Incubator escapee wiki

New towns in the United Kingdom

Article Discussion

Template:Short description Template:Use British English Template:Use dmy dates The new towns in the United Kingdom were planned under the powers of the New Towns Act 1946 (9 & 10 Geo. 6. c. 68) and later acts to relocate people from poor or bombed-out housing following the Second World War. Designated new towns were placed under the supervision of a development corporation, and were developed in three waves. Later developments included the "expanded towns": existing towns which were substantially expanded to accommodate what was called the "overspill" population from densely populated areas of deprivation.

Historical precedentsEdit

File:The Parkway Fountain.jpg
Park and fountain in Welwyn Garden City, one of the two Garden Cities that were later designated as new towns

Garden citiesEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} The concept of the "garden city" was first envisaged by Ebenezer Howard in his 1898 book To-morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform, as an alternative to the pollution and overcrowding in Britain's growing urban areas.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Taking inspiration from the model villages of Port Sunlight and Bournville, he saw garden cities as the "joyous union" of town and country, providing a much better quality of life for those who lived there.<ref name=HEB>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Two garden cities were builtTemplate:Snd Letchworth, Hertfordshire, in 1903, and Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, in 1920.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

The underlying principles of garden cities (including community engagement, well designed housing, easily accessible recreational and shopping facilities, and an integrated transport network) were influential in the development of the post-war new towns movement.<ref name=HEB />

Overspill estatesEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} An "overspill estate" is a housing estate planned and built for the housing of excess population in urban areas, both from the natural increase of population and often in order to rehouse people from decaying inner city areas, usually as part of the process of slum clearance.<ref name=Cullingworth>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name=Paice>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> They were created on the outskirts of most large British towns and during most of the 20th century, with new towns being an alternative approach outside London after World War II.<ref name=Paice /> The objective of this was to bring more economic activity to these smaller communities, whilst relieving pressure on overpopulated areas of major cities.<ref name=Cullingworth />

  • London County Council built housing developments affixed to towns outside its jurisdiction, of which Becontree, Dagenham (which became part of Greater London in 1965) was the largest. It was built in the 1920s and 1930s.
  • Seacroft in Leeds was built from 1934 when Leeds City Council bought 1,000 acres (4.0 km2) for municipal housing. Most houses and blocks of flats were built after World War II. The council had planned for Seacroft to be a "satellite town within the city boundary" <ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

List of new townsEdit

EnglandEdit

First waveEdit

File:New Town COI.ogv
Animated film by the Central Office of Information about post-war new towns and their planning

The first wave of independent new towns was intended to help alleviate the housing shortages following the Second World War, beyond the green belt around London. Two sites in County Durham were also designated. These designations were made under the New Towns Act 1946 (9 & 10 Geo. 6. c. 68).

Second waveEdit

File:Telford town centre -England.JPG
The town of Telford (formerly Dawley New Town) was created from a number of towns which were joined around a central service area.

The second wave (1961–1964) was likewise initiated to alleviate housing shortfalls. Two of the locations below (Redditch and Dawley New TownTemplate:Sndlater renamed Telford) are near the West Midlands conurbation and were designed for Birmingham and Wolverhampton overspill; another two (Runcorn and Skelmersdale) are near Merseyside and were intended as overspill for the city of Liverpool.

File:New Telford Centre sign.jpg
Telford Centre

Third waveEdit

File:Orton Malborne housing.jpg
New Town architecture in Peterborough

The third wave of new towns (1967–1970) allowed for additional growth, chiefly further north from the previous London new towns, among them "Central Lancashire New Town" and Warrington. Dawley New Town was redesignated as Telford New Town, with a much larger area, as overspill for Birmingham and nearby towns including Wolverhampton. With a target population of 250,000 and a planning brief to become the first "new city", the largest of these was Milton Keynes at the northern edge of the South East, about halfway between Birmingham and London. In the East Midlands, the existing town of Northampton was expanded. The city of Peterborough was designated as a new town to accommodate overspill from London.Template:Citation needed

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Yate and South Woodham FerrersEdit

Yate in Gloucestershire and South Woodham Ferrers in Essex were developed between the 1950s and 1970s,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> coinciding with the creation of the above new towns, and Yate pointedly marketed itself as a "new town" during the 1960s.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> However, they differ in that they were not commissioned by any of the New Town Acts.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

WalesEdit

ScotlandEdit

Six new towns in Scotland were designated between 1947 and 1973, mostly for the overspill population of Glasgow.

Other major developmentsEdit

Future developmentsEdit

  • Forestmill: new settlement proposed in Clackmannanshire in close proximity to the Fife Council administrative boundary
  • Owenstown: new settlement proposed in the South Lanarkshire area to the south of Lanark

Northern IrelandEdit

The New Towns Act (Northern Ireland) 1965 gave the Minister of Development of the Government of Northern Ireland the power to designate an area as a new town, and to appoint a development commission. An order could be made to transfer municipal functions of all or part of any existing local authorities to the commission, which took the additional title of urban district council, although unelected. This was done in the case of Craigavon.

The New Towns Amendment Act 1968 was passed to enable the establishment of the Londonderry Development Commission to replace the County Borough and rural district of Londonderry, and implement the Londonderry Area Plan. On 3 April 1969, the development commission took over the municipal functions of the two councils, the area becoming Londonderry Urban District.Template:Sfn

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Other "overspill" developmentsEdit

During the same period as the new town scheme, several other towns underwent local authority led expansion as "overspills" to larger urban areas, but were not officially designated as new towns, among these were:

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Subsequent town expansion schemesEdit

No new towns have been designated under the New Towns Act in England since 1970 (and Scotland since 1973), but several new large scale developments have been founded, some of which have been designated town status in instances such as Cranbrook in Devon. More recently, a number of such developments have been expanded settlements designated "garden villages", drawing inspiration from the aforementioned garden city movement by "putting green, wildlife friendly spaces at the heart of development". They have also been described as "modern market towns with a focus on mixed use", despite the use of "village" in their titles. The first in the latest wave of garden villages to start development were announced by the government in January 2017. Whilst some of these were conceptualised as extensions of existing towns, others centered around the planned urbanisation of previously rural villages, or are outright new settlements. Around the time of the announcement, fourteen of the proposed sites for these garden villages were covered in the press, some of which have been cancelled since, but those that went ahead have been listed below.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

The following is a list of large developments since the 1970s:

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

The following have been announced, but development on them has not yet been started, or they are awaiting planning permission to be granted:

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

  • Maltkiln, North Yorkshire<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

  • Manydown, Hampshire<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Poundbury is an experimental new town or urban extension on the outskirts of Dorchester. The development is built on land owned by the Duchy of Cornwall. It is built according to the principles of (then) Prince Charles, who was known for holding strong views challenging the post-war trends in town planning that were suburban in character. South East Faversham, another settlement proposed by the Duchy of Cornwall adjacent to the M2 in Kent, was expected to undergo the planning process in 2023.

Euxton has grown significantly following the Buckshaw Village development, described as "one of the largest brownfield schemes of its kind throughout Europe", and conceptualised as an eco-village.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Further expansion is planned with another development, Euxton Heights.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Although Euxton falls under what were the designated boundaries of Central Lancashire New Town, the decision to proceed with these developments is unrelated.

In 2025, Warwickshire County Council outlined twelve "New Settlement locations", targeted for newbuild housing and expansion. So far, of these, progress on new homes has notably started already in Long Marston, Bishop's Tachbrook, Bidford-on-Avon and Wellesbourne.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Long Marston has additionally been granted garden village status.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Mosley Common, a suburban village in Greater Manchester, is currently due to receive one of the largest portions of newbuild homes in north west England. Between four new developments known as Garrett Hall, Garrett Hall Fields, Trilogy, and a fourth under construction being managed by Peel Land ("land North of Mosley Common"), there's an expectation to deliver on around 1800 new homes to the area.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Similar examples are Hethersett in Norfolk, where the recent Ketts Meadow development is set to deliver 1200 homes in total, and 2500 homes due to be built in the Hampshire village of Horton Heath.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

On 13 May 2007, chancellor Gordon Brown, who became Prime Minister of the United Kingdom the following month, announced he would designate 10 new "eco-towns" to ease demand for low-cost housing. The towns, around 20,000 population each—at least 5,000 homes— were planned to be "carbon neutral" and use locally generated sustainable-energy sources. Only one site was identified in the announcement: the former Oakington Barracks in Cambridgeshire, which was the site of what is now Northstowe. A site near St Austell, Cornwall was also proposed, which later became the West Carclaze settlement. As of 2009, it was reported that the other sites Brown had had in mind were "not going to happen".<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> However, the garden villages announced in the 2010s have been similar in ethos, and West Carclaze was in fact later classed as one.

In September 2014, the CBI called for all political parties to commit to building 10 new towns and garden cities to get to grips with the country's housing shortage.<ref>CBI Calls For 10 New Towns and Garden Cities</ref>

In addition to the garden villages, the January 2017 announcement outlined that some existing towns could receive newbuild homes, so much as doubling them in size in some cases, after acquiring "garden town" status. Didcot, Oxfordshire has been one of the first to be awarded garden town status in 2015.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Amongst the towns expected to see the most dynamic population growth after developments are Didcot, Harlow and Gilston as part of a joint garden town project,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Taunton<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and Cullompton.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

FinanceEdit

Template:Unsourced section The financial model was for many years as follows: an area of countryside was designated as a new town under the act; land was bought from the owners at agricultural prices; the government borrowed to invest in housing, commercial premises, and supporting infrastructure such as sewers, schools, churches or open spaces; and in due course it sold off the commercial premises and part of the housing at developed prices, thus paying off the debt. This model ran into some difficulty in the 1970s as growing inflation increased the cost of new borrowing, and this complicated the impact of the programme on public finances. The corporations were in due course dissolved and their assets split between local authorities and, in England, the Commission for New Towns (later English Partnerships).

LegacyEdit

In July 2002, the Select Committee on Transport, Local Government and the Regions assessed the effectiveness of the new towns and concluded that:

While many New Towns have been economically successful, most now are experiencing major problems. Their design is inappropriate to the 21st Century. Their infrastructure is ageing at the same rate and many have social and economic problems. Many are small local authorities which do not have the capacity to resolve their problems. Their attempts to manage the towns are complicated by the role played by English Partnerships which still has major landholdings and other outstanding interests.Template:Sfn

and:

The new towns are no longer new and many of the quickly built houses have reached the end of their design life. The masterplans dictated low density development with large amounts of open space, and housing segregated from jobs, shopping and business services. These created a car dependency and are now not considered sustainable. Low density developments are expensive to maintain. Roads and sewers are in need of expensive upgrades.Template:Sfn

The lack of social ties experienced by some residents of the new towns has given rise to the notion of "new town blues".<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

See alsoEdit

Elsewhere:

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

Further readingEdit

  • {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}

  • {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}

Template:Authority control

Retrieved from "https://zalansite.site/mediawiki/index.php?title=New_towns_in_the_United_Kingdom&oldid=366286"