Lucas primality test

Revision as of 20:18, 14 March 2025 by imported>Suriname0 (Adding local short description: "Algorithm for checking if a number is prime", overriding Wikidata description "primality test")
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Template:Short description Template:For multi

In computational number theory, the Lucas test is a primality test for a natural number n; it requires that the prime factors of n − 1 be already known.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> It is the basis of the Pratt certificate that gives a concise verification that n is prime.

ConceptsEdit

Let n be a positive integer. If there exists an integer a, 1 < a < n, such that

<math>a^{n-1}\ \equiv\ 1 \pmod n \, </math>

and for every prime factor q of n − 1

<math>a^{({n-1})/q}\ \not\equiv\ 1 \pmod n \, </math>

then n is prime. If no such number a exists, then n is either 1, 2, or composite.

The reason for the correctness of this claim is as follows: if the first equivalence holds for a, we can deduce that a and n are coprime. If a also survives the second step, then the order of a in the group (Z/nZ)* is equal to n−1, which means that the order of that group is n−1 (because the order of every element of a group divides the order of the group), implying that n is prime. Conversely, if n is prime, then there exists a primitive root modulo n, or generator of the group (Z/nZ)*. Such a generator has order |(Z/nZ)*| = n−1 and both equivalences will hold for any such primitive root.

Note that if there exists an a < n such that the first equivalence fails, a is called a Fermat witness for the compositeness of n.

ExampleEdit

For example, take n = 71. Then n − 1 = 70 and the prime factors of 70 are 2, 5 and 7. We randomly select an a=17 < n. Now we compute:

<math>17^{70}\ \equiv\ 1 \pmod {71}.</math>

For all integers a it is known that

<math>a^{n - 1}\equiv 1 \pmod{n}\ \text{ if and only if } \text{ ord}(a)|(n-1).</math>

Therefore, the multiplicative order of 17 (mod 71) is not necessarily 70 because some factor of 70 may also work above. So check 70 divided by its prime factors:

<math>17^{35}\ \equiv\ 70\ \not\equiv\ 1 \pmod {71}</math>
<math>17^{14}\ \equiv\ 25\ \not\equiv\ 1 \pmod {71}</math>
<math>17^{10}\ \equiv\ 1\ \equiv\ 1 \pmod {71}.</math>

Unfortunately, we get that 1710≡1 (mod 71). So we still don't know if 71 is prime or not.

We try another random a, this time choosing a = 11. Now we compute:

<math>11^{70}\ \equiv\ 1 \pmod {71}.</math>

Again, this does not show that the multiplicative order of 11 (mod 71) is 70 because some factor of 70 may also work. So check 70 divided by its prime factors:

<math>11^{35}\ \equiv\ 70\ \not\equiv\ 1 \pmod {71}</math>
<math>11^{14}\ \equiv\ 54\ \not\equiv\ 1 \pmod {71}</math>
<math>11^{10}\ \equiv\ 32\ \not\equiv\ 1 \pmod {71}.</math>

So the multiplicative order of 11 (mod 71) is 70, and thus 71 is prime.

(To carry out these modular exponentiations, one could use a fast exponentiation algorithm like binary or addition-chain exponentiation).

AlgorithmEdit

The algorithm can be written in pseudocode as follows:

algorithm lucas_primality_test is
    input: n > 2, an odd integer to be tested for primality.
           k, a parameter that determines the accuracy of the test.
    output: prime if n is prime, otherwise composite or possibly composite.

    determine the prime factors of n−1.

    LOOP1: repeat k times:
        pick a randomly in the range [2, n − 1]
            Template:Nowrap
                return composite
            else Template:Nowrap
                LOOP2: for all prime factors q of n−1:
                    Template:Nowrap
                        if we checked this equality for all prime factors of n−1 then
                            return prime
                        else
                            continue LOOP2
                    else Template:Nowrap
                        continue LOOP1

    return possibly composite.

See alsoEdit

NotesEdit

Template:Reflist

Template:Number theoretic algorithms