Tzimtzum

The tzimtzum or tsimtsum (Template:Langx) is a term used in Lurianic Kabbalah to explain Isaac Luria's doctrine that God began the process of creation by limiting the Ohr Ein Sof (infinite light) of the Godhead in order to allow for a conceptual space in which the Four Worlds, or finite realms, could exist. This primordial initial contraction, forming a "vacant space" (Template:Langx) into which new creative light could beam, is denoted by general reference to the tzimtzum. In Kabbalistic interpretation, tzimtzum gives rise to the paradox of simultaneous divine presence and absence within the vacuum and resultant Creation. Various approaches exist as to how the paradox may be resolved, and as to the nature of tzimtzum itself.<ref>See, for a survey, Template:Harvp.</ref>

Function

Because the tzimtzum results in the space in which the spiritual and physical worlds and, ultimately, free will, can exist, God is often referred to as "Ha-Makom" (Template:Script/Hebrew lit. "the Place", "the Omnipresent") in rabbinic literature.Template:Sfnp Olam, the Hebrew term for a world, is derived from the triliteral {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} "concealment". This etymology is complementary with the concept of tsimtsum in that the subsequent spiritual realms and the ultimate physical universe conceal to different degrees the lifeforce of creation.

Their progressive diminutions of the divine ohr (Light) from realm to realm in creation are also referred to in the plural as secondary tzimtzumim. However, these subsequent concealments are found in medieval Kabbalah. The new doctrine of Luria advanced the notion of the primordial withdrawal or dilug (radical "leap") to reconcile the causal creative chain from the Godhead with finite existence.

Inherent paradox

A commonly held<ref>See for example Template:Harvp.</ref> understanding in Kabbalah is that the concept of tzimtzum contains a built-in paradox, requiring that God be simultaneously transcendent and immanent. Viz.: On the one hand, if the "Infinite" did not restrict itself, then nothing could exist—everything would be overwhelmed by God's totality. Existence thus requires God's transcendence, as above. On the other hand, God continuously maintains the existence of, and is thus not absent from, the created universe.

God gives their force to all creatures and this force gives them their limits, so that material substance could be finite and with nature for Original providence.

Nachman of Breslav discusses this inherent paradox as follows:

So God is eternal and the infinity in time and space is his nature: we cannot think the infinity of causes about the infinity of Universe or Creation because in the first case the infinity of numbers is only possible in theory but God is the Creator and no one can be like God, "the First Cause": it is impossible thinking about two God because one of them could have hypothetical superiority and we would admit one God, so the First Cause is God; in the second case, that is the infinity of Creation, it is impossible because, a part the "fantasy of this think without Logical-reason and without research of real study", we cannot think about infinity of time because eternity is a nature of God and not a quality of material substance:

Hasdai Crescas in "Or Hashem"Template:Sfnp explains that over the limits of world of finitude of shape it can be said that God is living forever with eternal attribute of Infinite, i.e. His essence over time and space:

This "material-World" is "inside God", with earth and universe: God is infinite but the World and Universe are finites, so the centre of God is not possible, because of His Infinite-essence; God is infinite with the World with nature, humankind, animals, etc. "Inside-Him".Chokhmah, Binah and Daat are like onion skins because the Pardes transcends all literal significance of Torah:

Before Creation and before Tzimtzum "God filled all space", that is, God alone existed because Creation had not yet been created. The Torah reflects divine wisdom, so God was with the Torah even before Creation: "I (the Torah) was there"; in other words the Midrash explains that before the Creation "God played with the Torah", his wisdom was therefore his only delight. Maimonide also explains that God is the same entity together with his wisdom, he also states that "the knower, knowledge and the known" refer to the "same thing".

Hasdai Crescas relates this idea with intellect of man but this is true only for God because His Wisdom is omniscient so when "God knows about himself... He is knowing about all things". God knows also about all things in their "Quiddity", i.e. their essence and their attributes. It’s evident that God knows Himself and the intelligibles:

Lurianic interpretation

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}

File:Lonzano diagram.jpg

A diagram of the worlds created after the first Tzimtzum, found in a manuscript written by Menahem Lonzano, a version of a diagram found in the writings of Hayyim ben Joseph Vital

Isaac Luria introduced four central themes into Kabbalistic cosmology: tzimtzum (divine contraction), Shevirat HaKelim (the shattering of the vessels), Tikkun (repair and rectification), and Partzufim (the arrangement of divine personas). These concepts form a continuous and interrelated process describing how the finite world emerged from divine infinity. Tzimtzum represents the initial withdrawal of divine light (Ohr Ein Sof), creating a "vacant space" (chalal panui) where independent existence could emerge. However, even within this space, a residual trace of the divine (reshimu) remained, ensuring the continued presence of divinity within creation.Template:Sfnmp Shevirat HaKelim describes how, after the tzimtzum, God created the vessels (HaKelim) in the empty space, and how when God began to pour his Light into the vessels they were not strong enough to hold the power of God's Light and shattered (Shevirat). The third step, Tikkun, is the process of gathering together, and raising, the sparks of God's Light that were carried down with the shards of the shattered vessels.Template:Sfnp

Since tzimtzum is connected to the concept of exile, and Tikkun is connected to the need to repair the problems of the world of human existence, Luria unites the cosmology of Kabbalah with the practice of Jewish ethics, and makes ethics and traditional Jewish religious observance the means by which God allows humans to complete and perfect the material world through living the precepts of a traditional Jewish life.Template:Sfnp Thus, in contrast to earlier, Medieval Kabbalah, this made the first creative act a concealment/divine exile rather than unfolding revelation. This dynamic crisis-catharsis in the divine flow is repeated throughout the Lurianic scheme.

Hasidic interpretations

In Hasidic thought, the concept of tzimtzum is not meant to be interpreted literally but rather to refer to how God impresses his presence upon the consciousness of finite reality.Template:Sfnp Tzimtzum is not only seen as being a natural process but is also seen as a doctrine that every person is able, and indeed required, to understand and meditate upon. The function of the tzimtzum was "to conceal from created beings the activating force within them, enabling them to exist as tangible entities, instead of being utterly nullified within their source".Template:Sfnp The tzimtzum produced the required "vacated space" (Template:Script/Hebrew Template:Transliteration "empty space", Template:Script/Hebrew Template:Transliteration "space"), devoid of direct awareness of God's presence.

Non-Hasidic interpretations

Vilna Gaon's view

The Vilna Gaon maintained that tzimtzum was not a literal contraction of God's presence but rather a conceptual process that was not perceptible to those who had not been fully initiated into Kabbalistic thought. While he rejected the notion that God physically withdrew from creation, he also emphasized that the upper unity—the idea that the universe is ultimately an illusion—remained beyond human comprehension for those untrained in esoteric wisdom.Template:Sfnp

Despite this, some scholars argue that the Vilna Gaon held a more literal interpretation of tzimtzum, viewing it as a real withdrawal in a certain sense.Template:Sfnp This perspective is particularly emphasized by Rabbi Shlomo Elyashiv, who insisted that the literal reading of Luria's teachings aligns with the Gaon's view. Elyashiv criticized later interpretations that treated the world as entirely illusory, arguing that such an approach undermines the foundations of Torah and Jewish belief.<ref>Leshem Sh-vo ve-Achlama, Sefer Ha-Deah, Drush Olam HaTohu, chelek 1, drush 5, siman 7, section 8 (p. 57b)</ref>

Ultimately, both the Vilna Gaon and Elyashiv maintained that tzimtzum applied only to God's will (ratzon), rather than to God's essential being (Atzmus), which remains unknowable and beyond all human comprehension.

Modern interpretations

Some modern scholars have reinterpreted Tzimtzum using psychological and existential frameworks. Shlomo Giora Shoham presents tzimtzum as a mythoempirical projection of pregnancy, arguing that the process of divine contraction mirrors gestation and fetal development. In this view, tzimtzum is not merely a withdrawal but a gradual transformation, where infinite divine light is "fed" and develops within a cosmic womb. Shoham describes the fetus as a core of Divinity, which eventually leads to the materialization of cosmic vessels and the formation of finite existence.Template:Sfnp

Expanding on this idea, Shoham further elaborates that Shevirat HaKelim, the breaking of these vessels, corresponds to birth, a moment of rupture that leads to Tikkun (repair and rectification).Template:Sfnp In this analogy, the world of Tikkun, which follows the breaking, represents the postnatal stage, where divine light is restructured into Partzufim (divine personas or images), reflecting the maturation process after birth. Shoham’s interpretation positions Lurianic Kabbalah within a universal archetypal framework, aligning tzimtzum with human developmental metaphors and the existential cycle of contraction, rupture, and restoration.

See also

• Acosmism
• Hylomorphism
• Monism
• Nondualism

References

Works cited

• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}

• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite journal
• {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}

• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book

Further reading

• {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}

• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }} An Hasidic discourse on the paradox of Tzimtzum.

• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book Especially chapter II.

External links

• Basics in Kabbalah and Chassidut (inner.org)
• Igeret Hakodesh: Epistle 12 (chabad.org)