Editing Epiousion (section)

====Criticisms====
Those rejecting this translation include some Roman Catholic Biblical scholars, such as [[Raymond E. Brown]],<ref name="ReferenceA">Raymond E. Brown. "The Pater Noster as an Eschatological Prayer." ''Theological Studies'' 1961</ref> [[Jean Carmignac]],<ref name="Carmignac1969">{{cite book|author=Jean Carmignac|title=Recherches sur le "Notre Père."|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=s6gAAAAAMAAJ|year=1969|publisher=Letouzey & Ané}}</ref> and Nicholas Ayo.<ref name="Ayo2002"/>

There is no known source word from Aramaic or Hebrew, the native languages of Jesus, that translates into the Greek word {{transliteration|grc|epiousion}}. In fact, there is no word in either of these languages that easily translates as ''supersubstantial'',<ref name="Pitre2015_172"/> a unique translation for a unique Greek word.

M. Eugene Boring, a Protestant theologian at [[Texas Christian University]], claims that the connection with the Eucharist is ahistoric because he thinks that the ritual only developed some time after the Gospel was written and that the author of Matthew does not seem to have any knowledge of or interest in the Eucharist.<ref>Boring, Eugene "Gospel of Matthew." ''The New Interpreter's Bible, volume 8'' Abingdon, 1995</ref> [[Craig Blomberg]], also a Protestant New Testament scholar, agrees that these "concepts had yet to be introduced when Jesus gave his original prayer and therefore could not have been part of his original meaning."<ref name="Blomberg2015">{{cite book|author=Craig L. Blomberg|title=Neither Poverty nor Riches: A Biblical Theology of Possessions|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L61jCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA131|date=5 March 2015|publisher=InterVarsity Press|isbn=978-0-8308-9933-3 |page=131}}</ref>