Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Iskandar of Johor
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Gomez Incident=== {{Main|1993 amendments to the Constitution of Malaysia#Gomez Incident}} ====Assault==== In late 1992, two separate assault cases by the Sultan as well as his younger son, Tunku Abdul Majid Idris, on hockey coaches culminated in the stripping of immunity of rulers from prosecution. Both cases received considerable attention in the local and international news which was dubbed as "The Gomez Incident".<ref>Crouch (1996), pg 146–7</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.iht.com/articles/1992/12/15/mayl.php|date=15 December 1992|title=Malaysia Prepares To Strip Sultans of Their Immunity|author=Michael Richardson|publisher=[[International Herald Tribune]]}}</ref> The incident was kicked off on 10 July 1992, when Sultan Iskandar's second son, the Tunku Bendahara– Tunku [[Abdul Majid]] Idris, lost his temper during a hockey match with the Perak hockey team after Perak won the match by a penalty stroke, and assaulted the [[Perak]] goalkeeper, Mohamed Ja'afar Mohamed Vello.<ref>Prince to appear before MHF board, by Gerald Martinez, 10 August 1992, [[New Straits Times]]</ref> The goalkeeper later lodged a police report on 30 July. The incident received public attention, especially when the matter was debated in parliament.<ref name="Kershaw110">Kershaw (2001), pg 110</ref> The incident resulted in the Malaysian Hockey Federation issuing Majid — then second-in line to the throne after his elder brother — a ban of five years from participating in any tournaments following investigations.<ref>MHF ban Majid for five years, by Lazarus Rokk, 19 October 1992, New Straits Times</ref> Tunku Abdul Majid was later convicted of assault in January 1993, of which the chief justice sentenced him to a year in prison, on top of a RM 2,000 fine. He was released on a bail, and these charges were later dropped on grounds of immunity, which was still applicable at the time when the act was committed.<ref name="Asian_Bulletin">Asian Bulletin, Asian Peoples' Anti-Communist League, Asian Peoples' Anti-Communist League (China: Republic: 1949– ), Asian-Pacific Anti-Communist League, APLFD (Organization), Published by APACL Publications, 1993, pg 30</ref> The Sultan responded to the ban by putting pressure on the state authorities to pull Johorean hockey teams from all national tournaments.<ref name="Kershaw110"/> In November 1992, Douglas Gomez, a coach for the Maktab Sultan Abu Bakar field hockey team, expressed his displeasure at being called to withdraw from a semi-final national hockey match by the Director of the Johor Education Department. The incident attracted the attention of the Sultan, who personally summoned Gomez to his palace, the [[Istana Bukit Serene]], where he was promptly reprimanded and assaulted by the Sultan.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.capi.uvic.ca/pubs/oc_papers/GILLEN.pdf|date=24–31 December 1992|page=16|title=Bending the rulers: Sultan's behaviour raises doubts over role of royalty|publisher=Far Eastern Economic Review|access-date=20 September 2007|archive-date=26 March 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326111658/http://www.capi.uvic.ca/pubs/oc_papers/GILLEN.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> Following Gomez's meeting with the Sultan, Gomez sought treatment to his face and stomach. Subsequently, he lodged a police report against the Sultan for assault. Gomez elaborated that the Sultan's bodyguards and members of the Johor Military Force present were merely onlookers, and that the Sultan was solely responsible for the injuries.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.capi.uvic.ca/pubs/oc_papers/GILLEN.pdf|date=7 December 1992|title=Gomez: Sultan beat me|pages=1, 3|author=K. Vijayan|work=[[New Straits Times]]|access-date=20 September 2007|archive-date=26 March 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326111658/http://www.capi.uvic.ca/pubs/oc_papers/GILLEN.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> ====Public responses and follow ups==== The assault resulted in a public outcry over the event<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.capi.uvic.ca/pubs/oc_papers/GILLEN.pdf|date=7 December 1992|title=Abdullah: Rakyat ashamed and angry|page=4|work=[[New Straits Times]]|access-date=20 September 2007|archive-date=26 March 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326111658/http://www.capi.uvic.ca/pubs/oc_papers/GILLEN.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> which pressured all levels of the government up to the top ranks of the federal government to investigate into the matter.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.capi.uvic.ca/pubs/oc_papers/GILLEN.pdf|date=7 December 1992|title=Stem violence, Malay congress to government|page=4|work=[[New Straits Times]]|access-date=20 September 2007|archive-date=26 March 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326111658/http://www.capi.uvic.ca/pubs/oc_papers/GILLEN.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> In the closing months of 1992, and also the opening months of 1993, dozens of articles mentioning misdeeds by the royal families of several states–but in particular Sultan Iskandar himself were published.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.capi.uvic.ca/pubs/oc_papers/GILLEN.pdf|date=20 January 1993|title=List of criminal acts done by the Johor Sultan|page=4|work=[[New Straits Times]]|access-date=20 September 2007|archive-date=26 March 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326111658/http://www.capi.uvic.ca/pubs/oc_papers/GILLEN.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> A good deal of these alleged misdeeds that were mentioned included the charging of exorbitant fines–way above the prescribed legal limits–upon offenders who had obstructed the Sultan's car, amongst others.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.capi.uvic.ca/pubs/oc_papers/GILLEN.pdf|date=14 December 1992|title=Motorist: I was fined $500 for blocking royal motorcade|page=2|work=[[New Straits Times]]|access-date=20 September 2007|archive-date=26 March 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326111658/http://www.capi.uvic.ca/pubs/oc_papers/GILLEN.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> Sultan Iskandar, bore the brunt of the backlash by the numerous references centred towards alleged acts of criminal wrongdoings even though many of the listed acts were committed by other members of the royal family.<ref>Aliran Monthly, Aliran Kesedaran Negaran, 1984, pg 30</ref> The criticisms roused by the press prompted Members of Parliament of the [[Dewan Rakyat]] to convene a special session on 10 December 1992. All 96 parliamentarians present passed a unanimous resolution<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.themalaysianinsider.com.my/index.php/business/13599-on-bringing-back-royal-immunity|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090303234834/http://www.themalaysianinsider.com.my/index.php/business/13599-on-bringing-back-royal-immunity|url-status=dead|archive-date=3 March 2009|date=2 December 2008|title=On bringing back royal immunity|author=Abdul Aziz Bari|publisher=The Malaysian Insider}}</ref> which called for action to curb the powers of the rulers if necessary. During the special meeting, parliamentarians disclosed past criminal records of Sultan Iskandar and his two sons, all of whom had been involved in a total of at least 23 cases of assault and manslaughter,<ref>''Malaysia, Singapore & Brunei (2004)'', Rowthorn, Benson, Benson, Kerr, Niven, pg 235</ref><ref name="Asian_Recorder">''Asian Recorder (1993)'', pg 22904</ref> five of which were committed by the Sultan after 1981, two by the Mahkota and three by the Bendahara.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://d.scribd.com/docs/1qk1gf12zfh2pc7brw49.pdf|date=20 January 1993|title=List of criminal acts done by the Johor Sultan|page=4|work=[[New Straits Times]]}}</ref> A bill was passed by both the [[Dewan Rakyat]] and [[Dewan Negara]] on 19 and 20 January 1993 respectively.<ref>Change to take its course: PM tables amendment Bill despite Rulers' disagreement, New Straits Times, 19 January 1993, pg 1, 4.</ref> The bill, which proposed to remove legal immunity was approved by six out of nine sultans<ref>Six Rulers say 'Yes', New Straits Times, 16 January 1993, pg 1, 2</ref>—but saw stiff opposition from three, two of which included Sultan [[Ismail Petra of Kelantan]] and the Sultan Iskandar himself. Sultan Iskandar took up the initiative to obtain more royal support to stall the implementation of the proposed bill. The bill, which proposed to strip rulers and members of the royal families of legal immunity, would make them prosecutable by the law in any cases of proven criminal wrongdoings.<ref>Kershaw (2001), pg 110–2</ref> Sultan Iskandar organised a rally which was to be held outside the palace with the aim of garnering public support to stall the bill's implementation. However, this was cancelled after intense pressure from the government. A report made during the rally quoted Sultan Iskandar calling upon all local civil servants to boycott state and federal functions in a show of support for his motion.<ref>''Summary of World Broadcasts'' (1993), Phrase: "... Straits Times of 21 January, the Sultan of Johor is reported as"</ref> Meanwhile, the federal government continued to pressure the rulers into assenting to the bills, which they did after several revisions of the bill were made by the government. Following which, the proposed bill was enshrined into the [[Constitution of Malaysia|Federal Constitution]] in March 1993.<ref>Crouch (1996), pg 147</ref> The bill allowed rulers who violated the laws to be prosecuted, while the [[Sedition Act (Malaysia)|Sedition Act]] of 1948 was also amended to allow public criticism of the rulers.<ref>''Mahathir, the Secret of the Malaysian Success: The Secret of the Malaysian Success'', Somun, Somun-Krupalija, pg 155</ref> A special court was created–presided by the [[Lord President of the Federal Court]]–to empower and prosecute members of the rulers and immediate members of the royal household.<ref>[http://www.parlimen.gov.my/Undang/1993/Bill-DR-1.pdf A BILL intituled: An Act to amend the Federal Constitution.] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326111659/http://www.parlimen.gov.my/Undang/1993/Bill-DR-1.pdf |date=26 March 2009 }}, [[Dewan Rakyat]], January 1993, Retrieved 7 January 2009</ref> ====Aftermath==== Sultan Iskandar and his family members were not prosecuted for their past violations of the law on grounds that the royal immunity was still applicable when those incidents occurred.<ref>''Jendela masa: kumpulan esei sempena persaraan (2001)'', Othman, Khoo, pg 393</ref> Nevertheless, shortly after the incident, Sultan Iskandar was prompted to take steps to rehabilitate his public image, which was more or less tarnished by the incident. In a public speech shortly after the episode, the Sultan was noted to have somewhat toned down his hardline image and appeared to be somewhat more humble, appealing to Johoreans to maintain their loyalty to him.<ref name="Asian_Bulletin"/> The Gomez incident also led to a review and proposal by the Federal Government in August 1993 to disband the [[Johor Military Forces]] (JMF).<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.capi.uvic.ca/pubs/oc_papers/GILLEN.pdf|date=14 August 1993|title=End to Joh or Military Force, Muhyiddin: Sultan's private army will be disbanded|pages=1, 2|work=[[New Straits Times]]|access-date=20 September 2007|archive-date=26 March 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326111658/http://www.capi.uvic.ca/pubs/oc_papers/GILLEN.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> However, the bill to disband the JMF was subsequently repealed by parliament.<ref>[http://www.parlimen.gov.my/billindex/pdf/1994/Rang%20Undang-Undang%20DR%2020.pdf Rang Undang-Undang Askar Timbalan Setia Negeri Johor (Pembubaran Dan Pemansuhan) 1994] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326111721/http://www.parlimen.gov.my/billindex/pdf/1994/Rang%20Undang-Undang%20DR%2020.pdf |date=26 March 2009 }}, Susunan Fasal, [[Dewan Rakyat]], 1994</ref><ref>[http://www.parlimen.gov.my/Undang/1994/Bill-DR-20.pdf Johore Military Forces (Disbandment And Repeal) Bill 1994] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326111711/http://www.parlimen.gov.my/Undang/1994/Bill-DR-20.pdf |date=26 March 2009 }}, [[Dewan Rakyat]], 1994, Retrieved 7 January 2009</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)