Template:Short description Template:Italic The Free Software Definition, written by Richard Stallman and published by the Free Software Foundation (FSF), defines free software as being software that ensures that the users have freedom in using, studying, sharing and modifying that software. The term "free" is used in the sense of "free speech," not of "free of charge."<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The earliest-known publication of the definition was in the February 1986 edition<ref name="bull6">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> of the now-discontinued GNU's Bulletin publication by the FSF. The canonical source for the document is in the philosophy section of the GNU Project website. Template:As of, it is published in 39 languages.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The FSF publishes a list of licences that meet this definition.

The Four Essential Freedoms of Free SoftwareEdit

The definition published by the FSF in February 1986 had two points:<ref name="bull6" />

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

The word "free" in our name does not refer to price; it refers to freedom. First, the freedom to copy a program and redistribute it to your neighbors, so that they can use it as well as you. Second, the freedom to change a program, so that you can control it instead of it controlling you; for this, the source code must be made available to you.{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

In 1996, when the gnu.org website was launched, "free software" was defined referring to "three levels of freedom" by adding an explicit mention of the freedom to study the software (which could be read in the two-point definition as being part of the freedom to change the program).<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}Template:Dead link</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Stallman later avoided the word "levels", saying that all of the freedoms are needed, so it is misleading to think in terms of levelsTemplate:Cn.

Finally, another freedom was added, to explicitly say that users should be able to run the program. The existing freedoms were already numbered one to three, but this freedom should come before the others, so it was added as "freedom zero".<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

The modern definition defines free software by whether or not the recipient has the following four freedoms:<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Template:Quote

Freedoms 1 and 3 require source code to be available because studying and modifying software without its source code is highly impractical.

Later definitionsEdit

In July 1997, Bruce Perens published the Debian Free Software Guidelines.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> A definition based on the DFSG was also used by the Open Source Initiative (OSI) under the name "The Open Source Definition".

Comparison with The Open Source DefinitionEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Template:See also Despite the philosophical differences between the free software movement and the open-source-software movement, the official definitions of free software by the FSF and of open-source software by the OSI basically refer to the same software licences, with a few minor exceptions. While stressing these philosophical differences, the Free Software Foundation comments: Template:Quote

See alsoEdit

Template:Portal

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

External linksEdit

Template:FOSS