Incubator escapee wiki

Niccolò Machiavelli

Article Discussion

Template:Short description {{#invoke:other uses|otheruses}} Template:Use dmy dates Template:Infobox philosopher

Niccolò di Bernardo dei MachiavelliTemplate:Efn (3 May 1469 – 21 June 1527) was a Florentine<ref>Dietz, Mary G.. Machiavelli, Niccolò (1469–1527), 1998, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-S080-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis</ref><ref>Berridge, G.R., Lloyd, L. (2012). M. In: Barder, B., Pope, L.E., Rana, K.S. (eds) The Palgrave Macmillan Dictionary of Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137017611_13</ref> diplomat, author, philosopher, and historian who lived during the Italian Renaissance. He is best known for his political treatise The Prince ({{#invoke:Lang|lang}}), written around 1513 but not published until 1532, five years after his death.<ref>For example: {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }} and {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> He has often been called the father of modern political philosophy and political science.<ref>For example: Template:Cite book, Template:Cite book, Template:Cite book</ref>

For many years he served as a senior official in the Florentine Republic with responsibilities in diplomatic and military affairs. He wrote comedies, carnival songs, and poetry. His personal correspondence is also important to historians and scholars of Italian correspondence.<ref>Template:Harvnb</ref> He worked as secretary to the second chancery of the Republic of Florence from 1498 to 1512, when the Medici were out of power.

After his death Machiavelli's name came to evoke unscrupulous acts of the sort he advised most famously in his work, The Prince.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> He concerned himself with the ways a ruler could survive in politics, and knew those who flourished engaged in deception, treachery, and crime.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> He advised rulers to engage in evil when political necessity requires it, at one point stating that successful founders and reformers of governments should be excused for killing other leaders who would oppose them.<ref>For example, The Prince chap. 15, and The Discourses Book I, chapter 9</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Machiavelli's Prince has been surrounded by controversy since it was published. Some consider it to be a straightforward description of political reality. Many view The Prince as a manual, teaching would-be tyrants how they should seize and maintain power.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Even into recent times, some scholars, such as Leo Strauss, have restated the traditional opinion that Machiavelli was a "teacher of evil".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Even though Machiavelli has become most famous for his work on principalities, scholars also give attention to the exhortations in his other works of political philosophy. While less well known than The Prince, the Discourses on Livy (composed Template:Circa) has been said to have paved the way for modern republicanism.<ref>Harvey Mansfield and Nathan Tarcov, "Introduction to the Discourses". In their translation of the Discourses on Livy</ref> His works were a major influence on Enlightenment authors who revived interest in classical republicanism, such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau and James Harrington.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Machiavelli's political realism has continued to influence generations of academics and politicians, and his approach has been compared to the Realpolitik of figures such as Otto von Bismarck.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

LifeEdit

Template:For timeline

File:Portrait of Niccolò Machiavelli Cristofano di Papi dell'Altissimo.jpg
Oil painting of Machiavelli by Cristofano dell'Altissimo

Machiavelli was born in Florence, Italy, the third child and first son of attorney Bernardo di Niccolò Machiavelli and his wife, Bartolomea di Stefano Nelli, on 3 May 1469.<ref>Template:Harvtxt</ref> The Machiavelli family is believed to be descended from the old marquesses of Tuscany and to have produced thirteen Florentine Gonfalonieres of Justice,<ref>Template:CathEncy</ref> one of the offices of a group of nine citizens selected by drawing lots every two months and who formed the government, or Signoria; he was never, though, a full citizen of Florence because of the nature of Florentine citizenship in that time even under the republican regime. Machiavelli married Marietta Corsini in 1501. They had seven children, five sons and two daughters: Primerana, Bernardo, Lodovico, Guido, Template:Interlanguage link, Baccina and Totto.<ref>Template:Harvcoltxt</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Machiavelli was born in a tumultuous era. The Italian city-states, and the families and individuals who ran them could rise and fall suddenly, as popes and the kings of France, Spain, and the Holy Roman Empire waged acquisitive wars for regional influence and control. Political-military alliances continually changed, featuring condottieri (mercenary leaders), who changed sides without warning, and the rise and fall of many short-lived governments.<ref>Maurizio Viroli, Niccolò's Smile: A Biography of Machiavelli (2000), ch 1</ref>

Machiavelli was taught grammar, rhetoric, and Latin by his teacher, Paolo da Ronciglione.<ref>Template:Citation</ref> It is unknown whether Machiavelli knew Greek; Florence was at the time one of the centres of Greek scholarship in Europe.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In 1494 Florence restored the republic, expelling the Medici family that had ruled Florence for some sixty years. Shortly after the execution of Savonarola, Machiavelli was appointed to an office of the second chancery, a medieval writing office that put Machiavelli in charge of the production of official Florentine government documents.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Shortly thereafter, he was also made the secretary of the Dieci di Libertà e Pace.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

In the first decade of the sixteenth century, he carried out several diplomatic missions, most notably to the papacy in Rome. Florence sent him to Pistoia to pacify the leaders of two opposing factions which had broken into riots in 1501 and 1502; when this failed, the leaders were banished from the city, a strategy which Machiavelli had favoured from the outset.Template:Sfn From 1502 to 1503, he witnessed the brutal reality of the state-building methods of Cesare Borgia (1475–1507) and his father, Pope Alexander VI, who were then engaged in the process of trying to bring a large part of central Italy under their possession.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The pretext of defending Church interests was used as a partial justification by the Borgias.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Other excursions to the court of Louis XII and the Spanish court influenced his writings such as The Prince.

At the start of the 16th century, Machiavelli conceived of a militia for Florence, and he then began recruiting and creating it.<ref name="Viroli 81–86">Template:Cite book</ref> He distrusted mercenaries (a distrust that he explained in his official reports and then later in his theoretical works for their unpatriotic and uninvested nature in the war that makes their allegiance fickle and often unreliable when most needed),<ref>This point is made especially in The Prince, Chap XII</ref> and instead staffed his army with citizens, a policy that yielded some positive results. By February 1506 he was able to have four hundred farmers marching on parade, suited (including iron breastplates), and armed with lances and small firearms.<ref name="Viroli 81–86"/> Under his command, Florentine citizen-soldiers conquered Pisa in 1509.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

File:Santa Croce Firenze Apr 2008 (20).JPG
Machiavelli's tomb in the Santa Croce Church in Florence

Machiavelli's success was short-lived. In August 1512, the Medici, backed by Pope Julius II, used Spanish troops to defeat the Florentines at Prato.<ref>Many historians have argued that this was due to Piero Soderini's unwillingness to compromise with the Medici, who were holding Prato under siege.</ref> In the wake of the siege, Piero Soderini resigned as Florentine head of state and fled into exile. The experience would, like Machiavelli's time in foreign courts and with the Borgia, heavily influence his political writings. The Florentine city-state and the republic were dissolved, with Machiavelli then being removed from office and banished from the city for a year.Template:Sfn In 1513, the Medici accused him of conspiracy against them and had him imprisoned.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Despite being subjected to tortureTemplate:Sfn ("with the rope", in which the prisoner is hanged from his bound wrists from the back, forcing the arms to bear the body's weight and dislocating the shoulders), he denied involvement and was released after three weeks.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Machiavelli then retired to his farm estate at Sant'Andrea in Percussina, near San Casciano in Val di Pesa, where he devoted himself to studying and writing political treatises. During this period, he represented the Florentine Republic on diplomatic visits to France, Germany, and elsewhere in Italy.Template:Sfn Despairing of the opportunity to remain directly involved in political matters, after a time he began to participate in intellectual groups in Florence and wrote several plays that (unlike his works on political theory) were both popular and widely known in his lifetime. Politics remained his main passion, and to satisfy this interest, he maintained a well-known correspondence with more politically connected friends, attempting to become involved once again in political life.<ref>Niccolò Machiavelli (1996), Machiavelli and his friends: Their personal correspondence, Northern Illinois University Press, translated and edited by James B. Atkinson and David Sices.</ref> In a letter to Francesco Vettori, he described his experience:

When evening comes, I go back home, and go to my study. On the threshold, I take off my work clothes, covered in mud and filth, and I put on the clothes an ambassador would wear. Decently dressed, I enter the ancient courts of rulers who have long since died. There, I am warmly welcomed, and I feed on the only food I find nourishing and was born to savour. I am not ashamed to talk to them and ask them to explain their actions and they, out of kindness, answer me. Four hours go by without my feeling any anxiety. I forget every worry. I am no longer afraid of poverty or frightened of death. I live entirely through them.<ref>Joshua Kaplan, "Political Theory: The Classic Texts and their Continuing Relevance," The Modern Scholar (14 lectures in the series; lecture #7 / disc 4), 2005.</ref>

Machiavelli died on 21 June 1527 from a stomach ailment<ref>Viroli, M. (2002). Niccolò's Smile: A Biography of Machiavelli. Macmillan. pg.256-259</ref> at the age of 58 after receiving his last rites.<ref>"Even such men as Malatesta and Machiavelli, after spending their lives in estrangement from the Church, sought on their deathbeds her assistance and consolations. Both made good confessions and received the Holy Viaticum." – Ludwig von Pastor, History of the Popes, Vol. 5, p. 137.</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> He was buried at the Church of Santa Croce in Florence. In 1789 George Nassau Clavering, and Pietro Leopoldo, Grand Duke of Tuscany, initiated the construction of a monument on Machiavelli's tomb. It was sculpted by Innocenzo Spinazzi, with an epitaph by Doctor Ferroni inscribed on it.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Efn

Major worksEdit

The PrinceEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}

File:Duke-Lorenzo.jpg
Lorenzo di Piero de' Medici, to whom the final version of The Prince was dedicated

Machiavelli's best-known book Il Principe contains several maxims concerning politics. Instead of the more traditional target audience of a hereditary prince, it concentrates on the possibility of a "new prince". To retain royal authority, the hereditary prince does not have to do much to keep his position, as Machiavelli states that only an "excessive force" will deprive him of his rule.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> By contrast, a new prince has the more difficult task in ruling: He must first stabilize his newfound power in order to build an enduring political structure. Machiavelli views that the virtues often recommended to princes actually hinder their ability to rule, thus a prince must learn to be able to act opposite said virtues in order to maintain his regime.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> A ruler must be concerned not only with reputation, but also must be positively willing to act unscrupulously at the right times. Machiavelli believed that, for a ruler, it was better to be widely feared than to be greatly loved; a loved ruler retains authority by obligation, while a feared leader rules by fear of punishment.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> As a political theorist, Machiavelli emphasized the "necessity" for the methodical exercise of brute force or deceit, including extermination of entire noble families, to head off any chance of a challenge to the prince's authority.<ref>Machiavelli, The Prince, Chapter III</ref>

Scholars often note that Machiavelli glorifies instrumentality in state building, an approach embodied by the saying, often erroneously attributed to Machiavelli, "The ends justify the means".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Fraud and deceit are held by Machiavelli as necessary for a prince to use.<ref>The Prince, Chapter XVIII, "In What Mode Should Faith Be Kept By Princes"</ref> Violence may be necessary for the successful stabilization of power and introduction of new political institutions. Force may be used to eliminate political rivals, destroy resistant populations, and purge the community of other men strong enough of a character to rule, who will inevitably attempt to replace the ruler.<ref>The Prince. especially Chapters 3, 5 and 8</ref> In one passage, Machiavelli subverts the advice given by Cicero to avoid duplicity and violence, by saying that the prince should "be the fox to avoid the snares, and a lion to overwhelm the wolves". It would become one of Machiavelli's most famous maxims.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Machiavelli's view that acquiring a state and maintaining it requires evil means has been noted as the chief theme of the treatise.<ref>Template:Harvtxt</ref> Machiavelli has become infamous for such political advice, ensuring that he would be remembered in history through the adjective "Machiavellian".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Due to the treatise's controversial analysis on politics, in 1559, the Catholic Church banned The Prince, putting it on the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Landon, W. J. (2005). Politics, Patriotism and Language: Niccolò Machiavelli's" secular Patria" and the Creation of an Italian National Identity (Vol. 57). Peter Lang.</ref> Humanists, including Erasmus (Template:CircaTemplate:Snd1536), also viewed the book negatively. As a treatise, its primary intellectual contribution to the history of political thought is the fundamental break between political realism and political idealism, due to it being a manual on acquiring and keeping political power.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> In contrast with Plato and Aristotle, Machiavelli insisted that an imaginary ideal society is not a model by which a prince should orient himself.

Concerning the differences and similarities in Machiavelli's advice to ruthless and tyrannical princes in The Prince and his more republican exhortations in Discourses on Livy, a few commentators assert that The Prince, although written as advice for a monarchical prince, contains arguments for the superiority of republican regimes, similar to those found in the Discourses. In the 18th century, the work was even called a satire, for example by Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778).<ref>Discourse on Political Economy: opening pages.</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> This however is an interpretation that is often refuted by scholars.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Scholars such as Leo Strauss (1899–1973) and Harvey Mansfield (Template:B.) have stated that sections of The Prince and his other works have deliberately esoteric statements throughout them.<ref>This point made most notably by Template:Harvtxt.</ref> However, Mansfield states that this is the result of Machiavelli's seeing grave and serious things as humorous because they are "manipulable by men", and sees them as grave because they "answer human necessities".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

The Marxist theorist Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937) argued that Machiavelli's audience was the common people, as opposed to the ruling class, who were already made aware of the methods described through their education.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Discourses on LivyEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}

The Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livius, written around 1517, and published in 1531, often referred to simply as the Discourses or Discorsi, is nominally a discussion regarding the classical history of early Ancient Rome, although it strays far from this subject matter and also uses contemporary political examples to illustrate points. Machiavelli presents it as a series of lessons on how a republic should be started and structured. It is a larger work than The Prince, and while it more openly explains the advantages of republics, it also contains many similar themes from his other works.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> For example, Machiavelli has noted that to save a republic from corruption, it is necessary to return it to a "kingly state" using violent means.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> He excuses Romulus for murdering his brother Remus and co-ruler Titus Tatius to gain absolute power for himself in that he established a "civil way of life", or a kingdom with laws suitable for a republic.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Commentators disagree about how much the two works agree with each other, as Machiavelli frequently refers to leaders of republics as "princes".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Machiavelli even sometimes acts as an advisor to tyrants.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Other scholars have pointed out the aggrandizing and imperialistic features of Machiavelli's republic.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Nevertheless, it became one of the central texts of modern republicanism, and has often been argued to be a more comprehensive work than The Prince.<ref>Template:Harvtxt</ref>

Florentine HistoriesEdit

Template:Excerpt

Art of WarEdit

Template:Excerpt

OriginalityEdit

File:Niccolò-Machiavelli-Amelot-de-La-Houssaie-Il-principe MG 1089.tif
Engraved portrait of Machiavelli, from the Peace Palace Library's Il Principe, published in 1769

Major commentary on Machiavelli's work has focused on two issues: how unified and philosophical his work is and how innovative or traditional it is.<ref name=Fischer>Template:Harvcoltxt</ref>

CoherenceEdit

There is some disagreement concerning how best to describe the unifying themes, if there are any, that can be found in Machiavelli's works, especially in the two major political works, The Prince and Discourses. Some commentators have described him as inconsistent, and perhaps as not even putting a high priority on consistency.<ref name=Fischer/><ref>Interpreting Modern Political Philosophy: From Machiavelli to Marx, pg. 40</ref> Others such as Hans Baron have argued that his ideas must have changed dramatically over time. Some have argued that his conclusions are best understood as a product of his times, experiences and education. Others, such as Leo Strauss and Harvey Mansfield, have argued strongly that there is a strong and deliberate consistency and distinctness, even arguing that this extends to all of Machiavelli's works including his comedies and letters.<ref name=Fischer/><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

InfluencesEdit

Commentators such as Leo Strauss have gone so far as to name Machiavelli as the deliberate originator of modernity itself. Others have argued that Machiavelli is only a particularly interesting example of trends which were happening around him. In any case, Machiavelli presented himself at various times as someone reminding Italians of the old virtues of the Romans and Greeks, and other times as someone promoting a completely new approach to politics.<ref name=Fischer/> Machiavelli emphasizes the originality of his endeavor in several instances. Many scholars note that Machiavelli seems particularly original and that he frequently seems to act without any regard for his predecessors.<ref>Mansfield, Machiavelli's Virtue, pg. ix (Introduction)</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

That Machiavelli had a wide range of influences is in itself not controversial. Their relative importance is however a subject of ongoing discussion. It is possible to summarize some of the main influences emphasized by different commentators.

The Mirror of Princes genre

Template:Harvcoltxt summarized the similarities between The Prince and the genre it imitates, the so-called "Mirror of Princes" style. This was a classically influenced genre, with models at least as far back as Xenophon and Isocrates. While Gilbert emphasized the similarities, however, he agreed with all other commentators that Machiavelli was particularly novel in the way he used this genre, even when compared to his contemporaries such as Baldassare Castiglione and Erasmus.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> One of the major innovations Gilbert noted was that Machiavelli focused on the "deliberate purpose of dealing with a new ruler who will need to establish himself in defiance of custom".<ref>Template:Harvcoltxt</ref> Normally, these types of works were addressed only to hereditary princes. (Xenophon is also an exception in this regard.)

Classical republicanism

Commentators such as Quentin Skinner and J.G.A. Pocock, in the so-called "Cambridge School" of interpretation, have asserted that some of the republican themes in Machiavelli's political works, particularly the Discourses on Livy, can be found in medieval Italian literature which was influenced by classical authors such as Sallust.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Classical political philosophy: Xenophon, Plato and Aristotle

File:Xenophon.jpg
Xenophon, author of the Cyropedia

Political thinkers usually engage to some extent with their predecessors, even (or perhaps particularly) those who aim to fundamentally disagree with prior thoughts.<ref>Berlin, I. (2014). ‘The Originality of Machiavelli'. In Reading Political Philosophy (pp. 43-58). Routledge.</ref> Therefore, even with a figure as seemingly innovative as Machiavelli, scholars have looked deeper into his works to consider possible historical and philosophical influences. Although Machiavelli examined ancient philosophers, he does not frequently reference them as authorities. He mentions neither Plato nor Aristotle in The Prince, and he mentions Aristotle only once in The Discourses.<ref>New Modes and Orders, p. 391</ref> He usually does not speak of philosophers as such, but mentions "writers" and "authors".<ref>Harvey Mansfield and Nathan Tarcov, "Introduction to the Discourses". In their translation of the Discourses on Livy</ref> One of the writers Machiavelli mentions the most is Xenophon.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> In his time, the most commonly cited discussion of classical virtues was Book 1 of Cicero’s De Officiis. Yet, Cicero is never mentioned in The Prince, and is mentioned only three times in the Discourses.<ref>Niccolò Machiavelli, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref>

The major difference between Machiavelli and the Socratics, according to Strauss, is Machiavelli's materialism, and therefore his rejection of both a teleological view of nature and of the view that philosophy is higher than politics. With their teleological understanding of things, Socratics argued that by nature, everything that acts, acts towards some end, as if nature desired them, but Machiavelli claimed that such things happen by blind chance or human action.<ref name=Strauss>Template:Harvcoltxt</ref>

Classical materialism

Strauss argued that Machiavelli may have seen himself as influenced by some ideas from classical materialists such as Democritus, Epicurus and Lucretius. Strauss however sees this also as a sign of major innovation in Machiavelli, because classical materialists did not share the Socratic regard for political life, while Machiavelli clearly did.<ref name=Strauss/>

Thucydides

Some scholars note the similarity between Machiavelli and the Greek historian Thucydides, since both emphasized power politics.<ref>Paul Anthony Rahe, Against throne and altar: Machiavelli and political theory under the English Republic (2008), p. 282.</ref><ref>Jack Donnelly, Realism and International Relations (2000), p. 68.</ref> Strauss argued that Machiavelli may indeed have been influenced by pre-Socratic philosophers, but he felt it was a new combination:

...contemporary readers are reminded by Machiavelli's teaching of Thucydides; they find in both authors the same "realism", i.e., the same denial of the power of the gods or of justice and the same sensitivity to harsh necessity and elusive chance. Yet Thucydides never calls in question the intrinsic superiority of nobility to baseness, a superiority that shines forth particularly when the noble is destroyed by the base. Therefore Thucydides' History arouses in the reader a sadness which is never aroused by Machiavelli's books. In Machiavelli we find comedies, parodies, and satires but nothing reminding of tragedy. One half of humanity remains outside of his thought. There is no tragedy in Machiavelli because he has no sense of the sacredness of "the common". – Template:Harvtxt

BeliefsEdit

Amongst commentators, there are a few consistently made proposals concerning what was most new in Machiavelli's work.

Empiricism and realism versus idealismEdit

Machiavelli is sometimes seen as the prototype of a modern empirical scientist, building generalizations from experience and historical facts, and emphasizing the uselessness of theorizing with the imagination.<ref name=Fischer/>

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

He emancipated politics from theology and moral philosophy. He undertook to describe simply what rulers actually did and thus anticipated what was later called the scientific spirit in which questions of good and bad are ignored, and the observer attempts to discover only what really happens.{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Machiavelli felt that his early schooling along the lines of traditional classical education was essentially useless for the purpose of understanding politics. Nevertheless, he advocated intensive study of the past, particularly regarding the founding of a city, which he felt was a key to understanding its later development.<ref name=twsC11r44fzf/> Moreover, he studied the way people lived and aimed to inform leaders how they should rule and even how they themselves should live. Machiavelli denies the classical opinion that living virtuously always leads to happiness. For example, Machiavelli viewed misery as "one of the vices that enables a prince to rule."<ref>Leo Strauss, Joseph Cropsey, History of Political Philosophy (1987), p. 300.</ref> Machiavelli stated that "it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being loved."<ref>Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince, Chap 17.</ref> In much of Machiavelli's work, he often states that the ruler must adopt unsavoury policies for the sake of the continuance of his regime. Because cruelty and fraud play such important roles in his politics, it is not unusual for certain issues (such as murder and betrayal) to be commonplace within his works.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

A related and more controversial proposal often made is that he described how to do things in politics in a way which seemed neutral concerning who used the adviceTemplate:Sndtyrants or good rulers.<ref name=Fischer/> That Machiavelli strove for realism is not doubted, but for four centuries scholars have debated how best to describe his morality. The Prince made the word Machiavellian a byword for deceit, despotism, and political manipulation. Leo Strauss declared himself inclined toward the traditional view that Machiavelli was self-consciously a "teacher of evil", since he counsels the princes to avoid the values of justice, mercy, temperance, wisdom, and love of their people in preference to the use of cruelty, violence, fear, and deception.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Strauss takes up this opinion because he asserted that failure to accept the traditional opinion misses the "intrepidity of his thought" and "the graceful subtlety of his speech".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Italian anti-fascist philosopher Benedetto Croce (1925) concludes Machiavelli is simply a "realist" or "pragmatist" who accurately states that moral values, in reality, do not greatly affect the decisions that political leaders make.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> German philosopher Ernst Cassirer (1946) held that Machiavelli simply adopts the stance of a political scientistTemplate:Snda Galileo of politicsTemplate:Sndin distinguishing between the "facts" of political life and the "values" of moral judgment.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> On the other hand, Walter Russell Mead has argued that The PrinceTemplate:'s advice presupposes the importance of ideas like legitimacy in making changes to the political system.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

FortuneEdit

Machiavelli is generally seen as being critical of Christianity as it existed in his time, specifically its effect upon politics and humanity in general.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> In his opinion, the Christianity that the Church had come to accept allowed practical decisions to be guided too much by imaginary ideals and encouraged people to lazily leave events up to providence or, as he would put it, chance, luck or fortune. Machiavelli took a radically different view, and opined that the pagan religion, given it's faults, was preferable to Christianity as it championed martial warfare.<ref>Discourses on Livy, Book II chap. 2</ref> Machiavelli's own concept of virtue, which he calls "virtù", is original and is usually seen by scholars as different from the traditional viewpoints of other political philosophers.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Virtù can consist of any quality at the moment that helps a ruler maintain his state, even being ready to engage in necessary evil when it is advantageous.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Skinner, Q. (2017). Machiavelli and the misunderstanding of princely virtù. Machiavelli on Liberty and Conflict, 139-163.</ref> Harvey Template:Harvtxt wrote of Machiavelli's followers that: "In attempting other, more regular and scientific modes of overcoming fortune, Machiavelli's successors formalized and emasculated his notion of virtue." Mansfield describes Machiavelli's usage of virtù as a "compromise with evil".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Mansfield however argues that Machiavelli's own aims have not been shared by those he influenced. Machiavelli argued against seeing mere peace and economic growth as worthy aims on their own if they would lead to what Mansfield calls the "taming of the prince".<ref>Template:Harvtxt</ref>

Najemy has argued that this same approach can be found in Machiavelli's approach to love and desire, as seen in his comedies and correspondence. Najemy shows how Machiavelli's friend Vettori argued against Machiavelli and cited a more traditional understanding of fortune.Template:Sfn

Cary Nederman says of Machiavelli's use of fortuna that: "Machiavelli’s remarks point toward several salient conclusions about Fortuna and her place in his intellectual universe. Throughout his corpus, Fortuna is depicted as a primal source of violence (especially as directed against humanity) and as antithetical to reason. Thus, Machiavelli realizes that only preparation to pose an extreme response to the vicissitudes of Fortuna will ensure victory against her. This is what virtù provides: the ability to respond to fortune at any time and in any way that is necessary."<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Strauss concludes his 1958 book Thoughts on Machiavelli by proposing that "The difficulty implied in the admission that inventions pertaining to the art of war must be encouraged is the only one which supplies a basis for Machiavelli’s criticism of classical political philosophy." and that this shows that classical-minded men "had to admit in other words that in an important respect the good city has to take its bearings by the practice of bad cities or that the bad impose their law on the good".Template:Harvtxt

ReligionEdit

Machiavelli shows repeatedly that he saw religion as man-made, and that the value of religion lies in its contribution to social order and the rules of morality must be dispensed with if security requires it.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> In The Prince, the Discourses and in the Life of Castruccio Castracani he describes "prophets", as he calls them, like Moses, Romulus, Cyrus the Great and Theseus as the greatest of new princes, the glorious and brutal founders of the most novel innovations in politics, and men whom Machiavelli assures us have always used armed force, being willing to kill those who did not ultimately agree with their vision.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Especially in the Discourses III.30, but also The Prince Chap.VI</ref> He estimated that these sects last from 1,666 to 3,000 years each time, which, as pointed out by Leo Strauss, would mean that Christianity became due to start finishing about 150 years after Machiavelli.<ref>Template:Harvtxt</ref> Machiavelli's concern with Christianity as a religion was that it made the Italians of his day "weak and effeminate", delivering politics into the hands of cruel and wicked men without a fight, as well as celebrated humility and otherworldly things, instead of being focused on the tangible world.<ref>See for example Template:Harvtxt.</ref> While Machiavelli's own religious allegiance has been debated, it is assumed that he had a low regard of contemporary Christianity.<ref>Parsons, W. B. (2016). Machiavelli's gospel: The critique of Christianity in the prince. Boydell & Brewer.</ref>

While fear of God can be replaced by fear of the prince, if there is a strong enough prince, Machiavelli felt that having a religion is in any case especially essential to keeping a republic in order.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> For Machiavelli, a truly great prince can never be conventionally religious himself, but he should make his people religious if he can. According to Template:Harvtxt he was not the first person to explain religion in this way, but his description of religion was novel because of the way he integrated this into his general account of princes.

Machiavelli's judgment that governments need religion for practical political reasons was widespread among modern proponents of republics until approximately the time of the French Revolution. This, therefore, represents a point of disagreement between Machiavelli and late modernity.<ref>Template:Harvtxt</ref>

TerminologyEdit

Stato

Another term of Machiavelli's that scholars debate over is his use of the word stato (literally translated as "state"). Whenever he uses the word, it usually refers to a regime's political command to which a leader takes a hold of, and rules over himself.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Generally he believes that in all states, there exists two humors, that of the great, who wish to rule and oppress others, and that of the people, who do not seek to oppress.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Glory plays a central role in Machiavelli’s political thought, drawing heavily on the Roman ideal of gloria, which emphasized public recognition for one's achievements, especially in warfare or public service.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Republicanism

The majority of scholars have taken into account Machiavelli's admiration of, and recommendations to republics, and his contribution to republican theory. Machiavelli gives lengthy advice for republics in how they can best protect their liberties, and how they can avoid those who would ultimately usurp legitimate authority.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Even in this, commentators have no consensus as to the exact nature of his republicanism. For example, the "Cambridge School" of interpretation holds Machiavelli to be a civic humanist and classical republican who viewed that the highest quality of republican virtue is self-sacrifice for the common good.<ref>Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975. </ref> However this opinion has been contested by scholars who believe that Machiavelli has a radically modern view of republics, accepting and unleashing the self interest of those who rule.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Some scholars have even asserted that the goal of his ideal republic does not differ greatly from his principality, as both rely on rather ruthless measures for conquest and empire.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

InfluenceEdit

File:Machiavel Offices Florence.jpg
Statue at the Uffizi

To quote Robert Bireley:<ref>Bireley, Robert (1990), The Counter Reformation Prince, p. 14.</ref>

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

...there were in circulation approximately fifteen editions of the Prince and nineteen of the Discourses and French translations of each before they were placed on the Index of Paul IV in 1559, a measure which nearly stopped publication in Catholic areas except in France. Three principal writers took the field against Machiavelli between the publication of his works and their condemnation in 1559 and again by the Tridentine Index in 1564. These were the English cardinal Reginald Pole and the Portuguese bishop Jeronymo Osorio, both of whom lived for many years in Italy, and the Italian humanist and later bishop, Ambrogio Caterino Politi.{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Machiavelli's ideas had a profound impact on political leaders throughout the modern west, helped by the new technology of the printing press. During the first generations after Machiavelli, his main influence was in non-republican governments. Pole reported that The Prince was spoken of highly by Thomas Cromwell in England and had influenced Henry VIII in his turn towards Protestantism, and in his tactics, for example during the Pilgrimage of Grace.<ref name="BireleyP15">Template:Harvcoltxt</ref> A copy was also possessed by the Catholic king and emperor Charles V.<ref>Template:Harvcoltxt</ref> In France, after an initially mixed reaction, Machiavelli came to be associated with Catherine de' Medici and the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre. As Template:Harvcoltxt reports, in the 16th century, Catholic writers "associated Machiavelli with the Protestants, whereas Protestant authors saw him as Italian and Catholic". In fact, he was apparently influencing both Catholic and Protestant kings.<ref>While Bireley focuses on writers in the Catholic countries, Template:Harvcoltxt makes the same observation, writing with more of a focus upon the Protestant Netherlands.</ref>

One of the most important early works dedicated to criticism of Machiavelli, especially The Prince, was that of the Huguenot, Innocent Gentillet, whose work commonly referred to as Discourse against Machiavelli or Anti Machiavel was published in Geneva in 1576.<ref>The first English edition was A Discourse upon the meanes of wel governing and maintaining in good peace, a Kingdome, or other principalitie, translated by Simon Patericke.</ref> He accused Machiavelli of being an atheist and accused politicians of his time by saying that his works were the "Koran of the courtiers", that "he is of no reputation in the court of France which hath not Machiavel's writings at the fingers ends".<ref>Template:Harvcoltxt</ref> Another theme of Gentillet was more in the spirit of Machiavelli himself: he questioned the effectiveness of immoral strategies (just as Machiavelli had himself done, despite also explaining how they could sometimes work). This became the theme of much future political discourse in Europe during the 17th century. This includes the Catholic Counter Reformation writers summarised by Bireley: Giovanni Botero, Justus Lipsius, Carlo Scribani, Adam Contzen, Pedro de Ribadeneira, and Diego de Saavedra Fajardo.<ref>Template:Harvcoltxt</ref> These authors criticized Machiavelli, but also followed him in many ways. They accepted the need for a prince to be concerned with reputation, and even a need for cunning and deceit, but compared to Machiavelli, and like later modernist writers, they emphasized economic progress much more than the riskier ventures of war. These authors tended to cite Tacitus as their source for realist political advice, rather than Machiavelli, and this pretence came to be known as "Tacitism".<ref>Template:Harvcoltxt</ref> "Black tacitism" was in support of princely rule, but "red tacitism" arguing the case for republics, more in the original spirit of Machiavelli himself, became increasingly important. Cardinal Reginald Pole read The Prince while he was in Italy, and on which he gave his comments.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Frederick the Great, king of Prussia and patron of Voltaire, wrote Anti-Machiavel, with the aim of rebutting The Prince.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

File:British - Francis Bacon - Google Art Project.jpg
Francis Bacon argued the case for what would become modern science which would be based more upon real experience and experimentation, free from assumptions about metaphysics, and aimed at increasing control of nature. He named Machiavelli as a predecessor.

Modern materialist philosophy developed in the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries, starting in the generations after Machiavelli. Modern political philosophy tended to be republican, but as with the Catholic authors, Machiavelli's realism and encouragement of innovation to try to control one's own fortune were more accepted than his emphasis upon war and factional violence. Not only was innovative economics and politics a result, but also modern science, leading some commentators to say that the 18th century Enlightenment involved a "humanitarian" moderating of Machiavellianism.<ref>Template:Harvtxt, Template:Harvtxt</ref>

The importance of Machiavelli's influence is notable in many important figures in this endeavour, for example Bodin,<ref>Template:Harvcoltxt: "Jean Bodin's first comments, found in his Method for the Easy Comprehension of History, published in 1566, were positive."</ref> Francis Bacon,<ref>Bacon wrote: "We are much beholden to Machiavelli and other writers of that class who openly and unfeignedly declare or describe what men do, and not what they ought to do." Template:Citation. See Template:Harvtxt Chapter 4.</ref> Algernon Sidney,<ref>Template:Harvtxt chapter 6.</ref> Harrington, John Milton,<ref>Template:Harvcoltxt</ref> Spinoza,<ref>Template:Cite encyclopedia</ref> Rousseau, Hume,<ref>Danford "Getting Our Bearings: Machiavelli and Hume" in Template:Harvtxt.</ref> Edward Gibbon, and Adam Smith. Although he was not always mentioned by name as an inspiration, due to his controversy, he is also thought to have been an influence for other major philosophers, such as Montaigne,<ref>Template:Harvtxt</ref> Descartes,<ref>Template:Harvtxt, chapter 11.</ref> Hobbes, Locke<ref>Barnes Smith "The Philosophy of Liberty: Locke's Machiavellian Teaching" in Template:Harvtxt.</ref> and Montesquieu.<ref>Carrese "The Machiavellian Spirit of Montesquieu's Liberal Republic" in Template:Harvtxt</ref><ref>Template:Harvcoltxt</ref> Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who is associated with very different political ideas, viewed Machiavelli's work as a satirical piece in which Machiavelli exposes the faults of a one-man rule rather than exalting amorality.

In the seventeenth century it was in England that Machiavelli's ideas were most substantially developed and adapted, and that republicanism came once more to life; and out of seventeenth-century English republicanism there were to emerge in the next century not only a theme of English political and historical reflectionTemplate:Sndof the writings of the Bolingbroke circle and of Gibbon and of early parliamentary radicalsTemplate:Sndbut a stimulus to the Enlightenment in Scotland, on the Continent, and in America.<ref>Template:Harvtxt</ref>

File:John Adams A18236.jpg
John Adams admired Machiavelli's rational description of the realities of statecraft. Adams used Machiavelli's works to argue for mixed government.

Scholars have argued that Machiavelli was a major indirect and direct influence upon the political thinking of the Founding Fathers of the United States due to his overwhelming favouritism of republicanism and the republican type of government. According to John McCormick, it is still very much debatable whether or not Machiavelli was "an advisor of tyranny or partisan of liberty."<ref>John P. McCormick, Machiavellian democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2011), p. 23.</ref> Benjamin Franklin, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson followed Machiavelli's republicanism when they opposed what they saw as the emerging aristocracy that they feared Alexander Hamilton was creating with the Federalist Party.<ref>Template:Harvtxt</ref> Hamilton learned from Machiavelli about the importance of foreign policy for domestic policy, but may have broken from him regarding how rapacious a republic needed to be in order to survive.<ref>Walling "Was Alexander Hamilton a Machiavellian Statesman?" in Template:Harvtxt.</ref><ref>Template:Harvtxt</ref> George Washington was less influenced by Machiavelli.<ref>Spalding "The American Prince? George Washington's Anti-Machiavellian moment" in Template:Harvtxt</ref>

The Founding Father who perhaps most studied and valued Machiavelli as a political philosopher was John Adams, who profusely commented on the Italian's thought in his work, A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America.<ref name="thompson">Template:Harvtxt</ref> In this work, John Adams praised Machiavelli, with Algernon Sidney and Montesquieu, as a philosophic defender of mixed government. For Adams, Machiavelli restored empirical reason to politics, while his analysis of factions was commendable. Adams likewise agreed with the Florentine that human nature was immutable and driven by passions. He also accepted Machiavelli's belief that all societies were subject to cyclical periods of growth and decay. For Adams, Machiavelli lacked only a clear understanding of the institutions necessary for good government.<ref name="thompson" />

20th centuryEdit

The 20th-century Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci drew great inspiration from Machiavelli's writings on ethics, morals, and how they relate to the State and revolution in his writings on Passive Revolution, and how a society can be manipulated by controlling popular notions of morality.<ref>Marcia Landy, "Culture and Politics in the work of Antonio Gramsci," 167–188, in Antonio Gramsci: Intellectuals, Culture, and the Party, ed. James Martin (New York: Routledge, 2002).</ref>

Joseph Stalin read The Prince and annotated his own copy.<ref>Service, Robert. Stalin: A Biography, p.10.</ref>

In the 20th century there was also renewed interest in Machiavelli's play La Mandragola (1518), which received numerous stagings, including several in New York, at the New York Shakespeare Festival in 1976 and the Riverside Shakespeare Company in 1979, as a musical comedy by Peer Raben in Munich's Anti Theatre in 1971, and at London's National Theatre in 1984.<ref name="Jann Racquoi 1979">Review by Jann Racquoi, Heights/Inwood Press of North Manhattan, 14 March 1979.</ref>

Template:Anchor

"Machiavellian"Edit

File:Cesareborgia.jpg
Portrait of a Gentleman (Cesare Borgia), used as an example of a successful ruler in The Prince

Machiavelli's works are sometimes even said to have contributed to the modern negative connotations of the words politics and politician,<ref>Template:Harvtxt</ref> and it is sometimes thought that it is because of him that Old Nick became an English term for the Devil.<ref>Template:Harvtxt</ref> The adjective Machiavellian became a term describing a form of politics that is "marked by cunning, duplicity, or bad faith".<ref>Template:Cite dictionary</ref> The word Machiavellianism is also a term used in political discussions, often as a byword for bare-knuckled political realism.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

While Machiavellianism is notable in the works of Machiavelli, scholars generally agree that his works are complex and have equally influential themes within them. For example, J. G. A. Template:Harvtxt saw him as a major source of the republicanism that spread throughout England and North America in the 17th and 18th centuries and Leo Template:Harvtxt, whose view of Machiavelli is quite different in many ways, had similar remarks about Machiavelli's influence on republicanism and argued that even though Machiavelli was a teacher of evil he had a "grandeur of vision" that led him to advocate immoral actions. Whatever his intentions, which are still debated today, he has become associated with any proposal where "the end justifies the means". For example, Leo Template:Harvtxt wrote:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Machiavelli is the only political thinker whose name has come into common use for designating a kind of politics, which exists and will continue to exist independently of his influence, a politics guided exclusively by considerations of expediency, which uses all means, fair or foul, iron or poison, for achieving its endsTemplate:Sndits end being the aggrandizement of one's country or fatherlandTemplate:Sndbut also using the fatherland in the service of the self-aggrandizement of the politician or statesman or one's party.{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Template:Anchor

In popular cultureEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Due to Machiavelli's popularity, he has been featured in various ways in cultural depictions. In English Renaissance theatre (Elizabethan and Jacobian), the term "Machiavel" (from 'Nicholas Machiavel', an "anglicization" of Machiavelli's name based on French) was used for a stock antagonist that resorted to ruthless means to preserve the power of the state, and is now considered a synonym of "Machiavellian".<ref>Kahn, V. (1994). Machiavellian rhetoric: From the counter-reformation to Milton. Princeton University Press.</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Christopher Marlowe's play The Jew of Malta (Template:Circa) contains a prologue by a character called Machiavel, a Senecan ghost based on Machiavelli.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Machiavel expresses the cynical view that power is amoral, saying:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

<poem>

"I count religion but a childish toy, And hold there is no sin but ignorance." </poem>{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Shakespeares titular character, Richard III, refers to Machiavelli in Henry VI, Part III, as the "murderous Machiavel".<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

WorksEdit

Template:See also

Political and historical worksEdit

File:Art of War-1573.jpg
Peter Withorne's 1573 translation of The Art of War

Fictional worksEdit

Template:See also Template:Republicanism sidebar

Besides being a statesman and political scientist, Machiavelli also translated classical works, and was a playwright (Clizia, Mandragola), a poet (Sonetti, Canzoni, Ottave, Canti carnascialeschi), and a novelist (Belfagor arcidiavolo).

Some of his other work:

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Other worksEdit

Della Lingua (Italian for "On the Language") (1514), a dialogue about Italy's language is normally attributed to Machiavelli.

Machiavelli's literary executor, Giuliano de' Ricci, also reported having seen that Machiavelli, his grandfather, made a comedy in the style of Aristophanes which included living Florentines as characters, and to be titled Le Maschere. It has been suggested that due to such things as this and his style of writing to his superiors generally, there was very likely some animosity to Machiavelli even before the return of the Medici.<ref>Template:Harvtxt. Also see Template:Harvtxt</ref>

See alsoEdit

Template:Portal

ReferencesEdit

Footnotes Template:Notelist

Citations Template:Reflist

SourcesEdit

Further readingEdit

BiographiesEdit

Template:Refbegin

  • Template:Cite journal
  • Black, Robert. Machiavelli: From Radical to Reactionary. London: Reaktion Books (2022)
  • Burd, L. A., "Florence (II): Machiavelli" in Cambridge Modern History (1902), vol. I, ch. vi. pp. 190–218 online Google edition
  • Capponi, Niccolò. An Unlikely Prince: The Life and Times of Machiavelli (Da Capo Press; 2010) 334 pages
  • Celenza, Christopher S. Machiavelli: A Portrait (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2015) 240 pages. Template:ISBN
  • Template:Citation
  • Template:Citation, an intellectual biography that won the Pulitzer Prize; excerpt and text search Template:Webarchive
  • Hale, J. R. Machiavelli and Renaissance Italy (1961) online edition Template:Webarchive
  • Hulliung, Mark. Citizen Machiavelli (Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 1983)
  • Lee, Alexander. Machiavelli: His Life and Times (London: Picador, 2020)
  • Oppenheimer, Paul. Machiavelli: A Life Beyond Ideology (London; New York: Continuum, 2011) Template:ISBN
  • Ridolfi, Roberto. The Life of Niccolò Machiavelli (1963)
  • Schevill, Ferdinand. Six Historians (1956), pp. 61–91
  • Skinner, Quentin. Machiavelli, in Past Masters series. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1981. pp. vii, 102. Template:ISBN pbk.
  • Skinner, Quentin. Machiavelli: A Very Short Introduction (2d ed., 2019) Template:ISBN pbk.
  • Unger, Miles J. Machiavelli: A Biography (Simon & Schuster, 2011)
  • Villari, Pasquale. The Life and Times of Niccolò Machiavelli (2 vols. 1892) (Vol 1; Vol 2)
  • Template:Citation excerpt and text search Template:Webarchive
  • Viroli, Maurizio. Machiavelli (1998) online edition Template:Webarchive
  • Vivanti, Corrado. Niccolò Machiavelli: An Intellectual Biography (Princeton University Press; 2013) 261 pages

Template:Refend

Political thoughtEdit

Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend

Italian studiesEdit

Template:Refbegin

  • Barbuto, Marcelo (2005), "Questa oblivione delle cose. Reflexiones sobre la cosmología de Maquiavelo (1469–1527)," Revista Daimon, 34, Universidad de Murcia, pp. 34–52.
  • Barbuto, Marcelo (2008), "Discorsi, I, XII, 12–14. La Chiesa romana di fronte alla republica cristiana", Filosofia Politica, 1, Il Mulino, Bologna, pp. 99–116.
  • Celli, Carlo ( 2009), Il carnevale di Machiavelli, Firenze, L.S. Olschki.
  • Connell, William J. (2015), Machiavelli nel Rinascimento italiano, Milano, Franco Angeli.
  • Giuseppe Leone, "Silone e Machiavelli. Una scuola...che non crea prìncipi", pref. di Vittoriano Esposito, Centro Studi Ignazio Silone, Pescina, 2003.
  • Martelli, Mario (2004), "La Mandragola e il suo prologo", Interpres, XXIII, pp. 106–142.
  • Martelli, Mario (2003), "Per la definizione della nozione di principe civile", Interpres, XXII.
  • Martelli, Mario (2001), "I dettagli della filologia", Interpres XX, pp. 212–271.
  • Martelli, Mario (1999a), "Note su Machiavelli", Interpres XVIII, pp. 91–145.
  • Martelli, Mario (1999b), Saggio sul Principe, Salerno Editrice, Roma.
  • Martelli, Mario (1999c), "Machiavelli e Savonarola: valutazione politica e valutazione religiosa", Girolamo Savonarola. L´uomo e il frate". Atti del xxxv Convegno storico internazionale (Todi, II-14 ottobre 1998), CISAM, Spoleto, pp. 139–153.
  • Martelli, Mario (1998a), Machiavelli e gli storici antichi, osservazioni su alcuni luoghi dei discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio, Quaderni di Filologia e critica, 13, Salerno Editrice, Roma.
  • Martelli, Mario (1998b), "Machiavelli politico amante poeta", Interpres XVII, pp. 211–256.
  • Martelli, Mario (1998c), "Machiavelli e Savonarola", Savonarola. Democrazia, tirannide, profezia, a cura di G.C. Garfagnini, Florencia, Sismel-Edizioni del Galluzo, pp. 67–89.
  • Martelli, Mario and Bausi, Francesco (1997), "Politica, storia e letteratura: Machiavelli e Guicciardini", Storia della letteratura italiana, E. Malato (ed.), vol. IV. Il primo Cinquecento, Salerno Editrice, Roma, pp. 251–320.
  • Martelli, Mario (1985–1986), "Schede sulla cultura di Machiavelli", Interpres VI, pp. 283–330.
  • Martelli, Mario (1982) "La logica provvidenzialistica e il capitolo XXVI del Principe", Interpres IV, pp. 262–384.
  • Martelli, Mario (1974), "L´altro Niccolò di Bernardo Machiavelli", Rinascimento, XIV, pp. 39–100.
  • Sasso, Gennaro (1993), Machiavelli: storia del suo pensiero politico, II vol., Bologna, Il Mulino,
  • Sasso, Gennaro (1987–1997) Machiavelli e gli antichi e altri saggi, 4 vols., Milano, R. Ricciardi

Template:Refend

EditionsEdit

Template:Refbegin Collections

  • Gilbert, Allan H. ed. Machiavelli: The Chief Works and Others, (3 vol. 1965), the standard scholarly edition
  • Bondanella, Peter, and Mark Musa, eds. The Portable Machiavelli (1979)
  • Penman, Bruce. The Prince and Other Political Writings, (1981)
  • Template:Citation excerpt and text search Template:Webarchive

The Prince

The Discourses on Livy

  • Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio (2001), ed. by Francesco Bausi, Edizione Nazionale delle Opere di Niccolò Machiavelli, II vol. Salerno Editrice, Roma.
  • The Discourses, online 1772 edition Template:Webarchive
  • The Discourses, tr. with introduction and notes by L. J. Walker (2 vol 1950).
  • Machiavelli, Niccolò (1531). The Discourses. Translated by Leslie J. Walker, S.J, revisions by Brian Richardson (2003). London: Penguin Books. Template:ISBN
  • The Discourses, edited with an introduction by Bernard Crick (1970).

The Art of War

Florentine Histories

Correspondence

  • Epistolario privado. Las cartas que nos desvelan el pensamiento y la personalidad de uno de los intelectuales más importantes del Renacimiento, Juan Manuel Forte (edición y traducción), Madrid, La Esfera de los Libros, 2007, 435 págs, Template:ISBN
  • The Private Correspondence of Niccolò Machiavelli, ed. by Orestes Ferrara; (1929) online edition Template:Webarchive
  • Template:Citation. Translated and edited by James B. Atkinson and David Sices.
  • Also see Template:Harvtxt.

Poetry and comedy

  • Template:Citation Bilingual edition of The Woman from Andros, The Mandrake, and Clizia, edited by David Sices and James B. Atkinson.
  • Hoeges, Dirk. Niccolò Machiavelli. Dichter-Poeta. Mit sämtlichen Gedichten, deutsch/italienisch. Con tutte le poesie, tedesco/italiano, Reihe: Dialoghi/Dialogues: Literatur und Kultur Italiens und Frankreichs, Band 10, Peter Lang Verlag, Frankfurt/M. u.a. 2006, Template:ISBN.

Template:Refend

External linksEdit

Template:Sister project links

Template:Niccolò Machiavelli Template:Political philosophy

Template:Authority control

Retrieved from "https://zalansite.site/mediawiki/index.php?title=Niccolò_Machiavelli&oldid=13919"