Damnatio memoriae
Template:Short description Template:Italic title Template:Use dmy dates
{{#invoke:Lang|lang}} ({{#invoke:IPA|main}}) is a modern Latin phrase meaning "condemnation of memory" or "damnation of memory", indicating that a person is to be excluded from official accounts. Depending on the extent, it can be a case of historical negationism. There are and have been many routes to {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} including the destruction of depictions, the removal of names from inscriptions and documents, and even large-scale rewritings of history. The term can be applied to other instances of official scrubbing. The practice has been seen as early as the Egyptian New Kingdom period, where the Pharaohs Hatshepsut and Akhenaten were subject to it.
After Herostratus set fire to the Temple of Artemis, one of the Seven Wonders of antiquity, the people of Ephesus banned the mention of his name. His name has since become an eponym for people who commit crimes for the purpose of gaining notoriety.
EtymologyEdit
Although the term {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} is Latin, the phrase was not used by the ancient Romans, and first appeared in a thesis written in Germany in 1689 by Christoph Schreiter and Johann Heinrich Gerlach.<ref name="Omissi2018">Template:Cite book</ref> The thesis was titled Dissertationem juridicam de damnatione memoriae, praescitu superiorum, in florentissima Philurea (lit. "A Legal Dissertation on the Damnation of Memory, Foreknown by Superiors, in the Most Flourishing Philurea").<ref name="Omissi2018" />
Ancient worldEdit
_2012-09-30_008.jpg){kind=link}
Today's best known examples of damnatio memoriae from antiquity concern chiselling stone inscriptions or deliberately omitting certain information from them.
Ancient MesopotamiaEdit
According to Stefan Zawadzki, the oldest known examples of such practices come from around 3000–2000 BC. He cites the example of Lagash (an ancient city-state founded by the Sumerians in southern Mesopotamia), where preserved inscriptions concerning a conflict with another city-state, Umma, do not mention the ruler of Umma, but describe him as "the man of Umma". Zawadzki sees this as an example of deliberate degradation of the ruler of Umma to the role of an unworthy person whose name and position in history the rulers of Lagash did not want to record for posterity.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Ancient EgyptEdit
.jpg){kind=link}
Egyptians also practiced this,<ref name="Wilkinson 2011">Template:Cite journal</ref> as seen in relics from pharaoh Akhenaten's tomb and elsewhere. Akhenaten's sole worship of the god Aten, instead of the traditional pantheon, was considered heretical. During his reign, Akhenaten endeavoured to have all references to the god Amun chipped away and removed.<ref name="Amun">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> After his reign, temples to Aten were dismantled and the stones reused to create other temples. Images of Akhenaten had their faces chipped away, and images and references to Amun reappeared. The people blamed their misfortunes on Akhenaten's shift of worship to Atenism, away from the gods they served before him.<ref name="Heretic">Template:Cite book</ref> Other Egyptian victims of this practice include the pharaohs that immediately succeeded Akhenaten, including Smenkhkare, Neferneferuaten, and Ay.<ref name="Wilkinson 2011" /> The campaign of damnatio memoriae against Akhenaten and his successors was initiated by Ay's successor, Horemheb, who decided to erase from history all pharaohs associated with the unpopular Amarna Period; this process was continued by Horemheb's successors.<ref name="CarneyMüller2020">Template:Cite book</ref> Tutankhamun was also erased from history in this way, even though he had restored Egypt to the Amun god, because he was one the kings who succeeded Akhenaten; he may also have been Akhenaten's son.
Ancient HittitesEdit
One case of damnatio memoriae is known for the ancient Hittite empire. Mursili III was a king of the Hittites for about seven years in 1282–1275 BC, before being overthrown by his uncle Hattusili III who assumed the throne.
There is a well known relief of Mursili's father Muwatalli II near the village of Sirkeli Höyük in Turkey, as well as a second, very similar relief that is believed to be that of his son Mursili. It was largely destroyed in antiquity, most likely by his spiteful uncle. The relief of the father was left untouched.
Ancient GreeceEdit
_part_2.jpg){kind=link}
The practice was known in Ancient Greece.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> The Athenians frequently destroyed inscriptions which referred to individuals or events that they no longer wished to commemorate.Template:Sfn After Timotheus was convicted of treason and removed from his post as general in 373Template:NbsBC, all references to him as a general were deleted from the previous year's naval catalogue.Template:Sfn The most complete example is their systematic removal of all references to the Antigonids from inscriptions in their city, in 200Template:NbsBC when they were besieged by the Antigonid king Philip V of Macedon during the Second Macedonian War.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> One decree praising Demetrius Poliorcetes (Philip V's great-grandfather) was smashed and thrown down a well.Template:Sfn
At Delphi, an honorific inscription erected between 337 and 327 BC for Aristotle and his nephew Callisthenes, two philosophers who were closely associated with the Macedonians, were smashed and thrown in a well after the death of Alexander of Macedon in 323Template:NbsBC.Template:Sfn
Ancient RomeEdit
_-_Museo_Archeologico,_Cagliari_-_Photo_by_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_November_11_2016.jpg){kind=link}
In ancient Rome, the practice of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} was the condemnation of emperors after their deaths. If the Senate or a later emperor did not like the acts of an emperor, they could have his property seized, his name erased and his statues reworked (normally defaced). Because there was an economic incentive to seize property and rework statues, historians and archaeologists have had difficulty determining when official {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} actually took place, although it seems to have been quite rare.
Compounding this difficulty is the fact that a completely successful {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} results—by definition—in the full and total erasure of the subject from the historical record. In the case of figures such as emperors or consuls it is unlikely that complete success was possible, as even comprehensive obliteration of the person's existence and actions in records and the like would continue to be historically visible without extensive reworking. The impracticality of such a cover-up could be vast—in the case of Emperor Geta, for example, coins bearing his effigy proved difficult to entirely remove from circulation for several years, even though the mere mention of his name was punishable by death.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
Difficulties in implementation also arose if there was not full and enduring agreement with the punishment, such as when the Senate's condemnation of Nero was implemented—leading to attacks on many of his statues<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>—but subsequently evaded with the enormous funeral he was given by Vitellius. Similarly, it was often difficult to prevent later historians from "resurrecting" the memory of the sanctioned person.
The impossibility of actually erasing memory of an emperor has led scholars to conclude that this was not actually the goal of damnatio. Instead, they understand damnatio:
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
not so much as an attempt to obliterate memory entirely as to transform honorific commemoration into a form of visible denigration. That is: the power of an act of damnatio relies, at least in part, on the viewer of a monument being able to supplement the gaps in an inscription with their own knowledge of what
those gaps had once contained, and the reasons why the text had been removed{{#if:Polly Low, Template:QiTemplate:Sfn|{{#if:|}}
— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries}}
{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}Template:AnchorThese emperors are known to have been erased from monuments:<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
| Emperor | Reign | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Caligula | 37–41 | Disputed whether per senate decree<ref name=":0">Template:Citation</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> |
| Nero | 54–68 | hostis iudicatio (posthumous trial for treason)<ref name=":0" /> |
| Domitian | 81–96 | per senate decree (96)<ref name=":0" /> |
| Commodus | 177–192 | per senate decree (192)<ref name=":0" /> |
| Clodius Albinus | Usurper | |
| Geta | 209–211 | per his brother Caracalla |
| Macrinus | 217–218 | Usurper |
| Diadumenian | 217–218 | Usurper |
| Elagabalus | 218–222 | |
| Severus Alexander | 222–235 | Only during the reign of Maximinus Thrax |
| Maximinus Thrax | 235–238 | per senate decree (238)<ref name=":0" /> |
| Maximus I | Caesar only | |
| Philip the Arab | 244–249 | |
| Philip II | 247–249 | Philip the Arab's son |
| Decius | 249–251 | |
| Herennius Etruscus | 251 | Decius' son |
| Hostilian | 251 | Decius' son |
| Aemilianus | 253 | |
| Gallienus | 253–268 | |
| Aurelian | 270–275 | Briefly |
| Probus | 276–282 | |
| Carus | 282–283 | |
| Carinus | 284–285 | |
| Numerian | 283–284 | |
| Diocletian | 284–305 | |
| Maximian | 286–305 | per senate decree (310)<ref name=":0" /> |
| Galerius | 305–311 | |
| Valerius Severus | 306–307 | |
| Maximinus II | 308–313 | per senate decree (313)<ref name=":0" /> |
| Maxentius | 306–312 | |
| Licinius | 308–324 | |
| Constantine II | 337–340 | |
| Constans | 337–350 | |
| Magnentius | Usurper | |
| Magnus Maximus | 383–388 |
Middle AgesEdit
In the Middle Ages, heresiarchs could have their memory condemned. The Council of Constance decreed the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} of John Wycliffe.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
The practice of replacing pagan beliefs and motifs with Christian, and purposefully not recording the pagan history, has been compared to {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} as well.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
In her book Medici Women - Portraits of Power, Love and Betrayal, Gabrielle Langdon also presents compelling evidence concerning a probable damnatio memoriae issued against Isabella de' Medici, a prominent female figure of the 16th century Renaissance Medici court.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
AmericasEdit
Ancient MayaEdit
Several apparent damnatio memoriae incidents occurred within the Maya civilization during the Classic period (AD 250–900) as a result of political conflicts between leaders of the local kingdoms.
One notable incident occurred in the kingdom of Paʼ Chan (modern-day Yaxchilan, Mexico) in the middle of the 8th century. In June 742, the k'uhul ajaw (Holy Lord, i.e. king) of Pa' Chan, Itzamnaaj Bahlam III, died after a 60-year-long rule, during which he turned his kingdom into one of great riches after a large number of military campaigns which were recorded and illustrated on multiple high-quality stelae, lintels and hieroglyphic steps of temples which he dedicated to his military success (e.g. Temple 44) and his family (e.g. Temple 23). Though he had a son who eventually ascended to the throne after his death, there was a mysterious decade-long interregnum period in which Pa' Chan did not record the existence of any king. Itzamnaaj Bahlam's son, Yaxun Bʼalam IV, also known as Bird Jaguar IV, ascended to the throne in April 752, nearly ten years after his father's death.<ref name="Martin & Grube 2008">Template:Cite book</ref>
This interregnum period may be explained by a text from the nearby northern kingdom of Yokib (modern-day Piedras Negras, Guatemala). Panel 3 of this city, largely regarded as one of the most beautiful pieces of Mayan art, was carved approximately in 782 and illustrates an episode of the reign of Itzam Kʼan Ahk II (also known as Pawaaj Kʼan Ahk II), in which he celebrated his first kʼatun (period of 7200 days) as king, on 27 July 749. Panel 3 claims that the celebration Template:Qi Also known as Yopaat Bahlam II, this mysterious ruler does not appear anywhere else in the historical record, not even in his supposed homeland. Moreoever, his respectful presence at a celebration in Yokib, Paʼ Chan's centuries-old and bitter rival (which had, in fact, scored a victory in battle against Itzamnaaj Bahlam III in 726), as well as the depiction of Itzam Kʼan Ahk apparently addressing a speech (now hardly readable, but probably involving an event of Paʼ Chan's past) toward a party from Paʼ Chan—which included his son and "heir to the throne" of Paʼ Chan (chʼok paʼchan ajaw), Sihyaj Ahkteʼ—, possibly indicate that he ruled as a vassal of Itzam Kʼan Ahk, or that he used the celebration as an opportunity to ask for Itzam Kʼan Ahk's support against Yaxun Bʼalam IV, his political rival.<ref name="García Juárez & Bernal Romero 2019">Template:Cite journal</ref> This has led to the conclusion that if this man truly ruled Paʼ Chan, any records of his existence were destroyed during the reign of Yaxun Bʼalam IV, who notoriously led a massive propaganda campaign throughout his rule to claim legitimacy over the throne, which involved the rewriting of his kingdom's dynastic history and restoration of several historical records of previous kings. The immense texts writing Yaxun Bʼalam's own version of his kingdom's dynastic history may have been carved over existing records which would have been intentionally erased with plaster, possibly destroying the records of the king (or kings) of the interregnum.<ref name="Martin & Grube 2008" />
It is possible Yopaat Bahlam and his son lived the rest of their lives in exile at Yokib, and that the "heir to the throne" never rose to power. Yopaat Bahlam may have been buried in Burial 13 of the city, judging from a text carved on four Spondylus limbatus shells found within it which bears his name and mentions that he had previously visited the city in January 747, also within the interregnum.<ref name="García Juárez & Bernal Romero 2019" />
New SpainEdit
Notorious incidents of damnatio memoriae occurred during the existence of the Viceroyalty of New Spain, the Spanish colony that emerged after the Spanish conquest of Mexico in 1521. Various viceroys ordered the destruction of monuments and documents depicting certain episodes of pre-Columbian Mesoamerican history and rebels to Spanish rule over the Americas.
For instance, Moctezuma I (not to be confused with his more famous great-grandson Moctezuma II), 15th-century huei tlahtoani (Great Speaker, i.e. emperor) of the Excan Tlahtoloyan (Template:Lit Triple Capital),<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> known by historians as the Mexica or Aztec Empire (also known as the Aztec Triple Alliance, whose inhabitants referred to themselves as Culhua-Mexica), ordered the creation of a portrait of himself and of his military and political advisor Tlacaelel at Chapultepec, a historically and naturally important site which nowadays is within Mexico City. This became a tradition among subsequent Mexica rulers, and portraits of Axayacatl and Ahuizotl, two of Moctezuma's successors, were also made throughout the rest of the century (Tizoc's absence may be explained by his sudden death from poisoning). Moctezuma II would create the last portrait of this kind in 1519 (which Template:Harvtxt believes might be Template:Qi), at the eve of the Spanish conquest.
Antonio de León y Gama, a distinguished Mexican intellectual, wrote in the late 18th century that these portraits were well preserved up until that century. León y Gama claimed that the only portrait he got to see himself was Moctezuma II's, before its destruction was ordered by the authorities in 1753 or 1754. He mentioned that Axayacatl's portrait still existed earlier in that century before it was Template:Qi Indeed, the remains of Moctezuma's portrait, approximately 2 meters (over 6 feet) high, reveal that its damage was not accidental or natural. It was carved on pink-to-gray andesite, which is Template:Qi according to Hajovsky. The markings in the damaged parts show that apparently its destruction was executed with the dropping of a boulder, and that deep holes were drilled Template:Qi
In another notorious instance, Spanish bishop Juan de Zumárraga ordered the destruction of a portrait depicting Nezahualcoyotl, king of Texcoco, on 7 July 1539, along with various other sculptures at the Hill of Texcotzingo Template:Qi<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> a clear example of damnatio memoriae.
During the Mexican War of Independence, which started in 1810, one of the earliest revolutionary leaders, Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla, nowadays remembered as a national Hero, was executed by the Spanish authorities in 1811. After his execution, according to contemporary accounts, the authorities declared a damnatio memoriae. According to one of Hidalgo's soldiers, Pedro García (1790–1873), Template:Qi was done through strict censorship.
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
It became illegal to speak about Hidalgo anywhere, it became a great crime that was severely punished. This is the reason why no portrait which resembles him at all is found anywhere in the country, since the prohibition lasted nearly ten years. Nobody felt safe speaking inside their homes.{{#if:|{{#if:|}}
— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries}}
{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}
The Spanish efforts to erase his memory, however, were in vain. The War of Independence continued, and the leaders who continued to revolution after Hidalgo's death made great efforts to commemorate his legacy. José María Morelos, for example, declared in 1813 that 16 September, the anniversary of the beginning of the war, would be celebrated every year Template:Qi<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Similar practices in modern timesEdit
While complete {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} has not been attempted in modern times—naming or writing about a person fallen from favour has never been made subject to formal punishment—less total instances of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} in modern times include numerous examples from the Soviet Union, retouching photos to remove individuals such as Leon Trotsky,<ref name="Kohonen2017">Template:Cite book</ref> Nikolay Yezhov,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and even Stalin.<ref name="HydenSheckels2016">Template:Cite book</ref> After Stalin ordered the murder of Grigory Kulik's wife Kira Kulik-Simonich, all photographic records of her were destroyed; although she was described as very pretty, no photographs or other images of her survive.<ref>Joseph Abraham, (2020) Kings, Conquerors, Psychopaths: From Alexander to Hitler to the Corporation, Hidden Hills Press, p. 147 Template:ISBN.</ref> Following their fall from favour, Lavrentiy Beria and others were removed from articles in the Great Soviet Encyclopedia.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Following the fall of communism in Eastern Europe, many communist statues, particularly of Lenin and Stalin, were removed from former Soviet satellite states.<ref name="Nead1999">Template:Cite book</ref> Following a 2015 decision, a process of decommunization in Ukraine successfully dismantled all 1,320 statues of Lenin after its independence, as well as renaming roads and structures named under Soviet authority.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
The graphic designer David King had a strong interest in Soviet art and design, and amassed a collection of over 250,000 images. His most striking examples of before-and-after alterations were published as The Commissar Vanishes.
PolandEdit
19th century Polish writers often omitted mentioning two kings from the list of Polish monarchs, Bezprym and Wenceslaus III of Bohemia, which has resulted in their being omitted from many later works as well.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
ChinaEdit
The treatment of Chinese politician Zhao Ziyang following his fall from grace inside the Chinese Communist Party is regarded as another modern case of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
GermanyEdit
The destruction of all copies of The Victory of Faith in order to erase Ernst Röhm is considered an act of Nazi damnatio memoriae.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> In the end, two copies survived: one preserved in London and one preserved by the Communist government of East Germany.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
North KoreaEdit
In December 2013, Jang Song-thaek was abruptly accused of being a counter-revolutionary and was stripped of all his posts, expelled from the Workers' Party of Korea (WPK), arrested and executed. His photos were removed from official media and his image digitally removed from photos with other North Korean leaders.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
United KingdomEdit
An instance of damnatio memoriae-esque policy instituted without governmental decree occurred in the aftermath of the Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal. Following extensive accusations of sexually abusing underage, disabled, and dead individuals, various public institutions in the United Kingdom took extensive measures to remove posthumous relics of Savile's public presence.<ref name="Rohrer 2012">Template:Cite news</ref> This included taking down monuments and memorials to Savile<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref> (including his headstone),<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref> rechristening locations and awards previously named after him,<ref name="BBC17oct2012">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> dissolving charity organizations named after him,<ref name="bbc-news-jimmy-savile-charities-have-no-future">Template:Cite news</ref> and suppressing episodes of television and radio shows which featured or explicitly referenced him.<ref name="Rohrer 2012" /><ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref> In the immediate aftermath of the scandal, BBC News reporter Finlo Rohrer commented that Template:Qi<ref name="Rohrer 2012" />
AnalysisEdit
The term is used in modern scholarship to cover a wide array of official and unofficial sanctions through which the physical remnants and memories of a deceased individual are destroyed.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Looking at cases of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} in modern Irish history, Guy Beiner has argued that iconoclastic vandalism only makes martyrs of the "dishonored", thus ensuring that they will be remembered for all time.<ref name="fr">Template:Cite book</ref> Nonetheless, Beiner goes on to argue that the purpose of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}—rather than being to erase people from history—was to guarantee only negative memories of those who were so dishonored.<ref name="fr" /><ref name="rem">Template:Cite book</ref> Pointing out that {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} did not erase people from history but in effect kept their memory alive,<ref name="rem" /> Beiner concluded that those who partake in the destruction of a monument should be considered agents of memory.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Author Charles Hedrick proposes that a distinction be made between {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (the condemnation of a deceased person) and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (the actual erasure of another from historical texts).<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
In case of removal of Soviet monuments in Eastern Europe, the primary reason was that they were established as a symbol of occupation, domination or cult of personality, rather than simple historic mark. It has been pointed out that all Nazi-established monuments and street names have been removed after World War II which has been perceived as natural reaction after liberation at that time.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
See alsoEdit
- Alan Smithee, pseudonym used by film directors who disown a project
- Anathema
- Cancel culture
- Censorship in Italy
- Censorship in North Korea
- Censorship of images in the Soviet Union
- Crisis of the Roman Republic
- Denazification/De-Ba'athification/Decommunization/De-Stalinization
- Forced disappearance
- Historical negationism
- Iconoclasm
- Execration texts
- List of tombs of antipopes
- Mass shooting contagion#"Don't Name Them" Campaign
- Memoricide
- Memory hole
- Naming taboo, not naming as a mark of respect
- Nineteen Eighty-Four, Orwell's novel: the 'writing out' of historical figures by a totalitarian regime
- Persona non grata
- Proscription
- Shunning
- Slighting
- Yimakh shemo, an equivalent concept in Judaism
ReferencesEdit
BibliographyEdit
External linksEdit
Template:Sister project Template:Spoken Wikipedia
- Damnatio memoriae at Livius.org
Template:Conformity Template:Censorship Template:Falsification of history