Element (mathematics)
Template:Short description Template:For In mathematics, an element (or member) of a set is any one of the distinct objects that belong to that set. For example, given a set called Template:Mvar containing the first four positive integers (<math>A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}</math>), one could say that "3 is an element of Template:Mvar", expressed notationally as <math>3 \in A </math>.
SetsEdit
Writing <math>A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}</math> means that the elements of the set Template:Mvar are the numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4. Sets of elements of Template:Mvar, for example <math>\{1, 2\}</math>, are subsets of Template:Mvar.
Sets can themselves be elements. For example, consider the set <math>B = \{1, 2, \{3, 4\}\}</math>. The elements of Template:Mvar are not 1, 2, 3, and 4. Rather, there are only three elements of Template:Mvar, namely the numbers 1 and 2, and the set <math>\{3, 4\}</math>.
The elements of a set can be anything. For example the elements of the set <math>C = \{\mathrm{\color{Red}red}, \mathrm{12}, B\}</math> are the color red, the number 12, and the set Template:Mvar.
In logical terms, <math>(x \in y) \leftrightarrow \forall x[P_x = y]: x \in \mathfrak D y</math>.Template:Clarify
Notation and terminologyEdit
The binary relation "is an element of", also called set membership, is denoted by the symbol "∈". Writing
- <math>x \in A </math>
means that "x is an element of A".<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Equivalent expressions are "x is a member of A", "x belongs to A", "x is in A" and "x lies in A". The expressions "A includes x" and "A contains x" are also used to mean set membership, although some authors use them to mean instead "x is a subset of A".<ref name="schech">Template:Cite book p. 12</ref> Logician George Boolos strongly urged that "contains" be used for membership only, and "includes" for the subset relation only.<ref name="boolos">Template:Cite speech</ref>
For the relation ∈ , the converse relation ∈T may be written
- <math>A \ni x</math>
meaning "A contains or includes x".
The negation of set membership is denoted by the symbol "∉". Writing
- <math>x \notin A</math>
means that "x is not an element of A".
The symbol ∈ was first used by Giuseppe Peano, in his 1889 work {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}.<ref name=ken>Template:Cite journal</ref> Here he wrote on page X:
{{#invoke:Lang|lang}}
which means
The symbol ∈ means is. So Template:Math is read as a is a certain b; …
The symbol itself is a stylized lowercase Greek letter epsilon ("ϵ"), the first letter of the word Template:Wikt-lang, which means "is".<ref name=ken/>
ExamplesEdit
Using the sets defined above, namely A = {1, 2, 3, 4}, B = {1, 2, {3, 4}} and C = {red, green, blue}, the following statements are true:
Cardinality of setsEdit
{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} The number of elements in a particular set is a property known as cardinality; informally, this is the size of a set.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In the above examples, the cardinality of the set A is 4, while the cardinality of set B and set C are both 3. An infinite set is a set with an infinite number of elements, while a finite set is a set with a finite number of elements. The above examples are examples of finite sets. An example of an infinite set is the set of positive integers Template:Math.
Formal relationEdit
As a relation, set membership must have a domain and a range. Conventionally the domain is called the universe denoted U. The range is the set of subsets of U called the power set of U and denoted P(U). Thus the relation <math>\in</math> is a subset of Template:Math. The converse relation <math>\ni</math> is a subset of Template:Math.
See alsoEdit
ReferencesEdit
Further readingEdit
- Template:Citation - "Naive" means that it is not fully axiomatized, not that it is silly or easy (Halmos's treatment is neither).
- Template:Citation
- Template:Citation - Both the notion of set (a collection of members), membership or element-hood, the axiom of extension, the axiom of separation, and the union axiom (Suppes calls it the sum axiom) are needed for a more thorough understanding of "set element".