Fish ladder

Template:Short description Template:Lead too short

Pool-and-weir fish ladder at Bonneville Dam on the Columbia River

Drone video of a fish way in Estonia, on the river Jägala

FERC fish ladder safety sign

A fish ladder, also known as a fishway, fish pass, fish steps, or fish cannon, is a structure on or around artificial and natural barriers (such as dams, locks and waterfalls) to facilitate diadromous fishes' natural migration as well as movements of potamodromous species.<ref name="whatis">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Most fishways enable fish to pass around the barriers by swimming and leaping up a series of relatively low steps (hence the term ladder) into the waters on the other side. The velocity of water falling over the steps has to be great enough to attract the fish to the ladder, but it cannot be so great that it washes fish back downstream or exhausts them to the point of inability to continue their journey upriver.

HistoryEdit

File:Denil fish ladder.jpg

Denil Fishway on Salmon Creek, Montana

Written reports of rough fishways date to 17th-century France, where bundles of branches were used to make steps in steep channels to bypass obstructions.

A 1714 construction of an old channel bypassing a dam, "originally cut for the passage of fish up and down the river", is mentioned in the 1823 U.S. Circuit Court Case Tyler v. Wilkinson. This example predates the 1880 fish ladder at Pawtuxet Falls. The 1714 channel "wholly failed for this purpose" and, in 1730, a mill was built in its place. The channel and its mill usage became an important legal case in U.S. water law.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

A pool and weir salmon ladder was built around 1830 by James Smith, a Scottish engineer on the River Teith, near Deanston, Perthshire in Scotland. Both the weir and salmon ladder are there today and many subsequent salmon ladders built in Scotland were inspired by it.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

A version was patented in 1837 by Richard McFarlan of Bathurst, New Brunswick, Canada, who designed a fishway to bypass a dam at his water-powered lumber mill.<ref>Mario Theriault, Great Maritime Inventions 1833–1950, Goose Lane, 2001, p. 45</ref> In 1852–1854, the Ballisodare Fish Pass was built in County Sligo in Ireland to draw salmon into a river that had not supported a fishery. In 1880, the first fish ladder was built in Rhode Island, United States, on the Pawtuxet Falls Dam. The ladder was removed in 1924, when the City of Providence replaced the wood dam with a concrete one. USA legislated fishways in 1888.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

As the Industrial Age advanced, dams and other river obstructions became larger and more common, leading to the need for effective fish by-passes.<ref>Office Of Technology Assessment Washington DC (1995) Fish passage technologies : protection at hydropower facilities Diana Publishing, Template:ISBN.</ref>

TypesEdit

Template:See also

Pool and weir: One of the oldest styles of fish ladders. It uses a series of small dams and pools of regular length to make a long, sloping channel for fish to travel around the obstruction. The channel acts as a fixed lock to gradually step down the water level; to head upstream, fish must jump over from box to box in the ladder.
Baffle fishway: Uses a series of symmetrical close-spaced baffles in a channel to redirect the flow of water, allowing fish to swim around the barrier. Baffle fishways need not have resting areas, although pools can be included to provide a resting area or to reduce the velocity of the flow. Such fishways can be built with switchbacks to minimize the space needed for their construction. Baffles come in variety of designs. The most common design is the Larinier pass, named after the French engineer who designed them. They are suitable for coarse fish as well as salmonids, and can be built large enough to be used by canoes.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref> The original design for a Denil fishway was developed in 1909 by a Belgian scientist, G. Denil; it has since been adjusted and adapted in many ways. The Alaskan Steeppass, for example, is a modular prefabricated Denil-fishway variant originally designed for remote areas of Alaska. Baffles have been installed by Project Maitai in several waterways in Nelson, New Zealand, to improve fish passage as part of general environmental restoration.

Fish elevator (or fish lift): Breaks with the ladder design by providing a sort of elevator to carry fish over a barrier. It is well suited to tall barriers. With a fish elevator, fish swim into a collection area at the base of the obstruction. When enough fish accumulate in the collection area, they are nudged into a hopper that carries them into a flume that empties into the river above the barrier. On the Connecticut River, for example, two fish elevators lift up to 500 fish at a time, 52 feet (15.85 m), to clear the Holyoke Dam. In 2013, the elevator carried over 400,000 fish.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Rock-ramp fishway: Uses large rocks and timbers to make pools and small falls that mimic natural structures. Because of the length of the channel needed for the ladder, such structures are most appropriate for relatively short barriers. They have a significant advantage in that they can provide fish spawning habitat.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Vertical-slot fish passage: Similar to a pool-and-weir system, except that each "dam" has a narrow slot in it near the channel wall. This allows fish to swim upstream without leaping over an obstacle. Vertical-slot fish passages also tend to handle reasonably well the seasonal fluctuation in water levels on each side of the barrier. Recent studies suggest that navigation locks have a potential to be operated as vertical slot fishways to provide increased access for a range of biota, including poor swimmers.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Fish siphon: Allows the pass to be installed parallel to a water course and can be used to link two watercourses. The pass utilises a syphon effect to regulate its flow. This style is particularly favoured to aid flood defence.
Fish cannon: A wet, flexible pneumatic tube uses air pressure to suck in salmon one at a time and gently shoot them out into the destination water. The system was originally designed by Bellevue, Washington company Whooshh to safely move apples.<ref>'Salmon Cannon' Fires Fish Over Dams At 22mph 13 August 2014 www.youtube.com, accessed 15 January 2022</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

Fish lock: A fish lock is a structure designed to facilitate the passage of fish over barriers such as dams or weirs, enabling them to access upstream habitats essential for spawning and growth. It operates similarly to a navigation lock, using a chamber that fills and empties to move fish across the barrier by adjusting water levels to match the upstream and downstream sections. There are several types of fish locks, such as the Borland fish lock, Deelder lock, Pavlov lock, and most recently, the Fishcon lock.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Fishcon lock: The Fishcon lock enables both upstream and downstream fish migration in a compact space and was developed by the company Fishcon. Between 2019 and mid-2024, seven Fishcon locks were installed in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Five of these installations have been already independently evaluated with great results and deemed functional according to Austrian and German standards.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Borland fish lock: This is similar to a canal lock. At the downstream end of the obstruction, fish are attracted to a collecting pool by an outflow of water through a sluice gate. At fixed intervals, the gate is closed, and water from the upper level fills the collecting pool and an inclined shaft, lifting the fish up to the upstream level. Once the shaft is full, a sluice at the top level opens, to allow fish to continue their journey upstream. The top sluice then closes, and the shaft empties for the process to begin again. A number of Borland fish locks have been built in Scotland, associated with hydro-electric dams, including one at Aigas Dam on the River Beauly.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Deelder lock: Developed by Dutch engineer Klaas Deelder, this design features two chambers separated by an internal weir. Fish enter the lower chamber, which then fills with water, allowing them to swim over the weir into the upper chamber and continue upstream. This method has been effective in passing a wide range of fish species and sizes.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Pavlov lock: This design, attributed to Russian engineer Dmitry Sergeyevich Pavlov, incorporates features to guide fish into the lock chamber, such as attraction flows and holding pools. The lock operates cyclically, filling and emptying to move fish upstream, and has been implemented in various regions to assist fish migration.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Template:Cleanup-gallery

John Day Dam fish ladder.jpg

John Day Dam fish ladder on the Columbia River, United States
Fischlift1.jpg

Fish elevator
Grave vistrap laag.jpg

Fish ladder in Meuse River the Netherlands
CapilanoRiverRegPark-salmonladder.jpg

Fish ladder in North Vancouver, Canada
Climbing Chinook Salmon (15419560541).jpg

Chinook salmon climbing a ladder
Dart at Salmon leap 2.JPG

Detail of fish ladder on the River Dart in England
Salmon Fish Ladder.jpg

Salmon climbing a ladder on Issaquah Creek, Washington
Pico Blanco Fish Ladder.jpg

Bi-directional, seasonal ladder at Camp Pico Blanco on the Little Sur River in Big Sur, California, United States
Laxtrappan.JPG

Fish ladder for salmon near the power station in Gullspång, Sweden
Fish pass.jpg

A small fish ladder on the River Otter, Devon
Fish ladder entrance at mouth of Mosel River.jpg

Fish ladder access point (from the downriver side of the power generator-lock complex): Mosel at Koblenz
2-Kammern-Organismenwanderhilfe Alm.jpg

Fishcon lock on the river Alm in Austria

EffectivenessEdit

File:Fish using a fish ladder in Akerselva, Oslo, Norway.jpg

This fish failed to enter the narrow opening in the fish ladder in Akerselva, Norway

Fish ladders have a mixed record of effectiveness. This varies for different types of species, with one study showing that only three percent of American Shad make it through all the fish ladders on the way to their spawning ground.<ref name="BlockedMigration">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Effectiveness depends on the fish species' swimming ability, and how the fish moves up and downstream. A fish passage that is designed to allow fish to pass upstream may not allow passage downstream, for instance.<ref name="UpstreamBattle">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Fish passages do not always work. In practice a challenge is matching swimming performance data to hydrodynamic measurements.<ref name="Katopodis2016">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="Wang2017b">Template:Cite journal</ref> Swim tests rarely use the same protocol and the output is either a single-point measurement or a bulk velocity. In contrast, physical and numerical modelling of fluid flow (i.e. hydrodynamics) deliver a detailed flow map, with a fine spatial and temporal resolution. Regulatory agencies face a difficult task to match hydrodynamic measurements and swimming performance data.

CulvertsEdit

Template:See During the last three decades,Template:When? the ecological impact of culverts on natural streams and rivers has been recognised. While the culvert discharge capacity derives from hydrological and hydraulic engineering considerations,<ref name="Chanson_book2004">Template:Cite book</ref> this results often in large velocities in the barrel, which may prevent fish from passing through.

Baffles may be installed along the barrel invert to provide some fish-friendly alternative.<ref name="Olsen2013">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="Chanson_Uys2016">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="Cabonce2017">Template:Cite book</ref> For low discharges, the baffles decrease the flow velocity and increase the water depth to facilitate fish passage. At larger discharges, baffles induce lower local velocities and generate recirculation regions. However, baffles can reduce drastically the culvert discharge capacity for a given afflux,<ref name="Lariner2002">Template:Cite journal</ref> thus increasing substantially the total cost of the culvert structure to achieve the same design discharge and afflux. It is believed that fish-turbulence interplay may facilitate upstream migration, albeit an optimum design must be based upon a careful characterisation of both hydrodynamics and fish kinematics.<ref name="Wang2017b" /><ref name="Wang2017">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="WangChanson2018">Template:Cite journal</ref> Finally the practical engineering design implications cannot be ignored, while a solid understanding of turbulence typology is a basic requirement to any successful boundary treatment conducive of upstream fish passage.<ref name="Chanson2019">Template:Cite journal</ref>