Template:Short description {{#invoke:other uses|otheruses}} Template:Use dmy dates

Template:Anthropology of religion

Comparative religion is the branch of the study of religions with the systematic comparison of the doctrines and practices, themes and impacts (including migration) of the world's religions. In general the comparative study of religion yields a deeper understanding of the fundamental philosophical concerns of religion such as ethics, metaphysics and the nature and forms of salvation. It also considers and compares the origins and similarities shared between the various religions of the world. Studying such material facilitates a broadened and more sophisticated understanding of human beliefs and practices regarding the sacred, numinous, spiritual and divine.<ref>"Human beings' relation to that which they regard as holy, sacred, spiritual, and divine" Encyclopædia Britannica (online, 2006), cited in {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

In the field of comparative religion, a common geographical classification<ref name="EB" /> of the main world religions distinguishes groups such as Middle Eastern religions (including Abrahamic religions and Iranian religions), Indian religions, East Asian religions, African religions, American religions, Oceanic religions, and classical Hellenistic religions.<ref name="EB">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

There also exist various sociological classifications of religious movements.

HistoryEdit

File:Monumento a Ibn Hazm.jpg
A statue of Ibn Hazm, father of modern comparative religious studies, in Córdoba Spain.

Al-Biruni (973 – Template:Circa) and Ibn Hazm (994 – 1064), both of the Islamic Golden Age and considered the "fathers of comparative religion", compared the study of religious pluralism and their works have been significant in the fields of theology and philosophy.<ref name="Arberry">Ibn Hazm. The Ring of the Dove: A Treatise on the Art and Practice of Arab Love Template:Webarchive (Preface). Trans. A. J. Arberry. Luzac Oriental, 1997 Template:ISBN</ref><ref name=brill>R. Arnaldez, Ibn Ḥazm Template:Webarchive. Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Brill Online, 2013. Reference. 9 January 2013</ref><ref name=gulf>Joseph A. Kechichian, A mind of his own Template:Webarchive. Gulf News: 21:30 December 20, 2012.</ref><ref name="hadithsunnah">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Al-Biruni discussed his idea of history in The Remaining Signs of Past Centuries (Template:Circa AD) which was translated by Eduard Sachau in the 19th century. It is a comparative study of calendars of different cultures and civilizations, interlaced with mathematical, astronomical, and historical information, exploring the customs and religions of different peoples.<ref name=Khan>M. S. Khan (1976). "al-Biruni and the Political History of India", Oriens 25, pp. 86-115.</ref>

In the seventeenth century, antiquarians such as Athanasius Kircher along with Sir Thomas Browne were pioneering scholars of comparative religion.

Social scientists in the 19th century took a strong interest in comparative and "primitive" religion through the work of Max Müller, Edward Burnett Tylor, William Robertson Smith, James George Frazer, Émile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Rudolf Otto.<ref>Hans Kippenberg, Discovering Religious History in the Modern Age (2001).</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Nicholas de Lange, Professor of Hebrew and Jewish Studies at Cambridge University, says that

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

The comparative study of religions is an academic discipline which has been developed within Christian theology faculties, and it has a tendency to force widely differing phenomena into a kind of strait-jacket cut to a Christian pattern. The problem is not only that other 'religions' may have little or nothing to say about questions which are of burning importance for Christianity, but that they may not even see themselves as religions in precisely the same way in which Christianity sees itself as a religion.<ref>Nicholas de Lange, Judaism, Oxford University Press, 1986</ref>{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}Examples that demonstrate this point are Buddhism and Chinese Folk Religions. These belief systems have not historically been seen as mutually exclusive and have blended over time into different beliefs such as Pure Land Buddhism. This shows a marked difference from Western conceptions of religions, which see adherence to one religion as precluding membership of another faith.<ref>Yong, A. (2016). Many tongues, many buddhisms in a pluralistic world: A christian interpretation at the interreligious crossroads. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 43(2), 357-IV.</ref>

Hinduism and Buddhism provide another insight in the form of soteriology. Comparative study of religions may approach religions with a base idea of salvation with eternal life after death, but religions like Hinduism or Buddhism don't necessarily share this view. Instead, Hinduism and Theravada Buddhism both speak of a falling back into nonexistence and escaping the cycle of reincarnation, rather than eternal life after death.<ref name=":3">Batchelor, S. (2012). A secular buddhism. Journal of Global Buddhism, 13, 87-107. Template:ProQuest</ref><ref>Osto, D. (2018). NO-SELF IN SĀṂKHYA: A COMPARATIVE LOOK AT CLASSICAL SĀṂKHYA AND THERAVĀDA BUDDHISM. Philosophy East and West, 68(1), 201-222,III. Template:ProQuest</ref>

Geographical classificationEdit

According to Charles Joseph Adams, in the field of comparative religion, a common geographical classification discerns<ref name="EB"/> the main world religions as follows:<ref name="EB" />

  1. Middle Eastern religions, including Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Zoroastrianism, and a variety of ancient belief systems;
  2. East Asian religions, the religious communities of China, Japan, Korea and Vietnam, and consisting of Confucianism, Taoism, the various schools of Mahayana ("Greater Vehicle") Buddhism, and Shintō;
  3. Indian religions, including early Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism, Sikhism, and sometimes also the Theravada ("Way of the Elders") Buddhism and the Hindu- and Buddhist-inspired religions of South and Southeast Asia;
  4. African religions, the ancient belief systems of the various indigenous peoples of Africa, excluding ancient Egyptian religion, which is considered to belong to the ancient Middle East;
  5. American religions, the beliefs and practices of the various Indigenous peoples of the two American continents;
  6. Oceanic religions, the religious systems of the peoples of the Pacific islands, Australia, and New Zealand; and
  7. Religions of ancient Greece and Rome and their Hellenistic descendants.

Middle Eastern religionsEdit

Abrahamic or Western Asian religionsEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}

In the study of comparative religion, the category of Abrahamic religions includes the three monotheistic religions, Christianity, Islam and Judaism, which claim Abraham (Hebrew Avraham אַבְרָהָם; Arabic Ibrahim إبراهيم ) as a part of their sacred history. Smaller religions such as the Baháʼí Faith that fit this description are sometimes included but are often omitted.<ref>Why Abrahamic? Template:Webarchive Lubar Institute for the Study of the Abrahamic Religions at the University of Wisconsin</ref>

The original belief in the God of Abraham eventually became strictly monotheistic present-day Rabbinic Judaism. Religious Jews regard Judaism as the expression of the covenant that God established with the Children of Israel. Jews hold that the Torah forms part of the larger text known as the Tanakh or the Hebrew Bible. They also look to a supplemental oral tradition represented by later texts such as the Midrash and the Talmud.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Christians believe that Christianity represents the fulfillment and continuation of the Jewish Old Testament. Christians believe that Jesus (Hebrew Yeshua יֵשׁוּעַ) is the awaited Messiah (Christ) foretold in the Old Testament prophecies, and also honor the subsequently produced New Testament scriptures.<ref>Template:Citation</ref> Generally, Christians believe that Jesus is both the incarnation of God and the Son of God. Their creeds generally hold in common that the incarnation, ministry, suffering, death on the cross, and resurrection of Jesus took place for the salvation of mankind.<ref>Template:Citation</ref>

Islam teaches that the present Christian and Jewish scriptures have been corrupted over time and are no longer the original divine revelations as given to the Jewish people and to Moses, Jesus, and other prophets. For Muslims, the Quran is the final, complete revelation from God (Arabic الله Allah); they believe it to have been revealed to Muhammad alone, whom they characterise as the final prophet of Islam and as the Khatam an-Nabiyyin, meaning the last of the prophets ever sent by Allah ("seal of the prophets").

Based on the Muslim figure of the Mahdī, the ultimate savior of humankind and the final Imām of the Twelve Imams, Ali Muhammad Shirazi, later known as "the Báb", created the Bábí movement out of the belief that he was the gate to the Twelfth Imām. This signaled a break with Islam and started a new religious system, Bábism. However, in the 1860s a split occurred, after which the vast majority of Bábís who considered Mirza Husayn `Ali or Bahá'u'lláh to be the Báb's spiritual successor founded the Baháʼí Movement, while the minority who followed Subh-i-Azal came to be called Azalis.<ref>"But the upshot of the whole matter is, that out of every hundred Bábís probably not more than three or four are Ezelís [sic], all the rest accepting Behá'u'lláh [sic] as the final and most perfect manifestation of the Truth." (Browne (1889) p. 351 Template:Webarchive)</ref> The Baháʼí division eventually became a full-fledged religion in its own right, the Baháʼí Faith. In comparison to the other Abrahamic religions - Judaism, Christianity and Islam - the number of adherents for Baháʼí faith and other minor Abrahamic religions are not very numerous.

Out of the three major Abrahamic faiths, Christianity and Judaism are the two religions that diverge the most in theology and practice.

The historical interaction between Islam and Judaism started in the 7th century CE with the origin and spread of Islam. There are many common aspects between Islam and Judaism, and as Islam developed, it gradually became the major religion closest to Judaism. In contrast to Christianity, which originated from interaction between ancient Greek, Roman, and Hebrew cultures, Judaism is very similar to Islam in its fundamental religious outlook, structure, jurisprudence and practice.<ref>Rabbi David Rosen, Jewish-Muslim Relations, Past and Present Template:Webarchive, November 2003</ref> There are many traditions within Islam that originate from traditions which are recorded in the Hebrew Bible or which stem from post-biblical Jewish traditions. These practices are known collectively as the Isra'iliyat.<ref>Rabbi Justin Jaron Lewis, Islam and Judaism Template:Webarchive, October 2001</ref>

The historical interaction between Christianity and Islam connects fundamental ideas in Christianity with similar ones in Islam. Islam accepts many aspects of Christianity as part of its faithTemplate:Sndwith some differences in interpretationTemplate:Sndand rejects other aspects; for example, it simplifies complex Christian Christological teaching and completely avoids the potential pitfalls of Trinitarianism. Islam holds that the Quran is the final revelation from God and a completion of all previous revelations, including the Bible.

Mandaeism, sometimes also known as Sabianism (after the mysterious Sabians mentioned in the Quran, a name historically claimed by several religious groups),<ref>Template:Cite encyclopedia Template:Cite book p. 5.</ref> is a Gnostic and monotheistic religion.<ref name="Mandaens">Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> John the Baptist is their chief prophet, and frequent baptism is part of their core practices. According to most scholars, Mandaeism originated sometime in the first three centuries CE, either in southwestern Mesopotamia or in the Syro-Palestinian area.<ref name="auto">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> However, some scholars take the view that Mandaeism is older and dates from pre-Christian times.<ref>Etudes mithriaques 1978 p545, Jacques Duchesne-Guillemin</ref> Mandaeans assert that their religion predates Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as a monotheistic faith.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Mandaeans believe that they descend directly from Shem, Noah's son,<ref name="auto2">Drower, Ethel Stefana. The Mandaeans of Iraq and Iran. Oxford At The Clarendon Press, 1937</ref>Template:Rp and also from John the Baptist's original disciples.<ref name = DrowerHaranGawaita>Template:Cite book</ref>

Iranian religionsEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}

Several important religions and religious movements originated in Greater Iran, that is, among speakers of various Iranian languages. They include Zoroastrianism, Mithraism, Ætsæg Din, Yazdanism, Ahl-e Haqq, Zurvanism, Manichaeism, and Mazdakism.

File:Faravahar-Gold.svg
Depiction of the Faravahar, a popular symbol for Zoroastrianism

Perhaps one of the most important religions that originated in Iran was Zoroastrianism. While not, properly speaking, a world religion, it became widespread in the Iranian cultural sphere, especially through the Achaemenid and Sasanian Empires. It went into decline alongside many Iranian religions with the rise of Islam and the establishment of Caliphates. The religion still survives today in small numbers, with a particularly notable example being the Parsis in India and Pakistan.<ref>Elfenbein, J. (2003). INDO-IRANIAN LANGUAGES AND PEOPLES. edited by NICHOLAS SIMS-WILLIAMS. pp. viii, 296. oxford, oxford university press, 2002. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 13(3), 400-403. Template:ProQuest</ref><ref name=":0">SUNDERMANN, W. (2008). Zoroastrian motifs in non-zoroastrian traditions. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 18(2), 155-165. {{#invoke:doi|main}}</ref>

Scholars have often noted the similarities between Zoroastrianism and the Abrahamic religions, especially Christianity. They've particularly noted this due to the historic relationship between the Jews and the Zoroastrian Persian Empires, as well as the relationship between Greek philosophy, Persia, and Christianity. They've debated whether Zoroastrianism played an influential role in shaping these religions.

Key areas of concern include a shared sense of duality between the forces of good and evil, or light and darkness. In addition to this, there is a shared belief in the resurrection of the dead as well as an emphasis on free will and the moral responsibility of mankind. These are seen by some as having influenced the three major Abrahamic faiths as well as Gnosticism and the Baháʼí Faith.<ref name=":0" />

Manichaeism is another Iranian faith that shares many similarities with Zoroastrianism. Notably, Manichaeism shares a belief in the prophethood of Zoroaster while also acknowledging the prophethood of Gautama Buddha and Jesus Christ. It shares a dualist cosmology that pits good and light against evil and darkness, with an adversary to oppose the benevolent God.<ref>KRONEN, J. D., & MENSSEN, S. (2010). The defensibility of zoroastrian dualism. Religious Studies, 46(2), 185-205. {{#invoke:doi|main}}</ref> Furthermore, Manichaeism and Mandaeism also share a common belief in many of the figures and stories of the Abrahamic faiths, which has raised questions of influences and origins.<ref>Yamauchi, E. M. (2004). The mandaeans: Ancient texts and modern people. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 124(1), 136-137. Template:ProQuest</ref>

Indian religionsEdit

File:Rigveda MS2097.jpg
The Rig Veda is one of the oldest Vedic texts. Shown here is a Rig Veda manuscript in Devanagari, early nineteenth century.

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Template:See also

In comparative religion, Indian religions refer to all the faiths that originated in South Asia. It is believed that "the kinship of the religions of India stems from the fact that Jains, Buddhists, and Sikhs look back to Hinduism as their common mother."<ref>Religions of the World S. Vernon McCasland, Grace E. Cairns, David C. Yu</ref><ref name=":3" />

Al-Biruni deeply studied the Vedic religions, and through his works essential details about pre-11th century Indian religions and cultures emerged. Adi Shankaracharya was an early 8th century philosopher and theologian<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> who consolidated the doctrine of Advaita Vedanta.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn Gautama Buddha is mentioned as an Avatar of Vishnu in the Puranic texts of Hinduism. Most Hindus believe the Buddha accepted and incorporated many tenets of Hinduism in his doctrine.<ref name=":3" /> Prominent modern Hindu reformers such as Mahatma Gandhi<ref>“owes on eternal debt of gratitude to that great teacher,”Mahatma Gandhi and Buddhism Y.P. Anand An Encounter with Buddhism http://www.iop.or.jp/0414/anand.pdf Template:Webarchive</ref> and Vivekananda<ref>He is the ideal Karma-Yogi, acting entirely without motive, and the history of humanity shows him to have been the greatest man ever born; beyond compare the greatest combination of heart and brain that ever existed, the greatest soul-power that has ever been manifested. Essay, Ideal Karma Yogi http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/5208/karmayoga/ideal.html Template:Webarchive</ref> acknowledge Buddhist influence. Like Hindus, Gandhi himself did not believe Buddha established a non-Hindu tradition. He writes, "I do not regard Jainism or Buddhism as separate from Hinduism."<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

East Asian or Taoic religionsEdit

File:Tao.svg
The Chinese character depicting Tao, the central concept in Taoism

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Template:See also

A Taoic religion is a religious philosophy that centers on the East Asian concept of Tao, meaning "The Way". This forms a large group of eastern religions, including Taoism, Confucianism, Jeung San Do, Shintoism, I-Kuan Tao, Chondogyo, and Chen Tao. In large parts of East Asia, Buddhism has taken on some taoic features.

Tao can be roughly defined as the flow of the universe or the force behind the natural order. It is believed to influence the balance and order of the cosmos and is closely associated with nature, as it is thought that nature exemplifies the Tao.

The flow of qi, as the essential energy of action and existence, is often compared to the universal order represented by the Tao. Following the Tao is also associated with a "proper" attitude, morality and lifestyle. This concept is intimately tied to the complex idea of De, or literally "virtue" or "power". De is the active expression of Tao.

Taoism and Chan Buddhism for centuries had a mutual influence on each other in China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. These influences were inherited by Zen Buddhism when Chan Buddhism arrived in Japan and adapted as Zen Buddhism.

Despite the geographical distance that would seemingly preclude any direct influence, some scholars have historically observed similarities between traditional Chinese religious beliefs and Christianity. This was noted by Jesuit missionaries who became known as figurists. Figurists promoted the idea that the ancient Chinese knew the truth of Christian revelation and that many of the figures described in Chinese texts are actually figures and concepts from Christianity. Noted parallels include shared flood myths, similarities between Fuxi and Enoch, as well as parallels between Christ and the sages.<ref name=":1">Ping, Y. (2020). The jesuit translation and interpretation of the yijing (classic of changes) in historical and cultural perspective. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 16(2), 47-53,76. Template:ProQuest</ref> There is also a noted similarity between the Tao being "the Way" as well as Christ claiming to be "the Way".<ref>Andrew, S. P. (2001). A theology of the way (tao): A journal of bible and theology. Interpretation, 55(4), 389-399. Template:ProQuest</ref>

While scholarship rejects this view today, it was a notable view in the history of comparative religion. These beliefs were ultimately opposed and disavowed by the Catholic Church in the 18th century.<ref name=":1" />

The introduction of Nestorian Christianity to China under the Tang dynasty also led to increasing similarities between Chinese Buddhism and Nestorian Christianity. Christians began using Buddhist and Taoist concepts to explain their faith. During this time the Jingjiao documents were created, sometimes called sutras that demonstrated the blending of Christianity with Buddhism.<ref>Littlejohn, R. (2003). The jesus sutras: Rediscovering the lost scrolls of taoist christianity. Journal of Church and State, 45(1), 167-168. Template:ProQuest</ref><ref name=":2">Chin Ken-pa. (2019). Jingjiao under the lenses of chinese political theology. Religions, 10(10) {{#invoke:doi|main}}</ref> Nestorian Christians and Buddhists formed a monastic tradition that furthered the similarities. This fusion was so pronounced that when Emperor Wuzong of the Tang dynasty began persecuting Buddhists in the 9th century, he claimed Christianity was merely a heresy of Buddhism rather than a distinct religion.<ref>Philip, T. V. (1998). "Christianity in China". East of the Euphrates: Early Christianity in Asia. Delhi: Indian Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge and Christian Sahitya Samithy, Tiruvalla. P. 123, Template:Isbn.</ref> This conflation contributed to the collapse of Nestorian Christianity in China during the Buddhist persecutions.<ref name=":2" />

Comparing traditionsEdit

Religious ideologies can be systematically understood as having formed many major groups with tens of thousands of subbranches. It is a form of cultural evolution that can be intuitively illustrated through trees depicting historical relationships and the diversification over time of the various traditions.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Some of the most successful have been those religions that aligned with empires, kingdoms, or caliphates early in their history (e.g., Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism). A few major groups of religion are given below.

ChristianityEdit

Mormonism

JudaismEdit

IslamEdit

SikhismEdit

HinduismEdit

BuddhismEdit

JainismEdit

Paganism and NeopaganismEdit

ConfucianismEdit

TaoismEdit

Baháʼí FaithEdit

ZoroastrianismEdit

See alsoEdit

Template:Sister project Template:Col div

Template:Colend

NotesEdit

Template:Reflist

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

Works citedEdit

Further readingEdit

  • Chopra, R. M. A Study of Religions, (Anuradha Prakashan, New Delhi, 2015) Template:ISBN.
  • Davis, G. Scott. Believing and Acting: The Pragmatic Turn in Comparative Religion and Ethics (Oxford University Press, 2012).
  • Eastman, Roger. The Ways of Religion: An Introduction to the Major Traditions. (3rd ed. Oxford University Press, 1959) Template:ISBN.
  • Eliade, Mircea. Patterns in comparative religion (1958) online
  • Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion (1959) online
  • Gothoni, Rene, How to Do Comparative Religion: Three Ways, Many Goals (2005) online
  • James, E. O. Comparative Religion (1961) online textbook
  • Jones, Lindsay, ed. Encyclopedia of Religion (2nd edn, 15 vols, Macmillan, 2004)
  • Template:Cite book
  • Muhiyaddin, M. A. (1984) A Comparative Study of the Religions of Today. Vantage Press, US. Template:ISBN.
  • Paden, William E. "Comparative religion." in The Routledge companion to the study of religion (Routledge, 2009). pp 239–256. online
  • Paden, William E. New patterns for comparative religion: Passages to an evolutionary perspective (Bloomsbury, 2016).
  • Paden, William E. Interpreting the Sacred: Ways of Viewing Religion (2003) excerpt
  • Paden, William E. Religious Worlds: The Comparative Study of Religion (2015) excerpt
  • Saso, Michael R. Mystic, Shaman, Oracle, Priest (MYSHOP): Prayers Without Words. (Sino-Asian Institute of America, US, 2015). Template:ISBN.
  • Sharpe, Eric J. Comparative Religion: A History, London: Duckworth, 1975 (2nd revised edition 1986).
  • Shaw, Jeffrey M. Illusions of Freedom: Thomas Merton and Jacques Ellul on Technology and the Human Condition. (Wipf and Stock, 2014). Template:ISBN.
  • Smart, Ninian. Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World's Beliefs (1999) Template:ISBN
  • Smith, Huston. The World's Religions: Our Great Wisdom Traditions. (1991) HarperOne, US; Rev Rep edition. Template:ISBN.

External linksEdit

|CitationClass=web }}Template:Sndcomparative religion studies inspired by Aldous Huxley's The Perennial Philosophy

  • Have religious discussions and debates both voice and text on telegram group: Discuss Religion

Template:Religion topics Template:Authority control