Great Red Spot
Template:Short description Template:Coord
.png){kind=link}
The Great Red Spot is a persistent high-pressure region in the atmosphere of Jupiter, producing an anticyclonic storm that is the largest in the Solar System. It is the most recognizable feature on Jupiter, owing to its red-orange color whose origin is still unknown. Located 22 degrees south of Jupiter's equator, it produces wind-speeds up to Template:Convert. It was first observed in September 1831, with 60 recorded observations between then and 1878, when continuous observations began.<ref name="Denning" /><ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite encyclopedia</ref> A similar spot was observed from 1665 to 1713; if this is the same storm, it has existed for at least {{#expr: (2025 - 1665)}} years,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> but a study from 2024 suggests this is not the case.<ref name="Sánchez-Lavega2024"/>
Observation historyEdit
First observationsEdit
The Great Red Spot may have existed before 1665, but it could be that the present spot was first seen only in 1830, and was well studied only after a prominent appearance in 1879. The storm that was seen in the 17th century may have been different from the storm that exists today.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> A long gap separates its period of current study after 1830 from the 17th century discovery. It is unknown whether the original spot dissipated and reformed, whether it faded away, or whether observers simply failed to study and record it.Template:Sfnp
The first sighting of the Great Red Spot is often credited to Robert Hooke, who described a spot on the planet in May 1664.<ref name="aps-hooke-cassini"/> However, it is likely that Hooke's spot was not only in another belt altogether (the North Equatorial Belt, as opposed to the current Great Red Spot in the South Equatorial Belt), but also that it was in the shadow of a transiting moon, most likely Callisto.<ref name="aps-hooke-cassini">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In the following year, Giovanni Cassini describes a "a permanent [spot] which was often seen to return in the same place with the same size and shape", calculating its rotation period to be Template:Nowrap.<ref name="aps-hooke-cassini"/>Template:Sfnp With fluctuations in visibility, Cassini's spot was observed from 1665 to 1713, but the 48-year observational gap makes the identity of the two spots inconclusive. Because of the older spot's shorter observational history and slower motion than the modern spot, it is difficult to conclude that they are the same.Template:Sfnp
A minor mystery concerns a Jovian spot depicted in a 1711 canvas by Donato Creti, which is exhibited in the Vatican.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Sfnp Part of a series of panels in which different (magnified) heavenly bodies serve as backdrops for various Italian scenes, and all overseen by the astronomer Eustachio Manfredi for accuracy, Creti's painting is the first known depiction of a large spot on Jupiter as red (albeit raised to the Jovian northern hemisphere due to an optical inversion inherent to the era's telescopes). No Jovian feature was explicitly described in writing as red before the late 19th century.Template:Sfnp
The Great Red Spot has been frequently observed since 5 September 1831, with over 60 observations recorded by 1879, when it came into popular prominence.<ref name="Denning">Template:Cite journal</ref> Since then, it has been under continuous observation.
A 2024 study of historical observations suggests that the "permanent spot" observed from 1665 to 1713 may not be the same as the modern Great Red Spot observed since 1831. It is suggested that the original spot disappeared, and later another spot formed, which is the one seen today.<ref name="Sánchez-Lavega2024"/>
Late 20th and 21st centuriesEdit
On 25 February 1979,Template:Sfnp when the Voyager 1 spacecraft was Template:Convert from Jupiter, it transmitted the first detailed image of the Great Red Spot. Cloud details as small as Template:Convert across were visible. The colorful, wavy cloud pattern seen to the left (west) of the Red Spot is a region of extraordinarily complex and variable wave motion.
In the 21st century, the major diameter of the Great Red Spot has been observed to be shrinking. In 2004 its length was about half that of a century earlier, when it reached a size of Template:Convert, about three times the diameter of Earth. At the present rate of reduction, it will become circular by 2040.
It is not known how long the spot will last, or whether the change is a result of periodic fluctuations.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> In 2019, the spot began "flaking" at its edge, with fragments of the storm spinning off and dissipating.<ref name="disintegrating">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The shrinking and "flaking" fueled speculation from some astronomers that the spot could dissipate within decades.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> However, other astronomers believe the apparent size of the spot reflects its cloud coverage and not the size of the underlying vortex, and also that the flaking events can be explained by interactions with other cyclones or anticyclones, including incomplete absorptions of smaller systems; this might mean that the Great Red Spot is not in danger of dissipating.<ref name="may not">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
A smaller spot, designated Oval BA, which formed in March 2000 from the merging of three white ovals,<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> has turned reddish in color. Astronomers have named it the Little Red Spot or Red Jr. As of 5 June 2006, the Great Red Spot and Oval BA appeared to be approaching convergence.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The storms pass each other about every two years, but the passings of 2002 and 2004 were of little significance.Template:Cn Amy Simon-Miller, of the Goddard Space Flight Center, predicted the storms would have their closest passing on 4 July 2006.Template:Cn She worked with Imke de Pater and Phil Marcus of UC Berkeley as well as a team of professional astronomers beginning in April 2006 to study the storms using the Hubble Space Telescope; on 20 July 2006, the two storms were photographed passing each other by the Gemini Observatory without converging.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> In May 2008, a third storm turned red.<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref>
The Juno spacecraft, which entered into a polar orbit around Jupiter in 2016, flew over the Great Red Spot upon its close approach to Jupiter on 11 July 2017, taking several images of the storm from a distance of about Template:Convert above the surface.<ref name="junospots"/><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Over the duration of the Juno mission, the spacecraft continued to study the composition and evolution of Jupiter's atmosphere, especially its Great Red Spot.<ref name="junospots" />
The Great Red Spot should not be confused with the Great Dark Spot, a feature observed near the northern pole of Jupiter in 2000 with the Cassini–Huygens spacecraft.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> There is also a feature in the atmosphere of Neptune called the Great Dark Spot. The latter feature was imaged by Voyager 2 in 1989 and may have been an atmospheric hole rather than a storm.Template:Cn It disappeared by 1994, although a similar spot had appeared farther to the north.Template:Cn
Mechanical dynamicsEdit
Jupiter's Great Red Spot rotates counterclockwise, with a period of about 4.5 Earth days,<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> or 11 Jovian days, as of 2008. Measuring Template:Convert in width as of 3 April 2017, the Great Red Spot is 1.3 times the diameter of Earth.<ref name="junospots">Template:Cite news</ref> The cloud-tops of this storm are about Template:Convert above the surrounding cloud-tops.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> The storm has continued for centuries because there is no planetary surface (only a mantle of hydrogen) to cause friction; circulating atmospheric eddies persist because there is nothing to oppose their angular momentum.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
Infrared data has long indicated that the Great Red Spot is colder (and thus higher in altitude) than most of the other clouds on the planet.Template:Sfnp The upper atmosphere above the storm, however, has substantially higher temperatures than the rest of the planet.Template:Cn Acoustic waves rising from the turbulence of the storm below have been proposed as an explanation for the heating of this region.<ref name="Heating of Jupiter's upper atmosphere">Template:Cite journal</ref> The acoustic waves travel vertically up to a height of Template:Cvt above the storm where they break in the upper atmosphere, converting wave energy into heat. This creates a region of upper atmosphere that is Template:Convert—several hundred kelvins warmer than the rest of the planet at this altitude.<ref name="Heating of Jupiter's upper atmosphere" /> The effect is described as like "crashing [...] ocean waves on a beach".<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
Careful tracking of atmospheric features revealed the Great Red Spot's counterclockwise circulation as far back as 1966, observations dramatically confirmed by the first time-lapse movies from the Voyager fly-bys.Template:Sfnp The spot is confined by a modest eastward jet stream to its south and a very strong westward one to its north.Template:Sfnp Though winds around the edge of the spot peak at about Template:Convert, currents inside it seem stagnant, with little inflow or outflow.Template:Sfnp The rotation of the spot has slowed with time, perhaps as a direct result of its steady reduction in size.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
The Great Red Spot's latitude has been stable for the duration of good observational records, typically varying by about a degree. Its longitude, however, is subject to constant variation, including a 90-day longitudinal oscillation with an amplitude of ~1°.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>Template:Sfnp<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Because Jupiter's gaseous body does not rotate uniformly at all latitudes, astronomers have defined three different systems for defining longitude. System II is used for latitudes of more than 10 degrees and was originally based on the average rotational period of the Great Red Spot (Template:Nowrap).<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>Template:Sfnp Despite this, however, the spot has "lapped" the planet in System II at least 10 times since the early 19th century.Template:Cn Its drift rate has changed dramatically over the years and has been linked to the brightness of the South Equatorial Belt and the presence or absence of a South Tropical Disturbance.Template:Sfnp
Internal depth and structureEdit
.png){kind=link}
Jupiter's Great Red Spot (GRS) is an elliptical-shaped anticyclone, occurring at 22 degrees below the equator, in Jupiter's southern hemisphere.<ref name="gas-composition">Template:Cite journal</ref> The largest anticyclonic storm (Template:Nowrap) in the Solar System, little is known about its internal depth and structure.<ref name="depth-grs-juno">Template:Cite journal</ref> Visible imaging and cloud-tracking from in-situ observation determined the velocity and vorticity of the GRS, which is located in a thin anticyclonic ring at 70–85% of the radius and is located along Jupiter's fastest westward moving jet stream.<ref name="thermal-structure">Template:Cite journal</ref> During NASA's 2016 Juno mission, gravity signature and thermal infrared data were obtained that offered insight into the structural dynamics and depth of the GRS.<ref name="velocity-vorticity">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="depth-grs-juno"/><ref name="thermal-structure"/> During July 2017, the Juno spacecraft conducted a second pass of the GRS to collect Microwave Radiometer (MWR) scans of the GRS to determine how far the GRS extended toward the surface of the condensed Template:Chem layer.<ref name="depth-grs-juno"/> These MWR scans suggested that the GRS vertical depth extended to about Template:Nowrap below cloud level, with an estimated drop in atmospheric pressure to Template:Nowrap.<ref name="depth-grs-juno"/><ref name="thermal-structure"/> Two methods of analysis that constrain the data collected were the mascon approach, which found a depth of Template:Nowrap, and the Slepian approach showing wind extending to Template:Nowrap.<ref name="depth-grs-juno"/> These methods, along with gravity signature MWR data, suggest that the GRS zonal winds still increase at a rate of 50% of the velocity of the viable cloud level, before the wind decay starts at lower levels. This rate of wind decay and gravity data suggest the depth of the GRS is between 200 and Template:Nowrap.<ref name="depth-grs-juno"/>
Galileo and Cassini's thermal infrared imaging and spectroscopy of the GRS were conducted during 1995–2008, in order to find evidence of thermal inhomogeneities within the internal structure vortex of the GRS.<ref name="thermal-structure"/> Previous thermal infrared temperature maps from the Voyager, Galileo, and Cassini missions suggested the GRS is a structure of an anticyclonic vortex with a cold core within a upwelling warmer annulus; this data shows a gradient in the temperature of the GRS.<ref name="gas-composition"/><ref name="thermal-structure"/> Better understanding of Jupiter's atmospheric temperature, aerosol particle opacity, and ammonia gas composition was provided by thermal-IR imaging: a direct correlation of the visible cloud layers reactions, thermal gradient and compositional mapping to observational data were collected over decades.<ref name="gas-composition"/><ref name="thermal-structure"/> During December 2000, high spatial resolution images from Galileo, of an atmospheric turbulent area to the northwest of the GRS, showed a thermal contrast between the warmest region of the anticyclone and regions to the east and west of the GRS.<ref name="thermal-structure"/><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
The vertical temperatureTemplate:Clarify of the structure of the GRS is constrained to be between 100 and Template:Nowrap, with the vertical temperatureTemplate:Clarify of the GRS core at approximately Template:Nowrap of pressureTemplate:Clarify being Template:Nowrap, much warmer than regions of the GRS to the east–west, and Template:Nowrap warmer than regions to the north–south of the structure's edge.Template:ClarifyTemplate:Fix<ref name="thermal-structure"/> This structure is consistent with the data collected by the VISIR (VLT Mid-Infrared Imager Spectrometer on the ESO Very Large Telescope) imaging obtained in 2006; this revealed that the GRS was physically present at a wide range of altitudes that occur within the atmospheric pressure range of Template:Nowrap, and confirms the thermal infrared mapping result.<ref name="thermal-structure"/><ref name="velocity-vorticity"/><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> To develop a model of the internal structure of the GRS, the Cassini instrument Composite Infrared Spectrometer (CIRS) and ground based spatial imaging mapped the composition of the phosphine and ammonia aerosols (Template:Chem, Template:Chem) and para-hydroxybenzoic acid within the anticyclonic circulation of the GRS.<ref name="thermal-structure"/><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The images that were collected from the CIRS and ground-based imaging trace the vertical motion in the Jovian atmosphere by Template:Chem and Template:Chem spectra.<ref name="gas-composition"/><ref name="thermal-structure"/>
The highest concentrations of Template:Chem and Template:Chem were found to the north of the GRS peripheral rotation. They aided in determining the southward jet movement and showed evidence of an increase in altitude of the column of aerosols with pressures ranging from Template:Nowrap.<ref name="thermal-structure"/><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> However, the Template:Chem composition data shows that there is a major depletion of Template:Chem below the visible cloud layer at the southern peripheral ring of the GRS; this lower opacity is relative to a narrow band of atmospheric subsidence.<ref name="thermal-structure"/> The low mid-IR aerosol opacity, along with the temperature gradients, the altitude difference, and the vertical movement of the zonal winds, are involved with the development and sustainability of the vorticity.<ref name="thermal-structure"/> The stronger atmospheric subsidence and compositional asymmetries of the GRS suggest that the structure exhibits a degree of tilt from the northern edge to the southern edge of the structure.<ref name="thermal-structure"/><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The GRS depth and internal structure has been constantly changing over decades;<ref name="depth-grs-juno"/> however there is still no logical reason that it is Template:Nowrap in depth, but the jet streams that supply the force that powers the GRS vortex are well below the structure base.<ref name="depth-grs-juno"/><ref name="thermal-structure"/>
Color and compositionEdit
It is not known what causes the Great Red Spot's reddish color. Hypotheses supported by laboratory experiments suppose that it may be caused by chemical products created by the solar ultraviolet irradiation of ammonium hydrosulfide<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and the organic compound acetylene, which produces a reddish material—likely complex organic compounds called tholins.<ref name="Hudson2018">Template:Cite journal</ref> The high altitude of the compounds may also contribute to the coloring.<ref name="EarthSky">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
The Great Red Spot varies greatly in hue, from almost brick-red to pale salmon or even white. The spot occasionally disappears, becoming evident only through the Red Spot Hollow, which is its location in the South Equatorial Belt (SEB). Its visibility is apparently coupled to the SEB: when the belt is bright white, the spot tends to be dark, and when it is dark, the spot is usually light. These periods when the spot is dark or light occur at irregular intervals: between 1947 and 1997, the spot was darkest in the periods 1961–1966, 1968–1975, 1989–1990, and 1992–1993.Template:Sfnp
See alsoEdit
- Extraterrestrial vortex
- Great Dark Spot
- Great White Spot, a similar storm on Saturn
- Hypercane
- WISEP J190648.47+401106.8
ReferencesEdit
Further readingEdit
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite journal
External linksEdit
- Template:Cite news
- Template:Cite news
- Template:Cite news
- Template:Cite journal
- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}
- Video based on Juno's Perijove 7 overflight by Seán Doran (see album for more)