Immunofluorescence
Template:Cs1 config Immunofluorescence (IF) is a light microscopy-based technique that allows detection and localization of a wide variety of target biomolecules within a cell or tissue at a quantitative level. The technique utilizes the binding specificity of antibodies and antigens.<ref name=":0">Template:Cite journal</ref> The specific region an antibody recognizes on an antigen is called an epitope. Several antibodies can recognize the same epitope but differ in their binding affinity. The antibody with the higher affinity for a specific epitope will surpass antibodies with a lower affinity for the same epitope.<ref name=":2">Template:Citation</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
By conjugating the antibody to a fluorophore, the position of the target biomolecule is visualized by exciting the fluorophore and measuring the emission of light in a specific predefined wavelength using a fluorescence microscope. It is imperative that the binding of the fluorophore to the antibody itself does not interfere with the immunological specificity of the antibody or the binding capacity of its antigen.<ref name=":3">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Immunofluorescence is a widely used example of immunostaining (using antibodies to stain proteins) and is a specific example of immunohistochemistry (the use of the antibody-antigen relationship in tissues). This technique primarily utilizes fluorophores to visualize the location of the antibodies, while others provoke a color change in the environment containing the antigen of interest or make use of a radioactive label. Immunofluorescent techniques that utilized labelled antibodies was conceptualized in the 1940s by Albert H. Coons.<ref name=":2" /><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Immunofluorescence is employed in foundational scientific investigations and clinical diagnostic endeavors, showcasing its multifaceted utility across diverse substrates, including tissue sections, cultured cell lines, or individual cells. Its usage includes analysis of the distribution of proteins, glycans, small biological and non-biological molecules, and visualization of structures such as intermediate-sized filaments.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
If the topology of a cell membrane is undetermined, epitope insertion into proteins can be used in conjunction with immunofluorescence to determine structures within the cell membrane.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Immunofluorescence (IF) can also be used as a “semi-quantitative” method to gain insight into the levels and localization patterns of DNA methylation. IF can additionally be used in combination with other, non-antibody methods of fluorescent staining, e.g., the use of DAPI to label DNA.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Examination of immunofluorescence specimens can be conducted utilizing various microscope configurations, including the epifluorescence microscope, confocal microscope, and widefield microscope.<ref name=":4">Template:Cite journal</ref>
TypesEdit
Minor edits by Mikael Häggström, MD
- Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license</ref>
Preparation of fluorescenceEdit
To perform immunofluorescence staining, a fluorophore must be conjugated (“tagged”) to an antibody. Staining procedures can be applied to both retained intracellular expressed antibodies, or to cell surface antigens on living cells. There are two general classes of immunofluorescence techniques: primary (direct) and secondary (indirect).<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2" /> The following descriptions will focus primarily on these classes in terms of conjugated antibodies.<ref name=":4" />
Primary (direct)Edit
Primary (direct) immunofluorescence (DIF) uses a single antibody, conjugated to a fluorophore. The antibody recognizes the target molecule (antigen) and binds to a specific region, called the epitope. The attached fluorophore can be detected via fluorescent microscopy, which, depending on the type of fluorophore, will emit a specific wavelength of light once excited.<ref name=":0" /><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
The direct attachment of the fluorophore to the antibody reduces the number of steps in the sample preparation procedure, saving time and reducing non-specific background signal during analysis.<ref name=":4" /> This also limits the possibility of antibody cross-reactivity, and possible mistakes throughout the process. One disadvantage of DIF is the limited number of antibodies that can bind to the antigen. This limitation may reduce sensitivity to the technique. When the target protein is available in only small concentrations, a better approach would be secondary IF, which is considered to be more sensitive than DIF <ref name=":2" /><ref name=":4" /> when compared to Secondary (Indirect) Immunofluorescence.<ref name=":0" />
Secondary (indirect)Edit
Secondary (indirect) immunofluorescence (SIF) is similar to direct immunofluorescence, however the technique utilizes two types of antibodies whereas only one of them have a conjugated fluorophore. The antibody with the conjugated fluorophore is referred to as the secondary antibody, while the unconjugated is referred to as the primary antibody.<ref name=":0" />
The principle of this technique is that the primary antibody specifically binds to the epitope on the target molecule, whereas the secondary antibody, with the conjugated fluorophore, recognizes and binds to the primary antibody.<ref name=":0" />
This technique is considered to be more sensitive than primary immunofluorescence, because multiple secondary antibodies can bind to the same primary antibody. The increased number of fluorophore molecules per antigen increases the amount of emitted light, and thus amplifies the signal.<ref name=":0" /> There are different methods for attaining a higher fluorophore-antigen ratio such as the Avidin-Biotin Complex (ABC method) and Labeled Streptavidin-Biotin (LSAB method).<ref>Template:Citation</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
LimitationsEdit
Immunofluorescence is only limited to fixed (i.e. dead) cells, when studying structures within the cell, as antibodies generally do not penetrate intact cellular or subcellular membranes in living cells, because they are large proteins. To visualize these structures, antigenic material must be fixed firmly on its natural localization inside the cell.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> To study structures within living cells, in combination with fluorescence, one can utilize recombinant proteins containing fluorescent protein domains, e.g., green fluorescent protein (GFP). The GFP-technique involves altering the genetic information of the cells.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
A significant problem with immunofluorescence is photobleaching,<ref name=":4" /> the fluorophores permanent loss of ability to emit light.<ref name=":0" /> To mitigate the risk of photobleaching one can employ different strategies. By reducing or limiting the intensity, or timespan of light exposure, the absorption-emission cycle of fluorescent light is decreased, thus preserving the fluorophores functionality. One can also increase the concentration of fluorophores, or opt for more robust fluorophores that exhibit resilience against photobleaching such as Alexa Fluors, Seta Fluors, or DyLight Fluors.<ref name=":2" />
Other problems that may arise when using immunofluorescence techniques include autofluorescence, spectral overlap and non-specific staining.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2" /> Autofluorescence includes the natural fluorescence emitted from the sample tissue or cell itself. Spectral overlap happens when a fluorophore has a broad emission specter, that overlaps with the specter of another fluorophore, thus giving rise to false signals. Non-specific staining occurs when the antibody, containing the fluorophore, binds to unintended proteins because of sufficient similarity in the epitope. This can lead to false positives.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" /><ref name=":0" />
AdvancesEdit
The main improvements to immunofluorescence lie in the development of fluorophores and fluorescent microscopes. Fluorophores can be structurally modified to improve brightness and photostability, while preserving spectral properties and cell permeability.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy methods can produce images with a higher resolution than those microscopes imposed by the diffraction limit. This enables the determination of structural details within the cell.<ref name=":1">Template:Cite journal</ref> Super-resolution in fluorescence, more specifically, refers to the ability of a microscope to prevent the simultaneous fluorescence of adjacent spectrally identical fluorophores (spectral overlap). Some of the recently developed super-resolution fluorescent microscope methods include stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy, saturated structured-illumination microscopy (SSIM), fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy (FPALM), and stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM).<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Notable peopleEdit
- Albert Hewett Coons (1912–1978), physician, pathologist and immunologist
- Cornelia Mitchell Downs (1892–1987), microbiologist and journalist
See alsoEdit
- Antibodies
- Cutaneous conditions with immunofluorescence findings
- Fluorescence
- Immunochemistry
- Immunohistochemistry
- Patching and Capping
ReferencesEdit
External linksEdit
- Images associated with autoimmune diseases Template:Webarchive at University of Birmingham
- Overview at Davidson College
- Template:MeshName
Template:Pathology Template:Immunologic techniques and tests Template:Authority control