Planned economy

Template:Short description Template:Use American English Template:Economic systems sidebar Template:Socialism sidebar A planned economy is a type of economic system where investment, production and the allocation of capital goods takes place according to economy-wide economic plans and production plans. A planned economy may use centralized, decentralized, participatory or Soviet-type forms of economic planning.<ref>Alec Nove (1987). "Planned Economy". The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. vol. 3. p. 879.</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> The level of centralization or decentralization in decision-making and participation depends on the specific type of planning mechanism employed.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Socialist states based on the Soviet model have used central planning, although a minority such as the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia have adopted some degree of market socialism. Market abolitionist socialism replaces factor markets with direct calculation as the means to coordinate the activities of the various socially owned economic enterprises that make up the economy.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name=":0">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> More recent approaches to socialist planning and allocation have come from some economists and computer scientists proposing planning mechanisms based on advances in computer science and information technology.<ref name=":1" />

Planned economies contrast with unplanned economies, specifically market economies, where autonomous firms operating in markets make decisions about production, distribution, pricing and investment. Market economies that use indicative planning are variously referred to as planned market economies, mixed economies and mixed market economies. A command economy follows an administrative-command system and uses Soviet-type economic planning which was characteristic of the former Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc before most of these countries converted to market economies. This highlights the central role of hierarchical administration and public ownership of production in guiding the allocation of resources in these economic systems.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="The Soviet Union Has an Administered, Not a Planned, Economy, 1985">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Overview

In the Hellenistic and post-Hellenistic world, "compulsory state planning was the most characteristic trade condition for the Egyptian countryside, for Hellenistic India, and to a lesser degree the more barbaric regions of the Seleucid, the Pergamenian, the southern Arabian, and the Parthian empires".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Scholars have argued that the Incan economy was a flexible type of command economy, centered around the movement and utilization of labor instead of goods.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> One view of mercantilism sees it as involving planned economies.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

The Soviet-style planned economy in Soviet Russia evolved in the wake of a continuing existing World War I war-economy as well as other policies, known as war communism (1918–1921), shaped to the requirements of the Russian Civil War of 1917–1923. These policies began their formal consolidation under an official organ of government in 1921, when the Soviet government founded Gosplan. However, the period of the New Economic Policy (Template:Circa to Template:Circa) intervened before the planned system of regular five-year plans started in 1928. Leon Trotsky was one of the earliest proponents of economic planning during the NEP period.<ref name=Twiss>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Trotsky argued that specialization, the concentration of production and the use of planning could "raise in the near future the coefficient of industrial growth not only two, but even three times higher than the pre-war rate of 6% and, perhaps, even higher".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> According to historian Sheila Fitzpatrick, the scholarly consensus was that Stalin appropriated the position of the Left Opposition on such matters as industrialisation and collectivisation.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

After World War II (1939–1945) France and Great Britain practiced dirigisme – government direction of the economy through non-coercive means. The Swedish government planned public-housing models in a similar fashion as urban planning in a project called Million Programme, implemented from 1965 to 1974. Some decentralized participation in economic planning occurred across Revolutionary Spain, most notably in Catalonia, during the Spanish Revolution of 1936.<ref name="Wetzel">Wetzel, Tom. "Workers Power and the Spanish Revolution" Template:Webarchive.</ref><ref name="Dolgoff">Dolgoff, Sam, ed. (1974). The Anarchist Collectives (1st ed.). Free Life Editions. p. 114. Template:ISBN.</ref>

Relationship with socialism

File:Albert Einstein Head.jpg

Albert Einstein advocated for a socialist planned economy with his 1949 article "Why Socialism?"

In the May 1949 issue of the Monthly Review titled "Why Socialism?", Albert Einstein wrote:<ref>Einstein, Albert (May 1949). "Why Socialism?" Template:Webarchive, Monthly Review.</ref>

I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals. In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow-men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society.

While socialism is not equivalent to economic planning or to the concept of a planned economy, an influential conception of socialism involves the replacement of capital markets with some form of economic planning in order to achieve ex-ante coordination of the economy. The goal of such an economic system would be to achieve conscious control over the economy by the population, specifically so that the use of the surplus product is controlled by the producers.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> The specific forms of planning proposed for socialism and their feasibility are subjects of the socialist calculation debate.

Computational economic planning

In 1959 Anatoly Kitov proposed a distributed computing system (Project "Red Book", Template:Langx) with a focus on the management of the Soviet economy. Opposition from the Defence Ministry killed Kitov's plan.<ref> Template:Cite book </ref>

In 1971 the socialist Allende administration of Chile launched Project Cybersyn to install a telex machine in every corporation and organization in the economy for the communication of economic data between firms and the government. The data was also fed into a computer-simulated economy for forecasting. A control room was built for real-time observation and management of the overall economy. The prototype-stage of the project showed promise when it was used to redirect supplies around a trucker's strike,<ref name=":2">Template:Cite journal</ref> but after CIA-backed Augusto Pinochet led a coup in 1973 that established a military dictatorship under his rule the program was abolished and Pinochet moved Chile towards a more liberalized market economy.

In their book Towards a New Socialism (1993), the computer scientist Paul Cockshott from the University of Glasgow and the economist Allin Cottrell from Wake Forest University claim to demonstrate how a democratically planned economy built on modern computer technology is possible and drives the thesis that it would be both economically more stable than the free-market economies and also morally desirable.<ref name=":1" />

Cybernetics

File:CyberSyn-render-106.png

Project Cybersyn was an early form of computational economic planning.

The use of computers to coordinate production in an optimal fashion has been variously proposed for socialist economies. The Polish economist Oskar Lange (1904–1965) argued that the computer is more efficient than the market process at solving the multitude of simultaneous equations required for allocating economic inputs efficiently (either in terms of physical quantities or monetary prices).<ref name=":3">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

In the Soviet Union, Anatoly Kitov had proposed to the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union a detailed plan for the re-organization of the control of the Soviet armed forces and of the Soviet economy on the basis of a network of computing centers in 1959.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Kitov's proposal was rejected, as later was the 1962 OGAS economy management network project.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Soviet cybernetician, Viktor Glushkov argued that his OGAS information network would have delivered a fivefold savings return for the Soviet economy over the first fifteen-year investment.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Salvador Allende's socialist government pioneered the 1970 Chilean distributed decision support system Project Cybersyn in an attempt to move towards a decentralized planned economy with the experimental viable system model of computed organisational structure of autonomous operative units through an algedonic feedback setting and bottom-up participative decision-making in the form of participative democracy by the Cyberfolk component.<ref> "Cyberfolk". Project Cybersyn. Template:Webarchive. Retrieved 6 August 2020. </ref>

Central planning

Advantages

Supporters of a planned economy argue that the government can harness land, labor, and capital to serve the economic objectives of the state. Consumer demand can be restrained in favor of greater capital investment for economic development in a desired pattern. In international comparisons, supporters of a planned economy have said that state-socialist nations have compared favorably with capitalist nations in health indicators such as infant mortality and life expectancy. However, according to Michael Ellman, the reality of this, at least regarding infant mortality, varies depending on whether official Soviet or WHO definitions are used.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

The state can begin building massive heavy industries at once in an underdeveloped economy without waiting years for capital to accumulate through the expansion of light industry and without reliance on external financing. This is what happened in the Soviet Union during the 1930s when the government forced the share of gross national income dedicated to private consumption down from 80% to 50%. As a result of this development, the Soviet Union experienced massive growth in heavy industry, with a concurrent massive contraction of its agricultural sector due to the labor shortage.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Disadvantages

Economic instability

Studies of command economies of the Eastern Bloc in the 1950s and 1960s by both American and Eastern European economists found that contrary to the expectations of both groups they showed greater fluctuations in output than market economies during the same period.<ref name="Economic Reforms in Polish Industry">Template:Cite book</ref>

Inefficient resource distribution

Critics of planned economies argue that planners cannot detect consumer preferences, shortages and surpluses with sufficient accuracy and therefore cannot efficiently co-ordinate production (in a market economy, a free price system is intended to serve this purpose). This difficulty was notably written about by economists Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek, who referred to subtly distinct aspects of the problem as the economic calculation problem and local knowledge problem, respectively.<ref name="Mises">Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="AER519-30">Hayek, Friedrich A. (1945). "The Use of Knowledge". American Economic Review. XXXV: 4. pp. 519–530.</ref> These distinct aspects were also present in the economic thought of Michael Polanyi.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Whereas the former stressed the theoretical underpinnings of a market economy to subjective value theory while attacking the labor theory of value, the latter argued that the only way to satisfy individuals who have a constantly changing hierarchy of needs and are the only ones to possess their particular individual's circumstances is by allowing those with the most knowledge of their needs to have it in their power to use their resources in a competing marketplace to meet the needs of the most consumers most efficiently. This phenomenon is recognized as spontaneous order. Additionally, misallocation of resources would naturally ensue by redirecting capital away from individuals with direct knowledge and circumventing it into markets where a coercive monopoly influences behavior, ignoring market signals. According to Tibor Machan, "[w]ithout a market in which allocations can be made in obedience to the law of supply and demand, it is difficult or impossible to funnel resources with respect to actual human preferences and goals".<ref name="tibor2001">Template:Cite book</ref>

Historian Robert Vincent Daniels regarded the Stalinist period to represent an abrupt break with Lenin's government in terms of economic planning in which an deliberated, scientific system of planning that featured former Menshevik economists at Gosplan had been replaced with a hasty version of planning with unrealistic targets, bureaucratic waste, bottlenecks and shortages. Stalin's formulations of national plans in terms of physical quantity of output was also attributed by Daniels as a source for the stagnant levels of efficiency and quality.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Suppression of economic democracy and self-management

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}

Economist Robin Hahnel, who supports participatory economics, a form of socialist decentralized planned economy, notes that even if central planning overcame its inherent inhibitions of incentives and innovation, it would nevertheless be unable to maximize economic democracy and self-management, which he believes are concepts that are more intellectually coherent, consistent and just than mainstream notions of economic freedom.<ref name="Hahnel, Robin 2002">Template:Cite book</ref> Furthermore, Hahnel states:

Combined with a more democratic political system, and redone to closer approximate a best case version, centrally planned economies no doubt would have performed better. But they could never have delivered economic self-management, they would always have been slow to innovate as apathy and frustration took their inevitable toll, and they would always have been susceptible to growing inequities and inefficiencies as the effects of differential economic power grew. Under central planning neither planners, managers, nor workers had incentives to promote the social economic interest. Nor did impeding markets for final goods to the planning system enfranchise consumers in meaningful ways. But central planning would have been incompatible with economic democracy even if it had overcome its information and incentive liabilities. And the truth is that it survived as long as it did only because it was propped up by unprecedented totalitarian political power.<ref name="Hahnel, Robin 2002"/>

Command economy

Planned economies contrast with command economies in that a planned economy is "an economic system in which the government controls and regulates production, distribution, prices, etc."<ref name="reference1">"Planned economy" Template:Webarchive. Dictionary.com. Unabridged (v. 1.1). Random House, Inc. Retrieved 11 May 2008).</ref> whereas a command economy necessarily has substantial public ownership of industry while also having this type of regulation.<ref name="autogenerated1">"Command economy" Template:Webarchive. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Retrieved 11 May 2008.</ref> In command economies, important allocation decisions are made by government authorities and are imposed by law.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

This is contested by some Marxists.<ref name=":0" /><ref>Schweickart, David; Lawler, James; Ticktin, Hillel; Ollman, Bertell (1998). "Definitions of Market and Socialism". Market Socialism: The Debate Among Socialists. New York: Routledge. pp. 58–59. Template:ISBN. "For an Anti-Stalinist Marxist, socialism is defined by the degree to which the society is planned. Planning here is understood as the conscious regulation of society by the associated producers themselves. Put it differently, the control over the surplus product rests with the majority of the population through a resolutely democratic process. [...] The sale of labour power is abolished and labour necessarily becomes creative. Everyone participates in running their institutions and society as a whole. No one controls anyone else."</ref> Decentralized planning has been proposed as a basis for socialism and has been variously advocated by anarchists, council communists, libertarian Marxists and other democratic and libertarian socialists who advocate a non-market form of socialism, in total rejection of the type of planning adopted in the economy of the Soviet Union.<ref>Schweickart, David (2007). "Democratic Socialism". In Anderson, Gary L.; Herr, Kathryn G., eds. Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice. Sage Publications. p. 448. Template:ISBN. Template:Webarchive. Retrieved 6 August 2020. "Virtually all socialists have distanced themselves from the economic model long synonymous with socialism (i.e., the Soviet model of a nonmarket, centrally planned economy. [...] Some have endorsed the concept of market socialism, a postcapitalist economy that retains market competition but socializes the means of production and, in some versions, extends democracy to the workplace. Some hold out for a nonmarket, participatory economy. All democratic socialists agree on the need for a democratic alternative to capitalism".</ref>

Most of a command economy is organized in a top-down administrative model by a central authority, where decisions regarding investment and production output requirements are decided upon at the top in the chain of command, with little input from lower levels. Advocates of economic planning have sometimes been staunch critics of these command economies. Leon Trotsky believed that those at the top of the chain of command, regardless of their intellectual capacity, operated without the input and participation of the millions of people who participate in the economy and who understand/respond to local conditions and changes in the economy. Therefore, they would be unable to effectively coordinate all economic activity.<ref name=":4">Template:Cite book</ref>

Historians have associated planned economies with Marxist–Leninist states and the Soviet economic model. Since the 1980s, it has been contested that the Soviet economic model did not actually constitute a planned economy in that a comprehensive and binding plan did not guide production and investment.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The further distinction of an administrative-command system emerged as a new designation in some academic circles for the economic system that existed in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc, highlighting the role of centralized hierarchical decision-making in the absence of popular control over the economy.<ref name="The Rise and Fall of Socialist Planning">Template:Cite book</ref> The possibility of a digital planned economy was explored in Chile between 1971 and 1973 with the development of Project Cybersyn and by Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Kharkevich, head of the Department of Technical Physics in Kiev in 1962.<ref>"Machine of communism. Why the USSR did not create the Internet" Template:Webarchive.</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

While both economic planning and a planned economy can be either authoritarian or democratic and participatory, democratic socialist critics argue that command economies under modern-day communism is highly undemocratic and totalitarian in practice.<ref>Busky, Donald F. (2000). Democratic Socialism: A Global Survey. Praeger. pp. 7–8. Template:ISBN. "Sometimes simply called socialism, more often than not, the adjective democratic is added by democratic socialists to attempt to distinguish themselves from Communists who also call themselves socialists. All but communists, or more accurately, Marxist-Leninists, believe that modern-day communism is highly undemocratic and totalitarian in practice, and democratic socialists wish to emphasise by their name that they disagree strongly with the Marxist-Leninist brand of socialism."</ref><ref>Prychito, David L. (2002). Markets, Planning, and Democracy: Essays After the Collapse of Communism. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 72. Template:ISBN. "It is perhaps less clearly understood that advocates of democratic socialism (who are committed to socialism in the above sense but opposed to Stalinist-style command planning) advocate a decentralized socialism, whereby the planning process itself (the integration of all productive units into one huge organisation) would follow the workers' self-management principle."</ref> Indicative planning is a form of economic planning in market economies that directs the economy through incentive-based methods. Economic planning can be practiced in a decentralized manner through different government authorities. In some predominantly market-oriented and Western mixed economies, the state utilizes economic planning in strategic industries such as the aerospace industry. Mixed economies usually employ macroeconomic planning while micro-economic affairs are left to the market and price system.

Decentralized planning

File:Portrait of Leon Trotsky.jpg

Leon Trotsky was among the earliest Soviet figures that supported economic planning and decentralization<ref name=Twiss/> but opposed the Stalinist model.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

A decentralized-planned economy, occasionally called horizontally planned economy due to its horizontalism, is a type of planned economy in which the investment and allocation of consumer and capital goods is explicated accordingly to an economy-wide plan built and operatively coordinated through a distributed network of disparate economic agents or even production units itself. Decentralized planning is usually held in contrast to centralized planning, in particular the Soviet-type economic planning of the Soviet Union's command economy, where economic information is aggregated and used to formulate a plan for production, investment and resource allocation by a single central authority. Decentralized planning can take shape both in the context of a mixed economy as well as in a post-capitalist economic system. This form of economic planning implies some process of democratic and participatory decision-making within the economy and within firms itself in the form of industrial democracy. Computer-based forms of democratic economic planning and coordination between economic enterprises have also been proposed by various computer scientists and radical economists.<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":1">Cottrell, Allin; Cockshott, W. Paul (1993). Towards a New Socialism Template:Webarchive. (Nottingham, England: Spokesman. Retrieved 17 March 2012.</ref><ref name=":2" /> Proponents present decentralized and participatory economic planning as an alternative to market socialism for a post-capitalist society.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Decentralized planning has been a feature of anarchist and socialist economics. Variations of decentralized planning such as economic democracy, industrial democracy and participatory economics have been promoted by various political groups, most notably anarchists, democratic socialists, guild socialists, libertarian Marxists, libertarian socialists, revolutionary syndicalists and Trotskyists.<ref name=":4" /> During the Spanish Revolution, some areas where anarchist and libertarian socialist influence through the CNT and UGT was extensive, particularly rural regions, were run on the basis of decentralized planning resembling the principles laid out by anarcho-syndicalist Diego Abad de Santillan in the book After the Revolution.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Trotsky had urged economic decentralisation between the state, oblast regions and factories during the NEP period to counter structural inefficiency and the problem of bureaucracy.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Models

Negotiated coordination

Economist Pat Devine has created a model of decentralized economic planning called "negotiated coordination" which is based upon social ownership of the means of production by those affected by the use of the assets involved, with the allocation of consumer and capital goods made through a participatory form of decision-making by those at the most localized level of production.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Moreover, organizations that utilize modularity in their production processes may distribute problem solving and decision making.<ref name="Kostakis, Vasilis 2019">Kostakis, Vasilis (2019). "How to Reap the Benefits of the 'Digital Revolution'? Modularity and the Commons" Template:Webarchive. Halduskultuur: The Estonian Journal of Administrative Culture and Digital Governance. 20 (1): 4–19.</ref>

Participatory planning

Template:See also The planning structure of a decentralized planned economy is generally based on a consumers council and producer council (or jointly, a distributive cooperative) which is sometimes called a consumers' cooperative. Producers and consumers, or their representatives, negotiate the quality and quantity of what is to be produced. This structure is central to guild socialism, participatory economics and the economic theories related to anarchism.

Practice

Kerala

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Some decentralized participation in economic planning has been implemented in various regions and states in India, most notably in Kerala. Local level planning agencies assess the needs of people who are able to give their direct input through the Gram Sabhas (village-based institutions) and the planners subsequently seek to plan accordingly.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Revolutionary Catalonia

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Template:See also Some decentralized participation in economic planning has been implemented across Revolutionary Spain, most notably in Catalonia, during the Spanish Revolution of 1936.<ref name="Wetzel"/><ref name="Dolgoff"/>

Similar concepts in practice

Community participatory planning

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} The United Nations has developed local projects that promote participatory planning on a community level, requiring opportunities for all people to be politically involved and share in the community development process.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Portrayals in fiction

The 1888 novel Looking Backward by Edward Bellamy depicts a fictional planned economy in a United States around the year 2000 which has become a socialist utopia. Other literary portrayals of planned economies include Yevgeny Zamyatin's We (1924).

See also

• Adhocracy
• Commanding heights of the economy
• Communist state
• Creative destruction
• Critique of political economy
• Distributed economy
• Economic equilibrium
• Economic interventionism
• Inclusive democracy
• Input–output model
• Laissez-faire
• Material balance planning
• Nationalization
• Peer-to-peer economy
• Production for use
• Public ownership
• Resource-based economy
• Social peer-to-peer processes
• Steady-state economy
• Technocracy
• Workers' self-management
• The Venus Project
• Why Socialism? – an article written by Albert Einstein which presented a critique of modern capitalism and advocated for a planned economy.

Case studies (Soviet-type economies) Template:Cols

• Analysis of Soviet-type economic planning
• Eastern Bloc economies
• Economy of Cuba<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
• Economy of North Korea
• Five-year plans of the Soviet Union
• OGAS, a plan for creating a computer network to supervise the Soviet economy
• Project Cybersyn, a project for a computer network controlling the economy of Chile under Salvador Allende

Case studies (mixed-market economies)

• Five-year plans of China
• Dirigisme (indicative planning in France)
• Economy of India
• Economy of Singapore
• First Malaysia Plan
• Five-year plans of Argentina
• Five-year plans of South Korea
• The Lucas Plan, an industrial plan which combined the theoretical understanding of aerospace designers and practice knowledge of workers to produce 150 alternative product designs.

Further reading

• Kaplan, Robert – see reference to his work on International Economics and Foreign Relations, where he addresses nature of "command economy", a Weberian term.
• Cox, Robin (2005). "The Economic Calculation Controversy: Unravelling of a Myth". Common Voice (3).
• Damier, Vadim (2012). "The Economy of Freedom".
• Devine, Pat (2010). Democracy and Economic Planning. Polity. Template:ISBN.
• Ellman, Michael (2014). Socialist Planning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Template:ISBN.
• Grossman, Gregory (1987): "Command economy". The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. 1. pp. 494–495.
• Landauer, Carl (1947). Theory of National Economic Planning (2nd ed.). Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
• Mandel, Ernest (1986). In Defence of Socialist Planning. New Left Review (159).
• Template:Citation.
• Nove, Alec (1987). "Planned economy". The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. 3. pp. 879–885.

External links

• "The Myth of the Permanent Arms Economy"
• "The Stalin Model for the Control and Coordination of Enterprises in a Socialist Economy" Template:Webarchive