Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Costs== {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; margin-left:10px" align="right" border="1" |+ NDA increasing estimates of remaining cost of decommissioning and clean-up<ref name=nao-20150301>{{cite report |url=http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-committees/public-accounts/Progress-on-Sellafield-Site.pdf |title=Nuclear Decommissioning Authority - Progress on the Sellafield site: an update |publisher=National Audit Office |date=March 2015 |access-date=16 March 2015}}</ref><ref name=gov-20160901/> |- ! rowspan="2" | Year of<br/>estimate !! Sellafield !! Other NDA sites !! Total |- ! colspan="3" | (£ billions, discounted) |- |2009-10 || 25.2 || 19.9 || 45.1 |- |2010-11 || 32.7 || 16.5 || 49.2 |- |2011-12 || 37.2 || 15.6 || 52.9 |- |2012-13 || 42.0 || 16.9 || 58.9 |- |2013-14 || 47.9 || 17.0 || 64.9 |- |2015-16 || 117.4 || 43.3 || 160.7 |- |2017-18<ref name=nao-20180620>{{cite report |url=https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/The-Nuclear-Decommissioning-Authority-progress-with-reducing-risk-at-Sellafield.pdf |title=The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority: progress with reducing risk at Sellafield |isbn=9781786042019 |publisher=National Audit Office |date=20 June 2018 |access-date=10 July 2018 |page=27 |quote=The discounted provision has more than tripled since 2015, increasing from £73 billion in 2015 to £234 billion, due to changes in HM Treasury’s discount rates.}}</ref> || n/a || n/a || 234.1 |- |2018-19<ref name=nda-20190704/> || 94.0<br/>(undiscounted) || 30.3<br/>(undiscounted) || 130.7 |- |2019-20<ref name=2020report/> || 96.5<br/>(undiscounted) || 35.1<br/>(undiscounted) || 134.9 |} In 2005, the cost of decommissioning these sites was planned at £55.8{{nbsp}}billion, with Sellafield requiring £31.5{{nbsp}}billion.<ref name=nda-strategy-2005>{{cite report |url=http://www.nda.gov.uk/documents/upload/Draft_Strategy_for_Consultation_2005.pdf |title=NDA Strategy - draft for consultation |page=66 |publisher=Nuclear Decommissioning Authority |year=2005 |access-date=7 December 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091122155158/http://www.nda.gov.uk/documents/upload/Draft_Strategy_for_Consultation_2005.pdf |archive-date=22 November 2009 }}</ref> However, in 2006, the NDA reported that the cost of cleaning up existing waste was higher than previously thought, and gave a new estimated decommissioning cost of about £72{{nbsp}}billion over a 100-year period.<ref name=bbc-20060330>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4859980.stm |title=Nuclear clean-up 'to cost £70bn' |publisher=BBC News |date=30 March 2006 |access-date=2010-05-22}}</ref> In 2008, estimated decommissioning costs increased to £73.6{{nbsp}}billion, or after taking account of [[discount window|discount rates]], £44.1{{nbsp}}billion.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nda.gov.uk/news/arac-0708.cfm |title=Annual Report & Accounts 2007/08 |publisher=Nuclear Decommissioning Authority |access-date=2010-05-22}}</ref> A 2006 estimate foresaw £14{{nbsp}}billion of offsetting income from reprocessing fuel at [[Sellafield]].<ref name=bbc-20060330 /> In 2009, the NDA sold land near three existing reactor sites for expected new nuclear power stations, for over £200{{nbsp}}million.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article5992467.ece |title=Prices soar as bidders fight for nuclear sites |publisher=The Sunday Times |date=29 March 2009 |author=Danny Fortson and Dominic O’Connell |access-date=2010-05-22}}{{dead link|date=September 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> In 2013, a critical [[Public Accounts Committee (United Kingdom)|Public Accounts Committee]] report stated that the private consortium managing Sellafield has failed to reduce costs and delays. Between 2005 and 2013, the annual costs of operating Sellafield increased from £900{{nbsp}}million to about £1.6{{nbsp}}billion. The estimated lifetime [[Annual effective discount rate|undiscounted]] cost of dealing with the Sellafield site increased to £67.5{{nbsp}}billion.<ref name=bbc-20130204>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-21298117 |title=Sellafield clean-up cost reaches 67.5bn, says report |publisher=BBC |date=4 February 2013 |access-date=19 February 2013}}</ref><ref name=guardian-20130204>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/feb/04/sellafield-management-criticised-commons-committee |title=Sellafield management sharply criticised by Commons committee |author=Terry Macalister |newspaper=The Guardian |date=4 February 2013 |access-date=19 February 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite report |url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmpubacc/746/746.pdf |title=Nuclear Decommissioning Authority: Managing risk at Sellafield |work=Committee of Public Accounts |publisher=House of Commons |date=23 January 2013 |access-date=19 February 2013}}</ref> Bosses were forced to apologise after projected clean-up costs passed the £70{{nbsp}}billion mark in late 2013.<ref>{{Cite news |last= Macalister |first= Terry |date= 4 December 2013 |title= Sellafield bosses forced to say sorry over £70bn-plus cleanup costs |url= https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/dec/04/sellafield-boss-sorry-over-cleanup-costs |publisher=[[The Guardian|theguardian.com]] |access-date= 5 December 2013 }}</ref> In 2014, the undiscounted decommissioning cost estimate for Sellafield was increased to £79.1{{nbsp}}billion,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/10921309/Britains-nuclear-clean-up-bill-soars-to-110bn.html|title=Britain's nuclear clean-up bill soars to £110bn|first=Emily|last=Gosden|publisher=The Telegraph|date=23 June 2014|access-date=13 January 2015}}</ref> and by 2015 to £117.4{{nbsp}}billion.<ref name=gov-20160901>{{cite web |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nuclear-provision-explaining-the-cost-of-cleaning-up-britains-nuclear-legacy/nuclear-provision-explaining-the-cost-of-cleaning-up-britains-nuclear-legacy#latest-estimate |title=Nuclear Provision: the cost of cleaning up Britain's historic nuclear sites |publisher=NDA |date=1 September 2016 |access-date=26 February 2017}}</ref> The annual operating cost will be £2{{nbsp}}billion in 2016.<ref name=wnn-20160106>{{cite news |url=http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/C-UK-decommissioning-agency-lays-out-plans-to-2019-06011501.html |title=UK decommissioning agency lays out plans to 2019 |publisher=World Nuclear News |date=6 January 2016 |access-date=26 February 2017}}</ref> In 2018, the [[discount yield|discount rate]] used in evaluating future spending was changed from a [[HM Treasury]] determined real terms discount rate to a rate that combined a nominal discount rate and an implied inflation rate based on [[Consumer Price Index]] forecasts. This nearly halved the estimate of the remaining cost of decommissioning and clean-up.<ref name=nda-20190704>{{cite report |url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/814716/NDA_Annual_Report_and_Accounts_2018_to_2019v2.pdf |title=Annual Report & Accounts 2018/19 |id=HC 2425 |publisher=NDA |pages=84,104,163 |date=4 July 2019 |access-date=25 April 2020}}</ref> The expenditure of the NDA in 2022/23 was £3,759M and income £1,059M, leading to a net expenditure of £2,700M.<ref>{{cite web |title=NDA Annual Report 2022 to 2023 |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nuclear-decommissioning-authority-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/nda-annual-report-2022-to-2023#financial-summary-202223 |publisher=Nuclear Decommissioning Authority |access-date=29 February 2024}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)