Turtles all the way down
Template:About Template:Short description
"Turtles all the way down" is an expression of the problem of infinite regress. The saying alludes to the mythological idea of a World Turtle that supports a flat Earth on its back. It suggests that this turtle rests on the back of an even larger turtle, which itself is part of a column of increasingly larger turtles that continues indefinitely.
The exact origin of the phrase is uncertain. In the form "rocks all the way down", the saying appears as early as 1838.<ref name="Rocks" /> References to the saying's mythological antecedents, the World Turtle and its counterpart the World Elephant, were made by a number of authors in the 17th and 18th centuries.<ref name="Locke 1689" /><ref name="Hume 1779" />
The expression has been used to illustrate problems such as the regress argument in epistemology.
HistoryEdit
Background in Hindu mythologyEdit
Early variants of the saying do not always have explicit references to infinite regression (i.e., the phrase "all the way down"). They often reference stories featuring a World Elephant, World Turtle, or other similar creatures that are claimed to come from Hindu mythology. The first known reference to a Hindu source is found in a letter by Jesuit Emanuel da Veiga (1549–1605), written at Chandagiri on 18 September 1599, in which the relevant passage reads: Template:Verse translation
Veiga's account seems to have been received by Samuel Purchas, who has a close paraphrase in his Purchas His Pilgrims (1613/1626), "that the Earth had nine corners, whereby it was borne up by the Heaven. Others dissented, and said, that the Earth was borne up by seven Elephants; the Elephants' feet stood on Tortoises, and they were borne by they know not what."<ref>Will Sweetman, Indology mailing list, citing Dieter Henrich, 'Die "wahrhafte Schildkröte"' Hegel-Studien 2 (1963), pp. 281-91, and J. Charpentier, 'A Treatise on Hindu Cosmography from the Seventeenth Century (Brit. Mus. MS. Sloane 2748 A).' Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London 3(2) (1924), pp. 317-342.</ref> Purchas' account is again reflected by John Locke in his 1689 tract An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, where Locke introduces the story as a trope referring to the problem of induction in philosophical debate. Locke compares one who would say that properties inhere in "Substance" to the Indian who said the world was on an elephant which was on a tortoise, "But being again pressed to know what gave support to the broad-back'd Tortoise, replied, something, he knew not what".<ref name="Locke 1689">John Locke (1689). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Book II, Chapter XXIII, section 2</ref> The story is also referenced by Henry David Thoreau, who writes in his journal entry of 4 May 1852: "Men are making speeches ... all over the country, but each expresses only the thought, or the want of thought, of the multitude. No man stands on truth. They are merely banded together as usual, one leaning on another and all together on nothing; as the Hindoos made the world rest on an elephant, and the elephant on a tortoise, and had nothing to put under the tortoise."<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
Modern formEdit
In the form of "rocks all the way down", the saying dates to at least 1838, when it was printed in an unsigned anecdote in the New-York Mirror about a schoolboy and an old woman living in the woods:
Another version of the saying appeared in an 1854 transcript of remarks by preacher Joseph Frederick Berg addressed to Joseph Barker:
Many 20th-century attributions claim that philosopher and psychologist William James is the source of the phrase.<ref>Robert Anton Wilson (1983). Prometheus Rising. Phoenix, AZ: New Falcon Publishers. p. 25. Template:ISBN</ref> James referred to the fable of the elephant and tortoise several times, but told the infinite regress story with "rocks all the way down" in his 1882 essay, "Rationality, Activity and Faith":
The linguist John R. Ross also associates James with the phrase:
Turtle world, infinite regress and explanatory failureEdit
The mythological idea of a turtle world is often used as an illustration of infinite regresses. An infinite regress is an infinite series of entities governed by a recursive principle that determines how each entity in the series depends on or is produced by its predecessor.<ref name="Cameron">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The main interest in infinite regresses is due to their role in infinite regress arguments. An infinite regress argument is an argument against a theory based on the fact that this theory leads to an infinite regress.<ref name="Cameron"/><ref name="Maurin">Template:Cite book</ref> For such an argument to be successful, it has to demonstrate not just that the theory in question entails an infinite regress but also that this regress is vicious.<ref name="Cameron"/><ref name="Huemer">Template:Cite book</ref> There are different ways in which a regress can be vicious.<ref name="Huemer"/><ref name="Wieland">Template:Cite journal</ref> The idea of a turtle world exemplifies viciousness due to explanatory failure: it does not solve the problem it was formulated to solve. Instead, it assumes already in disguised form what it was supposed to explain.<ref name="Huemer"/><ref name="Wieland"/> This is akin to the informal fallacy of begging the question.<ref name="Clark">Template:Cite journal</ref> In one interpretation, the goal of positing the existence of a world turtle is to explain why the earth seems to be at rest instead of falling down: because it rests on the back of a giant turtle. In order to explain why the turtle itself is not in free fall, another, even bigger turtle is posited, and so on, resulting in a world that is turtles all the way down.<ref name="Huemer"/><ref name="Cameron"/> Despite its shortcomings in clashing with modern physics, and due to its ontological extravagance, this theory seems to be metaphysically possible, assuming that space is infinite, thereby avoiding an outright contradiction. But it fails because it has to assume rather than explain at each step that there is another thing that is not falling. It does not explain why nothing at all is falling.<ref name="Cameron"/><ref name="Huemer"/>
In epistemology and other disciplinesEdit
The metaphor is used as an example of the problem of infinite regress in epistemology to show that there is a necessary foundation to knowledge, as written by Johann Gottlieb Fichte in 1794:<ref name="Fichte 1794">Fichte, J. G. (1794). Ueber den Begriff der Wissenschaftslehre oder der sogenannten Philosophie (Concerning the Conception of the Science of Knowledge Generally) (A. E. Kroeger, Trans.).</ref>Template:Page needed
David Hume references the story in his 1779 work Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion when arguing against God as an unmoved mover:<ref name="Hume 1779">David Hume (1779). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, part 4.</ref>
Bertrand Russell also mentions the story in his 1927 lecture Why I Am Not a Christian while discounting the First Cause argument intended to be a proof of God's existence:
Modern allusions or variationsEdit
References to "turtles all the way down" have been made in a variety of modern contexts. For example, American hardcore band Every Time I Die titled a song “Turtles All the Way Down” on their 2009 album New Junk Aesthetic. The lyrics mention the turtle world theory.
"Turtles All the Way Down" is the name of a song by country artist Sturgill Simpson that appears on his 2014 album Metamodern Sounds in Country Music.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> "Gamma Goblins ('Its Turtles All The Way Down' Mix)" is a remix by Ott for the 2002 Hallucinogen album In Dub.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Turtles All the Way Down is also the title of a 2017 novel by John Green about a teenage girl with obsessive–compulsive disorder.<ref>Senior, Jennifer (October 10, 2017). "In John Green’s 'Turtles All the Way Down,' a Teenager’s Mind Is at War With Itself." The New York Times. Retrieved October 29, 2017.</ref>
Musician Captain Beefheart used the phrase in 1975 to describe playing with Frank Zappa and The Mothers of Invention (captured on the album Bongo Fury) when he told Steve Weitzman of Rolling Stone that he "had an extreme amount of fun on this tour. They move awfully fast. I've never travelled this fast with the Magic Band—turtles all the way down."<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref>
Stephen Hawking incorporates the saying into the beginning of his 1988 book A Brief History of Time:<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia discussed his "favored version" of the saying in a footnote to his 2006 plurality opinion in Rapanos v. United States:<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
Microsoft Visual Studio had a gamification plug-in that awarded badges for certain programming behaviors and patterns. One of the badges was "Turtles All the Way Down", which was awarded for writing a class with 10 or more levels of inheritance.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
In a TED-Ed video discussing Gödel's incompleteness theorems, the phrase "Gödels all the way down" is used to describe the way in which one can never get rid of unprovable true statements in an axiomatic system.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
See alsoEdit
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link