Editing Glycerius (section)

==Life==
===Background===
The historian [[Penny MacGeorge]] states the summary that "almost nothing is known of Glycerius".{{sfn|MacGeorge|2002|p=272}} Glycerius was born probably in [[Dalmatia (Roman province)|Dalmatia]].{{citation needed|date=January 2023|reason=Neither of the cites previously here (nor the PLRE) actually verify this claim}} His family is unknown, and may not have been aristocratic.{{sfn|Grierson|Mays|1992|p=77}} He rose to the office of {{lang|la|[[comes domesticorum]]}} (commander of the palace guard), and likely served as such during the reign of [[Roman emperor|Western Roman]] Emperor [[Olybrius]] ({{reign|single=472}}).{{sfn|DIR Glycerius}}{{Sfn|Martindale|1980|p=514}} The [[Germanic peoples|Germanic]] {{lang|la|[[magister militum]]}} (master of soldiers) [[Ricimer]] had deposed the Western Roman Emperor [[Majorian]] ({{reign|457|461}}) in 461, and thereafter installed a series of Western Roman emperors as [[puppet emperor|puppets]]: [[Libius Severus]] ({{reign|461|465}}), [[Anthemius]] ({{reign|467|472}}), and Olybrius, enthroned in July 472, after Ricimer overthrew Anthemius.{{Sfn|Martindale|1980|pp=943–944}}{{sfn|Jones|1964|p=324}} Ricimer died on 18 August 472, forty days after deposing Anthemius, and was succeeded as {{lang|la|magister militum}} and kingmaker by his [[Burgundians|Burgundian]] nephew [[Gundobad]].{{sfn|Jones|1964|p=324}}{{sfn|Martindale|1980|pp=524 & 945}} Olybrius died shortly thereafter, on 2 November 472, and an [[interregnum]] ensued for nearly four months, before Gundobad convinced Glycerius to assume the throne, and proclaimed him as emperor at [[Ravenna]]: the {{lang|la|[[Fasti vindobonenses]]}}, a record of [[consular years]], states that it was on 5 March 473, however, the {{lang|la|[[Paschale campanum]]}}, also a consular record, asserts it was on the 3rd.{{sfn|MacGeorge|2002|p=272}}{{sfn|Meijer|2004|p=159}}{{sfn|Lee|2013|p=96}}{{sfn|Martindale|1980|pp=514 & 524}}

===Reign===
Few events of Glycerius' reign are known.{{sfn|MacGeorge|2002|p=272}}{{sfn|Meijer|2004|pp=159–160}} Glycerius is known from a few fragmented references in what historian [[Ralph Mathisen]] calls "jejune chronicles", such as the ''Annales'' of [[Marcellinus Comes]], the ''[[Gallic Chronicle of 511]]'', and the ''[[Chronicle of Saragossa]]'', as well as some small references provided by the 6th-century writer [[Jordanes]] and the bishop [[Magnus Felix Ennodius|Ennodius]].{{sfn|DIR Glycerius}} Under Glycerius, invasions by both the [[Visigoths]] and the [[Ostrogoths]] were repelled, through a mixture of diplomatic and military activities.{{sfn|MacGeorge|2002|p=272}}{{sfn|DIR Glycerius}}{{sfn|Meijer|2004|pp=159–160}} The Visigoths and Ostrogoths were [[Germanic peoples|Germanic]] groups that were settled in [[Gallia Aquitania]], and [[Pannonia Prima]] and [[Pannonia Valeria|Valeria]], respectively, as {{lang|la|[[foederati]]}}.{{sfn|Sivan|1987|pp=759–772}}{{sfn|DIR Marcian}}{{sfn|Friell|Williams|2005|pp=85–91}}{{sfn|Elton|2018|p=172}} In 473, the Visigothic king [[Euric]] ({{reign|466|484}}) ordered an invasion of [[Roman Italy|Italy]], but his commander, [[Vincentius (commander)|Vincentius]], was killed by the {{lang|la|[[Comites]]}} (regional commanders) Alla and Sindila. After Vincentius was killed, Euric chose instead to invade [[Gaul]], occupying both [[Arles]] and [[Marseille]]. The Ostrogothic king [[Videmir]] ({{reign|469|474}}) proposed to invade Italy,{{sfn|MacGeorge|2002|p=272}}{{sfn|DIR Glycerius}}{{sfn|Meijer|2004|pp=159–160}} but Glycerius was able to dissuade Videmir through the gift of 2,000 {{lang|la|[[solidi]]}} (high-value gold coins),{{sfn|Grierson|Mays|1992|p=263}}{{sfn|Harl|1996|p=159}}{{efn|The {{lang|la|solidus}} at the time was approximately {{convert|4.64|g}} of [[gold]], so this would constitute roughly {{convert|9.28|kg}} of gold.{{sfn|Harl|1996|p=159}}}} and diverted them from Italy to Gaul, where surrounding groups, described by Jordanes as "various peoples", later attacked them.{{sfn|MacGeorge|2002|p=272}}{{sfn|DIR Glycerius}}{{sfn|Meijer|2004|pp=159–160}} Mathisen comments that these actions to defend the empire may be the reason that Glycerius receives a generally favorable reception in Roman and Byzantine sources. The 9th-century historian [[Theophanes the Confessor|Theophanes]] describes him only as a "not despicable man", but Ennodius, the bishop of Pavia, describes him more thoroughly in his {{lang|la|[[Vita St. Epiphanius]]}}:{{sfn|DIR Glycerius}}

{{Quote|After Olybrius, Glycerius ascended to the rule. With regard to whom I summarize, in my desire for brevity, the numerous things he did for the well being of many people. For, when the blessed man [Bishop [[Epiphanius of Pavia]]] interceded, he pardoned the injury done to his mother by some men under his authority.{{sfn|DIR Glycerius}}}}

Mathisten states that the aforementioned injuries to Glycerius' mother may have been in reaction to his bribery of Videmir, but remarks that "such measures were a regular part of imperial policy", and speculates that the attackers may have been soldiers, explaining their lack of punishment.{{sfn|DIR Glycerius}} Glycerius seems to have primarily reigned in northern Italy, as all the coins found from his reign but one were minted in either Ravenna or [[Milan]]. The only law enacted by Glycerius which has survived was dated 11 March 473, and issued to [[Himilco (Praetorian prefect)|Himilco]], the [[Praetorian prefecture of Italy|Praetorian prefect of Italy]], and later reissued to the [[Praetorian prefecture of Illyricum|Praetorian prefects of Illyricum]], [[Praetorian prefecture of the East|the East]], [[Praetorian prefecture of Gaul|and Gaul]], regarding [[simony]] (the selling of church offices). It was adopted not just by the prefects of Italy and Gaul, who were a part of the Western Roman Empire, but also by the prefects of Illyricum and the East, despite the fact that he did not have the authority to issue laws to them. The law was designed to grant Glycerius the support of the clergy,{{sfn|DIR Glycerius}} but would likely also have appealed to the [[senatorial class]], who were concerned about increasingly violent elections, as well as the use of church funds by clergy for personal reasons.{{sfn|Harris|Chen|2021|p=208}} This law was also the last known one issued by a Western Roman emperor.{{sfn|Harris|Chen|2021|p=205}}

It is possible that Glycerius attempted reconciliation with the [[Eastern Roman Empire]], evidenced by the fact that Glycerius did not nominate a [[Roman consul|consul]] for 474, and instead accepted the eastern consul, the infant Emperor [[Leo II (emperor)|Leo II]] ({{reign|473|474}}).{{sfn|DIR Glycerius}} Despite this, the Eastern Roman Emperor, [[Leo I (emperor)|Leo I]] ({{reign|457|474}}), refused to recognize Glycerius as emperor because he was merely a puppet of Gundobad. Emperor Leo instead chose to recognize one of his own men, [[Julius Nepos]] ({{reign|474|475/480}}), and sent him with a fleet to invade the Western Empire.{{sfn|Meijer|2004|pp=159–160}} The 7th-century historian [[John of Antioch (historian)|John of Antioch]] states that Leo made the decision to remove Glycerius after hearing that he had assumed the throne of the Western Roman Empire, but Mathisen comments that Leo must have hesitated for some time, as the actual invasion was delayed by the onset of winter, and Julius Nepos was forced to wait until the beginning of spring to launch his invasion.{{sfn|DIR Julius Nepos}}

Glycerius was without allies, as Gundobad seemingly abandoned him, leaving him with no option but to surrender. After Nepos landed at [[Ostia (Rome)|Ostia]] in June 474, Glycerius abdicated on 24 June 474, in Ravenna, and Nepos assumed the throne.{{sfn|Meijer|2004|pp=159–160}}{{sfn|O'Flynn|1983|p=131}}{{sfn|Martindale|1980|p=524}} The historian [[John Michael O'Flynn]] states that the "circumstances surrounding this speedy overthrow are obscure and, at first sight, puzzling", noting that while the forces of Nepos were likely small, Gundobad made no moves to counter them, but rather "disappeared entirely from the Italian scene." He speculates that, while Gundobad could have put up stiff resistance, rather than attempting to oppose the imperial legitimacy of Leo, he accepted Leo's authority to reject Glycerius as an imperial colleague and to install one of his own choosing. Additionally, Glycerius seems to never have attracted the favor of the [[Roman Senate]] or the [[Gallo-Roman]] aristocracy, which would make the decision to back him, and therefore alienate both, far less palatable for Gundobad.{{sfn|O'Flynn|1983|p=130}} Notably, as king of [[Kingdom of the Burgundians|Burgundy]], Gundobad ({{reign|473/474|516}}) enjoyed warm relations with the Eastern Roman Empire, which he served as a {{lang|la|foederatus}} (treaty subject).{{sfn|O'Flynn|1983|p=131}}{{sfn|Martindale|1980|p=524}} Mathisen suggests the alternatives that Gundobad was attempting to raise further troops in Gaul, or that he left to ensure he received his inheritance after the death of his father, King [[Gondioc]] ({{reign|437|473}}).{{sfn|DIR Glycerius}}

===Later life===
After being deposed, Glycerius was promptly ordained as [[Bishop of Salona]].{{sfn|Meijer|2004|pp=159–160}} According to the 5th-century Byzantine historian [[Malchus (historian)|Malchus]], Glycerius had some part in organizing the assassination of Julius Nepos in 480, after Nepos had been forced to flee Italy and was [[Government in exile|ruling in exile]] in Dalmatia, although the historical records for the assassination are muddled.{{Sfn|DIR Glycerius}}{{sfn|Martindale|1980|p=514}}{{sfn|MacGeorge|2002|p=31 & 62}} Glycerius died sometime after 474, possibly in 480.{{sfn|Meijer|2004|pp=159–160}}{{sfn|Martindale|1980|p=514}} He has sometimes been identified with a [[Glycerius (bishop of Milan)|Glycerius]] who was [[Archbishop of Milan]] by King [[Odoacer]] ({{reign|476|493}}), but this is likely incorrect.{{sfn|DIR Glycerius}}{{sfn|Martindale|1980|p=514}} The source for the promotion of Glycerius to archbishop is an obscure line written by Ennodius, in which he praises an archbishop named Glycerius, among other archbishops of Milan, however, this section seems to have been either corrupted or added later, to identify the archbishop Glycerius with the emperor Glycerius.{{sfn|Martindale|1980|p=514}}