Template:Use dmy dates Template:Short description Template:Distinguish {{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |$B= Template:Ambox }} Template:Party politics Nonpartisanship, also known as nonpartisanism, is a lack of affiliation with a political party and a lack of political bias.<ref>The Merriam-Webster's dictionary defines nonpartisan as: Not partisan; free from party affiliation, bias, or designation. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
While an Oxford English Dictionary definition of partisan includes adherents of a party, cause, person, etc.,<ref>Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd. ed, partisan</ref> in most cases, nonpartisan refers specifically to political party connections rather than being the strict antonym of "partisan".<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
CanadaEdit
In Canada, the Legislative Assembly of the Northwest Territories and the Legislative Assembly of Nunavut are the only bodies at the provincial/territorial level that are currently nonpartisan; they operate on a consensus government system. The autonomous Nunatsiavut Assembly operates similarly on a sub-provincial level.
IndiaEdit
In India, the Jaago Re! One Billion Votes campaign was a non-partisan campaign initiated by Tata Tea, and Janaagraha to encourage citizens to vote in the 2009 Indian general election.Template:Citation needed The campaign was a non-partisan campaign initiated by Anal Saha.
United StatesEdit
{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Historian Sean Wilentz argues that from the days of George Washington's farewell address, to Senator Barack Obama's speech at the Democratic national convention in 2004, politicians have called upon Americans to move beyond parties. Wilentz calls this the post-partisan style, and argues that "the antiparty current is by definition antidemocratic, as political parties have been the only reliable electoral vehicles for advancing the ideas and interests of ordinary voters".<ref>p. 28</ref> However, nonpartisan elections are quite common at the local level, primarily in an effort to keep national issues from being mixed up with local issues.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Today, nonpartisan elections are generally held for municipal and county offices, especially school board, and are also common in the election of judges. The unicameral Legislature of Nebraska is the only state legislature that is entirely officially nonpartisan; additionally, the bicameral Fono of American Samoa is the only territorial legislature that is officially nonpartisan.
Although elections may be officially nonpartisan, in some elections (usually involving larger cities or counties, as well as the Nebraska unicameral) the party affiliations of candidates are generally known, most commonly by the groups endorsing a particular candidate (e.g., a candidate endorsed by a labor union would be generally affiliated with the Democratic Party, while a candidate endorsed by a business coalition would be generally affiliated with the Republican Party).<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Churches and other 501(c)(3) organizationsEdit
Churches and charities in the United States are mainly formed under US Internal Revenue Service tax code 501(c)(3) non-profit organization regulations. To maintain that tax-exempt status, and the ability for donors to take a tax deduction, they are required to remain nonpartisan.<ref>Eyes wide shut: The ambiguous "political activity" prohibition and its effects on 501(c)(3) organizations, Houston Business and Tax Journal Template:Webarchive, by Amelia Elacqua, 2008, pages 118, 119 and 141, referenced 16 February 2012</ref>
This has caused some to question the ability of organizations that have the appearance of partisanship.
The Brookings Institution is a Washington, D.C. think tank and 501(c)(3) non-profit, nonpartisan organization. Since its founding in 1916, it has had both identifiable Republicans and Democrats among its leadership. Owing to leadership changes such as this, some argue that it is a good example of a nonpartisan organization. The New York Times has at times listed the organization as being liberal, liberal-centrist, centrist, and conservative.<ref name="NYT">Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Next Generation of Conservatives (By the Dormful) Template:Webarchive by Jason DeParle, New York Times, 14 June 2005</ref><ref>Silicon Valley's New Think Tank Stakes Out 'Radical Center' Template:Webarchive by Neil A. Lewis, New York Times, 15 May 1999</ref><ref>ECONOMIC VIEW; Friedman And Keynes, Trading Pedestals Template:Webarchive by Tom Redburn, New York Times, 24 September 2000</ref><ref>Marshall A. Robinson, 83, Former Foundation Chief, Dies Template:Webarchive by Wolfgang Saxon, New York Times, 13 January 2006</ref> In 2008, The New York Times published an article where it referred to the "conservative Brookings Institution".<ref name="NYT"/>
Nonpartisan LeagueEdit
In the Progressive Era, the Nonpartisan League was an influential socialist political movement, especially in the Upper Midwest, particularly during the 1910s and 1920s. It also contributed much to the ideology of the former Progressive Party of Canada. It went into decline and merged with the Democratic Party of North Dakota to form the North Dakota Democratic–NPL Party in 1956.
MilwaukeeEdit
In the history of Milwaukee, the "Nonpartisans" were an unofficial but widely recognized coalition of Republicans and Democrats who cooperated in an effort to keep Milwaukee's Sewer Socialists out of as many offices as possible, including in elections which were officially non-partisan, but in which Socialists and "Nonpartisans" were clearly identified in the press.<ref>"School Board Returns Even: Both Nonpartisans and Socialists Pick Five Candidates Each" Milwaukee Journal 18 March 1931; p. 1, col. 7</ref> (Such candidates were sometimes called "fusion" candidates.<ref>"Fusion In Many Districts; Old Parties Unite On Legislative Candidates" Milwaukee Journal 1 November 1918; p. 9, col. 2</ref>) This lasted from the 1910s<ref>Avella, Steven M. Milwaukee Catholicism: Essays on Church and Community Milwaukee: Milwaukee Knights of Columbus, 1991; pp. 43–44</ref> well into the 1940s. (The similar effort in 1888 to prevent Herman Kroeger's election as a Union Labor candidate had been conducted under the banner of a temporary "Citizen's Party" label.<ref>Wells, Robert W. This Is Milwaukee New York: Doubleday, 1970; p. 169</ref>) During the period of Socialist-Progressive cooperation (1935–1941), the two sides were called "Progressives" and "Nonpartisans".<ref>Cibulka, James G. and Olson, Frederick I. "The Organization of the Milwaukee Public School System" in Seeds of Crisis: Public Schooling in Milwaukee since 1920 Rury, John L. and Cassell, Frank A., eds. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993; p. 104</ref>
See alsoEdit
- Apoliticism
- Decline to state
- Freedom of information
- Journalistic objectivity
- Independent politician
- Independent voter
- Media reform
- Neutrality
- Non-partisan democracy
- Objectivity (science)
- Partisan (politics)
- Party switching
- Subjectivity and objectivity (philosophy)