Template:Short description Template:For Template:Distinguish Template:Forms of government Template:Use British English Template:Use dmy dates

A protectorate, in the context of international relations, is a state that is under protection by another state for defence against aggression and other violations of law.Template:Sfnp It is a dependent territory that enjoys autonomy over most of its internal affairs, while still recognizing the suzerainty of a more powerful sovereign state without being a possession.<ref name=cyprus>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name=reflection>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name=boijkov>Template:Cite journal</ref> In exchange, the protectorate usually accepts specified obligations depending on the terms of their arrangement.<ref name=boijkov/> Usually protectorates are established de jure by a treaty.<ref name=cyprus/><ref name=reflection/> Under certain conditions—as with Egypt under British rule (1882–1914)—a state can also be labelled as a de facto protectorate or a veiled protectorate.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

A protectorate is different from a colony as it has local rulers, is not directly possessed, and rarely experiences colonization by the suzerain state.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> A state that is under the protection of another state while retaining its "international personality" is called a "protected state", not a protectorate.Template:SfnpTemplate:Efn

HistoryEdit

Protectorates are one of the oldest features of international relations, dating back to the Roman Empire. Civitates foederatae were cities that were subordinate to Rome for their foreign relations. In the Middle Ages, Andorra was a protectorate of France and Spain. Modern protectorate concepts were devised in the nineteenth century.Template:Sfnp

TypologyEdit

Foreign relationsEdit

In practice, a protectorate often has direct foreign relations only with the protector state, and transfers the management of all its more important international affairs to the latter.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name=boijkov/><ref name=cyprus/><ref name=reflection/> Similarly, the protectorate rarely takes military action on its own but relies on the protector for its defence. This is distinct from annexation, in that the protector has no formal power to control the internal affairs of the protectorate.

Protectorates differ from League of Nations mandates and their successors, United Nations trust territories, whose administration is supervised, in varying degrees, by the international community. A protectorate formally enters into the protection through a bilateral agreement with the protector, while international mandates are stewarded by the world community-representing body, with or without a {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} administering power.

Protected stateEdit

Template:See also

A protected state has a form of protection where it continues to retain an "international personality" and enjoys an agreed amount of independence in conducting its foreign policy.Template:Sfnp<ref> Template:Harvp: "First, protected states are entities which still have substantial authority in their internal affairs, retain some control over their foreign policy, and establish their relation to the protecting state on a treaty or another legal instrument. Protected states still have qualifications of statehood." </ref>

For political and pragmatic reasons, the protection relationship is not usually advertised, but described with euphemisms such as "an independent state with special treaty relations" with the protecting state.Template:Sfnp A protected state appears on world maps just as any other independent state.Template:Efn

International administration of a state can also be regarded as an internationalized form of protection, where the protector is an international organisation rather than a state.Template:Sfnp

Colonial protectionEdit

Multiple regions—such as the Colony and Protectorate of Nigeria, the Colony and Protectorate of Lagos, and similar—were subjects of colonial protection.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Conditions of protection are generally much less generous for areas of colonial protection. The protectorate was often reduced to a {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} condition similar to a colony, but with the pre-existing native state continuing as the agent of indirect rule. Occasionally, a protectorate was established by another form of indirect rule: a chartered company, which becomes a {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} state in its European home state (but geographically overseas), allowed to be an independent country with its own foreign policy and generally its own armed forces.Template:Citation needed

In fact, protectorates were often declared despite no agreement being duly entered into by the state supposedly being protected, or only agreed to by a party of dubious authority in those states. Colonial protectors frequently decided to reshuffle several protectorates into a new, artificial unit without consulting the protectorates, without being mindful of the theoretical duty of a protector to help maintain a protectorate's status and integrity. The Berlin agreement of February 26, 1885, allowed European colonial powers to establish protectorates in Black Africa (the last region to be divided among them) by diplomatic notification, even without actual possession on the ground. This aspect of history is referred to as the Scramble for Africa. A similar case is the formal use of such terms as colony and protectorate for an amalgamation—convenient only for the colonizer or protector—of adjacent territories, over which it held ({{#invoke:Lang|lang}}) sway by protective or "raw" colonial power.Template:Citation needed

Amical protectionEdit

In amical protection—as of United States of the Ionian Islands by Britain—the terms are often very favourable for the protectorate.<ref name="Wick2016">Template:Citation</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The political interest of the protector is frequently moral (a matter of accepted moral obligation, prestige, ideology, internal popularity, or dynastic, historical, or ethnocultural ties). Also, the protector's interest is in countering a rival or enemy power—such as preventing the rival from obtaining or maintaining control of areas of strategic importance. This may involve a very weak protectorate surrendering control of its external relations but may not constitute any real sacrifice, as the protectorate may not have been able to have a similar use of them without the protector's strength.

Amical protection was frequently extended by the great powers to other Christian (generally European) states, and to states of no significant importance.Template:Ambiguous After 1815, non-Christian states (such as the Chinese Qing dynasty) also provided amical protection of other, much weaker states.

In modern times, a form of amical protection can be seen as an important or defining feature of microstates. According to the definition proposed by Dumienski (2014): "microstates are modern protected states, i.e. sovereign states that have been able to unilaterally depute certain attributes of sovereignty to larger powers in exchange for benign protection of their political and economic viability against their geographic or demographic constraints".<ref>Template:Cite report</ref>

Argentina's protectoratesEdit

Brazil's protectoratesEdit

British Empire's protectorates and protected statesEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}

AmericasEdit

EuropeEdit

South AsiaEdit

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

West and Central AsiaEdit

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Sfnp

AfricaEdit

*protectorates which existed alongside a colony of the same name

De factoEdit

OceaniaEdit

Southeast AsiaEdit

China's protectoratesEdit

Template:Further

Dutch Empire's protectoratesEdit

Various sultanates in the Dutch East Indies (present day Indonesia):<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

SumatraEdit

Riau ArchipelagoEdit

JavaEdit

BaliEdit

LombokEdit

Flores and SolorEdit

  • Larantuka (1860–1904)
  • Tanah Kuna Lima (1917–1924)
  • Ndona (1917–1924)
  • Sikka (1879–c. 1947)

BorneoEdit

CelebesEdit

Ajattappareng Confederacy (1905–c. 1949)Edit

  • Malusetasi
  • Rapang
  • Swaito (union of Sawito and Alita, 1908)
  • Sidenreng
  • Supa

Mabbatupappeng Confederacy (1906–c. 1949)Edit

  • Barru
  • Soppengriaja (union of Balusu, Kiru, Kamiri, 1906)
  • Tanette

Mandar Confederacy (1906–c. 1949)Edit

Massenrempulu Confederacy (1905–c. 1949)Edit

MoluccasEdit

West Timor and AlorEdit

  • Amanatun (1749–c. 1949)
  • Amanuban (1749–c. 1949)
  • Amarasi (1749–c. 1949)
  • Amfoan (1683–c. 1949)
  • Beboki (1756–c. 1949)
  • Belu (1756–c.1949)
  • Insana (1756–c.1949)
  • Sonbai Besar (1756–1906)
  • Sonbai Kecil (1659–1917)
  • Roti (Korbafo before 1928) (c. 1750–c.1949)
  • TaEbenu (1688–1917)

New GuineaEdit

France's protectorates and protected statesEdit

AfricaEdit

"Protection" was the formal legal structure under which French colonial forces expanded in Africa between the 1830s and 1900. Almost every pre-existing state that was later part of French West Africa was placed under protectorate status at some point, although direct rule gradually replaced protectorate agreements. Formal ruling structures, or fictive recreations of them, were largely retained—as with the low-level authority figures in the French Cercles—with leaders appointed and removed by French officials.<ref>See the classic account on this in Robert Delavignette. Freedom and Authority in French West Africa. London: Oxford University Press, (1950). The more recent standard studies on French expansion include:
Robert Aldrich. Greater France: A History of French Overseas Expansion. Palgrave MacMillan (1996) Template:ISBN.
Alice L. Conklin. A Mission to Civilize: The Republican Idea of Empire in France and West Africa 1895–1930. Stanford: Stanford University Press (1998), Template:ISBN.
Patrick Manning. Francophone Sub-Saharan Africa, 1880–1995. Cambridge University Press (1998) Template:ISBN.
Jean Suret-Canale. Afrique Noire: l'Ere Coloniale (Editions Sociales, Paris, 1971); Eng. translation, French Colonialism in Tropical Africa, 1900 1945. (New York, 1971).</ref>

AmericasEdit

AsiaEdit

File:1 Sapèque - Protectorate of Tonkin (1905) 02.jpg
1 Sapèque – Protectorate of Tonkin (1905)

EuropeEdit

OceaniaEdit

Germany's protectorates and protected statesEdit

Template:See also

The German Empire used the word {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, literally protectorate, for all of its colonial possessions until they were lost during World War I, regardless of the actual level of government control. Cases involving indirect rule included:

Before and during World War II, Nazi Germany designated the rump of occupied Czechoslovakia and Denmark as protectorates:

India's protectoratesEdit

Italy's protectorates and protected statesEdit

Japan's protectoratesEdit

Poland's protectoratesEdit

Portugal's protectoratesEdit

Russia's and the Soviet Union's protectorates and protected statesEdit

De factoEdit

Template:See also Some sources mention the following territories as de facto Russian protectorates:

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Spain's protectoratesEdit

Turkey's and the Ottoman Empire's protectorates and protected statesEdit

De factoEdit

United Nations' protectoratesEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}

United States' protectorates and protected statesEdit

After becoming independent nations in 1902 and 1903 respectively, Cuba and Panama became protectorates of the United States. In 1903, Cuba and the U.S. signed the Cuban–American Treaty of Relations, which affirmed the provisions of the Platt Amendment, including that the U.S. had the right to intervene in Cuba to preserve its independence, among other reasons (the Platt Amendment had also been integrated into the 1901 constitution of Cuba). Later that year, Panama and the U.S. signed the Hay–Bunau-Varilla Treaty, which established the Panama Canal Zone and gave the U.S. the right to intervene in the cities of Panama and Colón (and the adjacent territories and harbors) for the maintenance of public order. The 1904 constitution of Panama, in Article 136, also gave the U.S. the right to intervene in any part of Panama "to reestablish public peace and constitutional order." Haiti later also became a protectorate after the ratification of the Haitian–American Convention (which gave the U.S. the right to intervene in Haiti for a period of ten years, which was later expanded to twenty years through an additional agreement in 1917) on September 16, 1915.

The U.S. also attempted to establish protectorates over the Dominican Republic<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and Nicaragua through the Bryan–Chamorro Treaty.

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

De factoEdit

Contemporary usage by the United StatesEdit

Some agencies of the United States government, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, refer to the District of Columbia and insular areas of the United States—such as American Samoa and the U.S. Virgin Islands—as protectorates.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> However, the agency responsible for the administration of those areas, the Office of Insular Affairs within the United States Department of the Interior, uses only the term "insular area" rather than protectorate.

Joint protectoratesEdit

Template:Further

See alsoEdit

NotesEdit

Template:Notelist

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

BibliographyEdit

Template:Colonial Empires Template:Terms for types of administrative territorial entities Template:Autonomous types of first-tier administration

Template:Authority control