Template:Chembox

Phenylthiocarbamide (PTC), also known as phenylthiourea (PTU), is an organosulfur thiourea containing a phenyl ring.

It has the unusual property that it either tastes very bitter or is virtually tasteless, depending on the genetic makeup of the taster. The ability to taste PTC is often treated as a dominant genetic trait, although inheritance and expression of this trait are somewhat more complex.<ref name="Guo & Reed">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="Myths of Human Genetics">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

PTC also inhibits melanogenesis and is used to grow transparent fish.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

About 70% of people can taste PTC, varying from a low of 58% for Indigenous Australians and indigenous peoples of New Guinea to 98% for indigenous peoples of the Americas.<ref name="SSC">Template:Cite journal</ref> One study has found that non-smokers and those not habituated to coffee or tea have a statistically higher percentage of tasting PTC than the general population.<ref name="Fischer1963">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> PTC does not occur in food, but related chemicals do, and food choice can be related to a person's ability to taste PTC.<ref name="Fischer1963"/><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

HistoryEdit

The tested genetic taste phenomenon of PTC was discovered in 1931 when DuPont chemist Arthur FoxTemplate:Efn accidentally released a cloud of fine crystalline PTC. A nearby colleague complained about the bitter taste, while Fox, who was closer and should have received a strong dose, tasted nothing. Fox then continued to test the taste buds of assorted family and friends, setting the groundwork for future genetic studies. The genetic penetrance was so strong that it was used in paternity tests before the advent of DNA matching.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

The PTC taste test has been widely used in school and college practical teaching as an example of Mendelian polymorphism in human populations. Based on a taste test, usually of a piece of paper soaked in PTC (or the less toxic propylthiouracil (PROP)), students are divided into taster and non-taster groups. By assuming that PTC tasting is determined by a dominant allele at a single autosomal gene, and that the class is an unbiased sample from a population in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, students then estimate allele and genotype frequencies within the larger population. While this interpretation is broadly consistent with numerous studies of this trait, it is worth noting that other genes, sex, age and environmental factors influence sensitivity to PTC.<ref name="Guo & Reed" /><ref name="Myths of Human Genetics" /> Also, there are several alleles segregating at the major gene determining the taste of PTC, particularly in African populations, and the common "taster" allele is incompletely dominant (homozygotes for this allele are more sensitive to PTC than are heterozygotes).<ref name="Myths of Human Genetics" /><ref name="Campbell et al. 2012" /> Additionally, PTC is toxic and sensitivity to the substitute, PROP, does not show a strong association with the gene controlling ability to taste PTC.<ref name="Myths of Human Genetics" />

Role in tasteEdit

There is a large body of evidence linking the ability to taste thiourea compounds and dietary habits. Much of this work has focused on 6-propyl-2-thiouracil (PROP), a compound related to PTC that has lower toxicity.<ref name="SSC"/> A supertaster has more of an ability to taste PTC. On the other hand, heavy cigarette smokers are more likely to have high PTC and PROP thresholds (i.e. are relatively insensitive).

In 1976, an inverse relationship between taster status for PTC and for a bitter component of the fruit of the tree Antidesma bunius was discovered.<ref name = "Henkin and Gillis">Template:Cite journal</ref> Research on the implications still continues.

Ability to taste PTC may be correlated with a dislike of plants in the genus Brassica, presumably due to chemical similarities. However, studies in Africa show a poor correlation between PTC tasting and dietary differences.<ref name="Campbell et al. 2012" />

GeneticsEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Much of the variation in tasting of PTC is associated with polymorphism at the TAS2R38 taste receptor gene.<ref name="Drayna 2005">Template:Cite journal</ref> In humans, there are three SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) along the gene that may render its proteins unresponsive.<ref name="Kim 2003">Template:Cite journal</ref> There is conflicting evidence as to whether the inheritance of this trait is dominant or incompletely dominant.<ref name="Myths of Human Genetics" /> Any person with a single functional copy of this gene can make the protein and is sensitive to PTC.Template:Citation needed Some studies have shown that homozygous tasters experience a more intense bitterness than people that are heterozygous; other studies have indicated that another gene may determine taste sensitivity.<ref name="Guo & Reed" />

The frequency of PTC taster and non-taster alleles vary in different human populations.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The widespread occurrence of non-taster alleles at intermediate frequencies, much more common than recessive alleles conferring genetic disease, across many isolated populations, suggests that this polymorphism may have been maintained through balancing selection.<ref name="Campbell et al. 2012">Template:Cite journal</ref>

Chimpanzees and orangutans also vary in their ability to taste PTC, with the proportions of tasters and non-tasters similar to that in humans.<ref name="Fisher, Ford & Huxley">Template:Cite journal</ref> The ability to taste PTC is an ancestral trait of hominids that has been independently lost in humans and chimpanzees, through distinct mutations at TAS2R38.<ref name="Wooding et al. 2006">Template:Cite journal</ref>

Non-taster phenotype distribution in selected populationsEdit

Results of multiple PTC taste tests in different regions done with the discrimination method developed by Harris and Kalmus in 1949, published in Annals of Eugenics.<ref name="Harris (1949)">Template:Cite journal</ref>
Location # of Participants Non-taster % References
Bosnia and Herzegovina 7,362 32.02 Hadžiselimović et al. (1982)<ref name="Hadžiselimović R (1982)">Template:Cite journal</ref>
Croatia 200 27.5 Grünwald, Pfeifer (1962)
Czech Republic 785 32.7 Kubičkova, Dvořaková (1968)
Denmark 251 32.7 Harrison et al. (1977)<ref name="Harrison (1977)">Harrison et al. (1977): Human biology – An introduction to human evolution, variation, growth and ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, Template:ISBN; Template:ISBN.</ref>
England 441 31.5 Harrison et al. (1977)<ref name="Harrison (1977)"/>
Hungary 436 32.2 Forai, Bankovi (1967)
Italy 1,031 29.19 Floris et al. (1976)
Montenegro 256 28.20 Hadžiselimović et al. (1982)<ref name="Hadžiselimović R (1982)"/>
Užice, Serbia 1,129 16.65 Hadžiselimović et al. (1982)<ref name="Hadžiselimović R (1982)"/>
Voivodina, Serbia 600 26.3 Božić, Gavrilović (1973)
Russia 486 36.6 Boyd (1950)
Slovenia 126 37.3 Brodar (1970)
Spain 204 25.6 Harrison et al. (1977)<ref name="Harrison (1977)"/>

NotesEdit

Template:Notelist

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

External linksEdit

| short = OMIM: | shortlink = OMIM: | plain = Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man: | full | #default = Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM):}}}} {{#if: |{{{2}}} - }} 171200 Thiourea tasting

Template:Cruciferous Biochemistry