Phytoplasma

Phytoplasmas are obligate intracellular parasites of plant phloem tissue and of the insect vectors that are involved in their plant-to-plant transmission. Phytoplasmas were discovered in 1967 by Japanese scientists who termed them mycoplasma-like organisms.<ref name="Doi et al.">Template:Cite journal</ref> Since their discovery, phytoplasmas have resisted all attempts at in vitro culture in any cell-free medium; routine cultivation in an artificial medium thus remains a major challenge. Phytoplasmas are characterized by the lack of a cell wall, a pleiomorphic or filamentous shape, a diameter normally less than 1 μm, and a very small genome.

Phytoplasmas are pathogens of agriculturally important plants, including coconut, sugarcane, sandalwood, and cannabis, as well as horticultural crops like sweet cherry, peaches, and nectarines. They cause a wide variety of symptoms ranging from mild yellowing, small fruit, and reduced sugar content to death. Phytoplasmas are most prevalent in tropical and subtropical regions. They are transmitted from plant to plant by vectors (normally sap-sucking insects such as leafhoppers) in which they both survive and replicate.

History

References to diseases now known to be caused by phytoplasmas can be found as far back as 1603 (mulberry dwarf disease in Japan).<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Such diseases were originally thought to be caused by viruses, which, like phytoplasmas, require insect vectors and cannot be cultured. Viral and phytoplasmic infections share some symptoms.<ref name="molecular plant path review">Template:Cite journal</ref> In 1967, phytoplasmas were discovered in ultrathin sections of plant phloem tissue and were termed mycoplasma-like organisms due to their physiological resemblance.<ref name="Doi et al." /> The organisms were renamed phytoplasmas in 1994 at the 10th Congress of the International Organization for Mycoplasmology.<ref name="molecular plant path review" />

Morphology

Phytoplasmas are Mollicutes that are bound by a triple-layered membrane rather than a cell wall.<ref name="apple proliferation">Template:Cite journal</ref> The phytoplasma cell membranes studied to date usually contain a single immunodominant protein of unknown function that constitutes most of the protein in the membrane.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> A typical phytoplasma is pleiomorphic or filamentous in shape and is less than 1 μm in diameter. Like other prokaryotes, phytoplasmic DNA is distributed throughout the cytoplasm instead of being concentrated in a nucleus.Template:Citation needed

Symptoms

Phytoplasmas can infect and cause various symptoms in more than 700 plant species. One characteristic symptom is abnormal floral organ development, including phyllody (the production of leaf-like structures in place of flowers), virescence (the development of green flowers attributable to a loss of pigment by petal cells),<ref name="Lee et al.">Template:Cite journal</ref> and fasciation (abnormal change in the apical meristem structure).<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Phytoplasma-harboring flowering plants may become sterile. The expression of genes involved in maintaining the apical meristem or in the development of floral organs is altered in the morphologically affected floral organs of phytoplasma-infected plants.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

A phytoplasma infection often triggers leaf yellowing, probably due to the presence of phytoplasma cells in the phloem, which can affect phloem function and carbohydrate transport,<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> inhibit chlorophyll biosynthesis, and trigger chlorophyll breakdown.<ref name="apple proliferation"/> These symptoms may be attributable to stress caused by the infection rather than a specific pathogenetic process.Template:Citation needed

Many phytoplasma-infected plants develop a bushy or "witches' broom" appearance due to changes in their normal growth patterns. Most plants exhibit apical dominance, but infection can trigger the proliferation of axillary (side) shoots and a reduction in internode size.<ref name="Lee et al." /> Such symptoms are actually useful in the commercial production of poinsettias. An infection triggers more axillary shoot production; the poinsettia plants thus produce more than a single flower.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Effector (virulence) proteins

Many plant pathogens produce virulence factors, or effectors, that modulate or interfere with normal host processes to the benefit of the pathogens. The first phytoplasmal virulence factor, a secreted protein termed “tengu-su inducer” (TENGU; Template:UniProt), was identified in 2009 from a phytoplasma causing yellowing of onions. TENGU induces characteristic symptoms, including witches' broom and dwarfism.<ref name="Hoshi et al">Template:Cite journal</ref> Transgenic expression of TENGU in Arabidopsis plants induced sterility in male and female flowers.<ref name="Minato et al">Template:Cite journal</ref> TENGU contains a signal peptide at its N-terminus. After cleavage, the mature protein is only 38 amino acids long.<ref name="Hoshi et al"/> Although phytoplasmas are restricted to the phloem, TENGU is transported from the phloem to other cells, including those of the apical and axillary meristems.<ref name="Hoshi et al"/> TENGU was suggested to inhibit both auxin- and jasmonic acid-related pathways, thereby affecting plant development.<ref name="Hoshi et al"/><ref name="Minato et al"/> Surprisingly, the N-terminal 11 amino acid region of the mature protein triggers symptom development in Nicotiana benthamiana plants.<ref name="Sugawara et al">Template:Cite journal</ref> TENGU undergoes proteolytic processing by a plant serine protease in vivo, suggesting that the N-terminal peptide alone induces the observed symptoms. TENGU homologs have been identified in AY-group phytoplasmas. All such homologs undergo processing and can induce symptoms, suggesting that the symptom-inducing mechanism is conserved among TENGU homologs.<ref name="Sugawara et al"/>

In 2009, 56 genes for secreted proteins were identified in the genome of aster yellows witches' broom phytoplasma strain (AY-WB); these were named secreted AY-WB proteins (SAPs) and considered effectors.<ref name="ReferenceA">Template:Cite journal</ref> Also in 2009, effector SAP11 was shown to target plant cell nuclei and unload from phloem cells in AY-WB-infected plants.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> SAP11 was later found to induce changes in leaf shapes of plants and stem proliferations which resembled the witches' broom symptoms of AY-WB-infected plants.<ref name="ReferenceB">Template:Cite journal</ref> In addition, it was demonstrated that SAP11 interacts with and destabilizes plant class II TCP protein domain transcription factors that lead to shoot proliferation and leaf shape changes.<ref name="ReferenceB"/><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> TCPs also control the expression of lipoxygenase genes required for jasmonate biosynthesis.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Jasmonate levels are decreased in phytoplasma-infected Arabidopsis plants and plants that transgenically express the AY-WB SAP11 effector. The downregulation of jasmonate production is beneficial to phytoplasmas because jasmonate is involved in plant defenses against herbivorous insects such as leafhoppers.<ref name="ReferenceB"/><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Leafhoppers lay increased numbers of eggs on AY-WB-infected plants, at least in part because of SAP11 production. For example, the leafhopper Macrosteles quadrilineatus laid 30% more eggs on plants expressing SAP11 transgenically than control plants and 60% more eggs on plants infected with AY-WB.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Phytoplasmas cannot survive in the external environment and are dependent upon insects such as leafhoppers for transmission to new (healthy) plants. Thus, by compromising jasmonate production, SAP11 encourages leafhoppers to lay more eggs on phytoplasma-infected plants, thereby ensuring that newly hatched leafhopper nymphs feed upon infected plants to become phytoplasma vectors. SAP11 effectors are identified in a number of divergent phytoplasmas and these effectors also interact with TCPs and modulate plant defenses.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> SAP11 is the first phytoplasma virulence protein for which plant targets and effector functions were identified. TCPs were found to be targeted by a number of other pathogen effectors.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

The AY-WB phytoplasma effector SAP54 was shown to induce virescence and phyllody when expressed in plants, and homologs of this effector were found in at least three other phytoplasmas.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Two SAP54 homologs, PHYL1 of the onion yellows phytoplasma and PHYL1_PnWB of the peanut witches' broom phytoplasma, also induce phyllody-like floral abnormalities.<ref name="Maejima et al">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> These results suggest that PHYL1, SAP54, and their homologs form a phyllody-inducing gene family, the members of which are termed phyllogens.<ref name="Maejima et al"/> MADS-box transcription factors (MTFs) of the ABCE model play critical roles in floral organ development in Arabidopsis. Phyllogens interact directly with class A and class E MTFs, inducing protein degradation in a ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent manner that, at least for SAP54, is dependent on interactions with the proteasome shuttle factor RAD23.<ref name="Maejima et al"/><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Interestingly, RAD23 mutants do not show phyllody when infected with phytoplasma indicating that RAD23 proteins are susceptibility factors; i.e. phytoplasmas and SAP54 require these plant proteins to induce phyllody symptoms.<ref name="ReferenceC">Template:Cite journal</ref> The accumulation of mRNAs encoding class B MTFs, the transcription of which is positively regulated by class A and class E MTFs, is drastically decreased in Arabidopsis constitutively expressing PHYL1.<ref name="Maejima et al"/> Phyllogens induce abnormal floral organ development by inhibiting the functions of these MTFs. RAD23 proteins are also required for promoting leafhopper vector egg laying on plants that express SAP54 and are infected with AY-WB phytoplasma.<ref name="ReferenceC"/><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Transmission

Movement between plants

Phytoplasmas are spread principally by insects of the families Cicadellidae (leafhoppers), Fulgoridae (planthoppers), and Psyllidae (jumping plant lice),<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> which feed on the phloem of infected plants, ingesting phytoplasmas and transmitting them to the next plant on which they feed. Thus, the host range of phytoplasmas is strongly dependent upon that of the insect vector. Phytoplasmas contain a major antigenic protein constituting most of the cell surface protein. This protein associates with insect microfilament complexes and is believed to control insect-phytoplasma interactions.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Phytoplasmas can overwinter in insect vectors or perennial plants. Phytoplasmas can have varying effects on their insect hosts; examples of both reduced and increased fitness have been noted.<ref name="insects">Template:Cite journal</ref>

Phytoplasmas enter the insect body through the stylet, pass through the intestine, and then move to the hemolymph and colonize the salivary glands.<ref name="insects"/> The entire process can take up to 3 weeks.<ref name="insects"/> Once established in an insect host, phytoplasmas are found in most major organs. The time between ingestion by the insect and attainment of an infectious titer in the salivary glands is termed the latency period.<ref name="insects"/>

Phytoplasmas can also be spread via dodders (Cuscuta)<ref name="Carraro">Template:Cite journal</ref> or by vegetative propagation such as the grafting of infected plant tissue onto a healthy plant.

Movement within plants

Phytoplasmas move within phloem from a source to a sink, and can pass through sieve tube element. However, as phytoplasmas spread more slowly than solutes, and for other reasons, passive translocation within plants is thought to be unimportant<ref name="Christensen et al." />

Detection and diagnosis

Before the molecular era, the diagnosis of diseases caused by phytoplasma was difficult because the organisms could not be cultured. Thus, classical diagnostic techniques, including symptom observation, were used. Ultrathin sections of phloem tissue from plants with suspected phytoplasma-infections were also studied.<ref name="Doi et al."/> The empirical use of antibiotics such as tetracycline was additionally employed.Template:Citation needed

Molecular diagnostic techniques for phytoplasma detection began to emerge in the 1980s and included enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based methods. In the early 1990s, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based techniques were developed. These are far more sensitive than ELISAs, and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis allowed the accurate identification of various phytoplasma strains and species.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

More recent techniques allow infection levels to be assessed. Both quantitative PCR and bioimaging can effectively quantify phytoplasma titers within plants.<ref name="Christensen et al.">Template:Cite journal</ref> In addition, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is now available as a commercial kit, allowing all known phytoplasma species to be detected in about 1 h, including the DNA extraction step.Template:Citation needed

Although phytoplasmas have recently been reported to be grown in a specific artificial medium, experimental repetition has yet to be reported.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Control

Phytoplasmas are normally controlled by the breeding and planting of disease-resistant crop varieties and by the control of insect vectors.<ref name="Lee et al."/>

Tissue culture can be used to produce healthy clones of phytoplasma-infected plants. Cryotherapy, the freezing of plant samples in liquid nitrogen, prior to tissue culture increases the probability of producing healthy plants in this manner.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Plantibodies targeting phytoplasmas have also been developed.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Tetracyclines are bacteriostatic to phytoplasmas.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> However, disease symptoms reappear in the absence of continuous antibiotic application. Thus, tetracycline is not a viable agricultural control agent, but it is used to protect ornamental coconut trees.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

Genetics

The genomes of four phytoplasmas have been sequenced: "onion yellows",<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> "aster yellows witches' broom" ("Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris"),<ref name="AYWB" >Template:Cite journal</ref> "Ca. Phytoplasma australiense",<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> and "Ca. Phytoplasma mali".<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Phytoplasmas have very small genomes with extremely low GC content (sometimes as little as 23%, which is thought to be the lower threshold for a viable genome).<ref>Dikinson, M. Molecular Plant Pathology (2003) BIOS Scientific Publishers</ref> In fact, the Bermuda grass white-leaf phytoplasma ("Ca. P. cynodontis") has a genome size of only 530 kilobases (kb), one of the smallest known genomes of all living organisms.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The larger phytoplasma genomes are around 1350 kb in size. The small genome size of phytoplasma is attributable to reductive evolution from Bacillus/Clostridium{{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |$B= Template:Fix }} ancestors. Phytoplasmas have lost ≥75% of their original genes, and can thus no longer survive outside of insects or plant phloem. Some phytoplasmas contain extrachromosomal DNA such as plasmids.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Despite their small genomes, many predicted phytoplasma genes are present in multiple copies. Phytoplasmas lack many genes encoding standard metabolic functions and have no functioning homologous recombination pathway, but they do have a sec transport pathway.<ref name="AYWB" /> Many phytoplasmas contain two rRNA operons. Unlike other Mollicutes, the triplet code of UGA is used as a stop codon in phytoplasmas.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Phytoplasma genomes contain large numbers of transposons and insertion sequences, as well as a unique family of repetitive extragenic palindromes termed PhREPS, for which no role is known. It is theorized that the stem-loop structures in PhREPS play a role in transcription termination or genome stability.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Taxonomy

Phytoplasmas belong to the monotypic order Acholeplasmatales.<ref name="Lee et al."/> In 1992, the Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Mollicutes proposed the use of "'Phytoplasma' rather than 'mycoplasma-like organisms' for reference to the phytopathogenic mollicutes".<ref>Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Mollicutes. Minutes of the Interim Meetings, 1 and 2 August, 1992, Ames, IowaTemplate:Dead link Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. April 1993, p. 394–397; Vol. 43, No. 2 (see minutes 10 and 25)</ref> In 2004, the generic name Phytoplasma was adopted and is currently of Candidatus (Ca.) status<ref name=genus04>Template:Cite journal</ref> (used for bacteria that cannot be cultured).<ref name="MurrayStackebrandt1995">Template:Cite journal</ref> As phytoplasma cannot be cultured, methods normally used to classify prokaryotes are not available.<ref name="Lee et al."/> Phytoplasma taxonomic groups are based on differences in fragment sizes produced by restriction digests of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences (RFLPs) or by comparisons of DNA sequences from 16S/23S spacer regions.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The actual number of taxonomic groups remains unclear; recent work on computer-simulated restriction digests of the 16Sr gene suggested up to 28 groups,<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> whereas others have proposed fewer groups with more subgroups. Each group includes at least one Ca. Phytoplasma species, characterized by distinctive biological, phytopathological, and genetic properties.Template:Citation needed

Species

Template:As of, the following names and type strains are from LPSN,Template:R, the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature.Template:R The associated diseases and 16Sr group-subgroup classifications are from various sources.Template:R

"Candidatus Phytoplasma" species

Species name	Associated disease	Type strain	16Sr group-subgroup
"Ca. P. aculeata" Soto et al. 2021			16SrIV
"Ca. P. allocasuarinae" Marcone et al. 2004	Allocasuarina yellows	AlloY	16SrXXXIII-A
"Ca. P. americanum" Lee et al. 2006	American potato purple top wilt	APPTW12-NE; PPT12-NE	16SrXVIII-A
"Ca. P. asteris" Lee et al. 2004	Aster yellows	MIAY; OAY	16SrI-B
"Ca. P. australamericanum" corrig. Davis et al. 2012 (Template:Nowrap Davis et al. 2012)	Passionfruit witches' broom	PassWB-Br3; PassWB-Br3R	16SrVI-I
"Ca. P. australasiaticum" corrig. White et al. 1998 (Template:Nowrap White et al. 1998)	Papaya mosaic	PpYC	16SrII-D
"Ca. P. australiense" Davis et al. 1997	Australian grapevine yellows	none	16SrXII-B
"Ca. P. balanitis" corrig. Win et al. 2013 (Template:Nowrap Win et al. 2013)	Balanites witches' broom	none	16SrV-F
"Ca. P. bonamiae" Rodrigues-Jardim et al. 2023		none
"Ca. P. brasiliense" Montano et al. 2001	Hibiscus witches' broom	HibWB26	16SrXV-A
"Ca. P. caricae" Arocha et al. 2005	Papaya bunchy top	PAY	16SrXVII-A
"Ca. P. castaneae" Jung et al. 2002	Chestnut witches' broom	CnWB	16SrXIX-A
"Ca. P. cirsii" Šafárová et al. 2016	Cirsium yellows and stunting	CirYS	16SrXI-E
"Ca. P. citri" corrig. Zreik et al. 1995 (Template:Nowrap Zreik et al. 1995)	Lime witches' broom	WBDL	16SrII-B
"Ca. P. cocoinigeriae" corrig. Firrao et al. 2004
"Ca. P. cocoitanzaniae" corrig. Firrao et al. 2004		16SrIV
"Ca. P. convolvuli" Martini et al. 2012	Bindweed yellows	BY-S57/11	16SrXII-H
"Ca. P. costaricanum" Lee et al. 2011	Soybean stunt	SoyST1c1	16SrXXXI-A
"Ca. P. cynodontis" Marcone et al. 2004	Bermuda grass white leaf	BGWL-C1	16SrXIV-A
"Ca. P. dypsidis" Jones et al. 2021		RID7692	16SrIV-?
"Ca. P. fabacearum" Rodrigues-Jardim et al. 2023		none
"Ca. P. fragariae" Valiunas et al. 2006	Strawberry yellows	StrawY; StrawYR	16SrXII-E
"Ca. P. fraxini" Griffiths et al. 1999	Ash yellows	AshY1; Ashy lT	16SrVII-A
"Ca. P. graminis" Arocha et al. 2005	Sugarcane yellow leaf	SCYLP	16SrXVI-A
"Ca. P. hispanicum" Davis et al. 2016	Mexican periwinkle virescence	MPV; MPVR	16SrXIII-A
"Ca. P. hispanola" Soto et al. 2021		16SrIV
"Ca. P. japonicum" Sawayanagi et al. 1999	Japanese hydrangea phyllody	none	16SrXII-D
"Ca. P. luffae" Davis et al. 2017	Loofah witches' broom	LfWB; LfWBR	16SrVIII-A
"Ca. P. lycopersici" Arocha et al. 2007	Tomato 'brote grande'	THP	16SrI-Y
"Ca. P. malaysianum" Nejat et al. 2013	Malaysian periwinkle virescence	MaPV; MaPVR	16SrXXXII-A
"Ca. P. mali" Seemüller and Schneider 2004	Apple proliferation	AP15	16SrX-A
"Ca. P. meliae" Fernández et al. 2016	Chinaberry yellowing	ChTY-Mo3	16SrXIII-G
"Ca. P. noviguineense" Miyazaki et al. 2018	Bogia coconut syndrome	BCS-Bo; BCS-BoR
"Ca. P. omanense" Al-Saady et al. 2008	Cassia witches' broom	IM-1	16SrXXIX-A
"Ca. P. oryzae" Jung et al. 2003	Rice yellow dwarf	RYD-Th	16SrXI-A
"Ca. P. palmae" Firrao et al. 2004	Palm lethal yellowing		16SrIV-D
"Ca. P. palmicola" Harrison et al. 2014	Coconut lethal yellowing	LYDM-178; LYDM-178R	16SrXXII-A
"Ca. P. persicae" Jones et al. 2004			16SrXII
"Ca. P. phoenicium" Verdin et al. 2003	Almond witches' broom	A4	16SrIX-B
"Ca. P. pini" Schneider et al. 2005	Pine witches' broom	Pin127S; Pin127SR	16SrXXI-A
"Ca. P. planchoniae" Rodrigues-Jardim et al. 2023		none
"Ca. P. pruni" Davis et al. 2013	Peach X-disease	PX11Ct1; PX11CT1R	16SrIII-A
"Ca. P. prunorum" Seemüller and Schneider 2004	European stone fruit yellows	ESFY-G1	16SrX-B
"Ca. P. pyri" Seemüller and Schneider 2004	Pear decline	PD1	16SrX-C
"Ca. P. rhamni" Marcone et al. 2004	Rhamnus witches' broom	BAWB; BWB	16SrXX-A
"Ca. P. rubi" Malembic-Maher et al. 2011	Rubus stunt	RuS	16SrV-E
"Ca. P. sacchari" Kirdat et al. 2021	Sugarcane Grassy Shoot Disease	SCGS	16SrXI-B
"Ca. P. solani" Quaglino et al. 2013	Stolbur	STOL; STOL11R	16SrXII-A
"Ca. P. spartii" Marcone et al. 2004	Spartium witches' broom	SpaWB	16SrX-D
"Ca. P. stylosanthis" Rodrigues-Jardim et al. 2021	Stylosanthes little leaf phytoplasma	VPRI 43683	16SrXXXVII-A
"Ca. P. tamaricis" Zhao et al. 2009	Salt cedar witches' broom	SCWB1; SCWB1R	16SrXXX-A
"Ca. P. taraxaca" corrig. Matiashova 2017			16SrIII
"Ca. P. trifolii" Hiruki and Wang 2004	Clover proliferation	CP	16SrVI-A
"Ca. P. tritici" Zhao et al. 2021		WBD R	16SrI-C
"Ca. P. ulmi" Lee et al. 2004	Elm yellows	EY1	16SrV-A
"Ca. P. vitis" Firrao et al. 2004		none	16SrV-?
"Ca. P. wodyetiae" Naderali et al. 2017	Foxtail palm yellow decline	Bangi-2; FPYD Bangi-2R	16SrXXXVI-A
"Ca. P. ziziphi" Jung et al. 2003	Jujube witches' broom	JWB; JWB-Ky	16SrV-B

Gallery

• Vitis vinifera phytoplasma.jpg

  A grape vine with "Candidatus bois noir" phytoplasma disease

• Flavescence dorée 3.jpg

  A grape vine with "flavescence dorée" phytoplasma disease

• Lethalyellowingpalms.jpg

  Coconut palms dying of lethal yellowing disease

• Asteryellowsmarigold.jpg

  Symptoms of aster yellows on marigold

• TPWB1.tif

  Tephrosia purpurea witches' broom<ref name="TPWB India">Template:Cite journal</ref>

• Elmphloemnecrosis.jpg

  Symptoms of elm phloem necrosis phytoplasma

• Brinjal Little leaf phytoplasma.jpg

  Brinjal Little leaf phytoplasma

• Ashyellows.jpg

  Trees dying of ash yellows phytoplasma

• Parthenium hysterophorus witches' broom phytoplasma.jpg

  Parthenium hysterophorus showing symptoms of witches' broom

• Phyllody on Cosmos.jpg

  Phyllody caused by phytoplasma infection on Cosmos spp.

• Little leaf disease of Cleome viscosa.jpg

  Little leaf disease of Cleome viscosa

• Sweetpotatoelittleleaf.JPG

  Symptoms of sweet potato little leaf phytoplasma on Catharanthus roseus

• Phyllody on Solidago.JPG

  Phyllody of goldenrod

• Soybean Phytoplasm.jpg

  Soybean Phytoplasma

• China Aster Phyllody Phytoplasma.jpg

  A flower of China Aster showing phyllody symptoms

• Amit Yadav SCGS 040620093043.jpg

  Sugarcane grassy shoot disease

• Coconutlethalyellowing.jpg

  A palm tree dying of lethal yellowing phytoplasma

• Sudden Decline.jpg

  A cabbage tree killed by Phytoplasma australiense

• Bamboo Phytoplasma.jpg

  Witches' broom on bamboo (Dendrocalamus strictus)

• Trillium grandiflorum at the North Walker Woods1.jpg

  Trillium grandiflorum with virescent petals

See also

• Cherry X-disease
• Elm yellows
• Grapevine yellows
• List of taxa with candidatus status
• Milkweed yellows phytoplasma
• List of bacterial orders
• List of bacteria genera

External links

• Phytoplasma Classification Iphyclassifier
• Phytoplasma iPhyDSDB A comprehensive database of phytoplasma diseased images
• First International Phytoplasmologist Working Group Meeting published in Vol. 60-2 2007 of Bulletin of Insectology
• Photo gallery about plants infected of phytoplasma Template:Webarchive
• Phytoplasma Resource and phytoplasma classification database Template:Webarchive
• Ohio State University publishes an informative site on this topic.
• First Internet Conference of Phytopathogenic Mollicutes includes several interesting articles on this topic.
• Phytoplasma Genome Projects.
• The Centre for Information on Coconut Lethal Yellowing with an associated Yahoo discussion group.
• Video of Melia yellows symptoms
• Video of maize bushy stunt symptoms
• Current research on Phytoplasmas at the Norwich Research Park
• Phytoplasma universal detection kit Nippon Gene Co., Ltd.
• Template:Cite journal