra-vector is constructed as a linear combination of other bra-vectors (for instance when expressing it in some basis) the notation creates some ambiguity and hides mathematical details. We can compare bra–ket notation to using bold for vectors, such as <math>\boldsymbol \psi</math>, and <math>(\cdot,\cdot)</math> for the inner product. Consider the following dual space bra-vector in the basis <math>\{|e_n\rangle\}</math>, where <math>\{\psi_n\}</math> are the complex number coefficients of <math>\langle \psi | </math>: <math display="block">\langle\psi| = \sum_n \langle e_n| \psi_n</math>

It has to be determined by convention if the complex numbers <math>\{\psi_n\}</math> are inside or outside of the inner product, and each convention gives different results.

<math display="block">\langle\psi| \equiv (\boldsymbol\psi, \cdot ) = \sum_n (\boldsymbol e_n, \cdot ) \, \psi_n</math> <math display="block">\langle\psi| \equiv (\boldsymbol\psi, \cdot ) = \sum_n (\boldsymbol e_n \psi_n, \cdot ) = \sum_n (\boldsymbol e_n, \cdot ) \, \psi_n^*</math>

Reuse of symbolsEdit

It is common to use the same symbol for labels and constants. For example, <math>\hat \alpha |\alpha\rangle = \alpha |\alpha \rangle</math>, where the symbol <math>\alpha</math> is used simultaneously as the name of the operator <math>\hat \alpha</math>, its eigenvector <math>|\alpha\rangle</math> and the associated eigenvalue <math>\alpha</math>. Sometimes the hat is also dropped for operators, and one can see notation such as <math>A |a\rangle = a |a \rangle</math>.<ref>Template:Harvnb Sec 1.2, 1.3</ref>

Hermitian conjugate of ketsEdit

It is common to see the usage <math>|\psi\rangle^\dagger = \langle\psi|</math>, where the dagger (<math>\dagger</math>) corresponds to the Hermitian conjugate. This is however not correct in a technical sense, since the ket, <math>|\psi\rangle</math>, represents a vector in a complex Hilbert-space <math>\mathcal{H}</math>, and the bra, <math>\langle\psi|</math>, is a linear functional on vectors in <math>\mathcal{H}</math>. In other words, <math>|\psi\rangle</math> is just a vector, while <math>\langle\psi|</math> is the combination of a vector and an inner product.

Operations inside bras and ketsEdit

This is done for a fast notation of scaling vectors. For instance, if the vector <math>|\alpha \rangle</math> is scaled by <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>, it may be denoted <math>|\alpha/\sqrt{2} \rangle</math>. This can be ambiguous since <math>\alpha</math> is simply a label for a state, and not a mathematical object on which operations can be performed. This usage is more common when denoting vectors as tensor products, where part of the labels are moved outside the designed slot, e.g. <math>|\alpha \rangle = |\alpha/\sqrt{2} \rangle_1 \otimes |\alpha/\sqrt{2} \rangle_2</math>.

Linear operatorsEdit

Template:See also

Linear operators acting on ketsEdit

A linear operator is a map that inputs a ket and outputs a ket. (In order to be called "linear", it is required to have certain properties.) In other words, if <math>\hat A</math> is a linear operator and <math>|\psi\rangle</math> is a ket-vector, then <math>\hat A |\psi\rangle</math> is another ket-vector.

In an <math>N</math>-dimensional Hilbert space, we can impose a basis on the space and represent <math>|\psi\rangle</math> in terms of its coordinates as a <math>N \times 1</math> column vector. Using the same basis for <math>\hat A</math>, it is represented by an <math>N \times N</math> complex matrix. The ket-vector <math>\hat A |\psi\rangle</math> can now be computed by matrix multiplication.

Linear operators are ubiquitous in the theory of quantum mechanics. For example, observable physical quantities are represented by self-adjoint operators, such as energy or momentum, whereas transformative processes are represented by unitary linear operators such as rotation or the progression of time.

Linear operators acting on brasEdit

Operators can also be viewed as acting on bras from the right hand side. Specifically, if Template:Math is a linear operator and Template:Math is a bra, then Template:Math is another bra defined by the rule <math display="block">\bigl(\langle\phi|\boldsymbol{A}\bigr) |\psi\rangle = \langle\phi| \bigl(\boldsymbol{A}|\psi\rangle\bigr) \,,</math> (in other words, a function composition). This expression is commonly written as (cf. energy inner product) <math display="block">\langle\phi| \boldsymbol{A} |\psi\rangle \,.</math>

In an Template:Math-dimensional Hilbert space, Template:Math can be written as a Template:Math row vector, and Template:Math (as in the previous section) is an Template:Math matrix. Then the bra Template:Math can be computed by normal matrix multiplication.

If the same state vector appears on both bra and ket side, <math display="block">\langle\psi|\boldsymbol{A}|\psi\rangle \,,</math> then this expression gives the expectation value, or mean or average value, of the observable represented by operator Template:Math for the physical system in the state Template:Math.

Outer productsEdit

A convenient way to define linear operators on a Hilbert space Template:Math is given by the outer product: if Template:Math is a bra and Template:Math is a ket, the outer product <math display="block"> |\phi\rang \, \lang \psi| </math> denotes the rank-one operator with the rule <math display="block"> \bigl(|\phi\rang \lang \psi|\bigr)(x) = \lang \psi | x \rang |\phi \rang.</math>

For a finite-dimensional vector space, the outer product can be understood as simple matrix multiplication: <math display="block"> |\phi \rangle \, \langle \psi | \doteq \begin{pmatrix} \phi_1 \\ \phi_2 \\ \vdots \\ \phi_N \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \psi_1^* & \psi_2^* & \cdots & \psi_N^* \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \phi_1 \psi_1^* & \phi_1 \psi_2^* & \cdots & \phi_1 \psi_N^* \\ \phi_2 \psi_1^* & \phi_2 \psi_2^* & \cdots & \phi_2 \psi_N^* \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \phi_N \psi_1^* & \phi_N \psi_2^* & \cdots & \phi_N \psi_N^* \end{pmatrix} </math> The outer product is an Template:Math matrix, as expected for a linear operator.

One of the uses of the outer product is to construct projection operators. Given a ket Template:Math of norm 1, the orthogonal projection onto the subspace spanned by Template:Math is <math display="block">|\psi\rangle \, \langle\psi| \,.</math> This is an idempotent in the algebra of observables that acts on the Hilbert space.

Hermitian conjugate operatorEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Just as kets and bras can be transformed into each other (making Template:Math into Template:Math), the element from the dual space corresponding to Template:Math is Template:Math, where Template:Math denotes the Hermitian conjugate (or adjoint) of the operator Template:Math. In other words, <math display="block"> |\phi\rangle = A |\psi\rangle \quad \text{if and only if} \quad \langle\phi| = \langle \psi | A^\dagger \,.</math>

If Template:Math is expressed as an Template:Math matrix, then Template:Math is its conjugate transpose.

PropertiesEdit

Bra–ket notation was designed to facilitate the formal manipulation of linear-algebraic expressions. Some of the properties that allow this manipulation are listed herein. In what follows, Template:Math and Template:Math denote arbitrary complex numbers, Template:Math denotes the complex conjugate of Template:Math, Template:Math and Template:Math denote arbitrary linear operators, and these properties are to hold for any choice of bras and kets.

LinearityEdit

  • Since bras are linear functionals, <math display="block">\langle\phi| \bigl( c_1|\psi_1\rangle + c_2|\psi_2\rangle \bigr) = c_1\langle\phi|\psi_1\rangle + c_2\langle\phi|\psi_2\rangle \,. </math>
  • By the definition of addition and scalar multiplication of linear functionals in the dual space,<ref>Lecture notes by Robert Littlejohn Template:Webarchive, eqns 12 and 13</ref> <math display="block">\bigl(c_1 \langle\phi_1| + c_2 \langle\phi_2|\bigr) |\psi\rangle = c_1 \langle\phi_1|\psi\rangle + c_2 \langle\phi_2|\psi\rangle \,. </math>

AssociativityEdit

Given any expression involving complex numbers, bras, kets, inner products, outer products, and/or linear operators (but not addition), written in bra–ket notation, the parenthetical groupings do not matter (i.e., the associative property holds). For example:

<math>\begin{align}

\lang \psi| \bigl(A |\phi\rang\bigr) = \bigl(\lang \psi|A\bigr)|\phi\rang \, &\stackrel{\text{def}}{=} \, \lang \psi | A | \phi \rang \\ \bigl(A|\psi\rang\bigr)\lang \phi| = A\bigl(|\psi\rang \lang \phi|\bigr) \, &\stackrel{\text{def}}{=} \, A | \psi \rang \lang \phi | \end{align}</math> and so forth. The expressions on the right (with no parentheses whatsoever) are allowed to be written unambiguously because of the equalities on the left. Note that the associative property does not hold for expressions that include nonlinear operators, such as the antilinear time reversal operator in physics.

Hermitian conjugationEdit

Bra–ket notation makes it particularly easy to compute the Hermitian conjugate (also called dagger, and denoted Template:Math) of expressions. The formal rules are:

  • The Hermitian conjugate of a bra is the corresponding ket, and vice versa.
  • The Hermitian conjugate of a complex number is its complex conjugate.
  • The Hermitian conjugate of the Hermitian conjugate of anything (linear operators, bras, kets, numbers) is itself—i.e., <math display="block">\left(x^\dagger\right)^\dagger=x \,.</math>
  • Given any combination of complex numbers, bras, kets, inner products, outer products, and/or linear operators, written in bra–ket notation, its Hermitian conjugate can be computed by reversing the order of the components, and taking the Hermitian conjugate of each.

These rules are sufficient to formally write the Hermitian conjugate of any such expression; some examples are as follows:

  • Kets: <math display="block">

\bigl(c_1|\psi_1\rangle + c_2|\psi_2\rangle\bigr)^\dagger = c_1^* \langle\psi_1| + c_2^* \langle\psi_2| \,. </math>

  • Inner products: <math display="block">\langle \phi | \psi \rangle^* = \langle \psi|\phi\rangle \,.</math> Note that Template:Math is a scalar, so the Hermitian conjugate is just the complex conjugate, i.e., <math display="block">\bigl(\langle \phi | \psi \rangle\bigr)^\dagger = \langle \phi | \psi \rangle^*</math>
  • Matrix elements: <math display="block">\begin{align}

\langle \phi| A | \psi \rangle^\dagger &= \left\langle \psi \left| A^\dagger \right|\phi \right\rangle \\ \left\langle \phi\left| A^\dagger B^\dagger \right| \psi \right\rangle^\dagger &= \langle \psi | BA |\phi \rangle \,. \end{align}</math>

  • Outer products: <math display="block">\Big(\bigl(c_1|\phi_1\rangle\langle \psi_1|\bigr) + \bigl(c_2|\phi_2\rangle\langle\psi_2|\bigr)\Big)^\dagger = \bigl(c_1^* |\psi_1\rangle\langle \phi_1|\bigr) + \bigl(c_2^*|\psi_2\rangle\langle\phi_2|\bigr) \,.</math>

Composite bras and ketsEdit

Two Hilbert spaces Template:Math and Template:Math may form a third space Template:Math by a tensor product. In quantum mechanics, this is used for describing composite systems. If a system is composed of two subsystems described in Template:Math and Template:Math respectively, then the Hilbert space of the entire system is the tensor product of the two spaces. (The exception to this is if the subsystems are actually identical particles. In that case, the situation is a little more complicated.)Template:Citation needed

If Template:Math is a ket in Template:Math and Template:Math is a ket in Template:Math, the tensor product of the two kets is a ket in Template:Math. This is written in various notations:

<math>|\psi\rangle|\phi\rangle \,,\quad |\psi\rangle \otimes |\phi\rangle\,,\quad|\psi \phi\rangle\,,\quad|\psi ,\phi\rangle\,.</math>

See quantum entanglement and the EPR paradox for applications of this product.

The unit operatorEdit

Consider a complete orthonormal system (basis), <math display="block">\{ e_i \ | \ i \in \mathbb{N} \} \,,</math> for a Hilbert space Template:Math, with respect to the norm from an inner product Template:Math.

From basic functional analysis, it is known that any ket <math>|\psi\rangle </math> can also be written as <math display="block">|\psi\rangle = \sum_{i \in \mathbb{N}} \langle e_i | \psi \rangle | e_i \rangle,</math> with Template:Math the inner product on the Hilbert space.

From the commutativity of kets with (complex) scalars, it follows that <math display="block">\sum_{i \in \mathbb{N}} | e_i \rangle \langle e_i | = \mathbb{I}</math> must be the identity operator, which sends each vector to itself.

This, then, can be inserted in any expression without affecting its value; for example <math display="block">\begin{align} \langle v | w \rangle &= \langle v | \left( \sum_{i \in \mathbb{N}} | e_i \rangle \langle e_i| \right) | w \rangle \\ 

                     &= \langle v | \left( \sum_{i \in \mathbb{N}} | e_i \rangle \langle e_i| \right) \left( \sum_{j \in \mathbb{N}} | e_j \rangle \langle e_j |\right)| w \rangle \\

&= \langle v | e_i \rangle \langle e_i | e_j \rangle \langle e_j | w \rangle \,, \end{align}</math> where, in the last line, the Einstein summation convention has been used to avoid clutter.

In quantum mechanics, it often occurs that little or no information about the inner product Template:Math of two arbitrary (state) kets is present, while it is still possible to say something about the expansion coefficients Template:Math and Template:Math of those vectors with respect to a specific (orthonormalized) basis. In this case, it is particularly useful to insert the unit operator into the bracket one time or more.

For more information, see Resolution of the identity,<ref>Template:Harvnb Sec 1.2, 1.3</ref> <math display="block"> {\mathbb I} = \int\! dx~ | x \rangle \langle x |= \int\! dp ~| p \rangle \langle p |,</math> where <math display="block">|p\rangle = \int dx \frac{e^{ixp / \hbar} |x\rangle}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}}.</math>

Since Template:Math, plane waves follow, <math display="block"> \langle x | p \rangle = \frac{e^{ixp / \hbar}}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}}.</math>

In his book (1958), Ch. III.20, Dirac defines the standard ket which, up to a normalization, is the translationally invariant momentum eigenstate <math display="inline">|\varpi\rangle=\lim_{p\to 0} |p\rangle</math> in the momentum representation, i.e., <math>\hat{p}|\varpi\rangle=0</math>. Consequently, the corresponding wavefunction is a constant, <math> \langle x|\varpi\rangle \sqrt{2\pi \hbar}=1</math>, and <math display="block">|x\rangle= \delta(\hat{x}-x) |\varpi\rangle \sqrt{2\pi \hbar},</math> as well as <math display="block">|p\rangle= \exp (ip\hat{x}/\hbar ) |\varpi\rangle.</math>

Typically, when all matrix elements of an operator such as <math display="block"> \langle x| A |y\rangle </math> are available, this resolution serves to reconstitute the full operator, <math display="block"> \int dx \, dy \, |x\rangle \langle x| A |y\rangle \langle y | = A \,. </math>

Notation used by mathematiciansEdit

The object physicists are considering when using bra–ket notation is a Hilbert space (a complete inner product space).

Let <math>(\mathcal H, \langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle)</math> be a Hilbert space and Template:Math a vector in Template:Math. What physicists would denote by Template:Math is the vector itself. That is, <math display="block"> |h\rangle\in \mathcal{H} .</math>

Let Template:Math be the dual space of Template:Math. This is the space of linear functionals on Template:Math. The embedding <math>\Phi:\mathcal H \hookrightarrow \mathcal H^*</math> is defined by <math>\Phi(h) = \varphi_h</math>, where for every Template:Math the linear functional <math>\varphi_h:\mathcal H\to\mathbb C</math> satisfies for every Template:Math the functional equation <math>\varphi_h(g) = \langle h, g\rangle = \langle h\mid g\rangle</math>. Notational confusion arises when identifying Template:Math and Template:Math with Template:Math and Template:Math respectively. This is because of literal symbolic substitutions. Let <math>\varphi_h = H = \langle h\mid</math> and let Template:Math. This gives <math display="block"> \varphi_h(g) = H(g) = H(G)=\langle h|(G) = \langle h|\bigl(|g\rangle\bigr) \,. </math>

One ignores the parentheses and removes the double bars.

Moreover, mathematicians usually write the dual entity not at the first place, as the physicists do, but at the second one, and they usually use not an asterisk but an overline (which the physicists reserve for averages and the Dirac spinor adjoint) to denote complex conjugate numbers; i.e., for scalar products mathematicians usually write <math display="block">\langle\phi ,\psi\rangle=\int \phi (x)\overline{\psi(x)}\, dx \,,</math> whereas physicists would write for the same quantity <math display="block"> \langle\psi |\phi \rangle = \int dx \, \psi^*(x) \phi(x)~.</math>

See alsoEdit

Template:Portal

NotesEdit

Template:Reflist

ReferencesEdit

External linksEdit

Template:Quantum mechanics topics

Retrieved from "https://zalansite.site/mediawiki/index.php?title=Bra–ket_notation&oldid=2646"