Synchronicity

Template:Short description Template:About Template:Redirect Template:Use Oxford spelling Template:Sidebar with collapsible lists Synchronicity (Template:Langx) is a concept introduced by Carl Jung, founder of analytical psychology, to describe events that coincide in time and appear meaningfully related, yet lack a discoverable causal connection.<ref> Template:Cite encyclopedia</ref> Jung held that this was a healthy function of the mind, although it can become harmful within psychosis.<ref name=Campbell2010>Template:Cite encyclopedia</ref>Template:Sfnp

Jung developed the theory as a hypothetical noncausal principle serving as the intersubjective or philosophically objective connection between these seemingly meaningful coincidences. After coining the term in the late 1920s<ref name=Tarnas2006>Template:Cite book</ref> Jung developed the concept with physicist Wolfgang Pauli through correspondence and in their 1952 work The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche.Template:Sfnp<ref>Jung, Carl Gustav, and Wolfgang Ernst Pauli. [1952] 1955. The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche, translated from German Naturerklärung und Psyche.</ref><ref>Main, Roderick. 2000. "Religion, Science, and Synchronicity". Harvest: Journal for Jungian Studies 46(2):89–107. Archived from the original on 8 December 2006.</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> This culminated in the Pauli–Jung conjecture.<ref name=AtmanspacherFuchs2014>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Beitman, Bernard D. 2009. "Coincidence Studies: A Freudian Perspective Template:Webarchive". PsycCRITIQUES 55(49): Article 8. {{#invoke:doi|main}}. Template:S2CID.</ref><ref name=DiaconisMosteller1989>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name=":0">Jung, Carl G. [1951] 2005. "Synchronicity". Pp. 91–98 in Jung on Synchronicity and the Paranormal, edited by R. Main. London: Taylor & Francis.</ref><ref name=Main2014>Template:Cite book</ref> Jung and Pauli's view was that, just as causal connections can provide a meaningful understanding of the psyche and the world, so too may acausal connections.<ref name=Bishop2008>Template:Cite journal</ref>

A 2016 study found 70% of therapists agreed synchronicity experiences could be useful for therapy. Analytical psychologists hold that individuals must understand the compensatory meaning of these experiences to "enhance consciousness rather than merely build up superstitiousness". However, clients who disclose synchronicity experiences report not being listened to, accepted, or understood. The experience of overabundance of meaningful coincidences can be characteristic of schizophrenic delusion.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Jung used synchronicity in arguing for the existence of the paranormal.<ref name="Roderick">Template:Cite book</ref> This idea was explored by Arthur Koestler in The Roots of CoincidenceTemplate:Sfnp and taken up by the New Age movement. Unlike magical thinking, which believes causally unrelated events to have paranormal causal connection, synchronicity supposes events may be causally unrelated yet have unknown noncausal connection.

The objection from a scientific standpoint is that this is neither testable nor falsifiable, so does not fall within empirical study.<ref name=TSEOP>Template:Cite encyclopedia</ref> Scientific scepticism regards it as pseudoscience. Jung stated that synchronicity events are chance occurrences from a statistical point of view, but meaningful in that they may seem to validate paranormal ideas. No empirical studies of synchronicity based on observable mental states and scientific data were conducted by Jung to draw his conclusions, though studies have since been done Template:See below. While someone may experience a coincidence as meaningful, this alone cannot prove objective meaning to the coincidence.

Statistical laws or probability, show how unexpected occurrences can be inevitable or more likely encountered than people assume. These explain coincidences such as synchronicity experiences as chance events which have been misinterpreted by confirmation biases, spurious correlations, or underestimated probability.<ref>Radford, Benjamin. 4 February 2014. "Synchronicity: Definition & Meaning". Live Science. Retrieved 25 June 2020.</ref><ref name=experience>Template:Cite book</ref>

Origins

File:CGJung.jpg

Carl G. Jung, who coined the term synchronicity between 1928 and 1930

Synchronicity arose with Jung's use of the ancient Chinese divination text I Ching. It has 64 hexagrams, each built from two trigrams or bagua. A divination is made by seemingly random numerical happenings for which the I Ching text gives detailed situational analysis. Richard Wilhelm, translator of Chinese, provided Jung with validation. Jung met Wilhelm in Darmstadt, Germany where Hermann von Keyserling hosted Gesellschaft für Freie Philosophie. In 1923 Wilhelm was in Zurich, as was Jung, attending the psychology club, where Wilhelm promulgated the I Ching. Finally,

I Ching was published with Wilhelm's commentary. I instantly obtained the book and found to my gratification that Wilhelm took much the same view of the meaningful connections as I had. But he knew the entire literature and could therefore fill in the gaps which had been outside my competence.{{#if:Aniela Jaffé (1962)Memories, Dreams, Reflections of C. G. Jung, page 374|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Jung coined the term synchronicity as part of a lecture in May 1930,<ref name=Bishop2008/> or as early as 1928,<ref name=Tarnas2006/> at first for use in discussing Chinese religious and philosophical concepts.<ref name=Bishop2008/><ref name=cambray/> His first public articulation of the term came in 1930 at the memorial address for Richard Wilhelm where Jung stated:<ref name=cambray/>

The science [i.e. cleromancy] of the I Ching is based not on the causality principle but on one which—hitherto unnamed because not familiar to us—I have tentatively called the Template:Em principle.{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

The I Ching is one of the five classics of Confucianism. By selecting a passage according to the traditional chance operations such as tossing coins and counting out yarrow stalks, the text is supposed to give insights into a person's inner states. Jung characterised this as the belief in synchronicity, and himself believed the text to give apt readings in his own experiences.<ref name=IDoP/> He would later also recommend this practice to certain of his patients.<ref name=franz_man/> Jung argued that synchronicity could be found diffused throughout Chinese philosophy more broadly and in various Taoist concepts.<ref name=cambray>Template:Cite journal</ref> Jung also drew heavily from German philosophers Gottfried Leibniz, whose own exposure to I Ching divination in the 17th century was the primary precursor to the theory of synchronicity in the West,<ref name=cambray/> Arthur Schopenhauer, whom Jung placed alongside Leibniz as the two philosophers most influential to his formulation of the concept,<ref name=cambray/><ref name=IDoP/> and Johannes Kepler.<ref name=TSEOP/> He points to Schopenhauer, especially, as providing an early conception of synchronicity in the quote:<ref name=IDoP>Template:Cite dictionary</ref>

All the events in a man's life would accordingly stand in two fundamentally different kinds of connection: firstly, in the objective, causal connection of the natural process; secondly, in a subjective connection which exists only in relation to the individual who experiences it, and which is thus as subjective as his own dreams[.]{{#if:Arthur Schopenhauer"Transcendent Speculation on the Apparent Deliberateness in the Fate of the Individual", Parerga and Paralipomena (1851), Volume 1, Chapter 4, trans. E. F. J. Payne|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

As with Paul Kammerer's theory of seriality developed in the late 1910s, Jung looked to hidden structures of nature for an explanation of coincidences.<ref name=JohansenOsman2015/> In 1932, physicist Wolfgang Pauli and Jung began what would become an extended correspondence in which they discussed and collaborated on various topics surrounding synchronicity, contemporary science, and what is now known as the Pauli effect.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Jung also built heavily upon the idea of numinosity, a concept originating in the work of German religious scholar Rudolf Otto, which describes the feeling of gravitas found in religious experiences, and which perhaps brought greatest criticism upon Jung's theory.<ref name=Kerr2013>Template:Cite encyclopedia</ref> Jung also drew from parapsychologist J. B. Rhine whose work in the 1930s had at the time Template:Em to validate certain claims about extrasensory perception.<ref name=TSEOP/> It was not until a 1951 Eranos conference lecture, after having gradually developed the concept for over two decades, that Jung gave his first major outline of synchronicity.<ref name=Bishop2008/> The following year, Jung and Pauli published their 1952 work The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche (Template:Langx), which contained Jung's central monograph on the subject, "Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle".<ref name=Bishop2008/>

Other notable influences and precursors to synchronicity can be found in: the theological concept of correspondences,<ref>Wolfgang Pauli in letter to Jung 1950</ref><ref>Brach, Jean-Pierre, and Wouter J. Hanegraaff. (2006). "Correspondences". In Dictionary of Gnosis & Western Esotericism, edited by Wouter Hanegraaff.</ref> sympathetic magic,<ref>Robert Todd Carroll, "sympathetic magic" in The Skeptic's Dictionary</ref> astrology,<ref name=franz_man>Marie-Louise von Franz, Man and His Symbols (1964), p. 227</ref> and alchemy.<ref name="TSEOP"/>

Pauli–Jung conjecture

File:Wolfgang Pauli ETH-Bib Portr 01042 (cropped).jpg

Wolfgang Pauli

The Pauli–Jung conjecture is a collaboration in metatheory between physicist Wolfgang Pauli and analytical psychologist Carl Jung, centered on the concept of Template:Nsl. It was mainly developed between the years 1946 and 1954, four years before Pauli's death, and speculates on a Template:Nsl perspective within the disciplines of both collaborators.<ref name=AtmanspacherFuchs2014/><ref name=Atmanspacher2012>Template:Cite journal</ref> Pauli additionally drew on various elements of quantum theory such as complementarity, nonlocality, and the observer effect in his contributions to the project.<ref name=AtmanspacherFuchs2014/><ref name=Filk2014/><ref name=Cambray2014>Template:Cite book</ref> Jung and Pauli thereby "offered the radical and brilliant idea that the currency of these correlations is not (quantitative) statistics, as in quantum physics, but (qualitative) meaning".<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Contemporary physicist T. Filk writes that quantum entanglement, being "a particular type of acausal quantum correlations", was plausibly taken by Pauli as "a model for the relationship between mind and matter in the framework [...] he proposed together with Jung".<ref name="Filk2014">Template:Cite book</ref> Specifically, quantum entanglement may be the physical phenomenon which most closely represents the concept of synchronicity.<ref name="Filk2014" />

Analytical psychology

In analytical psychology, the recognition of seemingly-meaningful coincidences is a mechanism by which unconscious material is brought to the attention of the conscious mind. A harmful or developmental outcome can then result only from the individual's response to such material.<ref name=Campbell2010/><ref name=IDoP/> Jung proposed that the concept could have psychiatric use in mitigating the negative effects of over-rationalisation<ref name=Campbell2010/> and proclivities towards mind–body dualism.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Analytical psychology considers modern modes of thought to rest upon the pre-modern and primordial structures of the psyche. Causal connections thus form the basis of modern worldviews, and connections which lack causal reasoning are seen as Template:Em. This chance-based interpretation, however, is incongruent with the primordial mind, which instead interprets this category as Template:Em.<ref name=Bishop2008/> The primordial framework in fact places emphasis on these connections, just as the modern framework emphasizes causal ones. In this regard, causality, like synchronicity, is a human interpretation imposed onto external phenomena.<ref name=Bishop2008/> Primordial modes of thought are however, according to Jung, necessary constituents of the modern psyche that inevitably protrude into modern life—providing the basis for meaningful interpretation of the world by way of meaning-based connections.<ref name=Bishop2008/> Just as the principles of psychological causality provide meaningful understanding of causal connections, so too the principle of synchronicity attempts to provide meaningful understanding of acasual connections. Jung placed synchronicity as one of three main conceptual elements in understanding the psyche:<ref name=Campbell2010/>

1. Template:Em, as understood in Freudian theory, by which repressed libidinal energy is discharged across the psyche in response to principles of cause and effect—though Jung broadened this to a more generalized mental energy that is "particular to the unfolding of the individual psyche"<ref name=Campbell2010/>
2. Template:Em, by which self-actualisation is an element of the psyche as potential
3. Template:Em, or meaningful chance, by which the potential for self-actualisation is either enhanced or negated

Jung felt synchronicity to be a principle that had explanatory power towards his concepts of archetypes and the collective unconscious.<ref group="lower-roman">Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious: Jung defines the 'collective unconscious' as akin to instincts.</ref> It described a governing dynamic which underlies the whole of human experience and history—social, emotional, psychological, and spiritual. The emergence of the synchronistic paradigm was a significant move away from Cartesian dualism towards an underlying philosophy of double-aspect theory. Some argue this shift was essential in bringing theoretical coherence to Jung's earlier work.<ref>Brown, R. S. 2014. "Evolving Attitudes". International Journal of Jungian Studies 6(3):243–53.</ref><ref group="lower-roman">In the final two pages of the Conclusion to Synchronicity, Jung states that not all coincidences are meaningful and further explains the creative causes of this phenomenon.</ref>

Philosophy of science

Jung held that there was both a philosophical and scientific basis for synchronicity.<ref name="TSEOP"/> He identified the complementary nature of causality and acausality with Eastern sciences and protoscientific disciplines, stating "the East bases much of its science on this irregularity and considers coincidences as the reliable basis of the world rather than causality. Synchronism is the prejudice of the East; causality is the modern prejudice of the West"<ref name=Kerr2013/> (see also: universal causation). Contemporary scholar L. K. Kerr writes:

Template:ErrorTemplate:Main other{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

It is also pointed out that, since Jung took into consideration only the narrow definition of causality—only the efficient cause—his notion of acausality is also narrow and so is not applicable to final and formal causes as understood in Aristotelian or Thomist systems.<ref>Arraj, James. 1996. "Synchronicity and Formal Causality". Ch. 8 in The Mystery of Matter: Nonlocality, Morphic Resonance, Synchronicity and the Philosophy of Nature of St. Thomas Aquinas. Template:Webarchive. Template:ISBN.</ref> Either the final causality is inherent<ref>Template:Cite book </ref> in synchronicity, as it leads to individuation; or synchronicity can be a kind of replacement for final causality. However, such finalism or teleology is considered to be outside the domain of modern science.Template:Cn

Jung's theory, and philosophical worldview implicated by it, includes not only mainstream science thoughts but also esoteric ones and ones that are against mainstream.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Paranormal

File:Brescia Piazza della Loggia Torre dell'Orologio Ziffernblatt 4.jpg

Astral configurations in astrology represent for Jung an example of synchronicity, that is, of a parallel, non-causal relationship between the development of celestial phenomena and those marked by terrestrial time.Template:Sfnp<ref>Liz Greene, Jung's Studies in Astrology: Prophecy, Magic, and the Qualities of Time, Routledge, 2018.</ref>

Jung's use of the concept in arguing for the existence of paranormal phenomena has been widely considered pseudoscientific by modern scientific scepticism.<ref name=TSEOP/> Furthermore, his collaborator Wolfgang Pauli objected to his dubious experiments of the concept involving astrology—which Jung believed to be supported by the laboratory experiments behind the uncertainty principle's formulation.<ref name=Kerr2013/> Jung similarly turned to the works of parapsychologist Joseph B. Rhine to support a connection between synchronicity and the paranormal.<ref name=Kerr2013/> In his book Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle, Jung wrote:

How are we to recognize acausal combinations of events, since it is obviously impossible to examine all chance happenings for their causality? The answer to this is that acausal events may be expected most readily where, on closer reflection, a causal connection appears to be inconceivable.Template:Sfnp It is impossible, with our present resources, to explain ESP [extrasensory perception], or the fact of meaningful coincidence, as a phenomenon of energy. This makes an end of the causal explanation as well, for "effect" cannot be understood as anything except a phenomenon of energy. Therefore it cannot be a question of cause and effect, but of a falling together in time, a kind of simultaneity. Because of this quality of simultaneity, I have picked on the term "synchronicity" to designate a hypothetical factor equal in rank to causality as a principle of explanation.Template:Sfnp

Roderick Main, in the introduction to his 1997 book Jung on Synchronicity and the Paranormal, wrote:<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Studies

• A 1989 overview of research areas and methodology in the study of coincidence published by the Journal of the American Statistical Association addresses various potentials in researching synchronicity experiences.<ref name=DiaconisMosteller1989/>

• A 2009 paper found that, clinically, synchronicity experiences seem to cluster around periods of emotional intensity or major life transitions, such as births, deaths, and marriage.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
• A 2016 study found that clients who have disclosed synchronicity experiences in clinical setting often report not being listened to, accepted, or understood. The study also found that for therapists these experiences often come as a shock and a challenge to their own worldviews,<ref name=RoxburghEvenden2016>Template:Cite journal</ref> prompting researchers to specify a need to provide accurate and reliable information about synchronicity experiences for mental health professionals.Template:Cn
• Another 2016 study of 226 therapists found that 44% reported synchronicity experiences in the therapeutic setting, and 67% felt that synchronicity experiences could be useful for therapy.<ref name=RoxburghRidgwayRoe2016>Template:Cite journal</ref> The study also points out ways of explanations of synchronicity: Template:Quotation
• A 2018 study shows that the concept of synchronicity finds clinical application in psychotherapies in form of a Jungian-specific approach to interpretation. Already the conceptual idea of synchronicity offers the therapist an additional therapeutic tool to put potentially meaningful experienced coincidences between him and the patient into a subjective narrative, which can be experienced by the patient as meaningful. If a synchronistic moment is sensitively recognized, thematized and interpreted as such, it can have positive consequences for the therapeutic relationship and therapy.<ref name="Reefschläger2018">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Scientific reception

Since their inception, Jung's theories of synchronicity have been highly controversial<ref name=TSEOP/> and have never had widespread scientific approval.<ref name=Kerr2013/> Scientific scepticism regards them as pseudoscience.<ref name=TSEOP/> Likewise, mainstream science does not support paranormal explanations of coincidences.<ref name=JohansenOsman2015>Johansen, M. K., and M. Osman. 2015. "Coincidences: A fundamental consequence of rational cognition". New Ideas in Psychology 39:34-44.</ref>

Despite this, synchronicity experiences and the synchronicity principle continue to be studied within philosophy, cognitive science, and analytical psychology.<ref name=Bishop2008/> Synchronicity is widely challenged by the sufficiency of probability theory in explaining the occurrence of coincidences, the relationship between synchronicity experiences and cognitive biases, and doubts about the theory's psychiatric or scientific usefulness.

Psychologist Fritz Levi, a contemporary of Jung, criticised the theory in his 1952 review, published in the periodical {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (New Swiss Observations). Levi saw Jung's theory as vague in determinability of synchronistic events, saying that Jung never specifically explained his rejection of "magic causality" to which such an acausal principle as synchronicity would be related. He also questioned the theory's usefulness.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

In a 1981 paper, parapsychologist Charles Tart writes:

Robert Todd Carroll, author of The Skeptic's Dictionary in 2003, argues that synchronicity experiences are better explained as apophenia—the tendency for humans to find significance or meaning where none exists. He states that over a person's lifetime one can be expected to encounter several seemingly-unpredictable coincidences and that there is no need for Jung's metaphysical explanation of these occurrences.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }} Last updated October 27, 2015.</ref>

In a 2014 interview, emeritus professor and statistician David J. Hand states:

Template:ErrorTemplate:Main other{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

In a 2015 paper, scholars M. K. Johansen and M. Osman state:

Examples

Jung

File:Cetonia aurata MF.jpg

lang}}

Jung tells the following story as an example of a synchronistic event in his 1960 book Synchronicity:

By way of example, I shall mention an incident from my own observation. A young woman I was treating had, at a critical moment, a dream in which she was given a golden scarab. While she was telling me this dream I sat with my back to the closed window. Suddenly I heard a noise behind me, like a gentle tapping. I turned round and saw a flying insect knocking against the window pane from outside. I opened the window and caught the creature in the air as it flew in. It was the nearest analogy to a golden scarab that one finds in our latitudes, a scarabaeid beetle, the common rose-chafer (Cetonia aurata), which contrary to its usual habits had evidently felt an urge to get into a dark room at this particular moment.

It was an extraordinarily difficult case to treat, and up to the time of the dream little or no progress had been made. I should explain that the main reason for this was my patient's animus, which was steeped in Cartesian philosophy and clung so rigidly to its own idea of reality that the efforts of three doctors—I was the third—had not been able to weaken it. Evidently something quite irrational was needed which was beyond my powers to produce. The dream alone was enough to disturb ever so slightly the rationalistic attitude of my patient. But when the "scarab" came flying in through the window in actual fact, her natural being could burst through the armor of her animus possession and the process of transformation could at last begin to move.Template:Sfnp{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

After describing some examples, Jung wrote: "When coincidences pile up in this way, one cannot help being impressed by them—for the greater the number of terms in such a series, or the more unusual its character, the more improbable it becomes."<ref name=":0" />Template:Rp

Deschamps

French writer Émile Deschamps claims in his memoirs that, in 1805, he was treated to some plum pudding by a stranger named Monsieur de Fontgibu. Ten years later, the writer encountered plum pudding on the menu of a Paris restaurant and wanted to order some, but the waiter told him that the last dish had already been served to another customer, who turned out to be de Fontgibu. Many years later, in 1832, Deschamps was at a dinner and once again ordered plum pudding. He recalled the earlier incident and told his friends that only de Fontgibu was missing to make the setting complete—and in the same instant, the now-senile de Fontgibu entered the room, having got the wrong address.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Pauli

In his book Thirty Years That Shook Physics: The Story of Quantum Theory (1966), George Gamow writes about Wolfgang Pauli, who was apparently considered a person particularly associated with synchronicity events. Gamow whimsically refers to the "Pauli effect", a mysterious phenomenon which is not understood on a purely materialistic basis, and probably never will be. The following anecdote is told:

In popular culture

Philip K. Dick makes reference to "Pauli's synchronicity" in his 1963 science-fiction novel, The Game-Players of Titan, in reference to pre-cognitive psionic abilities being interfered with by other psionic abilities such as psychokinesis: "an acausal connective event".<ref>Dick, Philip K. [1963] 1992. The Game-Players of Titan (1st ed.). New York: Vintage Books. Template:ISBN. p. 128.</ref>

In 1983 The Police released an album titled Synchronicity, inspired by Arthur Koestler's discussion of synchronicity in his book The Roots of Coincidence.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> A song from the album, "Synchronicity II", simultaneously describes the story of a man experiencing a mental breakdown and a lurking monster emerging from a Scottish lake.

Björk wrote a song titled "Synchronicity" for Spike Jonze's Hot Chocolate DVD.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Rising Appalachia released a song titled "Synchronicity" on their 2015 album Wider Circles.<ref>Template:Discogs release</ref>

See also

• Template:Annotated link
• Template:Annotated link
• Template:Annotated link
• Template:Annotated link
• Template:Annotated link
• Template:Annotated link

References

Works cited

• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book

Further reading

• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book

External links

• Carl Jung and synchronicity