Template:Short description Template:More citations needed Template:Use dmy dates Template:IPA notice
Russian orthography has been reformed officially and unofficially by changing the Russian alphabet over the course of the history of the Russian language. Several important reforms happened in the 18th–20th centuries.
Early changesEdit
Old East Slavic adopted the Cyrillic script, approximately during the 10th century and at about the same time as the introduction of Eastern Christianity into the territories inhabited by the Eastern Slavs. No distinction was drawn between the vernacular language and the liturgical, though the latter was based on South Slavic rather than Eastern Slavic norms. As the language evolved, several letters, notably the yuses (Ѫ, Ѭ, Ѧ, Ѩ) were gradually and unsystematically discarded from both secular and church usage over the next centuries.
The emergence of the centralized Russian state in the 15th and 16th centuries, the consequent rise of the state bureaucracy along with the development of the common economic, political and cultural space necessitated the standardization of the language used in administrative and legal affairs. It was due to that reason that the earliest attempts at standardizing Russian, both in terms of the vocabulary and in terms of the orthography, were made initially based on the so-called Moscow chancery language. From then and on the underlying logic of language reforms in Russia reflected primarily the considerations of standardizing and streamlining language norms and rules in order to ensure the language's role as a practical tool of communication and administration.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
18th-century changesEdit
,_page_5.gif){kind=link}
Template:Sister project The printed Russian alphabet began to assume its modern shape when Peter I introduced his "civil script" ({{#invoke:Lang|lang}}) type reform in 1708.<ref name="Yefimov" /> The reform was not specifically orthographic in nature. However, with the replacement of Ѧ with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} and the effective elimination of several letters (Ѯ, Ѱ, Ѡ) and all diacritics and accents (with the exception of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}) from secular usage and the use of Arabic numerals instead of Cyrillic numerals<ref name="Yefimov">Template:Citation</ref> there appeared for the first time a visual distinction between Russian and Church Slavonic writing. With the strength of the historic tradition diminishing, Russian spelling in the 18th century became rather inconsistent, both in practice and in theory, as Mikhail Lomonosov advocated a morphophonemic orthography and Vasily Trediakovsky a phonemic one.
19th-century changesEdit
Throughout the 18th and 19th centuries, miscellaneous adjustments were made ad hoc, as the Russian literary language came to assume its modern and highly standardized form. These included the introduction of the letter {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (yo) and the gradual loss of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (izhitsa, corresponding to the Greek upsilon υ and the Latin y), in favor of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} or {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (both of which represented {{#invoke:IPA|main}}); and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (fita, corresponding to the Greek theta θ), in favor of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} or {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}. (The standard Russian language neither has nor ever had a voiceless dental fricative. The {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} was used only for foreign words, particularly Greek.)
By 1917, the only two words still spelled with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} in common use were {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (Template:Transliteration, {{#invoke:IPA|main}}, 'chrism') and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (Template:Transliteration, {{#invoke:IPA|main}}, 'synod'). The {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} remained more common, though it became quite rare as a "Western" (French-like) pronunciation had been adopted for many words; for example, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (Template:Transliteration, {{#invoke:IPA|main}}, 'theater') became {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (Template:Transliteration, {{#invoke:IPA|main}}).
Attempts to reduce spelling inconsistency culminated in the 1885 standard textbook of Yakov Karlovich Grot, which retained its authority through 21 editions until the Russian Revolution of 1917. His fusion of the morphological, phonetic, and historic principles of Russian orthography remains valid to this day, though both the Russian alphabet and the writing of many individual words have been altered through a complicated but extremely consistent system of spelling rules that tell which of two vowels to use under all conditions.<ref name="auto">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
Post-revolution reformEdit
The most recent major reform of Russian spelling was prepared by Aleksey Shakhmatov and implemented shortly after the Bolshevik revolution of November 1917.
Shakhmatov headed the Assembly for Considering Simplification of the Orthography whose proposals of 11 May 1917 formed the basis of the new rules soon adopted by the Ministry of Popular Education.<ref name="ComrieEtAl1996">Template:Cite book</ref>
Specific changesEdit
Russian orthography was made simpler and easier by unifying several adjectival and pronominal inflections, conflating the letter {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (Yat) with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}. Additionally, the archaic mute yer became obsolete, including the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (the "hard sign") in final position following consonants (thus eliminating practically the last graphical remnant of the Old Slavonic open-syllable system). For instance, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} became {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} ("Rybinsk").
Examples:
- {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} to {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (children)
- {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} to {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (Jesus Christ)
- {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} to {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (marathon)
- {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} to {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (Petrograd)
- {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} to {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (region/district)
- {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} to {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (Russia)
- {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} to {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} – The United States of America (Template:Lit, popular pre-revolutionary name of the United States in Russia)
- {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} to {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (synod)
In a complex system of cases, the genitive adjectival ending {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} was replaced with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} after {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} ({{#invoke:Lang|lang}} → {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}), in other instances {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} was replaced with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (for example: {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} → {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} → {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}), respectively.
19th-century spelling prescriptions distinguished feminine and neuter plural adjectival endings {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} from masculine plural endings {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (with no difference in pronunciation). Although Old East Slavic distinction of genders in the plural (masculine {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, feminine {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, neuter {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}) had died in speech long ago, 18th-century writers still tried to distinguish genders in the spelling, and Mikhail Lomonosov's variant was chosen as the standard. The reform gave the uniform {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} for all the three genders ({{#invoke:Lang|lang}} → {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}).
19th-century spelling prescriptions gave the spellings {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} for feminine plural forms, but {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} for masculine and neuter plural forms. Although these forms were prescribed to be pronounced differently, the difference was not usually observed in everyday speech; pronunciations were used interchangeably, the one with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} being more common.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The reform gave the uniform spelling {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} for all genders. However, when {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} were pronounced according to the spelling in poetic rhymes, modern editions write them as {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}.
19th-century spelling prescriptions gave the spelling of the feminine pronoun {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} in the genitive case, but {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} in the accusative case, whereas it was usually pronounced as {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} in both cases. The reform gave uniform spelling for both cases: {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (or {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, with the optional letter Ё). However, sometimes {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} was pronounced according to the spelling in poetic rhymes. In that case, it is not changed in modern editions.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Prefixes ending with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} underwent a change: now all of them (except {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}) end with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} before voiceless consonants and with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} before voiced consonants or vowels ({{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, but {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}). Previously, the prefixes showed concurrence between phonetic (as now) and morphological (always {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}) spellings; at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century the standard rule was: {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} were always written in this way; other prefixes ended with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} before voiceless consonants except {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} and with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} otherwise ({{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, but {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}). Earlier 19th-century works also sometimes used {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} before {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}.
Practical implementationEdit
In December 1917, the People's Commissariat of Education, headed by A. V. Lunacharsky, issued a decree stating, "All state and government institutions and schools without exception should carry out the transition to the new orthography without delay. From 1 January 1918, all government and state publications, both periodical and non-periodical Template:Sic? to be printed in the new style."<ref name="ComrieEtAl1996" /><ref name="Chernyshev1947">Template:Cite book</ref> The decree was nearly identical to the proposals put forth by the May Assembly, and with other minor modifications formed the substance of the decree issued by the Soviet of People's Commissars in October 1918.<ref name="ComrieEtAl1996" /><ref name="Chernyshev1947" />
In this way, private publications could formally be printed using the old (or more generally, any convenient) orthography. The decree forbade the retraining of people previously trained under the old norm. A given spelling was considered incorrect only if it violated both the old and the new norms.
However, in practice, the Soviet government rapidly set up a monopoly on print production and kept a very close eye on the fulfillment of the edict. A common practice was the forced removal of not just the letters {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} from printing offices, but also {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}. Because of this, the usage of the apostrophe as a dividing sign became widespread in place of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (e.g., {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} instead of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}), and came to be perceived as a part of the reform (even if, from the point of view of the letter of the decree of the Council of People's Commissars, such uses were mistakes). Nonetheless, some academic printings (connected with the publication of old works, documents or printings whose typesettings predated the revolution) came out in the old orthography (except title pages and, often, prefaces) up until 1929.<ref name="auto1">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
Russian – and later Soviet – railroads operated locomotives with designations of "{{#invoke:Lang|lang}}", "{{#invoke:Lang|lang}}" and "{{#invoke:Lang|lang}}". (Although the letter Ѵ was not mentioned in the spelling reform,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> contrary to the statement in the Great Soviet Encyclopedia,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> it had already become very rare prior to the revolution.) Despite the altered orthography, the series names remained unchanged up until these locomotives were discontinued in the 1950s.
Some Russian émigré publications continued to appear in the former orthography until the 1970s.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
SimplificationEdit
The reform reduced the number of orthographic rules having no support in pronunciation—for example, the difference of the genders in the plural and the need to learn a long list of words which were written with yats (the composition of said list was controversial among linguists, and different spelling guides contradicted one another).
The reform resulted in some economy in writing and typesetting, due to the exclusion of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} at the end of words—by the reckoning of Lev Uspensky, text in the new orthography was shorter by one-thirtieth.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
The reform removed pairs of completely homophonous graphemes from the Russian alphabet (i.e., {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}; {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}; and the trio of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}), bringing the alphabet closer to the Russian language's actual phonological system.<ref name="auto"/>
CriticismEdit
According to critics, the choice of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} as the only letter to represent that side and the removal of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} defeated the purpose of 'simplifying' the language, as {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} occupies more space and, furthermore, is sometimes indistinguishable from {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}.<ref name="auto1"/>
The reform also created many homographs and homonyms, which used to be spelled differently. Examples: {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}/{{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (is/to eat) and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}/{{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (peace/world) became {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} in both instances.
Replacement of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} by {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} was especially controversial, as these feminine pronouns were deeply rooted in the language and extensively used by writers and poets.Template:Citation needed
ComparisonEdit
The following is the same opening paragraph from The Bronze Horseman by Alexander Pushkin in its original version (left) and post-reform version (right):
Mid-20th-century changesEdit
While there have not been any significant changes since the 1918 decree, debates and fluctuations have to some degree continued.
In December 1942, the use of letter Ё was made mandatory by Decree No. 1825 of the People's Commissariat of Education.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Since then, Ё is taught in schools as the seventh letter of the Russian alphabet (before 1942, it was usually considered a modification of Е and not a separate letter). However, the consistent use of Ё did not consolidate its grip in general publication; the usual typographic practice reverted to selective use of Ё (to show pronunciation of rare words and to distinguish words that are otherwise homographs). By 1952, normatives on checking school works, the Great Soviet Encyclopedia, and the reference book for typographers by K. I. Bylinsky had declared the letter Ё to be optional.
A codification of the rules of Russian orthography and punctuation<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> and the Spelling Dictionary of the Russian Language<ref>Орфографический словарь русского языка : 110 000 слов / Акад. наук СССР, Ин-т языкознания; [под ред. С. И. Ожегова и А. Б. Шапиро]. – Москва : ГИС, 1956. – 1259, [2] с.</ref> were published in 1956 but only a few minor orthographic changes were introduced at that time.<ref>These include the changing of "{{#invoke:Lang|lang}}" to "{{#invoke:Lang|lang}}" in a few words such as "{{#invoke:Lang|lang}}" and adding a hyphen to the words "{{#invoke:Lang|lang}}" and "{{#invoke:Lang|lang}}". Отбой учебной тревоги Template:Webarchive Template:In lang</ref> Those editions gave end to a number of variant spellings that existed in dictionaries and in usage of typographers and best writers at that time.<ref>For example: pre-1956 spellings идти/итти, прийти/придти, пенснэ/пенсне, диета/диэта, танцевать/танцовать, деревенеть/деревянеть, дощатый/досчатый were set in 1956 to be spelled идти, прийти, пенсне, диета, танцевать, деревенеть, дощатый. Русское правописание сегодня: О «Правилах русской орфографии и пунктуации» Template:In lang</ref> The 1956 codification additionally included a clarification of new rules for punctuation developed during the 1930s, and which had not been mentioned in the 1918 decree.<ref name="ComrieEtAl1996" />
A notable instance of renewed debate followed A. I. Efimov's 1962 publication of an article in Izvestia.<ref>Template:Cite journalTemplate:Full citation needed</ref><ref name="Klein1964">Template:Cite journal</ref> The article proposed extensive reform to move closer to a phonetic representation of the language.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Following the renewed discussion in papers and journals, a new Orthographic Commission began work in 1962, under the Russian Language Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. The Commission published its report, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (Proposal for the Improvement of Russian Orthography), in 1964.<ref name="Protchenko1964">Template:Cite journal</ref> The publication resulted in widespread debate in newspapers, journals, and on radio and television, as well as over 10,000 letters, all of which were passed to the institute.<ref name="ComrieEtAl1996" />
Responses to the article pointed to the need to simplify Russian spelling due to the use of Russian as the language of international communication in the Soviet Union and an increased study of Russian in the Eastern Bloc as well as in the West. That instruction for non-native speakers of Russian was one of the central concerns of further reform is indicated in the resistance to Efimov's proposal to drop the terminal "ь" (soft sign) from feminine nouns, as it helps learners identify gender category. Additionally, Efimov claimed that a disproportionate amount of primary school class time was devoted to orthography, rather than phonetics and morphology. Efimov asserted that the existing orthography was essentially unchanged since Grot's codification, and that only by bringing orthography closer to phonetic realization, and eliminating exceptions and variants, could appropriate attention be paid to stylistics and the "development of speech culture". The state's focus on proper instruction in Russian, as the national language of ethnic Russians, as the state language, and as the language of international communication continues to the present day.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="Klein1964" /><ref name="Klein2016">Template:Cite thesis</ref> Eventually, the 1964 project remained a dead proposal.
EncodingEdit
The IETF language tags have been registered:<ref name="IANA">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
- <syntaxhighlight lang="text" class="" style="" inline="1">ru-petr1708</syntaxhighlight> for text from the Peter reforms of 1708 until the 1917–18 reforms.
- <syntaxhighlight lang="text" class="" style="" inline="1">ru-luna1918</syntaxhighlight> for text following the 1917–18 reforms.
See alsoEdit
References and notesEdit
External linksEdit
- Criticism of the 1918 reform Template:In lang
- CyrAcademisator Bi-directional online transliteration for ALA-LC (diacritics), scientific, ISO/R 9, ISO 9, GOST 7.79B and others. Supports pre-reform characters
- The Writing on the Wall: The Russian Orthographic Reform of 1918
- Славеница (Slavenitsa): online converter from post-1918 to pre-1918 Russian